[]

A Short View OF The Preſent State OF THE Proteſtant Religion IN BRITAIN, AS It is now profeſt in the Epiſcopal Church in England, the Presbyterian Church in Scotland, and the Diſſenters in Both.

EDINBURGH, Printed in the Year, M.DCC.VII.

A Short View OF The preſent State OF THE Proteſtant Religion in BRITAIN, &c,

[3]

I Always obſerved in ſuch Caſes as this, the only way to come at a Clear Underſtanding of Particulars, was to go back to their Generals, to ſearch the Original of things, and ſee from thence not how they are repreſented, but how they really are in their meer Nature, and Native Circumſtances.

In doing this, I ſhall ſtudy as much as in me lies, to give no Offence to any body, nor concern my ſelf with any thing, however warmly ſaid on that Head, but to my utmoſt, keep cloſs to impartial Truth in Fact, and give my own thoughts as calmly as I can.

Perhaps the Hiſtorical part may be counted ſuperficial, and I am content it be ſo; no body can expect a ſuccinct Hiſtory of Religion in three Sheets of Paper, nor ſhall I, remote as I am from Books, Vouchers, and Perſons, enter into many Quotations, deſigning no [4] other Hiſtory of theſe Affairs; but what every Mans Memory may reflect on, or by very ſhort reading, be informed about.

I have no room to ſpare for Apologies; As I intend no Offence to any one, ſo I hope, no Man will take Offence at me, miſconſtrue my Meaning, or cavil at Miſtakes in the manner—. If they do, if they will raiſe Strife from what is deſign'd for Peace, the Strife ſhall be theirs, the Peace ſhall be mine; and to all falſe or railing Accuſations, I anſwer in the words of the Text, in the 9th. Verſe of the Epiſtle of Jude, and no more.

In the beginning of the Fifteenth Century, this whole Iſland was under the intire abſolute Dominion of Popery; Rulers and People too much united in following after Vanity and Idols, and very ſmall faint Glimerings of the Glorious Reſurrection of Truth were then only to be ſeen.

Henry VII. reigning in England, and James IV. in Scotland, had nothing in them inclining to an Alteration of Religion, but ſupinely ſlept—under the invincible Operation of the Roman Opiat: Prieſt Craft, and the Pomp of Religion had dozvd Man-kind, and that Glorious Light which the Spirit of GOD, by the Preaching of the Apoſtles, had ſpread thro' the World, ſeem'd ſo overclouded with the Univerſal Vail of Superſtition, and vile Traditional Performances, that it look'd as if the General Diſpenſation was at End, the Church of GOD compleated, and the World given up to Original Blindneſs.

I would not be miſunderſtood here, as if there were no Appearances in Particular Places and Perſons of a true Light; For God has never left the Church quite deſolate: And I know what has been alledged of the Waldenſes, Albigenſes, and other ſuffering Chriſtians—. But I deſire to be taken as I mean, that a General and dreadful Darkneſs had at that Time overſpread the World, all the Potentates of Europe bowed at the Feet [5] of Baal; and the Romiſh Pontiff executed a Tyrannick Power without Controul, if there were any Profeſſors of Truth, they behooved to be Confeſſors alſo; and what Light appear'd, tho it was received with Love, it was a Gueſt that brought certain Death with it—: Indeed the wonderful Power of the inviſible irreſiſtable Grace of GOD was in nothing more conſpicuous, than in furniſhing almoſt all to whom he revealed his Truth, with ſuch a Love to it, Zeal for it, and Reſolution in it, that Perſecution and Martyrdom were but meer Agents in the Propagation of Truth; and Sanguis Martyrum was at that time more than ever prov'd to be Semen Eccleſiae.

In this ſuffering poſture the Affairs of the Church ſtood at the coming of Henry VIII. to the Crown of England; the firſt part of his Reign gave little Hopes to any that a Reformation could have its Riſe in a Prince who committed the Famous John Lambert to the Fire, and appeared qualified to be the moſt Famous Perſecutor of Gods Church that ever was in the World, being in his Conduct Politick, in his Nature cholerick and cruel, in his Government Tyrannical, and in his Religion nothing at all, but—what was guided by his Ambition and Intereſt.

But behold how the Divine Power is magnified, in making his Enemies deſtroy themſelves; Pride, Ambition, Covetouſneſs, and the Wrath of Man in this day, brought to paſs the Glorious and determined Deſigns of God, and the Conſuſions and Extravagancies of the World aſſiſted to open the Eyes of ſuch whoſe Hearts God at the ſame time had touch't with His Grace; and now the Great Light of Truth began to break out between the Clouds, and by wonderful and various ſteps of Providence, too long to relate, All the Miſts of Darkneſs, Ignorance and Superſtition fled away, and Truth in its Native Luſtre ſhone over theſe Parts of the World.

For now Luther had broke in upon Error in Gormany; like a Torrent the Kings of the Earth began to hate [6] the Whore; and all the Northern Part of Europe fell off from Idolatry, both Princes and People.

The various Turns in England under Henry VIII. about the Article of Divorce, the Regale, and other things, widned a Breach between him and the Pope; and thoſe lucid Intervals gave ſuch breathings to the Reformed Religion, that it advanc't exceedingly, till even in his Reign, it crept into, firſt his Cabinet, and then his bed.

In this Criſi [...], he ſtrook the two great Preliminary Strokes at the Root of Popery, in which, tho I ſee no Ground to ſuggeſt, he had any Religious aim, yet Providence, who acted him as the Inſtrument, without giving him the Principle, brought to paſs the End by the involuntary Agency of what Means he thought ſit.

Theſe two Blows at Popery, which I call preliminarys, were caſting off the Popes Supremacy, and overturning theſe Seminaries of Filthineſs and. Superſtition, the Abbeys and Monaſteries.

And here any Body may ſee the Reaſon of my going thus far back in this Account, and which perhaps they might begin to think impertinent to my purpoſe. But the Caſe is this, Had King Henry's Zeal been for Retormation indeed, or rather had he not been acted by Pride in one, and Avarice in the other, that Step had been taken another way, which if it had, the Snares that have follow'd, had been perhaps prevented. I explain my ſelf thus.

Had Henry VIII. been Enlightned by a true Knowledge, in proportion to his Circumſtance, had his Fury been a Religious Zeal—, had he been acted by the Chriſtian, not the Monarch, when he pull'd down the Supremacy of the Pope, he had erected the true Goſpel Supremacy of Chriſt Jeſus, and in this unhappy Miſtake, has been found all the brooding Snakes of Eccleſiaſtick Tyranny, which this part of the World has been plagued with ever ſince.

I'll repeat it another way yet plainer, I hope I ſhall be excuſed the Tautology.

[7] Henry VIII, A meer Tyrant, a Man of no Religion in his inſide, and but very little in the outſide; for the Tyrant was too rampant in him, to ſuffer him to be a Hypocrite, when he pull'd down the Supremacy of the Pope, immediately ſet up his own; this was, I ſay, only dethroning one Devil to ſet up another; however, the Church was yet Popiſh, the Reformation young, and the Heads of the Reformers were glad to lay hold of this Handle to pull down what they really ſtruggled with, as Tyrannical; not foreſeeing that the Tyranny ſtill remained, tho the Maſters were chang'd, or that this Monſter call'd the temporal Supremacy, was big with future Miſchiefs, which generating from one another, would ſtill bring the Church of God into, at leaſt, unſcriptural Bondage.

But let no Man read this with Prejudice at the Good Men who were the Agents, who in the ſimplicity of their Souls, did this, and by it laid the Ax effectually to the Root of Religious Subjection; and the impious Ambition of the Church of Rome: If God Almighty for our Sins, and partly for Puniſhment, ſuffered yet this Canaanite to remain in the Bowels of the Reformation, without doubt he had his Divine Ends in it, which I ſhall not preſume to enquire into.

On this Foundation has however been built, that unhappy Structure of Diviſion, which has made ſuch Chaſms in Gods Church, broke in ſo much upon our Charity, and fatally upon our more perfect Reformation, even to this Day.

For the Supremacy in Matters Eccleſiaſtical, being reſolved in the King, began to produce ſtrange Effects, and ſome Martyrs, as they call them, on the Romiſh ſide died for denying it, ſuch as Sir Thomas Moor, Biſhop Fiſher and others, as in Burnets Hiſtory of the Reformation, Vol. 1. may be ſeen at large.

I ſhall touch at ſome of the Evils, that ſetting this Dignity on the head of the Temporal Prince brought [8] with it, and theſe were two. Firſt, That in Matters indifferent in themſelves, the Command of the Civil Magiſtrate, has Power to determine us, and make thoſe indifferent things neceſſary, and hereon is built all our Ceremonial, that has ſince cauſed ſuch Diviſion in the Proteſtant Churches here. And, Secondly, This I give as the Reaſon, or rather the Occaſion, that our Engliſh Church reformed into Epiſcopacy, and a Pompous Hierarchy, rather than a Calviniſtical Parity.

This is what we mean by the Regale, which of courſe brought the Pontificate along with it, and in this Scotland had the Advantage of England; for that the Reformation in Scotland being not in the Direction of the Prince, but rather in Oppoſition to the Regent the Queen Mother, the Pomp, the Magnificence, and the outſide of the Matter loſt all the Reverence it had in the Court of Princes, where it ſeem'd to be Carreſs't from ſome ſuitableneſs between them in Matters of Dominion.

'Tis true, Queen Mary reſign'd this Authority to the Pope, and Queen Elizabeth was not very haſty in reſuming it again, as 'tis plain from Burnet's Hiſtory of the Reformation.

The Church of England, tho' firſt Reform'd, being under the Reign of a Young King, he was eaſily prevail'd with to form the Model of Church Government in this manner, as having his Eye more at the main Point, viz. The rooting out of Idolatry and Superſtition, but had not yet had the Epiſcopal Hierarchy debated, or its Scriptural Authority call'd in Queſtion.

As to Queen Elizabeth, ſhe rather went back in the Reformation of Ceremonies, than foreward in deſtroying them; for which two Reaſons are aſſign'd by the Writers of that Age.

