1.
Mr Addison.
POEMS ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS.
WITH A DISSERTATION UPON The Roman POETS.
By Mr. ADDISON.
LONDON: Printed for E. CURLL in Fleet-ſtreet. 1719.
PREFACE.
[]NOW the Tranſlations of Mr. Addiſon's POEMS ap⯑pear together, it may not be improper to make a few Obſerva⯑tions on Modern Latin Poetry, and in particular the following Compo⯑ſitions.
Since the general Diſuſe and Cor⯑ruption of the Latin Tongue, there are not many Attempts in Poetry in that Language that retain the Purity and [vi] Graces of the Auguſtan-Age. The Italians, by the Encouragement of the Houſe of MEDICIS, firſt began the Study and Imitation of the beſt Roman Poets; and about the Time of Leo the Xth, there appeared a great Number of fine Genius's, who endea⯑vour'd to ſhake off the Barbarity, and poliſh the Ruſt of an ignorant Age. The Event very near anſwer'd their Expectations, and the Muſes ſeem'd to be re-inſtated in their old Land of Inheritance. The Reader may ſee a Collection of their beſt Pieces in a Volume intitul'd Poetae Italici; but among all of them Vida is the moſt pure and elegant, tho' ſome are of⯑fended at the perpetual Imitation of his Darling VIRGIL. The French have nothing conſiderable that I have [vii] ſeen in this way, but Rapin, whoſe Poems every where diſcover a Roman Colouring; and as he does not fol⯑low VIRGIL'S Expreſſion ſo nearly as Vida, he is more agreeable to the Judicious. Vida with an eaſy Feli⯑city adapts VIRGIL'S Words to every Subject, Rapin chuſes rather to imitate his manner of Expreſſion than borrow his very Phraſes: So that we may ſay of theſe Two, as Mr. Dryden does of Fletcher's and Johnſon's copy⯑ing Shakeſpear:
The Dutch themſelves have ſome no mean Latin Poems, as is evident from the Works of Grotius and Heinſius. [viii] Buchanan is the juſt boaſt of the Scots Nation: He was a perfect Maſter of the Latin Tongue, knew all its Strength and Beauties, and very happily tranſ⯑fus'd them into his own Poems. That neglected Piece of his De Sphaerâ is upon ſo nice and difficult a Subject as fine and noble a Poem as ever was wrote; tho' I don't know by what Fate, the Modern Criticks are never pleas'd to mention it to his Honour. I beg their Pardons for calling them Criticks, a Name too glorious for theſe Borrowers of others Opinions, who live upon the Plunder of Sca⯑liger and Rapin without conſulting the Originals; where, if they have happen'd to praiſe any thing, theſe Gentlemen take all upon truſt, and [ix] are Strangers to every Fault and Ex⯑cellence they have omitted to Blame or Commend.
As to our own Nation, the Occa⯑ſional Copies in the Ʋniverſity Col⯑lections, are the beſt Poems we have; the chief of which are publiſh'd in the Muſae Anglicanae, tho' I have read a great many more which deſerve an equal Honour. Out of theſe we have ſingled the Poems of Mr. Addiſon, as the moſt ſhining Ornaments of that Work, and given the unlearned Reader the Pleaſure of admiring them in his Native Language. I will not ſay that it is abſolutely neceſſary to be a good Latin Poet in order to become a good Engliſh One, but I [x] am ſure that he who imitates the Antients in their own Language will ſlide more eaſily into their way of Thinking, adapt their Graces by De⯑grees, and beautifully tranſplant them into his Mother-Tongue; and theſe are no vulgar Beauties in an Engliſh Poem. I could mention how ſuc⯑ceſsfully this was done by Milton formerly, and in our Times by Mr. Addiſon, if it did not draw me into too great a length of Pre⯑face, which more properly belongs to the following Pieces.
Moſt of theſe, tho' very perfect in their kinds, I am apt to believe were deſign'd as Trials of a great Genius, after the modeſt manner of [xi] the Antients, who began to ſport and play in Eſſays of their Poetical Strength before they attempted Sub⯑jects of a greater Dignity. To ſpeak of them in general, I obſerve that the Language is Pure, Elegant, and Sounding; the Verſification eaſy and numerous, happily adapted to the different Subjects it deſcribes, free from the affected Turns, Puerile Le⯑vities, and other Flatneſſes, which betray a falſe Taſte, and Defect of Judgment. The Critick every where accompanies the Poet, and even here a diſcerning Eye might have ſeen the Promiſes of a CAMPAIGN and a CATO.
[xii] The Battel of the Pygmies and Cranes, The Puppet-Show, and The Bowling-Green, are of the Mock-Heroic kind, the Subjects mean and trivial, ſeemingly incapable of Poetical Ornaments, but are rais'd to the Heroic, by a ſplendid Boldneſs of Expreſſion, a Pomp of Verſe, by Metaphors, Alluſions, and Simili⯑tudes drawn from Things of a higher Claſs, and ſuch as are ſuited by Nature to convey Ideas of Great⯑neſs and Magnificence to the Mind. VIRGIL, in his Georgicks, is the great Maſter in this way, with this Difference only, that his is a ſerious Geandeur, this a Mimic one, his pro⯑duces Admiration, this Laughter.
[xiii] The Reſurrection is a noble Piece, drawn after the Painter with a maſter⯑ly Hand. As it has been ſpoken to by the Tranſlator, I leave the Rea⯑der to his Obſervations.
The Barometer is a fine Philoſo⯑phical Poem, deſcribing the Effects of the Air on that wonderful Inſtru⯑ment with great Exactneſs, as well as in the moſt beautiful Poetry. The Odes to Dr. Burnett and Dr. Hannes are written in the true Spirit of HORACE, and are only equall'd among the Moderns by thoſe excel⯑lent ones of the Latter.
[xiv] The Peace of Reſwick is here plac'd laſt, but firſt in the Original, in which the Author ſeems to have exerted all his Powers, to make it ſhine above his other Compoſitions. It is, indeed, a Maſter-Piece, the Images are choſen with a nice Judg⯑ment, work'd up with a Delicacy of Imagination, and plac'd in the ſtrong⯑eſt Light. Every thing ſtrikes at the firſt View, and yet will bear the ſtricteſt Eye to re-examine it. The Deſcriptions being both juſt and ſurprizing, put the Mind upon the full ſtretch as they are preparing, and exceed the boldeſt Expectations when finiſh'd. Upon this occaſion I can't help remarking, that the Art of [xv] War being ſo much chang'd ſince the Roman Times, it muſt be a difficult Task to find Words in that Lan⯑guage to expreſs even the common Ideas of a Modern Battel; but to do it in all its terrible Scenes of new Inventions was reſerv'd for the Pen of Mr. Addiſon.
The Tranſlators, I hope, need not make any excuſe to the Reader, tho' they will want an Apology to the Author, whoſe Excellencies their Co⯑pies but faintly imitate. All that I can ſay in our Defence, is, that ſome of them have fell into much worſe Hands before, who have mangled his Senſe, and debas'd his Poetry, by a cold, unſpirited Tranſlation. Thus [xvi] if he does ſome Kindneſs in a moral way, who takes off part of an In⯑jury, tho' he can't redreſs the Whole, we may hope at leaſt to be forgiven who have corrected many Abuſes caſt on Mr. Addiſon by former Authors, tho' we could not in all things do him the Juſtice he de⯑ſerves.
[...] inv. E Kirkall. sculp.
Ad Inſigniſſimum Virum D. THO. BURNETTUM, Sacrae Theoriae Telluris Autorem.
AN ODE To the Learned Dr. Thomas Burnett, AUTHOR of The Theory of the EARTH.
[]AD D.D. HANNES, INSIGNISSIMUM MEDICUM & POETAM.
AN ODE TO Dr. HANNES, An Eminent PHYSICIAN and POET.
[19]ΠΥΓΜΑΙΟ-ΓΕΡΑΝΟ-ΜΑΧΙΑ, SIVE, PRAELIUM INTER PYGMAEOS & GRUES commiſſum.
THE BATTEL OF THE PYGMIES and CRANES.
[31]BAROMETRI DESCRIPTIO.
THE BAROMETER: OR, WEATHER-GLASS.
[]MACHINAE GESTICULANTES.
THE PUPPET-SHOW.
[]THE RESURRECTION: A POEM.
[]The FOURTH EDITION.
THE PREFACE.
[]THE following Lines are eſteemed by the beſt Judges to be the fineſt Sketch of the Reſurrection, that any Age or Language has produced: Nor do their only Excellence conſiſt in being an accurate Poem; but alſo in being an exact Copy of the Painter's Ori⯑ginal upon the Altar in Magdalen College; but ſo much improved with [82] all the ſtrongeſt Figures and moſt lively Embelliſhments of a Poetical Deſcription, that the Reader receives a double Satisfaction in ſeeing the two Siſter-Arts ſo uſeful to each other, in borrowing mutual Helps, and mu⯑tual Advantages.
It is, indeed, wonderful to find in the narrow Compaſs of ſo few Pages all the moſt dreadful Circum⯑ſtances of that laſt terrible Criſis of Time: The Poem is a beautiful and ſuccinct Epitome of all that has or can ever be ſaid on that important Subject; the very Text, which the ingenious Mr. Young has ſo largely and elegantly paraphras'd upon, in his excellent Poem on the LAST DAY.
[83] Mr. Addiſon is to be diſtinguiſh'd thro' all his Performances both Latin and Engliſh (and in his Latin, parti⯑cularly in the following one, and that on the Peace of Reſwick,) by the Strength of his Images, and by a forcible and unaffected Vivacity of Expreſſion, which none of our Mo⯑derns have attain'd to in ſo much Perfection; and which is very rarely to be met with even in any of the Antients ſince Virgil and Horace.
Having mention'd Mr. Addiſon, I cannot avoid congratulating my Country on his Preferment to one of her greateſt Civil Employments; nor forbear obſerving how happy we are in a KING, who has ſhown the [84] World that he will diſtribute his Fa⯑vours amongſt thoſe only, whom Merit and Virtue ſhall recommend to his Service.
With what uncommon Luſtre muſt that Man appear to Poſterity, who is not only the beſt Writer, and moſt candid Patron of the Age he lives in; but alſo the fineſt Gentleman, the ſincereſt Friend, the moſt affectionate Husband, the moſt accompliſh'd Stateſman, and the moſt exemplary Chriſtian? Under every one of theſe Views Mr. Addiſon gains the Eſteem and Admiration even of the bittereſt Enemies to that Cauſe which he ſo warmly eſpouſes, of the moſt furious Partiſans, and the moſt prejudic'd of Mankind.
[85] I muſt forbear to enlarge any far⯑ther on the Character of that truly great and good Man, leſt I draw upon my ſelf the Imputation of a Flatterer, by relating what all the World (except himſelf only) will allow to be the ſevereſt Truth.
I ſhall make no Excuſe for of⯑fering the following Poem to the World in an Engliſh DRESS, and under all the Diſadvantages of an imperfect Tranſlation. I have often read it in the Original with the greateſt Pleaſure and Satisfaction; and I hope it will need no Apo⯑logy to be willing to communi⯑cate ſo uſeful and ſublime an En⯑tertainment, [86] in the beſt manner I can, to thoſe of my Fellow-Subjects who are not qualify'd to read it in the Latin Original.
RESURRECTIO DELINEATA Ad Altare Coll. Magd. Oxon.
[]F [...]ller Pinxit ad Alt: Coll: Magd: Oxon: Delin Mburg. ſculpt. Univ. [...]
THE RESURRECTION: A POEM.
[]SPHAERISTERIUM.
[]THE BOWLING-GREEN.
[]PAX GULIELMI AUSPICIIS Europae reddita, 1697.
HONORATISSIMO VIRO CAROLO MONTAGUE ARMIGERO, SCACCHARII CANCELLARIO, AERARII PRAEFECTO, REGI à SECRETIORIBUS CONSILIIS, &c.