1ſt. Policy, That by the preſerving ſome ſunilitude to the old Rites, ſhe might, if poſſible, bring the Papiſts to comply with her way, and ſo prevent a Diviſion.

[9] 2. Her natural Gayneſs of Temper, which enclin'd her to be much in Love with the Pomp and Shows of Religion.

In King James the firſt, a new and unheard of Doctrine ſtarted into the World, found firſt in the Heads of his Flatterers, That Kings were immediatly clothed with their Power from above, that they Governed Jure Divino, and conſequently muſt be obeyed as Gods Ordinance, and without any Controul.

I ſhall not run into the dark Particulars of that wretched Doctrine, nor the Miſchiefs it brought upon both Nations; but having aſſign'd the proper Original, both of Prelacy and Ceremonies, the two great things now debated, I ſhall proceed to examine what has been the Conſequence of theſe things in theſe Kingdoms.

And Firſt, I muſt own they brought immediat Contention into the Reformed Churches, and afterwards all the Diviſions, Schiſms ſome call them, and Debates that have been in the World, ſince their Foundation.

There were indeed early Differences in the Reformed Churches in England, and Biſhop Hooper, and Biſhop Ridly cont [...]ded a little too warmly on both ſides, till Affliction and Suffering taught both of them more Charity; and when they came both to die for the Eſſentials of Religion, it taught them to own, the Root of Religion might be ſound, where the Bloſſom had not the ſame flagrance; that the Faith, Hope, Love, and other Chriſtian Graces might be preſerved, where they differed in the Circumſtances.

However, I believe no man will Diſpute with me, that the very Biſhops themſelves in thoſe Times were Good Men; of Holy and Blameleſs Lives, ſound and wholſome Doctrine; conſtant and Laborious in Preaching, of firm and unſhaken Faith, of invincible Fortitude in the Cauſe of Chriſt, and ſealed the Reformation with their Blood; and tho I am as far from Epiſcopacy in my Opinion as any man in Scotland, [10] yet I muſt do Juſtice; theſe were Biſhops, of whom five beſides Arch-Deacon Philpot, paſt the Fiery Trial, and laid down their Lives in the Glorious Cauſe of Religion.

Theſe were not dumb Dogs, but Zealous Teachers of the Good People, and having taught Chriſt firſt, they died for him afterwards: A thing eaſier to talk of than to do.

In Queen Elizabeth's Time, the Regale and Pontificat continuing ſtill in the Church, Biſhops and Ceremonies, reſerv'd their Legal Sanction or Confirmation rather; but as the World began to encreaſe in Knowledge, and Light ſpread it ſelf further than uſual; ſo People began to be much out of Love with the Pomp of Service, as with a thing remote from the true Inſtitution of the Goſpel; and tho ſeveral Acts of Parliament were made againſt them, yet their Number increaſed every Day; the Queen indeed proceeded very ſeverely with them, to reclaim them: And King James, tho bred up under another kind of Church Government himſelf, carryed it yet higher.

But as force never yet could be effectual over Religion; ſo all theſe Proceedings ſerv'd but to make the perſecuted People encreaſe.

Their Original, and I muſt own, I think a moſt juſt Objection was, that the Church required a yet farther Reformation, that it was their Duty to ſerve God in the way which was moſt agreeable to the Scriptures, and they having diſliked ſeveral things in the Ceremonies and Liturgy of the Church of England, preſſed for a greater Purity of Worſhip: Hence they were called PURITANS.

The Holineſs and Blameleſsneſs of their Lives, the inoffenſiveneſs of their Behaviour to all Perſons, and the General Character they had, was ſuch, that the Name firſt given them in Deriſion, was afterwards in great Honour, both at home, and eſpecially among the Proteſtant Churches Abroad; and Eraſmus, who [11] was in England at that time, and converſt with them; gave his Opinion of them in this noble Expreſſion, Sit anima mea cum Puritannis Anglicanis.

Yet even theſe Puritans, than whom Europe never ſhew'd better Chriſtians, remain'd in the Communion of the Church of England, and in Subjection to Epiſcopacy.

The Reaſon they gave for it was, that tho they could not join in many things of their Worſhip, yet they thought it their Duty not to ſeparate, and make a Breach or Schiſm in the Church.

Note, for I deſire to be rightly underſtood, I do not ſay it was their Duty not to ſeparate, but they were convinc't of its being their Duty, and ſo it might become a Duty to them.

And that it was apparently thus, appear'd afterward, even that when their Kings put that abominable Book of Sports upon then, for which all the moſt Godly and Pious Miniſters were deprived; yet they did not gather ſeparate Churches, they went about Preaching, Catechizing, and Inſtructing Private Families; but they neither Baptized nor adminiſtraed the Lords Supper, but their People Conform'd in that to the eſtabliſh't Church.

If 'tis enquir'd why I obſerve this, 'tis becauſe,

  • 1. I would note with what Force and unwillingneſs the Diſſenters in England have been driven to be Diſſenters, and as it were, thruſt out of the Church.
  • 2. Becauſe of alike backwardneſs to ſeparate, which appeared at the laſt juncture in 1661, which ſome Cenſure the Diſſenters, I think too ſeverely for.

But to return to the Puritans:

The Government being reſolved to puſh them upon all extremities, and put every thing upon them that they knew they would not comply with, an Opportunity offered to try whether it was meerly for the ſake of Perſecution and Oppreſſion, that they were thus [12] uſed, or whether being really affraid of them, their General Abſence would ha' been grateful to them.

For the Diſcovery of a Planting in the North part of America, called New England, happening about this time, they Petition King James for Leave to go over and plant themſelves there—, which not to enter here into the Circumſtances of their Addreſs, or its Reception, tho the Hiſtory of it is very diverting, was granted them.

Immediately the whole Kingdom was in motion, and nothing was to be ſeen, but hiring Ships, packing up Goods, ſelling Eſtates, Jewels, Houſhold Stuff, and Equippages, as if the whole Nation was going to tranſplant.

The firſt Families that went, met with Terrible ſeverity in [...]old, Famine, and Want of all things, particularly of Habitations in a barren uncultivated Wilderneſs; but what will not People ſuffer for the Liberty of their Conſciences? not diſcouraged by the Diſtreſſes they went thro', they went on, and were followed by ſuch Multitudes, and with ſuch Wealth, that if I remember right above 19000 People were found to have gone over in a very few Years; and ſo generally were they bent upon it, that the Council had it ſeveral times under debate to ſtop them.

But King James dying, and the Confuſions of the next Reign coming on, the Civil Wars broke out, and the Power of the Parliament prevailing, the Principle before mentioned, of Purity in Worſhip, obtained on the Nation, Epiſcopacy was wholly ſuppreſt, and a New form of Church Government erected.

This not only eſtabliſh't Liberty to all the Puritans, and put a ſtop to their flying Abroad, but the Scriptures with the Pattern of the Primitive Churches, being the Rule of their Eſtabliſhment, a General Aſſembly of Divines was call'd, who ſat at Weſtminſter—, what their proceedings were, how they entertain'd a Brotherly Correſpondence with the Aſſembly in this Countrey, [13] how they unhappily divided again into different Opinions, the Conteſts about the Jus Divinum of Church Government, and of their manner in particular; theſe are things too long to enter upon here, and ſomething Foreign to my Purpoſe alſo.

But to come as faſt as poſſible to the preſent Times, at the Reſtoration of the Monarchy in King Charles II. this whole Fabrick, ſo it ſeem'd good to the Almighty, fell at once, and the Epiſcopal Hierarchy, Liturgy, Ceremonies, &c. were reſtored.

The King, whether ſincerely deſirous to unite his Subjects, in poſſible, or not, is needleſs to determine here, the Conſequence beſt explain'd his Meaning; but however, in pretence and outſide he called it, appoints a Conference at the Savoy, and granted a Commiſſion to certain on both ſides, to treat of an Accommodation of Differences.

The Miniſters gladly accept of this Conference, and principally being made to believe that Conceſſions being made on their ſide, like Conceſſions would be made on the other, and it might be poſſible to prevent a Breach in the whole.

They then had ſeveral Meetings among themſelves, to conſider how far they might comply, and as they all thought it their Duty to go as far as poſſible: So the Latitude of ſome People went farther than others.

I ſhall not Juſtifie or condemn here, it is not my preſent Buſineſs; I ſhall readily own ſome Men went farther than any Body of the Diſſenters in England would go now, and farther than they themſelves would ever after have gone again.

They offered to ſubmit to a Superintendency; or call it what you will, a moderate Epiſcopacy, and I ſhall not diſpute with any Man, whether they did not offer to go higher than is conſiſtent with a Presby terian Parity.

They ſaw that whole Body going to be rent in Pieces; they ſaw themſelves going to be depriv'd of their Miniſterial [14] Function, and rendred uncapable of doing the Good they were dedicated to, and they thought it their Duty to go as far as poſſible to avoid the greater Evils they ſaw before them, to themſelves, the Church of God, and the Power of Religion in general.

Let thoſe that pleaſe to condemn their Latitude, take it in what Senſe they think fit, I readily grant all that is Matter of Fact in their Conceſſion, and which Mr. Baxter has at large given an account of in the Hiſtory of his Life.

I ſhall not examine how far the preſent Body of the Diſſenters are affected by it, or are to be cenſur'd for it, or are any way concern'd in it, and I wave it here for that Reaſon.

The Conceſſions of the Diſſenters being delivered in, the King told them, He was well pleaſed they agreed to the Eſſence of Epiſcopacy; and renew'd his Aſſurances to them of his earneſt Deſire of an Accommodation.

What the Treatment they met with from the Church Party upon theſe Conceſſions was, is very remarkable, and might put it out of any bodys thought ever to apprehend a Conjunction.

Their Conceſſions being rejected, the Miniſters were immediatly put to the Teſt of their Fidelity, and 'tis remarkable; that of all theſe that offered their Conceſſions, very few, if any, conform'd; above 3000 of the beſt, moſt Learned, and Pious of the Miniſters, and who enjoy'd the largeſt Benefices rejected the Offers of Biſhopricks and Preferment, and quitted their Livings; becauſe they could not comply.