[]CUM tanta auribus tuis obſtrepat va⯑tum nequiſſimorum turba, nihil eſt cur queraris aliquid inuſitatum tibi conti⯑giſſe, ubi praeclarum hoc argumentum meis etiam numeris violatum conſpexeris. Quan⯑tum virtute bellicâ praeſtent Britanni, recens ex rebus geſtis teſtatur gloria; quàm verò in humanio⯑ribus Pacis ſtudiis non emineamus, indicio ſunt quos nuper in lucem emiſimus verſiculi. Quòd ſi CONGREVIUS ille tuus divino, quo ſolet, fu⯑rore correptus materiam hanc non exornâſſet, vix [124] tanti eſſet ipſa Pax, ut illâ laetaremur tot perditiſ⯑ſunis Poëtis tam miſerè decantatâ. At, dum alios inſector, mei ipſius oblitus fuiſſe videor, qui haud minores forſan ex Latinis tibi moleſtias allaturus ſum, quàm quas illi ex vernaculis ſuis carminibus at⯑tulerunt; niſi quòd inter ipſos cruciatus lenimentum aliquod dolori tribuat tormenti varietas. Nec qui⯑dem unquam adduci poſſem, ut poëma patrio ſer⯑mone conſcriptum oculis tuis ſubjicerem, qui ab iſtis conatibus caeteros omnes ſcribendo non minùs deterres, quàm favendo excitaveris.
THE PEACE OF RESWICK.
[]To the Honourable Charles Montague, Eſq Chancellor of the Exchequer, Firſt Lord-Commiſſioner of the TREASURY, and Privy-Councellor to the KING.
[]SINCE your Ears are continually peſter'd by a wretched Set of Poets, you have no Reaſon to complain of any new Misfor⯑tunes [136] happening to you, when you ſhall find the following noble Subject debas'd by my Numbers. The Honour they have lately acquir'd by their Conqueſts, plainly ſhews how much the Engliſh excell all others in the Art of War; but how unequally low we are in the politer Studies of Peace, is evident from the Verſes we have lately pub⯑liſh'd.* If your Darling CONGREVE had not exert⯑ed his Divine Poetical Fury, with his uſual Happineſs, in the adorning of this Subject, [137] the PEACE it ſelf had been hardly worth our Joy, ſince it has been ſo miſerably cele⯑brated by ſo many vile Poe⯑taſters. But while I am bla⯑ming others, I may ſeem for⯑getful of my ſelf, who per⯑haps may give you as much trouble in my Latin Compo⯑ſitions, as they have before done in their Engliſh, unleſs the Variety of the Torment may bring ſome Mitigation to the Pain you are to ſuffer. For my part, I never could prevail upon my ſelf to offer you a POEM written in our Native Tongue, ſince you your ſelf deter all others by [138] your own Compoſitions from ſuch an Attempt, as much as you excite them by your Favour and Humanity. I am,
THE PEACE OF RESWICK.
[]Appendix A THE TABLE.
[]- AD Inſigniſſimum Virum D. THO. BUR⯑NETTUM, Sacrae Theoriae Telluris Autorem. Page 7
- To the Learned Doctor Thomas Burnett, Author of The Theory of the Earth. Page 9
- Ad D.D. HANNES, Inſigniſſimum Medicum & Poetam. Page 17
- To Dr. Hannes, an eminent Phyſician and Poet. Page 19
- ΠΥΓΜΑΙΟ-ΓΕΡΑΝΟ-ΜΑΧΙΑ, ſive Prae⯑lium inter Pygmaeos & Grues commiſſum. Page 25
- The Battel of the Pygmies and Cranes. Page 31
- BAROMETRI Deſcriptio. Page 51
- The Barometer: Or, Weather-Glaſs. Page 55
- []
- Machinae Geſticulantes. Page 63
- The Puppet-Show. Page 67
- RESURRECTIO delineata ad Altare Coll. Magd. Oxon. Page 87
- The Reſurrection. Page 95
- SPHAERISTERIUM. Page 109
- The Bowling-Green. Page 113
- Pax GULIELMI Auſpiciis Europae reddita, 1697. Page 125
- The Peace of Reſwick. Page 139
2.
Mr. ADDISON'S DISSERTATION ON THE Roman POETS.
Price One Shilling.
AUTHORS Names.
[]- I. Virgil.
- II. Lucretius.
- III. Ovid.
- IV. Statius.
- V. Lucan.
- VI. Claudian.
- VII. Horace.
- VIII. Juvenal.
- IX. Plautus.
- X. Terence.
- XI. Seneca.
- XII. Martial.
- XIII. Catullus.
- XIV. Tibullus.
- XV. Propertius.
1.
A DISSERTATION Upon the moſt celebrated Roman POETS.
Written originally in LATIN BY Joſeph Addiſon, Eſq
Made ENGLISH by CHRISTOPHER HAYES, Eſq
LONDON, Printed for E. CURLL in Fleet-ſtreet. MDCCXVIII.
DISSERTATIO DE INSIGNIORIBUS ROMANORUM POETIS.
[1]OMNIUM in re Poeti⯑ca maxime inclaruerunt Romani, & Romano⯑rum VIRGILIUS: Optimae quaeque Regulae huic Arti [2] inſervientes non tam Criticorum Praeceptis quam MARONIS exem⯑plo ſunt depromendae: Ut ideo de reliquis Heroici Carminis Scripto⯑ribus, recte ſtatuamus Virtutes & Vitia quae apud ſingulos occurrunt, lectioni conferamus Virgilianae; qui, ſi ullibi defecerit Bucolicis, nonnun⯑quam puriorem immiſcuit Styli ele⯑gantiam quam quae Paſtoribus con⯑veniat, & ſaepe grandior ſonat Car⯑minum Majeſtas quam quae tenui avenae conſona videatur: Apud quemlibet Georgicorum librum ini⯑mitabili quadam Sermonis Elegan⯑tia Res ruſticae explicantur, ſed ul⯑timus de Apum Natura valde praeter caeteros animum delectat; ubi dum [3] in tenui Argumento procedit Poe⯑ma, ſolennem quandam Sententia⯑rum & Verborum Pompam ſtudi⯑oſe affectet Poeta; Apum ideo O⯑pera Cyclopum aſſimulat Laboribus, nec majori Carminum tumultu AENEAE & TURNI recitat Cer⯑tamina, quam haſce Inſectorum Turmas inter ſeſe depraeliantes. U⯑bique exiguàe Reipublicae Duces, Populi, Studia, Mores, & tenue illud Imperium quod intra Alvea⯑rii Anguſtias exercetur, venuſta neſcio qua Carminis Magnificentia exprimuntur: Quin hoc certe in toto Opere praecipue occurrit admi⯑randum, quomodo dum Plantatio⯑nis, Paſtionis, & Agriculturae curas [4] exequitur Poeta, omiſſis uſitatioribus loquendi formulis, materiae tam in⯑cultae locutionem Poeticam accom⯑modaret, quomodo ignobiliori de⯑preſſus Argumento nunquam ad Stylum Plebeium Orationem demi⯑ſerat; ſed tanta undique apparet Locutionum vis, ut multi (quamvis temere) Georgicos etiam Aeneidi praetuliſſe non dubitarint; ſed in hoc Opere, per Argumentum, non licuit alias Poeſeωs Partes praeſtitiſ⯑ſe quam Styli & Deſcriptionum E⯑legantiam. Quod ad utrumque attinet, illud ſibi proprium ſemper vendicat MARONIS Pagina, ut quicquid exprimat mira quadam Dulcedine animum ingrediatur, & [5] quod deſcribat melius quam ſi O⯑culis ſubjiciatur, tanquam praeſens intueamur.
In Styli puritate proxime acce⯑dit LUCRETIUS, cujus Dictio, ſi obſoletae aliquando Verborum An⯑tiquitati, & Numeris pene ſolutis agnoſcas, illorum Palato qui Romane ſapiunt, perſuavis videatur. In De⯑ſcriptionibus tamen CLAUDIANO ſe⯑cundus debetur Honos, qui amoe⯑nas Rerum Imagines ubique venuſ⯑tiſſima contexuit Oratione, in hoc ſolummodo vitioſus, quod fuſius quam par eſt ſemper expatietur, eoſdem Verſus diverſis exponat Lo⯑quendi Modis; in hac Arte ſeſe [6] maxime profeciſſe ſatis noverat CLAUDIANUS, de quacunque enim re ſatagit, aſſidue ſemper quaerit quae deſcribenda ſunt, imo plurima ſumpſit Argumenta quae tota in Deſcriptionibus occupantur, ut videre eſt in Praefationibus, in Idylliis, in Libris de Raptu PRO⯑SERPINAE, de PHAENICE, HIS⯑TRICE, TORPEDINE, & ple⯑riſque Epigrammatum.
OVIDIUS (ut erat Aulici In⯑genii Homo) terſo quidem & polito Carmine res exhibuit amatorias, in caeteris tamen Operibus iſtiuſmodi occurrit Sermo quali in Triviis uti ſolent: Ille enim Ingenio ſuo con⯑fiſus [7] de operoſiori Dictione elabo⯑randa parum erat ſatis ſolicitus: In Libro tamen Metamorphoſeωs va⯑rias optime depinxit Animalium Mutationes, dum prior paulatim exuitur Forma & nova ſuperindu⯑citur.
Utrumque hoc quod jam tracta⯑mus Poetis Officium non raro op⯑time praeſtitit PAPINIUS, LU⯑CANUS neutrum, cujus Dictio quanquam multum ſonat inflata, nulla tamen Phraſeorum aut Epi⯑thetorum Venuſtate animatur, ſed Orationi magis ſolutae convenit quam Poeticae, imo certe tali ple⯑runque utitur Verborum delectu, [8] qualem vel Liber dedignetur Ser⯑mo. Et quanquam in Deſcriptio⯑nibus ſaepiſſime verſatur, & in hu⯑juſmodi diverticula nunquam non excurrit, raro tamen, ut debet, Opus abſolvit: Jam vero quod ad STA⯑TIUM attinet; plurima certe com⯑poſuit ſummis Poetarum invidenda, ſed inter magnas Virtutes maxima occurrunt Vitia; in Dictione enim Verba nimis admittit ſeſquipedalia, nullaque de Argumento habita ra⯑tione vana numeris miſcet Toni⯑trua: Nec minus in Deſcriptioni⯑bus peccat; nimio enim calori in⯑dulgens, dum totis viribus excellere conatur, ultra Finem tendit opus, et in tumorem excreſcit; in utrum⯑que [9] hujuſmodi vitium aliquando incidit CLAUDIANUS. Jam ve⯑ro quoniam de VIRGILII Aeneidis Argumento varii multa ſcripſerunt & praeclara, pauca ſolummodo de STATII & LUCANI Carmini⯑bus ſunt advertenda; utpote quae Latinorum omnium ſola Epica haberi debent. De LUCANO id ſaepe in Diſputationem venit, an Hiſtoria qua conſtat Pharſalicum Poema, ido⯑neum ſit Heroici Carminis Argu⯑mentum. Vera ideo Heroicae Poe⯑ſeωs Natura inquirenda eſt, quam apud Librum de Dignitate & Aug⯑mentis Scientiarum his Verbis op⯑time exhibuit VERULAMIUS noſtras. Ex quo ſatis patet veram [10] Hiſtoriam cum Epico Poemate male convenire; & proinde LUCANUM quoad Argumentum maxime defe⯑ciſſe. Quinque in illius Poemate maxime emicant Heroes, CAESAR, POMPEIUS, BRUTUS, CATO, & CICERO: Omnes ſane tam Vita inſignes quam Morte luctuoſi; quorum Virtutes (quantum licuit per humanam Naturam) Perfectio⯑ni iſtae Heroicae, quam reliqui Poe⯑tae Ducibus ſuis falſo tribuerunt, proxime acceſſerant. LUCANUS CAESARI undique oblatrat, POM⯑PEII Partes ambitioſe fovet, ſed BRUTI & CATONIS Encomia, ob Stoicum (credo) illud Ingenium, quod cum his habuit commune, [11] maxime celebrat: Et plurima certe quae LUCANO objicias Philoſo⯑phiae hujuſcemodi ſunt referenda: Inde immodicus iſte Ingenii tumor, & ambitioſa Sententiarum oſtenta⯑tio, quam cum illa Hominum tur⯑ba ſemper habet in Deliciis; inde quae magna ſunt, quam quae bona ſunt, maluit praeferre. Hinc etiam in eximia illa Poeſeωs Virtute Paſſi⯑onibus excitandis ipſe (qui omnes Philoſophiae Affectus tanquam illi⯑citos exiſtimavit) male ſucceſſerat, cujus Vitii unicum tantum (ut ta⯑ceam caetera) Argumentum profe⯑ram: Poſtquam in Pugna Pharſa⯑lica CAESAR de Pompeio Victoriam reportaverit, LUCANUS maxime [12] debuit, ſi aliquid ab ipſa Hiſtoria alienum protuliſſet, lugubri quo⯑dam Carmine immeritam doluiſſe POMPEII ſortem; quippe in toto Opere ſummo habuit honore; vel ſaltem ipſum POMPEIUM (ut ingens patuit Doloris Argumentum) aut de amiſſa Romae Libertate, aut de Amicorum Mortibus, aut de propriis querentem Infortuniis, in⯑troduxiſſe oportuit. Poeta tamen ab omni hujuſmodi Dolore tam longe abeſt, ut POMPEIUM, ob⯑nixe hortaretur, poſtquam victus a Bello deceſſerat, ut CAESARIS Victoris ſui commiſereſcat, quia nempe CAESAR non ſine Scelere Victoria potitus eſt;