And thus the Epiſcopal Hierarchy was again re-eſtabliſhed in England—, ſeveral Perſecutions of the Diſſenters followed in the times of King Charles II. the Rigour and Cruelty of which are ſtanding Teſtimonies that they are very far from being Epiſcopally enclined.

Several Acts of Parliament have been ſince made to render them as uneaſy as poſſible, as the Act of uniformity, [15] I mean the Amendments to it, the five Mile Act, the et cactera Oath, the Sacramental Teſt, and others.

But the Gentlemen on that ſide have ſeen their Error, and even theſe we call High-Church Men, are now forewardeſt to make Conceſſions to the Diſſenters, in order to bring them in to the Church—, what their Deſign is, he muſt be blinder than I will ſuppoſe any of my Readers to be, that does not ſee; but they do the Diſſenters this Service in it, to teſtifie for them, that no Conceſſions will now bring them in, but ſuch as ſhall bring the Worſhip and Diſcipline of the Church down to the Teſt of the Scriptures—, and this farther clears them of all Suſpicion of being Epiſcopally inclin'd.

And thus I have brought the Church of England part of this Diſcourſe down to the latter Times of King Charles II.

At his Death the Succeſſor was a Papiſt, and the firſt Step he took, was to face about to the Diſſenters, and by the Gloſs of Charity, and General Juſtice, court them to his Party, giving them Liberty, but on the foot of his Prerogative, not the Laws, to draw them into the Snares, of, at leaſt, a tacit Acknowledging his Right to do ſo.

The Generality of the Diſſenters ſaw the hook thro' this Bait, and tho they accepted their Liberty, and carryed it dutifully to their Sovereign; yet they profeſſed their Diſſatisfaction at having it given in an unparliamentary manner.

Upon which theſe Famous Lines were made which every Body had in their Prints and Diſcourſe.

The Declaration's but a Trojan Horſe,
The Form's illegal, and the Matter's worſe.

Some indeed were drawn into the Snares of Addreſſing, tho they were generally Oppoſed by the beſt and greateſt part of the Diſſenters, and thoſe that did it, [16] thank't him for the Liberty indeed, yet were ignorant both in the Deſign, and unbelieving in the Conſequences, as appear'd in that as ſoon as their Eyes were opened, they ſtarted back, and teſtified their Concern for having been drawn in ſo far, of which preſently.

This alſo farther appear'd in that, when the King, who thought he had gain'd one Point, was for puſhing at another, vlz. the taking off the Penal Laws and Teſt; the Diſſenters, tho they had ſuffered ſo deeply, and theſe Penal Laws were both wicked in their Nature, and particularly pointed at them; yet they generally rejected it, and declared they had rather be oppreſt by the Church of E. than have both the Church of England and themſelves too, torn to Pieces by Popery or thoſe Laws invaded by the diſpenſing Power of the Prince; nor could all King James his Booted Apoſtles bring them off from this.

In the Senſe of this the Church of England, and the Diſſenters made that famous Capitulation, on which the inviting over the Prince of Orange, afterwards the Glorious Reſtorer of Britains Liberty was built, and which is expreſt in the Eighth Article of the Memorial to that Prince, on the Performance of which Treaty, the Eſtabliſhment of the Church of England, and the Tolleration of the Diſſenters are equally built, and ſupported by Right, Truth, and Fundamental Law, and thus they both ſtand at this Day.

I come now to the Reformation of the Church of Scotland; which beginning later than that of England, by about twelve Years, and having no Bonds of Tyranny upon them, which as I have noted, drew England into the Snare of the Regale; but their Reformation being made by the People themſelves, and Mr. Jobn Knox being their Calvin, and who ſent or went to Geneva on purpoſe to concert the beſt Grounds of a National Settlement, they had nothing impoſed upon them, nor any body to impoſe it.

[17] The Lords which headed them, referr'd the whole Settlement of Religion to the Miniſters, they had the Miſchiefs England was fallen into by a partial and pompous Reformation before their Eyes, and thus they reform'd at once into the compleat Model, both as to Diſcipline and Worſhip, which we find at this day.

Nor were they ſo dark in their Foreſight, as not to expect all the Rage and Oppoſition the Enemies of ſuch a Reformation could be guilty of, and to ſecure the People therefore as far as poſſible in the ſtrict Adherence to the mighty Work they were engag'd in, they contrived the moſt Solemn, Awful and Tremendous Obligation, that I believe, any Nation ever bound themſelves in, ſince the Oath of God, which Moſes made the Children of Iſrael take at Mount Horeb.

This is what they call the National Covenant, in which the People bind themſelves and their Poſterity, in the moſt ſolemn manner to God Almighty, to adhere to, maintain and defend to the utmoſt of their Power the Reformation they had ſettled, the Doctrine, Diſcipline and Government of the Church, as expreſt in their confeſſion of Faith, and ſeveral other Articles both of Civil and Eccleſiaſtical Conſtitution therein expreſt, needleſs, and too long to be repeated here.

This Covenant was made firſt in the Year, 1581. the new Reformation being then threatned with many Enemies, as well Foreign as Domeſtick—, and it was renewed again, in the Year 1590.

I am far from raiſing the leaſt Scruple at, or making any Reflection upon the Nature, the Canſe, the Manner, or Obligation of this Covenant, or any Branch of it; they that conſtrue me ſo, do it to cover the Shame of the other ill Treatment which I have dayly from them.

I frankly own it a ſolemn, and almoſt juſt Obligation, and declare I never meant in any thing I ſaid, or printed, the leaſt Reflection againſt it; and 'tis very juſt I ſhould [18] have the explaining my own words.

If what I have ſaid any where, gives a ſeeming Reflection, I ſhould be very ſorry, for the ſake of them that may ignorantly miſtake me; as for thoſe that maliciouſly and wilfully miſtake me, they are worth no Honeſt Mans Notice, nor is it on their account in the leaſt, that I take notice of it here; but to diſabuſe thoſe who are impoſed upon by ſuch.

I freely recognize the National Covenant, and what I ſaid in the ſixth Eſſay of our Fathers eating theſe ſowre Grapes, and us their Children's Teeth ſet on edge by them. I wonder any Man ſhould be ſo unjuſt as to turn my words to a Meaning, That the Covenant is a ſowre Grape that ſets the Childrens Teeth on Edge. I therefore declare it to be only brought as an Alluſion to thoſe People who load themſelves with more Obligations in their Notions of the Covenant, than the Covenant really impoſes upon them—, and the Senſe of the place in which 'tis brought, will allow me this to any impartial Perſon.

I was proving that the National Covenant is not at all concern'd in the Union; I acknowledge firſt, that the Covenant is binding to Poſterity, and I add, that for Argument ſake, I'll grant; whether I believe it or no, it has all that Obligation they alledge, let that be what it will—, ſignifying thereby, they do reckon greater Obligations than really are in the Covenant, and this I call eating ſowre Grapes, 6th. Eſſay, P. 20. and this I leave to any impartial Cenſure.

If this be not Satisfaction to any Honeſt Man, that I have not the leaſt Diſreſpect for the National Covenant, I ſhall on any Reaſonable Sentence of indifferent Judges, make ſuch more ſolemn Declaration or Acknowledgment as they can deſire.

But to go on with my Hiſtory of the Reformation in Scotland, there was a great Difference in it from what had been in England, for here it was made perfectly, without the Aſſiſtance, and contrary to the Intention of [19] the Sovereign—, and the Regale therefore found no body to eſpouſe it, but the Reformers had opportunity to make their Model as compleat as they could.

I know it has been objected, that in the Infancy of the Reformation, they found the very Eſſence of Epiſcopacy neceſſary, and that was in the Superintendents named in the Church Policy, one of the firſt Inſtruments of ſettlement deviſed for their Church, the Model of which had been brought from Geneva by Mr. John Knox, and ſome have raiſed Pleas from hence for the Prelatick Power, as the moſt Original Inſtitution, and the like of the Common Prayers.

But the Biſhops would be ill pleaſed to be no other kind of Biſhops than thoſe were, who tho they had a Dioceſs indeed, yet were ſubject to be depoſed by the ordinary Miniſters of their own Bounds, and therefore I do not bring this to juſtify Prelacy, but to relate as near as I can, the Fact as it lies, and the Uſe of it ſhall appear preſently,

The Superintendents indeed had their Dioceſſes preſcribed, and 'tis call'd by that very name, and they had power to plant Miniſters, ſettle Churches, and do ſeveral things, which at that time could not be done without them; but I muſt always inſiſt upon their ſubjection as a Clauſe that Chocks all the Efforts to prove the firſt Reformation Epiſcopal.

However, they were Superintendents, and therefore ſome kind of Superintendency may not be inconſiſtent with Presbyterian Parity, and thats all the uſe I ſhall make of it.

I find another inſtance of this, which ſerves the preſent Occaſion, and that is a Letter written in the Year [...] from the Aſſembly of the Church of Scotland, to the Biſhops in England, and in a differing Stile from what we write here now; the letter begins thus.

The Superintendents, Miniſters and Commiſſioners of the Church within the Realm of Scotland to their [20] Brethren the Biſhops and Paſtors in England, who have renounced the Roman Antichriſt, and have profeſſed with us the Lord Jeſus

Here is ſomething very remarkable, and worth nothing.

  • 1. That the Church of Scotland eſteem'd, even the Biſhops and Paſtors in thoſe days, as Brethren profelling with them the Lord Jeſus, a quite different Language from thoſe who ſtile them Dumb Dogs, poor Rogues, &c. Indecencys, which muſt be offenſive to modeſt Ears, were the caſe much worſe than it is.
  • 2. The Church of Scotland was as far from owning Epiſcopacy it ſelf then as now, and in the very Letter, they exclaim againſt the Pomp and Ceremonies of Worſhip; but it did not at all break off their Charity from the Perſons of the Biſhops and Paſtors, whom they ſtill call'd Brethren, and own'd they profeſs't with them the Lord Jeſus.
  • 3. The Appellation of Brethren was moſt juſt, for that the

Biſhops in thoſe days, tho Prelats, veſted with Civil Power, wearing the Habit, and every way practiſing their Church Power as now, yet were Holy and worthy Chriſtians, and of the ſame Claſs with Cranmer, Ridly, Latimer, Farrar, and Bleſſed Hooper, who all of them ſealed the Reformed Religion with their Blood, and durſt paſs to the Stake, and the Flames in maintaining the true Proteſtant Faith, againſt that Roman Antichriſt here mentioned.