Quis tulerit Poetam tam ridicule philoſophantem? quaſi vero POM⯑PEIUS Senex, Exul, Miſer, Trium⯑umphatus, ob Victorem ſuum quamvis ſceleſtum Commiſeratio⯑nem quandam conciperet: Illum quidem maxime Stoice ſapuiſſe o⯑porterat, [14] qui omnibus hiſce Fortu⯑nae Donis ſpoliatus, tantam in nuda Virtute poneret Felicitatem. Sed nullus Poetarum niſi VIRGILIUS hujuſmodi afficiat Dolore: Alii plerunque dum moerorem aliquem Lectoribus inducerent, in illo pec⯑cant, quod nimia Prolixitate ſeſe in queſtus effundant, nec unquam ſatis Lachrymarum exhauſtum eſſe ſentiant, vel Ingenium, quod maxi⯑me poſſint, Verſibus infundendo, fa⯑ciunt ut magis Carmina miremur, quam materiam lugeamus. De u⯑troque cavit VIRGILIUS, qui mera ſemper Simplicitate luctuoſa ut in ſe ſunt exhibuit; & leviter quicquid dolet perſtrinxerat: ‘"Lamentati⯑ones [15] enim, inquit CICERO, de⯑bent eſſe breves & conciſae, quia Lachryma ſubito exareſcit, & difficile eſt Auditorem aut Le⯑ctorem in ſummo illo animi af⯑fectu tenere."’ Ut vero ad STA⯑TIUM redeamus, illi quidem Spi⯑ritus non raro feliciter aſſurgit, cui dum temperare nequit, neſcio quas projicit Ampullas, & vana Carmi⯑nibus addit Numerorum Terricula⯑menta. THEBAIDIS quidem Argumentum Ingenii ſui Truculen⯑tiae, ſed non Heroico Poemati ſa⯑tis aptum videatur: ETEOCLES enim, POLYNICES, & TYDE⯑US, quorum geſta hoc Carmine celebrantur, nihil habent eorum, ſi [16] unicam Fortitudinem demas, quae conveniunt Heroibus: Imo in toto Poemate nulla niſi Scelerum, qualia ſunt Parricidii, Perfidiae, Immani⯑tatis, Odiorum proferuntur Exem⯑plaria; dum in omnibus fere quos ſuo Carmine induxit VIRGILIUS praeclara quaedam illuceſcunt, & in ipſo AENEA ſummam Pietatem er⯑ga Does, Natum, Conjugem, A⯑micos, & Parentem, Oculis ſem⯑per habemus ſubjectam. Epitheta ple⯑runque STATIANA multum ſonant metaphorice, dum inanimatis illa tribuuntur quae Animalibus conve⯑niunt. In Verbis tamen nec raro ſine maxima Elegantia Metaphoras conſectatur CLAUDIANUS; VIR⯑GILIUS [17] in utriſque parciſſimus; STA⯑TIUS plurimas rerum ſimilitudines compoſuit, multum ſaepe de VIR⯑GILII Ingenio referentes, in qua arte melius ſucceſſerat LUCANUS, ſi aliquid unquam mediocre admi⯑ſerat; ſed dum VIRGILIUS ad A⯑pes, ad Formicas, & iſtiuſmodi Natura ludicra deſcendit, nihil un⯑quam niſi Quercum fulminatam, Terrae Exitium, aut Mundi Confla⯑grationem ebuccinat LUCANUS. Et hiſce tandem, quorum alii non operae Pretium duxerunt meminiſſe, de Heroicis Scriptoribus breviter perſtrictis; de Satyricis reſtat di⯑cendum; quorum omnium JUVE⯑NALIS & HORATIUS Pal⯑mam [18] dubiam quidem fecerunt: In⯑ter Literatos enim multum diſcre⯑pat, utrum mordax illa Ingenii acer⯑bitas, qua ſuam armavit paginam JUVENALIS, an potius HO⯑RATII feſtivae Irriſiones, magis Satyrae conveniant: Ut vero de utroque rectius ſtatuatur, pauca prius ſunt advertenda. Ob infamem vitae ſuae laſciviam, etiam nunc temporis, ma⯑le audit HORATIUS; Virtutem tamen ſemper rigide coluit JUVE⯑NALIS: Ille in abſolutiſſima AUGUSTI Aula verſatus eſt, hic in peſſima DOMITIANI Tem⯑pora incidiſſet: Proinde ut ad ſua & Saeculi utriuſque Ingenia Opera [19] accommodarent Poetae, HORA⯑TIUS totus in ludicro exercetur Argumento, nec Morum Licenti⯑am, ſed indecoras quaſdam Auli⯑corum Ineptias plerunque inſecta⯑tur; non ideo abfuiſſet quin irride⯑tur, ſi aliqua Styli ſeveritate ad le⯑viuſcula hujuſmodi caſtiganda ſe accinxiſſet: Graviſſima tamen in Temporibus ſuis reprehendit JUVE⯑NALIS, & de Vitiis ubique queri⯑tur quae vel pudeat recitare, & iſti ſane Materiae, ſumma Mentis Indig⯑natio, Orationis Ardor, & Ingenii Acrimonia, rectiſſime aptari videan⯑tur. Quamvis ubi ad Jocularia A⯑nimum demittit, non raro Satyris [20] Feſtivitatem fundit HORATIANAM. Uterque ideo (modo diverſum con⯑ſulas Argumentum) ſuo quidem Genere perfectiſſimus emicuit; in quo Ridiculum Acri melius, in hoc Acre Ridiculo. Reliqua certe HO⯑RATII Opera, Admiratione potius ſunt digna quam Encomiis, nec ma⯑jora ſolum Vituperatione, ſed etiam Laude. Jam vero quod ad Drama⯑ticos attinet, PLAUTI & TE⯑RENTII Argumenta, Sales, Elegan⯑tiae ubique adeo vulgantur, ut ni⯑hil de novo poſſit adjici: De SE⯑NECA vero tam diverſe ſentiunt, ut alii inter ſummos Tragicorum, alii infra Infimum annumerent: [21] Illi quidem Ingenium valde mag⯑num, Oratio elegans & conciſa, a⯑bundat Sententiis plerunque acutis, Stoicam ſemper Philoſophiam, quam amplexus eſt, redolentibus. Unde omnibus fere, qui Artem Dramati⯑cam parum ſapiunt, ſemper eſt in Deliciis; ſi tamen ad hanc reſpicias, Tragoediae ubique