Let no Man ſuſpect me here of favouring Epiſcopacy; for tho of late Years, the very Men have been a Scandal to the Office; yet I profeſs were the Biſhops Now all Hoopers and ranmers; I could not agree to their Church Government: However, I cannot call it a damning Error; certainly a Biſhop may go to Heaven, or elſe our want of Charity muſt be great for the Martyrs; I am [21] therefore for letting them alone, ſo far, I mean as reſpects Civil Treatment, and fair Uſage—; 'tis enough the Church of Scotland is fenced againſt them by Law, and the Debt of common Civility is due to all the World.

In like manner we find the Church of Scotland uſing a Liturgy in former Times—, I ſhall not infer that ſhe ought to be diſtruſted on that Score, as likely to relapfe to it.

But this I ſhall obſerve, that Liturgies unimpoſed, have always been in uſe in the Church, even from the firſt 300 Years, and therefore are not ſo Frightful as ſome people make them, and the Directory is a Liturgy in its kind; all the Reformed Churches have Liturgies, and all that could be deſired in that caſe, by the Diſſenters in 1661 was, 1. That they be reformed. And, 2dly. That they be not impoſed.

To prove that a Liturgy and Common Prayer were uſed in Scotland, take the following Inſtances.

  • 1. In the Church Policy mentioned before, we have theſe words, In great Towns, we think it expedient, that every day there be either Sermon or Common Prayer. And again, On the day of the Publick Sermon, we do not think the Common Prayer needful to be uſed.
  • 2. In the Directory for the publick Worſhip in Scotland, we have this Introduction or Preface; ‘"In the beginning of this Bleſſed Reformation, our wiſe and Pious Anceſtors took care to ſet forth an Order for redreſs of many things, which they then, by the word, diſcovered to be vain, erroneous Superſtitions and Idolatrous in the publick Worſhip of God—. This occaſioned many Godly and Learned Men to rejoice much in the Book of Common Prayer at that time ſet forth."’

The Summ of all this is, not at all to favour either Epiſcopacy or Liturgy in their Attempts to be either juſtified or reſtored in Britain: let no Man miſtake me, but to do Juſtice againſt furious Cenſures, who at the ſame time, that the Nations profeſſing both ſorts, are going to unite, [22] your to repreſent them as meer Popery or Heatheniſm, that the Diſſenters in England may be the eaſier Cenſured for offers of Complyance with them, and this I profeſs to be my ſingle Reaſon for giving theſe Inſtances; as for thoſe who will have me mean what I never intend, I leave them to their own ways, and contemn their want of Candour.

'Tis enough the Church of Scotland is reform'd from this, all the burthens of Ceremony, Forms and Hierarchys are taken away, and Purity in both Worſhip and Diſcipline obtained; but there is a Chriſtian Temper and Charity towards the Church of England certainly due, who, tho not ſo far reformed, are yet our Brethren, and of whom we yet hope, and ought to pray that they ſhall one day be effectually Illuminated; this Temper and Charity, I hope, ſhall now encreaſe on an Union, and that all the Contention ſhall be to out-preach, out-live, and out-practiſe one another, emulating, and thereby provoking one another to Love and to Good Works.

But to go back to the Church of Scotland, the ſeveral Convulſions ſhe has felt by the Interpoſition of Tyranny, Conqueſt, and ſometimes Epiſcopacy, are to be ſeen at large in the Hiſtorys of both Kingdoms, and I ſhall not enter upon them.

The Perſecutions of the Honeſt ſuffering Inhabitants are a melancholly Teſtiwmony of the Aſſaults the Devil and his Agents have made upon the Reformation here, the Courage, Conſtancy, and vigorous Oppoſition of the Zealous Confeſſors of Chriſt and his Church in this Nation deſerve a better Hiſtorian, and one leſs a Stranger to Scotland than I am, to record, and call for more leiſure, and more room than I have in this ſmall Tract, and I therefore leave them with this Remark, That no Nation in the World has with more Zeal and Fidelity oppoſed all the Impoſitions, Innovations and Barbarities of the Enemies of Truth; than this Nation, and more I cannot ſay here.

[23] Under theſe ſuffering Circumſtances, they continued, with ſome ſhort Intervals, till their being incorporated with England in the time of Oliver Cromwel, when tho they ſeemed to be under a Military Government; yet they had their Repreſentatives in Parliament, were Taxed but in Proportion to the Repreſentative; and as I am inform'd here, their Subjection, ſuch as it was, was attended with an Encreaſe of Wealth, Trade and Property.

At the Reſtoration, they had Epiſcopacy, Tranny and Superſtition reſtored juſt as in England; Miniſters that could not conform, turn'd out, ſilenced, perſecuted, fin'd, baniſhed, impriſoned mutatis mutandis, juſt as in England, except only that their Cruelties and Inhumanities here went farther than they did there.

Thus they continued till the Revolution, at the happy coming of the Great Deliverer of the whole Iſland, King WIlliam; when Tyranny fled, and Guilt drew in her bluſhing Countenance; Law, Truth, Juſtice and Liberty reviving, the Church of Scotland obtained a Reſurrection from a Hundred Years of Miſery, Uncertainty, and Diſtreſs.

Then Epiſcopay again vaniſh't in its turn, and its Elder Siſter Tyranny, abdicated with her; the Presbyterian Government of the Church was reſtored to its Primitive Freedom, and to the full Exerciſe and Extent of all its Legal Rights, as it is this day, and thus far relates to the Hiſtory of both Churches.

I come Now to the Diſſenters in England, as the third Claſs of People, I am to enter upon.

Of the Diſſenters in England.

I left them ejected, contemn'd, perſecuted, and oppreſt during the Reign of the late King Charles; wheedled and amuſed, under his Brother King James, reſtored [24] and tolerated under King William; and yet farther ſecured of that Liberty, tho under ſeveral Invaſions, by the Vigilance of the Honſe of Lords, and the Honour, Juſtice and ſpecial Favour of her preſent Majeſty, whoſe Concern for them, Clemency and Juſtice to them, and free Adherence to their compleat Toleration, I hope they wlll never forget.

Here I deſire to ſpeak ſomething to the Matter of diſſenting from the Church of England in general, and then to the Endeavours of Reconciliation on both ſides; and I hope that true ſtating the Matter of Fact, will clear up all the Doubts People may entertain on both ſides without invectives, perſonal Reproaches, Railery, or ill Treatment of the Parties, with which I ſhall no ways concern my ſelf.

I have deduc't the Diſſenters from the Church of England, from them they came out, the Reaſon of their diſſenting, I have confin'd to one Main Head, viz. Purity of Worſhip, which was the firſt; ſubſequent Scruples followed indeed, which were levelled at, what I call the Regale and Pontificate, the Supremacy of Civil Power, and the Eccleſiaſtical Hierarchy.

Theſe drove them out of the Church, and theſe only; for as to Doctrinal Articles, they are allow'd to be Orthodox, and all the Diſſenters frankly ſubſcribe them, the Quakers excepted, and the laſt Clauſe of the 27th. Article to the Anabaptiſts.

It being objected by ſome, That Offers have been made by the Diſsenters to come into the Church, I deſire to ſpeak directly to it, only to premiſe ſomething which I think neceſſary in this place, relating to the Church of England her ſelf.

1. The Diſſenters, in their ſeparating from the Church of England; do by no means diſown her being a true Church, they charge her with no Doctrinal Error, nothing Heretical or Antichriſtian, I mean as a Church.

2. No Man can be ſo void of Charity as to judge that [25] a Man adhering to the Church of England, and whoſe Conſcience is not farther enlightned, cannot be ſaved.

3. No Man then can deny, but that the Diſſenters in England would gladly come into the Church of England, and become one Body with them again, and ought to do ſo, would they abate, alter, or remove all thoſe things in which they differ from them, which do not appear warranted by the Word of God.

This being laid down, it will follow.

  • 1. That a ſimple offer of complying with the Church, can be no matter of Charge againſt the Diſſenters, if the Conditions on which they offer it are thus qualified.
  • 2. Thoſe that have offered more, are not to be juſtified, nor ſhall not by me; and thoſe that have not, ought not to be condemned for the Miſtakes of their Brethren, and a juſt Diſtinction ſhall be the Work before me.

I come then to ſpeak to the Matter of Fact, as ſome have alledged it, that the Diſſenters in England have made Offers to conform to the Church of England—; I readily grant it is true, and I think I may as readily grant all that has been ſaid upon that Head, which amounts to this, and no more, That ſome of the Diſſenting Miniſters at the Conference at the Savoy, and before at Breda, willing, if poſſible, to avoid a Breach, and keep the Office of their Miniſtry, did offer to ſubmit to a moderate Epiſcopacy, or as the King himſelf call'd it, owned the Eſſence of Epiſcopacy.

I'll grant, that the latitude of ſome of their Principles, and the particular extenſive Charity of others, and the Circumſtances of the whole at that time, carryed them farther than would conſiſt with the Presbyterian Parity now inſiſted on by both Churches.

Nay, I'll grant more than is asked, and I perceive, more than ſome People deſire I ſhould grant, viz. That they went farther than themſelves, when they ſaw farther into it, would afterwards agree to, and a great [26] deal more than others of their Brethren, even, at that time, would comply with.

But I make no queſtion to prove here, that there can be no juſt Argument drawn from hence, to prove that the Diſſenters now in England, ſhould be charged with the ſame Complyance, or diſtruſted on the Account of what then paſt—. But on the contrary, that there are very good Demonſtrations to prove they would by no means comply with any ſuch thing; and that the diſſenting in England, and in Scotland, is on the ſame Foundation with one another, and no other.

The Debate therefore of the Complyance in 1661, I take to be at an end here; Becauſe I grant all that can be alledged on that head, I neither Juſtifie nor approve the Conceſſions offered, tho at the ſame time the other Party alledged they were no Conceſſions at all, but what were deſtructive to Epiſcopacy, and, as they call'd it, a Plot againſt it.

I muſt own, I think, That ſuppoſe the Complyance of thoſe Men as ſinful as we pleaſe, they were Great and Good Men, they are dead, and gone to their Reſt, and their Works follow them; their Labours remain ſtanding Monuments of their Worth and Excellence, and ſeem to merit that their Infirmities ſhould be buried in the Grave with them.

Let any Miniſter in Britain firſt make it appear, that he has been bleſt with being made the Inſtrument of the Converſion, reſtoring and comforting as many Souls, as Mr. Baxters Call to the Unconverted, his Saints everlaſting Reſt, and Mr. Hows Bleſſedneſs of the Righteous, and he ſhall paſs with me for the greateſt Bleſſing of his kind, that God has left us in this Day.

Works of this Value deſerve their Savour in the Hearts of all good Chriſtians, and if ſome Opinions of theſe Men do not agree with ours; yet Charity ought to reſtrain our Cenſures of ſuch Men, as God has made eminently uſeful in his Church, at leaſt let us abſtract the Good, and let the Bad ſleep, that what we Diſlike [27] may not prejudge the Minds of thoſe who may receive Good from the other.

This I think is a Chriſtian way of dealing with them, and they that reflect moſt upon their own miſcarriages and failings will be apteſt to allow for other people, the reſt is all cavil and indecent.

Having yielded thus to the utmoſt, I am now to prove that the Diſſenters in England are not of the ſame Mind now, and would on no account go the ſame length, the Conſequence of which will be plain, that they are not to be Cenſur'd or diſtruſted for what was then done.

I confeſs my Abſence from Books and Vouchers in England, deprives me of ſome Helps; but I muſt work with ſuch Tools as I have; and tho my performance may not be ſo perfect as otherwiſe it would be; yet I hope it ſhall be convincing, and any moderate Perſon will allow for the Diſadvantage of meer Memory.

Firſt, I have living Teſtimony now in this place, who have heard moſt, if not all the Diſſenting Miniſters of England that have been here, declare in their own Names, and on account of their Brethren in England, that it is the general Opinion of the Diſſenters in England, That if the Church of England would abate their whole Liturgy, Habits, Ceremonies, &c. yet that they could not conform meerly on account of Epiſcopacy; and if it ſhall be of any weight to add my own Teſtimony, I declare I have heard them univerſally profeſs the ſame thing in England.

But to come farther, lets take the Teſtimony of their Enemies, which is no ill way of coming at a charge; the Author of the Regale and Pontificate, an Eminent Advocate for the Epiſcopal Hierarchy in England, charging the Diſſenters with their rejecting all offers of Complyance made from the Church, concludes thus, 'tis impoſſible that any Union can be made between the Church and them; becauſe they refuſe the REGALE [28] and PONTIFICATE, and on this he charges them with incurable Schiſm.

The Author of the Wolff ſtript, one of this Countrey Men, and a great Schollar, inviting, or rather challenging the Diſſenters to the ſtating their Scruples before the Convocation, in order to a Reconciliation, has theſe words—. We ſhould have little Quarrel with the Diſſenters about all the Objections they make as to Habit, Ceremonies, Liturgy, and even the grand Point of Ordination by Presbyters, if it was not for their Schiſm, and gathering ſeparate Congregations, in Oppoſition to the true Epiſcopal Authority of the Church.

Here's Liturgy, Ceremonies, Habits, and almoſt every thing ſacrifiz'd to the Diſſenters, BUT EPISCOPACY, and why did they not accept the Challenge; but becauſe the Main and Material thing was behind, without which there could be no Complyance, viz. Epiſcopal Hierarchy.

What is the Complyance of Mr. Baxter, &c. to theſe things? what was then done, is near 50 Years ago, and the State of things is ſomewhat altered ſince that time; for 'tis otherways now.

And here I think it will be proper to remind the Diſſenters Enemies, or thoſe that diſtruſt them on this account, with that many headed Monſter call'd A COMPREHENSION, which ſome People—, in the abundance of their Ignorance, have charg'd the Diſſenters with contriving.

I believe the Challenge may very modeſtly be made in the Name of all the Diſſenters in England to any Man, to prove that a Comprehenſion had ever its Riſe among them, or that any Diſſenter ever cloſed with it.

I know Biſhop Uſher's Model was the famous Foundation, and ſeveral Diſſenters, I believe, at that time, might have come into that.

But even that Model was far from a Comprehenſion, and when ever the Word [...]omprehenſion came to be conſidered, and brought down to the Edge of Practice, [29] it was always found impracticable, and therefore the aforeſaid Author of the Regale and Pontificate declares an Union between the Church and the Diſſenters impoſſible; becauſe the Diſſenters will not come up to Epiſcopacy.

I know ſome People are foreward to tell us there is a project in England now, of making Abatements to the Diſſenters to bring them in, I ſhall give a ſhort anſwer to it, if it be to take away the Regale and Pontificate, they will accept it, for that is not coming in to the Church, but receiving the Church in to us; if it be only as formerly, to abate Rigorous Exacting of Conformity, I pledge the Value of all I have ſaid upon it.

  • 1. That 'tis a high Church Project.
  • 2. That the Diſſenters reject it.

Now, I would fain ask thoſe Gentlemen that fear the Diſſenters and the Church of England ſhould unite, who of the Church, the Diſſenters ſhould be moſt likely to join with, the High Church or the Low Church; the Low Church-men do not ſeek it, for they are willing to give the Diſſenters all the Liberty and Toleration they deſire, knowing they cannot come in; as to the high Church, I believe no body will ſuſpect the Diſſenters of coming over to them.

But here's another Queſtion will be harder to decide ſtill; How comes it to paſs, that the High-Church Men quarrel the Low-Church-Men on this Head, and charge them with ſhifting the Cauſe of the Schiſm off from themſelves, telling them, they are not ſo willing to yield in indifferent things to the Diſſenters, as they are; to prove this the ſame Author quoted before, inviting the Diſſenters to offer their Demands to the Convocation, and telling them indifferent things will be given up to them, has theſe words.

‘'And if they will do this, it will ſoon appear whether the High or Low Church will go fartheſt to purchaſe the deſir'd Reconciliation, and which of them do in moſt earneſt wiſh for it.’

[30] ‘'Next ſays the ſame Author, Let thoſe of the Low Church, who make ſuch Boaſts of their Project for Reconciliation, produce the Terms of it, that it may appear they were none but indifferent things that were to be given up, otherways let them too, ceaſe their railing at the High Church Men for ſuſpecting them.’

‘'The High Church deſire that they and the Low Ohurch may be tryed by their Actions—’, thus you ſee an Alternative, the Low Church are ſuſpected by the High Church of giving up all, or giving up none, and Comprehenſions, Abatements, &c are all offered on the High Church Mens ſide.

The Reaſon is plain, they ſee an effectual Gate, to the Ruine of the Diſſenters in making Diviſion among them, by yielding in part—, but are mortally averſe to giving up the Subſtantial and effectual Articles, which once removed, would bring an Univerſal Conjunction.

If I am ask't here in General, whether we would on any terms joyn at all with them. I anſwer. and believe all good Chriſtians will anſwer, Yes, with all our Hearts—, and ſo will the Church of Scotland too.

And as 'tis natural to ſay in the next Queſtion, What are the Conditions, Truely ſuch as on the Foundation of which, we would all join with the Papiſts, or any Church in the World, and I hope, no body will take Offence at the General way of expreſſing it; for 'tis not ſtepping foreward, but receiving thoſe that ſtep forward to us.

If any Chriſtian Church will abate what is either in their Doctrine, Worſhip, or Diſcipline, not warranted by the Word of God, I'll readily ſay, we ſhall all join with that Church. But to come to Particulars, as this is not the firſt time that Queſtion has been ask't and anſwer'd, I'll give five Heads which have been offered to the Church in this Caſe by the Diſſenters, and on which, I believe; the Church of Scotland, the Church of England, and the Diſſenters, ſhould ſoon be one united Body, and theſe are long ſince made publick [31] in ſeveral Tracts, particularly in an Anſwer to the High Church Challenge printed in the Year 1704.

  • 1. That as to Liturgies, they may ſuffer ſuch amendment and Alterations as are juſtifiable by Scripture and the Practice of the Primitive Church.
  • 2. That when they are ſo amended, they may not be impoſed, or the Miniſter tyed up, and preſcrib'd by the Letter of the Book, but be at liberty to enlarge or abridge as his own abilities may ſupply, or the Caſe require.
  • 3. That Ordination of Miniſters be eſtabliſh't in the Presbyters, and no re-ordination or unreaſonable Oaths impoſed.
  • 4. That Habits and Ceremonies, ſuch as kneeling at the Sacrament, bowing at the name of Jeſus, the Croſs in Baptiſm, the Surplice, Veſtments, and all the reſt, ſcrupled by the Diſſenters, and own'd to be indifferent, may be wholly left out, or left at the Diſcretion of the People, as that they may not be impoſed upon them without their Conſent.
  • 5. That Church Government be reduced to ſuch a pitch of Authority, and veſted in ſuch Perſons as may be juſtified by the Scriptures, and no other.

In all theſe Offers, I do not ſee the leaſt Tendency towards a Complyance with any thing, either in Diſcipline or Worſhip, which the Church of Scotland would not agree to, or that can render the Diſſenters ſuſpected; I do not ſay theſe are all the things to be inſiſted on, and let no Man take that weak hold by the Barrenneſs of Expreſſion to ſuggeſt a corrupt Meaning; but I think there is nothing the Church of England can be ask't, but what is contained [...]airly in theſe Generals.

On the Conceding therefore theſe five Heads, the Diſſenters, yea, and the Church of Scotland too, might very eaſily cloſe with the General Union, and become one great Proteſtant, and purely reformed Church, for it would be one Presbyterian Church.