plurimum labo⯑rant, & iſtud vitii (ut reliqua prae⯑termittam) SENECAE peculiare vi⯑deatur, ut quoſcunque inducat In⯑terlocutores, nulla, ad Perſonas quas ſuſtinet, habita ratione, eundem ſemper unicuique tribuat loquendi modum: Omnes ſeveriora ſpirant Philoſophiae Dogmata, & quae Stoae [22] magis conveniant quam Theatro. E⯑adem ſemper Styli Magnificentia ſu⯑perbiunt Rex, & Nuncius: Imo ipſam Nutricem (plurima enim tam acute profert) Stoicorum Praeceptis non mediocriter imbutam ſentias. Inter Epigrammatiſtas potiſſimum emicu⯑erunt MARTIALIS & CLAU⯑DIANUS; Ille ſemper in extremo Poemate Ingenii ſubjecit acumen, & ſaepe ſimilia inſequitur Verbo⯑rum Tintinnabula; Hic per totum Epigramma ſuum diſpergit Salem, & venuſtiſſima ubique utitur Lati⯑nitatis Elegantia. Caeterum tamen Poetarum Vulgus, de iſtiuſmodi me⯑diocribus ſunt, quos nec Dii nec [23] Homines conceſſerunt; & quam⯑vis una aut altera apud affectatas CATULLI Oratiunculas, TIBULLI aut PROPERTII inhoneſtam pa⯑ginam, & Carmina incurioſa, illu⯑ceſcat Virtus, non tamen eſt Operae Pretium Gemmas inter Stercora eruere.
2.
A DISSERTATION Upon the moſt celebrated Roman POETS.
Made Engliſh from the Latin Original BY CHRISTOPHER HAYES, Eſq
LONDON, Printed in the Year 1718.
A DISSERTATION Upon the moſt celebrated Roman POETS.
[27]OF all the Nations in the World, the Romans have moſt excell'd in the Art of Poetry, and even among the Romans VIRGIL has been the moſt deſervedly celebra⯑ted; [28] from whom the juſteſt Rules of this Art are rather to be taken, than from the dry Precepts of the Criticks. To the End there⯑fore that we may the more truly aſcertain the Beauties and Faults which occur among the reſt of the Writers of Heroic Poetry, let us compare them with the Style of VIRGIL; who, if he be in any Thing deficient, it is when he has ſometimes in his Eclogues mingled ſuch a Purity of Style, as is not en⯑tirely agreeable with the Dialect of Shepherds; and frequently the Dig⯑nity of his Verſe ſeems no Way conſonant to the Rural Pipe. In every Book of his Georgicks, he [29] treats of Country Affairs with an in⯑imitable Elegancy of Style; but, above all, we are moſt delighted with his laſt Book, Of the Nature of BEES; where, in a Poem on ſo inconſiderable a Subject, our Au⯑thor purpoſely affects a peculiarly ſolemn and pompous Style. In this Piece he compares the Labours of the BEES to thoſe of the Cy⯑clops; and in the ſame lofty Num⯑bers recounts the Skirmiſhes of theſe little Inſects among themſelves, as he does the Rencounters of AENEAS and TURNUS. All along, the Generals of this ſmall Republick, the Populace, the Factions, the Cuſtoms and Forms of Govern⯑ment [30] exercis'd within the narrow Limits of the Bee-hive, are deſcrib'd with an inexpreſſible Beauty and Magnificence. Throughout the whole Work, what moſtly raiſes our Admiration, is, that in the Perſuit of his Diſcourſe on Plant⯑ing, Grazing, and Agriculture, (waving the common Forms of Speech) he ſuits his Poetick Diction to ſo unpolite a Theme; how, ſeemingly depreſs'd with the Mean⯑neſs of his Subject, he never ſinks into a Plebeian Style; but the Force and Energy of his Expreſſion are ſo conſpicuous, that many, too raſhly indeed, have not ſcrupled to prefer the Georgicks to the Aeneid: [31] But in a Work of this Nature, no other Parts of Poetry could be diſ⯑play'd, except an Elegance of Style and Deſcription: In both theſe Ways VIRGIL has this peculiar to himſelf, that he captivates the Soul with his wonderful Sweetneſs, and his Deſcriptions are as lively, as if we had the Object plac'd be⯑fore our Eyes.
In the Purity of his Style next follows LUCRETIUS, whoſe Diction, allowing for his Obſolete⯑neſs, and Numbers almoſt Proſa⯑ick, may challenge a Share of Praiſe in thoſe who have any Taſte of the Roman Eloquence: For De⯑ſcriptions [32] however, the ſecond Poſt of Honour is due to CLAUDIAN, who has throughout, in a moſt beautiful Style, interwoven his agreeable Images; faulty in this alone, that he expatiates upon his Subjects beyond all Decency, and frequently gives us the ſame Thoughts, diverſify'd only in Ex⯑preſſion. In this Art CLAUDIAN well knew the Progreſs he had made, for on whatſoever Topick he is engag'd, he diligently ſearches out Matter for Deſcription, nay moſt of the Subjects he has wrote upon are wholly ſuch, as may be ſeen in his Prefaces, his Eclogues, his Books of the Rape of PROSER⯑PINE, [33] his Phoenix, his Porcupine, his Cramp-Fiſh, and moſt of his EPIGRAMS.
OVID (like a true Courtier as he was) deſcribes the Affairs of Love in neat and polite Verſe. In the reſt of his Works we meet with the more vulgar Way of Expreſſi⯑on; for truſting to a good Genius, he was little ſolicitous about form⯑ing a more elaborate Style; but yet in his Metamorphoſes, he has painted in the greateſt Perfection the various Changes of all Creatures, and his Transformations ſucceed one another with a moſt ſurprizing Ce⯑lerity.
[34] STATIUS has frequently diſ⯑charg'd both theſe Requiſites of a Poet we juſt now obſerv'd; LU⯑CAN neither, whoſe Diction, al⯑tho' very bombaſt, is not enliven'd either by beautiful Phraſes or Epi⯑thets, but comes nearer Proſe than Poetry; nay, there is in him com⯑monly ſuch a mean Choice of Words, as is ſometimes even beneath Proſe it ſelf: And altho' he abounds in Deſcriptions, and is always making Excurſions of that Kind, yet he ſeldom finiſhes his Work as he ought, or brings his Thoughts to any Juſtneſs of Concluſion.
[35] But now as to STATIUS, he has given us Compoſitions worthy of the Envy of the beſt Poets: But with all his Beauties he has greater Faults; for in his Expreſſion he makes too much Uſe of Gigantick Words, and, not conſidering his Subject, mingles uſeleſs Thunder in his Numbers: Nor is he leſs faulty in his Deſcriptions, for, en⯑couraging too great a Heat, while he attempts to excel, he ſhoots be⯑yond his Mark, and ſwells unnatu⯑rally. Of both which Extreams CLAUDIAN is too often guilty.
[36] And now, ſince there have been many Pieces written, and thoſe of Note, on the Subject of VIRGIL'S Aeneis, (and leſs Notice is taken of the Poetry of STATIUS and LUCAN) to whoſe Productions only the Latines allow the Title of Epick Poetry. As to LUCAN, it has been often diſputed whether his Pharſalia be a proper Subject for an Heroick Poem. For the Deciſion of this Point, we muſt enquire in⯑to the true Nature of Heroick Poetry, which our Countryman the Lord BACON has admirably deſcrib'd in his Treatiſe of The Advancement of Learning. From [37] whence it is ſufficiently manifeſt, that Hiſtory and Epic Poetry are by no means proper Companions; and therefore that LUCAN has very much fail'd in his principal Subject: The five Heroes who make the greateſt Figure in his Poem, are CAESAR, POMPEY, BRUTUS, CATO, and CICERO; each of them indeed as diſtinguiſhable in their Lives, as they were lamented at their Deaths; Men whoſe Vir⯑tues, allowing for the Frailties of human Nature, came neareſt to that Pitch of Heroick Perfection which other Poets have falſely at⯑tributed to their Heroes. LUCAN every where rails at CAESAR, and [38] paſſionately eſpouſes POMPEY'S Intereſt, but moſt of all celebrates the Characters of BRUTUS and CATO for that Spirit of Stoiciſm, which he had equally imbib'd with them: And indeed moſt of the Faults objected to LUCAN, are rather to be imputed to this Kind of Philoſophy. From whence ſprung that boundleſs Vein of Wit, and that peculiar Affectation of a lofty Style, which, like that Sect of Men, he always delighted in, and therefore gives the Preference ra⯑ther to great, than good Actions: And upon this Account, in raiſing the Paſſions, (that moſt excellent Part of Poetry) he ſucceeded but [39] ill, becauſe upon the Principles of his Philoſophy, the Paſſions them⯑ſelves were accounted as abſolutely unlawful. To confirm this, (paſ⯑ſing by many others) I will produce but one Inſtance: After CAESAR had obtain'd the Victory over POM⯑PEY in the Battle of Pharſalia, LU⯑CAN certainly (if he had enlarg'd on any Circumſtance foreign to his Story) ſhould, upon ſo remarkable an Occaſion, have brought in POM⯑PEY lamenting his unhappy Fate in the moſt mournful Strain; eſ⯑pecially ſince he pays ſo high a De⯑ference to him throughout his whole Work; or at leaſt (as there was an open Field for Grief) he [40] ſhould have introduc'd POMPEY, either complaining of Rome's loſt Liberty, the Death of his Friends, or his own Misfortunes. But LU⯑CAN is ſo far from raiſing the Paſſions to this juſt Heighth, that he warmly adviſes POMPEY (when vanquiſh'd he retires from the Field of Action) to commiſerate the Con⯑dition of his Conqueror CAESAR, becauſe he had not won the Day but by unjuſtifiable Methods.
Who can bear to hear the Poet philoſophizing in this ridiculous [42] Manner? As if POMPEY, a Man in Years, an Exile, Miſerable, and Vanquiſh'd, ſhould have any Con⯑cern upon him for the Crimes of his Conqueror: He ought to have been very much ſtoiciz'd indeed, who, deſpoil'd of all the Goods of Fortune, could place the Sum of his Felicity in meer naked Virtue. But none of the Poets have touch'd this Paſſion of Grief like VIRGIL. The Generality of other Writers, when they attempt to move their Readers, offend in this Point, that they are too prolix in ſpinning out their Complaints, and think their Flood of Tears inexhauſtible; or elſe, while they labour to expreſs [43] the Greatneſs of their Genius, in the Profuſeneſs of their Verſe, ra⯑ther raiſe our Admiration at the Flowing of their Numbers, than excite our Pity in the Cataſtrophe of their Story. VIRGIL has care⯑fully avoided both theſe Extreams, and dreſſes his Images of Sorrow in their native Simplicity; and who⯑ever he makes to grieve, he always does it with a quick and tender Compaſſion: For according to CI⯑CERO, our Expreſſions of Grief ought to be ſhort and conciſe, becauſe our Tears quickly dry up, and it is unnatural to detain either an Auditor or a Reader in too long a Suſpenſion of Grief.