[32] Upon the whole, the Matter of Fact I think is plain, that the grand Difference between the Church of England and the Diſſenters, at this time, is juſt the ſame as in Scotland, and no other, I mean Church Government, or, in the High Church Language, the Regale and Pontificate, and all the Diſpute in both may be ſaid to turn upon two Points.

  • 1. Epiſcopal Hierarchy.
  • 2. The Supremacy of the Civil Magiſtrate, or his Power to Impoſe Indifferent Things, and thereby to make them neceſſary.

This is the Sum of the Matter, and moſt of it lyes in the firſt Head too; For, were the Hierarchy reduced, 'tis plain, the Church would ſoon give up the reſt: And, as the Author before Quoted obſerves, Would have little Diſpute about Habits, Ceremonies, Liturgies and Ordination; They are indeed but the Pomp and Jingle of the other, and the Scripture Rule would ſoon reduce them to Primitive Plainneſs.

I know the Nicety of the Subject I am writing upon, and the want of Charity with which ſome will read, and this forces me to frequent and otherwiſe needleſs Excurſions.

I hope I retain an Air of Integrity in my Meaning, and for Miſconſtructions, eſpecially wilful ones, I deſpiſe them: I ſee nothing in my Diſcourſe, that ſhould make me be ſuſpected of being Epiſcopally inclin'd—Tho I cannot be for Sealing all that are of an Epiſcopal Church to Reprobation.—Nor Treating them as Antichriſtian: I believe the Hierarchy Unſcriptural, and enter my publick Proteſt againſt both Regale and Ponitificate.—And I think this is as much as any Chriſtian can be requir'd.—But I cannot call the Church of England Antichriſtian, becauſe neither Regale or Pontificate are Eſſentials of Doctrine, and when ever they ſhall be quitted by them, they are from that time the ſame individual Reform'd Preſbyterian Church with this in Scotland.

[33] Some have taken pains to prove, that the Diſſenters in England, I deſire to be underſtood of the Diſſenters, the Preſbyterian Diſſenters, except where I explain it otherways, declare themſelves now for moderate Epiſcopacy—. But this can never be prov'd upon them; Nor does Mr. Calamy any where ſuggeſt i [...], that I remember, if he ſays No Body Queſtioned the Lawfulneſs of it at the Conference at the Savoy, it does not amount to a Proof, that they allowed the Lawfulneſs of it, much leſs that they do ſo now.

But then I find 'tis objected, That they Sign the 37th Article of the Church of England, which Recognizes the Regale, or Power of the Civil Authority: But he that Quotes the Words of that Article, and leaves out the Explanation with which they Sign it, does not Act the moſt candid part of a Reconciler, nor Treat them fairly.

'Tis known, That the Explication is made part of that Article, and with that Explication the Diſſenters are ſatisfied; and ſatisfied, that they do not own the Supremacy of the Civil Power in Eccleſiaſtical Matters, farther than all the Proteſtant Churches in Europe do.

Again, this cannot be brought as a ſingle Argument to diſtruſt the Preſbyterian Diſſenters, if it be any Proof at all, 'tis againſt the whole Body; For even the Anabaptiſts Sign that Article, as well as the Preſbyterians, and no Man ever ſuſpected them of owning the Supremacy.

Laſtly, And which is more than all the reſt, the Church her ſelf is come off from the Regale in General, and the Oath of Supremacy formerly impoſed was one of the firſt things left out of the Engliſh Conſtitution at the Revolution, the Act for it repealed, and has never been impoſed upon any Bo-dy ſince.

So that I think no Complyance can be charg'd on the Diſſenters in England upon that Foundation.

I have met with but one thing more, in which the Diſſenters are attack't, relating to Scotland, and that [34] is, that they ſet up for a Toleration of Diſſenters there.

I muſt own, I have not the ſame formidable Opinion of a Toleration here, as ſome Gentlemen have: And as to the Epiſcopal Diſſenters here, I firmly believe, 'tis the true method to diſſolve and reduce them to nothing, of which hereafter but this is nothing to the caſe; For I ſee no Proof, that the Diſſenters in England have, one way or other, concern'd themſelves in it: And therefore, if any Man charges them on that Head, it ought to be prov'd; For to ſay 'tis ſo, as far as we know, is only to make it appear, we know but little or nothing of the Matter.

But to offer at ſomething relating to their Principles in that caſe, it may be noted, 1. that when Eſſays at Univerſal Toleration have been made in England, the Diſſenters have always oppoſed them; particularly as in taking off the Penal Laws againſt Papiſts, when they choſe rather to bear the Unreaſonable Burden of thoſe Laws themſelves, than to tolerate what was deſtructive to the General Conſtitution of the Proteſtant Religion.

2. Another later Inſtance is, in a Famous Letter lately written by Mr. Toland to the reſpective Heads of the Diſſenters in England, preſſing them to declare their Opinions of the Univerſal Liberty of Chriſtians, and the Toleration of all Opinions meerly Religious: The Original of which Letter I have here with me, for it was never printed, and ſhall freely ſhow to any Body that deſires it.

Upon this Application, back't with Mr. Stephens and ſeveral others—the Diſſenters meeting and conſulting about it, unanimouſly reſolved, not to give any Anſwer at all to it, or to make any Declaration of their Opinion on that Head—. Now if they have thus refuſed to declare their Opinion in England where accepting Toleration themſelves, 'tis moſt likely they ſhould be for giving it to others, 'tis very unlikely they ſhould officiouſly declare themſelves for it [35] in Scotland, where they have nothing at all to do with it.

However to ſuch Objectors I refer them to my Opinion of that Matter ſtated in the Preface to Jure Divino, now to be ſeen in this Town, and which I ſhall take the Freedom to appeal to.

I think therefore they are free from any of the Reproaches thrown on them on that ſcore.

I find but one thing more objected againſt them and that is about their prompting the Diſpenſing Power of the late King in England, by their Addreſſes of Thanks for an Illegal Indulgence.

This has been directly anſwer'd already, and is briefly ſum'd up thus, ‘Some few Diſſenters did Addreſs and Thank the King for their Liberty, which, tho' I do not, nor ever did approve, becauſe that Liberty was their Native Right, yet as Ignorance, Good Manners, and Wilingneſs to [...]ultivate the Benefit which they had many Ages mourn'd for want of, moved ſome, and the prevailing Arts of Court Flatteries others, yet none of thoſe Addreſſes being a real owning the Diſpenſing Power, they cannot be directly charged. And it was plain, they were not deſign'd as ſuch by the Addreſſers, ſince, as ſoon as they diſcover'd the Fraud, they all ſtarted back, and acknowledg'd the Miſtake.’

Nor can it be argued, as is weakly inſinuated, That Thanking him for an Indulgence, is a Thanking him for a Diſpenſing Power, as that Indulgence was a breaking in upon the Laws by a Diſpenſing Power, becauſe the one was apparent, the other concealed.

That ſome were drawn in I owne, but to what?—To Thank the King—Well, what did they Thank him for?—For what was THE EFFECT of a Diſpenſing Power. Note again, not for the Diſpenſing [36] Power it ſelf, for they did not foreſee it—. The HOOK Tyranny, was cover'd with the BAIT Liberty, as in all Ages of the World it has been—. And 'tis Diſingenuous to charge that Ignorance as a Sin againſt Knowlege, and the more ſo, becauſe as ſoon as their Eyes were opened, they corrected the Miſtake.

Suppoſe a Man, with a Villainous Deſign to Murder me, makes me a Preſent of a Poiſoned Noſegay, I accept his Preſent, and ignorantly Thank him for it—. But I Thank him for the Flowers, I do not Thank him for the Poiſon; But, as ſoon as I diſcover the Treachery, I throw away the Gift, and proſecu [...] the Murderer.

Again, theſe People that were thus drawn in, were but a few, not One to Twenty, ſome ſay, not One [...] Fifty, and to charge this on the whole Body, looks [...] if the Enemy had a great Barrenneſs of Fact, [...] wants Charity more than it wants Malice.

But I am told very Scholaſtically, That ſpeaking indefinitly does not imply the whole, and to [...] THE DISSENTERS may mean but a few, [...] cauſe in School Logic, an Indefinite in a Matter Con [...] gent is taken but for a part.

I forbear any Reflection on the Sophiſtry of this, the Caſe before us is too honeſt to need ſuch Equivocations, and plai [...] Reaſon with the help of Fact will clear it up all.

If, to ſay THE Diſſenters did ſo, may ſignifie but ſome of them, then, if ten Diſſenters did it, it may be ſaid, The Diſſenters did it.

On the other hand, by the ſame Rule, if ten th [...] ſand did not do it, it may be as truly ſaid, The Diſſenters did not do it.

So by this bleſſed ſort of School Reaſoning, it may be true, and very proper to ſay, the Diſſenters did it, and the Diſſenters did not do it, both at the ſame time.

This is the Art of Reaſoning which I confeſs my ſelf untaught in and when I handle a Cauſe that wants it, [37] I'll go to School to learn it, but I thank GOD I am defending a Cauſe and a People, who want nothing but Truth in the plaineſt Dreſs to defend them, and a plain Fellow is therefore the fitter to plead for them.

Sincerity is the Glory of a Chriſtian, it makes his Life all of a piece with his Profeſſion, this is the Glory of the Cauſe of the Diſſenters, which is like the People, plain and ſincere, if they have ſlipt in any thing, Humanum eſt Errare, but they have fallen like Chriſtians to riſe again: And what People in the World has done it leſs? in Thirty Years Oppreſſion, they have ſtood their Ground, they have upheld the Juſtice of their Non-conformity, till tyred with perſecuting them, the very Church that oppoſed them has yielded to Truth, and complyed with their moſt reaſonable Demands.

To charge the Body for the Miſtake of a few, is unjuſt and unfair, and yet I dare ſay, that the Fact is not right neither, viz. That they really own'd the Diſpenſing Power in any one Addreſs, or any other way countenanc'd it than tacitly, and by conſequence without Deſign

I could ſay a great deal to defend their General Behaviour towards the Church.