[44] But to return to STATIUS, his Spirit is indeed lofty and aſpiring, to which while he gives too great a Looſe, he runs into Bombaſt, and to his Poetry often adds uſeleſs ſounding Words. The Subject of his Thebais ſeems indeed ſuited to the Barbarity of his Genius, but is beneath the Dignity of an Heroic Poem. For neither ETEOCLES, POLYNICES, nor TYDEUS, whoſe Actions are recorded in this Poem, have any Thing in them, except their Valour, agreeable to Heroes: Nay, throughout the whole Piece there are no Examples produc'd, unleſs of Perſons infamous for the [45] moſt flagitious Enormities, ſuch as Parricide, Treachery, Cruelty, and Revenge; while, on the contrary, every Thing Praiſe-worthy ſhines bright in VIRGIL'S Heroes, and in the Perſon of AENEAS we have plac'd before our Eyes an Inſtance of conſummate Piety towards the GODS, his Son, his Wife, his Friends, and his Father. The E⯑pithets of STATIUS are generally forc'd and very metaphorical, while ſuch Properties are aſcrib'd to In⯑animates, as really only belong to Animals. In the Choice of his Words, and frequently in his Me⯑taphors, he is follow'd by CLAU⯑DIAN with the utmoſt Elegance; [46] VIRGIL is ſparing in both theſe Particulars; STATIUS abounds much with Similitudes, in which he ſeems to imitate VIRGIL; but in this Inſtance LUCAN had had better Succeſs, if he had hit upon the proper Medium: But while VIRGIL ſtoops down to the hum⯑ble Subjects of Bees, Ants, and other ſuch like delightful Themes of Nature; on the other Hand, LUCAN bellows out nothing but Stories of Oaks ſplit by Lightning, Earthquakes, and the World's Con⯑flagration. Let this, in ſhort, ſuffice obſervable concerning the Writers of Heroic Poetry, in itſelf new, and never before taken No⯑tice of.
[47] Something now remains to be ſaid of the Satyriſts, among whom whether JUVENAL or HORACE have moſt Right to the Bays, it is difficult to determine; for it has been long a Diſpute among the Learned, whether that Keenneſs and Bitterneſs of Expreſſion with which JUVENAL has arm'd his Satires, or HORACE'S more jocoſe Lampoons are moſt agreeable to the End of SATIRE. Now that we may give a clearer Deciſion on this Head, a few Things muſt be pre⯑mis'd. HORACE bears to this Day, an ill Character for the Looſe⯑neſs of his Conduct in Life. JU⯑VENAL [48] was a rigid Practiſer of Virtue. The one was converſant in the moſt perfectly polite Court of AUGUSTUS; the other liv'd in the Dregs of DOMITIAN'S Time; and therefore both theſe Poets ac⯑commodated their Writings to the Manners of the different Ages they liv'd in: For HORACE is entirely upon the ludicrous, and perſues not ſo much the Licentiouſneſs of the Times, as the ridiculous Fopperies of ſome particular Courtiers; for had he attempted to correct theſe Trifles with Severity, he had not miſs'd of being laugh'd at: But JU⯑VENAL laſhes the groſſeſt Crimes prevalent in his Time, and com⯑plains [49] of Enormities which he was aſham'd to mention, and nothing leſs than the higheſt Reſentment of Soul, Ardency of Expreſſion, and Sharpneſs of Speech, could be an equal Match to Crimes ſo notori⯑ous; tho' whenever he deſcends to be jocoſe, we frequently meet with the Pleaſantry of HORACE. Both of them, allowing for the different Manner of their Writing, are per⯑fect Maſters in their ſeveral Ways; in the one ſhines the Ridicule, in the other the Severe. The reſt of HORACE'S Pieces are ſo admira⯑ble, that they exceed our higheſt Encomiums, and are not only beyond our Diſlike, but above our Praiſe.
[50] As to what concerns the Drama⯑tick Poets, PLAUTUS and TE⯑RENCE bear away the Bell, whoſe Plots, Turns, and Elegancy of Style, are ſo well known, that no⯑thing new can be ſaid upon them.
As to SENECA, Mankind have had different Opinions of him; ſome have rank'd him with the beſt Tragoedians, others have ſunk him below the worſt. He certainly had a great Genius, an elegant and con⯑ciſe Way of Expreſſion; he abounds with ſmart Turns, which always ſavour much of that Stoiciſm of which he was a Follower, upon [51] which Account he has always been eſteem'd by thoſe who have had lit⯑tle or no Taſte of Dramatick Poetry; but then if we conſider him as ſuch, his Tragedies are throughout too elaborate; and this, to paſs by his other Faults, ſeems peculiarly SE⯑NECA'S, that he makes all his A⯑ctors (without any Regard to the Characters they bear) talk in the ſame Strain; all of them inculcate rigid philoſophical Dogmata, and ſuch Morality as is rather fit for the Schools of the Stoicks, than the Roman Theatre: For with him the King and the Slave ſtrut in the ſame Buskin; nay, you may per⯑ceive the Nurſe herſelf deeply [52] ting'd with the Principles of Stoi⯑ciſm.
Among the Epigrammatiſts, MAR⯑TIAL and CLAUDIAN have bore the greateſt Reputation; the firſt, for the ſevere Point in the Cloſe of his Epigrams, and the pecu⯑liar Jingle of his Words. The other, for diſperſing the Poignancy of his Wit throughout his Epigrams, and that in the moſt beautiful Latin Phraſe.
The reſt of the Herd of the La⯑tin Poets creep ſo low in their Num⯑bers, that they are beneath the Notice either of GODS or Men: And tho' we may now and then [53] diſcover in the affected Harangues of CATULLUS, and the ob⯑ſcene Poetry of TIBULLUS and PROPERTIUS, ſome not diſ⯑agreeable Pieces, yet it is not worth our while to rake the Dunghills for the Sake of the JEWELLS.
ERRATA.
Pag. 5 Lin. 16 read eoſdemque. p. 13 l. 12 r. oportuerat.
Appendix A POSTSCRIPT.
[]The Paſſage of the Lord * BACON, which ſeems to be referr'd to by Mr. ADDI⯑SON, in the 9th Page of the foregoing DISSERTATION.
Thus tranſlated, in the Engliſh Edition, by Dr. RAWLEY.
- Citation Suggestion for this Object
- TextGrid Repository (2020). TEI. 3477 Poems on several occasions With a dissertation upon the Roman poets By Mr Addison. University of Oxford Text Archive. . https://hdl.handle.net/21.T11991/0000-001A-5B2B-F