They have always behaved decently and reſpectfully, as to a Body of Fellow Chriſtians, with whom, th [...] they cannot Conform to their Eccleſiaſtical Conſtitution, they deſir'd no Difference in Matters Civil and Neighbourly, I cannot think any Body will cenſure them for this—.

They have defended themſelves againſt their Argument, but not againſt their Perſons, they have kept their Conſciences, but ſubmitted every thing elſe to the Civil Government: Nay, they have gone further, they have not only acquieſc'd in the Civil Government of the Church of England, Magiſtracy, but, on all occaſions, when Popery and Tyranny have invaded the [38] Church of England, they have joyn'd with them as their Brethren, and as Perſons embark'd in the ſame Bottom with them, both as to Civil and Religious Intereſts.

When the late King Careſs'd the Diſſenters, whe [...] he uſed all poſſible Artifice to draw them in to ſide with him againſt the Church of England, he found it impoſſible; But the Church of England being the [...] in Diſtreſs, and threatned with Deſtruction by the High [...]ommiſſion Court, and ſeveral Gentlemen applying to the Diſſenters to joyn in calling over the Prince of Orange, they readily laid aſide all their Reſentments at their former ill Uſage, and not diſtinguiſhing the Niceties and Diſputes between them, as Church of England and Diſſenter, at ſuch a time as that; the [...] joyn'd heartily as one General Body of Proteſta [...] United in Intereſts, United in Doctrine, however differing in Opiuions and Circumſtances; and Capitulating for their Liberty only, they univerſally joyn'd in [...] Bleſſed Revolution of this Iſland.

If any Man will undertake to cenſure the Con [...] of the Diſſenters in this Caſe, and ſay, they Acted with leſs Policy than Charity, or with more Good Nature than Diſcretion, I muſt deſire them to remember, the Diſſenters and the Church in England ought to be conſidered in ſeveral and ſeparate Capacities.

  • 1. As a Nation, and reſpecting their Civil Policy as Engliſh-Men, they ſtand all upon [...] Foundation, viz. Of Law, Liberty and Rig [...] when ever they ſeparate, they are both deſtroy'd and both undone, and therefore, when ever the Diſpute comes to be between Liberty and Tyranny, between Law and Diſpenſing Power, Property and Arbitrary Government, the Church of England and Diſſenter [...] were ever together, as one Body of Free- [...] Engliſh-Men, United in Oppoſition to Slavery [39] and Bondage, and they muſt both have been diſtracted, if it had been otherwiſe.
  • 2. As Proteſtants, reſpecting Reformation in general, they are ſtill one United Body of Chriſtians, in Doctrine, Charity and Intereſt the ſame, and therefore, when ever the Diſpute comes to be between the Papiſt and the Proteſtant, between Idolatry and true Worſhip, between the Purity of Religion and the Teaching for Doctrines the Commandments of Men, they are ſtill one Body of Proteſtants, Deteſting and Renouncing the Errors of Rome, Eſpouſing heartily the true Reformation, and Profeſſing together the ſame Lord JESUS.
  • 3. But if you reſpect them as Particular Churches, then indeed you find them differing in Judgement and Opinion about the Circumſtantials of Religion, ſuch as Habits, Ceremonies, Worſhip and Diſcipline; yet this Difference, as it is not eſſential to Religion; ſo it does not, or, at leaſt, ought not to break in upon their Mutual Charity, or National Intereſt; much leſs upon their Civility and good Manners, and therefore all Revilings and Reproaches are to be carefully avoided between the Lovers of Peace on both ſides, and 'tis what the Diſſenters have always pleaded for, having ſuffered moſt by that [...] ſage; and I hope, ſhall be the laſt that return upon the Church, what they have ſo long complained of.
  • 4. In ſpeaking of them as regarding the Church of Scotland, this Diſtinction alſo ought to be made, viz. That the Diſſenters were once a part of the Church of England, and have only ſeparated from them for Purity of Worſhip, Church Government, &c. 'Tis therefore [40] quite another thing for them, to deſire to be reſtored to their National Union, than for the Church of Scotland, who never were a part of their Body; And ſince yet they do not offer to comply, but on Terms juſtifyable by the Word of GOD, there remains no Cenſure due to them, but ſuch as do blame them, ſhow their want of Judgment and want of Charity both together; Nor is it any ſufficient Exception, to ſay they did not declare againſt the Compliances of any, ſince they have always in Practice done it, and 'tis known they have no Power of Cenſure—.

Thro' infinit Perſecutions, Fines, Jails, and harraſſing of ſeveral kinds, they are at laſt arrived to a legal Liberty, a true Foundation Right which is called a Toleration; on this Foot they now ſtand.

On all Occaſions they have declar'd they cannot comply with the Church in the Article of Biſhops—, Comprehenſions have been projected; but they have always been concluded impracticable, and the Presbyterian declares himſelf not able to conform.

Their Difference are meerly conſciencious, they have ſuffered all Severities for their Conſciences, and cannor without great want of Charity, be diſtruſted or ſuſpected as Epiſcopally inclined.

CONCLUSION.

IT remains to ſay ſometing here to the preſent Circumſtances of both Kingdoms as now going to incorporate and unite, and in this I ſhall be very plain; but, I hope, not at all injurious to any body, and ſhall direct my words as General as I can.

[41] The Word Union directs my Diſcourſe, Union is the Theme; and 'tis Peace in this Union I ſhall plead for; however, you contemn the Man, liſten to the Doctrine; for let who will ſend the Teacher, the Teaching is from Heaven.

I cannot but think every Obſtruction to this Doctrine, out of Seaſon, I am ſorry ſo Juſt a hint ſhould give ſo great Offence, but Truth will never fail to juſtifie its Owner.

It cannot but be out of Seaſon, to talk of the ſinfulneſs of a thing after 'tis done, which we applauded or at leaſt, againſt which we ſaid nothing before.

It cannot but be out of Seaſon to rip up the Follies and Miſtakes of Men who are dead, and cannot anſwer for themſelves, eſpecially of Good Men, whoſe ſhining Patterns deſerve better Treatment.

It cannot but be out of Seaſon, to Preach up diſtruſt between a Society of Brethren at a time, when they are going to unite.

It cannot but be out of Seaſon, to fill the Heads of the People with theſe Diſtruſts, and raiſe Jealouſies and Diviſions, where General Charity, and mutual Aſſiſtance muſt be the Principal Humane Support of both.

In the preſent Circumſtances of theſe Kingdoms, I know nothing ſo eſſential to the Felicity of both, as mutual Confidence in, and Affection to one another.

The want of this is the only thing that can make all the Flegmatick Predictions of the Enemies of both come to paſs, Union of Nations, without Union of People, Union in Generals, without Union in Particulars, Union of Conſtitution, without Union of Intereſt, will make the Union a meer Name and bring to paſs all the Miſchiefs either ſide can apprehend.

'Twill defeat all the Endeavours either ſide can exert, to convince one another of their Sincerity; every kind Action, every Conceſſion, every Contrivance to oblige and engage on either ſide, will be rendred ſuſpected, [42] and taken for Traps and Snares to draw in and circumvent one another.

Mutual Diſtruſt will be the Poiſon of every Good Deſire, 'twill ruine Commerce, debauch Converſation ſlacken Endeavours, diſcourage Friends, encourage Enemies, blow up Feuds, ſcandalize Religion, diſhnour God, and ruine the Nation.

I ſhall ſum up this Matter here in as ſhort a Head as the Subject will permit, I have not room to ſpeak to the Head of the Diſſenters here in Scotland, [...] I purpoſed to do, I hope, in another place, I may [...] that Caſe, together with my Thoughts about Toleration, in a larger manner: Mean time, I deſire to apply a little what has been ſaid to the preſent Circumſtance between the Diſſenters and their Accuſers—

Firſt, I frankly own the Diſtruſt and Jealouſies endeavour'd to be fomented here, between the Church of Scotland and the Diſſenters in England, is far from being the General Act of the Miniſtry, or of the moſt Judicious of the People here: And among thoſe [...] of the Reverend Miniſters, who I have the Honour [...] Converſe with, I find a General Concern, that [...] thing ſo Unkind ſhould be offer'd to them; Nor ſhall I fail to do them all the Juſtice, both here and in England, that I can on that Head, that the Spirit of diſtruſt may ſpread no farther, and the Innocent [...] not be Cenſur'd with the Guilty.

My Diſcourſe therefore is not to them, but to th [...] who the Unhappy Temper has prevail'd upon, and who are too much drawn in to entertain fatal Suſpicions, and ill grounded Prejudices, againſt their Brethren, and 'tis to them I crave the Liberty of ſpeaking.

What Love Gentlemen? What Charity? What Mutual Aſſiſtance? What Advantages of Commerce? What Strength againſt Foreign, or Guard againſt Domeſtick Enemies? what Security of Liberty at Home, or Safety [43] from Encroachments Abroad? If we cannot truſt one another.

'Tis mutual Diſtruſt has kept theſe Nations ſo long divided, and been the Occaſion of ſuch Seas of Blood being ſhed between them; all the widowed Families, the helpleſs Orphans, the diſtreſt Provinces in either Kingdom, for theſe 300 Years bypaſt, have been principally produc'd by this Monſter—. This Child of Hell has been in every Miſchief, in every Plot, in every War between the two Nations.

To deſtroy this Devil, this preſent Union is contrived; 'tis for this all the Councils of both Kingdoms have been imployed; 'Tis to prevent this all the Enemies of our Peace have ſtruggled: And if after all the Hazards run, all the Tumults, Rabbles and Miſchiefs threatned, all the Endeavours of the Queen and her wiſeſt Counſellors, this part ſhould not be obtained, all the Attempts of a politick Union will be in vain.

What ſhall we ſay to an Endeavour after an Union, is as it were concluded between the Nations, to render the beſt People in both Nations, and perhaps in the World ſuſpected to one another—. Shall I, thro' Favour, or Fear of Reproach, ſay 'tis Honeſt, or Fair, or Chriſtian, or Seaſonable: God forbid I ſhould dare to approve, what the Scripture ſays himſelf hates, Prov. 6. 19. Him that ſoweth Diſcord among Brethren.

Brethren of the Church of Scotland, If the Diſſenters in England are not to be truſted; whither will ye ſeek? what ſhall your Temporal Peace depend upon? what upholds the Intereſt of Religion in Britain; but that Glorious Body of Proteſtants, that from a few Years of the firſt Reformation, have been dayly Confeſſors for that Purity of Worſhip, which they always profeſt, and which you enjoy?

Why ſhould they be diſtruſted that never abandon'd their Cauſe, that never deſerted the ſtrong Foundation of Truth and Liberty, that have defended it, and are at laſt built upon it in common with your ſelves.

[44] The Laws of Britain are their Safety now, and yours alſo; the Civil Capacity is the Foundation Security now of your Religious Capacity; Magna charta is yours by the Union as well as theirs; the Great Liberties of England are now laid open in common with you—, a Foundation ſo ſtrong, ſo certain, ſo ſure, that ſhould the greateſt Monarchs that ever reign'd in Britain invade it, even the Perſecutors themſelves would join with you, to pull them down.

You are all built upon Law and Liberty, that is the Rock that ſupports you all, and you have now nothing to do, but like your Stones in an Arch, by ſhouldering up one another, make your Strength invincible; thus united like the ſame Arch, the more weight is laid on you, the ſtronger you grow; but diſlocate one Stone only, and it falls by its own weight, into a heap of meer Rubbiſh and Diſorder.

Suffer a Stranger to exhort you to what your own Intereſt ought to guide you to, and to what your Experience will bleſs him for hereafter, unleſs by your unbelief, your Careaſſes fall in this wilderneſs of Strife, and if that ſhould happen, your Poſterity will acknowledge it.

Study Peace, Study to be Quiet, and mark ſuch as ſow Diviſions among you—; for where there is Strife and Contention, there is Every evil Work.

For my ſelf, I ſhall ſay little, I have quitted the juſt Reſentment at unſufferable Inſolencies, that I might with the utmoſt Calmneſs of Mind, move Scotland to Peace, and practiſe the thing I exhort to—; the Gentleman that oppoſes me in this, ſhall not rally me only in Print, but he ſhall trample me under his Feet; I am content to be all that is contemptible and vile in his Eyes, and in every Mans elſe, if I can but be inſtrumental in the leaſt to this bleſſed healing Temper.

I can hear him and his Platterers go about defaming my Morals to leſſen my Argument, reproaching [45] the Man, to weaken his Diſcourſe, a certain Token of the ſterility of better Anſwers—. It moves me not—. It ſhall all be in vain—. Slander and Backbiting ſhall do me no Injury—. I have been an open Reprover of other Mens Vices at the extremeſt Hazard—. If my own Practice had been ſcandalous, as theſe Men ſuggeſt, I ſhould, long ſince, have had it Printed in my Forehead; for this is not the firſt time it has been attempted. I am ſorry they force me to ſay any thing in my own Defence, a moſt inſignificant Triffle to what I am upon: But as 'tis done with a Deſign to leſſen the Eſteem of what I ſay in this Cauſe, I am oblig'd to ſpeak. They report me a Drunkard, a Swearer, a Sabbath-breaker, and what not—. Impotent Slanders! what Shift is Malice driven to? The Iſſue is ſhort and plain, and their Honeſty ſhall be tryed by it. I challenge them to bring the Man either here, or in England, that ever ſaw me drink to Exceſs, that ever heard me ſwear; or in ſhort, can charge my Converſation with the leaſt Vice or Immorality, with Indecency, Immodeſty, Paſſion, Prophaneneſs, or any thing elſe that deſerves Reproach; when they can do this, I'll burn this Book at the Mercat Croſs, and deſire all the World to regard no more what I ſay, and till they can do it, all Honeſt Men will abhor the Practice.

'Tis hard, Gentlemen, to force any Man to ſay thus much of his own Character, and ſo far, as it looks like Oſtentation, I ask Pardon for it; I am far from valuing my ſelf upon negative Vertue; yet I thank God that I am able to ſay thus much, and thought my ſelf oblig'd to convince the World how they are impoſed upon, and how a Stranger is treated here; and I beg the Gentlemen that uſe me thus, not to oblige me to recriminate upon their Morals, which I could do with too much Advantage.

It wounds every Honeſt Man to the Soul, to ſee a Spirit of Bitterneſs and Slander gone out among you, [46] biting and devouring, and diſtruſting one another, at a time, and in a very Debate of National Union.

I verily believe God in his Providence has determined the Bleſſed Union of theſe two Nations; I foreſee all the Malice of Hell cannot oppoſe it; the ſtrange concurrence of Circumſtances points out the Finger of Providence in every Point of it, 'thas been made up of Miracle, and unaccountable Junctures in its Periods. I beſeech you Gentlemen, let not your unbelieving rob you of the Bleſſing of it, and adjourn the Comforts ſo, that like the Elders at Samaria, you ſhould ſee it, but not taſte of it.

I ſee nothing objected but Chimeras, Maybe's, ſuppoſes, Suggeſtions—, what-ifs, and the like; one convincing Demonſtration of the ſincerity of your Brethren [...] England will cruſh them all, and how will you be aſham'd of your Suſpicions and Jealouſies, how will you regret the unkind Treatment of your Friends, who will thus requit you Good for Evil, and heap Coals of Fire on your Heads,

If you would compare the certain Evils you have avoided by it, with the ſuggeſted Evils that they ſay are in proſpect, there can be no rational Compariſon drawn, Jacobitiſm. Popiſh Succeſſion, French Tyranny, Popery and War—, theſe are avoided, and muſt have followed, what can there be before you to equal theſe.

If therefore you have any regard to Juſtice, to Truth, to your Intereſt, to your Religion, Liberty or Poſterity, calm your Minds, and fortify your Souls with peaceable Ideas, leave Jealouſies and Suſpicions to ly aſleep in the miſty heads of the Ignorant; For diſtruſt is the Product of a Barren Underſtanding, if your Eyes are open, you cannot but ſee your Safety and Proſperity in an hearty Affection, an Union of Love, an Union of Intreſts, and an Union of Charity.

[47] Without it, all's an empty Shadow, and muſt in time tend either to the Ruine of the General Peace, or of the particular oppoſers of it.

My Friends tell me I lay my ſelf too low in this and that the Adverſe Party have Ingenuity little enough to inſult me upon this head; indeed I find little Ingenuity enough in the Party: But when I conſider who they are, how mean in Character, how ſeandalouſly few in Number, how empty their Malice, and how ridiculous their Methods with me, 'tis a compleat Satisfaction, and I am perfectly unconcern'd for the reſt.

Moſt of the Perſons, whoſe ill treatment I complain of are realy contemptible in every part of them; their Principles, [...] they are oppoſite to mine, are ſo to all Honeſt Men, their Reproaches I value not enough to gratifie ſo much as their meaneſt Expectations; for with me it ſhall ever be calm without, when it is clear within; and for juſt Matters of Scandal, I have [...]airly defyed them.

As they are Enemies to God, ſo they are to the Government, to the Reformation; and to Good Men, and by Conſequence to the Union, which is plainly the Work of the firſt, and the deſi [...] of the laſt, and it is the Glory of her Majeſties Government, that it aims at nothing but what concurrs both with the Glory of one, and the Wiſhes of the other, I mean Piery and Peace.

If there was any thing elſe in the Deſign, I bleſs God, I was never a Slave to any Government in the World; I was never frighted by Power, when I was [...] by its [...], and I could never be brib'd by its Gi [...]s, when in the moſt proper circumſtances to want them, I would not write a word, no, nor for the Queen her ſelf, if my Conference and Principles did not ſay Amen to the Subject; and I challenge the World to ſay, when ever I acted otherwiſe.

The Party therefore in nothing more miſtake me, than in thinking, that when, for Peace ſake, I avoid Reflecting on their Follies, 'tis for any Value or Fear [48] of their Reſentment, they muſt be little acquainted with the Scenes I have acted in the World, who know me no better than that, and I refer them to the Reſentments of Men much more Capital than their Ambitious Thoughts can pretend to, and let them ſee the [...] Influence their Anger has had on me.

But all this Humility of mine is for the ſake of a few, a very few indeed, who, tho' Paſſion and Prejudice may over-rule them; and run them to Inconvenien [...], tho' they may go a little out of themſelves, I [...] hope are good Men in the Main, and Deſign no gen [...] ral Miſchief, theſe, however they treat me, I am [...] of expoſing, and tho' in this they unwarrily propagate the Jacobite Cauſe, and unhappily fall in [...] that fatal Principle that would ruine us all, yet [...] Tenderneſs to their Characters and Office, and [...] other Account, I behave calmly and carefully to [...] hoping, that in due time, they ſhall be bet [...]r informed, and then, I doubt not, they will do me Juſtice—

For the reſt, their Principles are Abominable, their Ways of Propagating them are Unchriſtian and Irrational, their Methods are Deteſted by all honeſt Men, and to me they merit the utmoſt Contempt.

Very few alſo are the Number of the [...] ceiv'd Proſelites they have made, not one in twenty, even of the Miniſters that I have known, are of [...] Opinion: And I have ſuch a Teſtimony from [...] of the beſt of that Reverend Body, of their Satisfac [...] in my honeſt Deſign, their Reſentment of this [...], and their juſt Regard to the Diſſenters in England, that I can, with the utmoſt Peace, bear the Reproa [...] of the ſmall Number that thus Attack me.

May the God of Peace move this Nation to thoughts of their own Happineſs, and cool the evil Spirit that now endeavours to diſquiet the Minds of thoſe th [...] otherwiſe mean no ill to their Native Countrey.

FINIS.
Distributed by the University of Oxford under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Zitationsvorschlag für dieses Objekt
TextGrid Repository (2020). TEI. 4297 A short view of the present state of the Protestant religion in Britain as it is now profest in the episcopal church in England the Presbyterian church in Scotland and the dissenters in both. University of Oxford Text Archive. . https://hdl.handle.net/21.T11991/0000-001A-5D34-2