THE QUERIST.
[119]Qu. 1. WHETHER there ever was, is, or will be, an induſtrious Nation poor, or an idle rich?
2. Whether a People can be called poor, where the common Sort are well fed, clothed and lodged?
3. Whether the Drift and Aim of every wiſe State ſhould not be, to encourage Induſtry in its Members? And, whether thoſe, who employ neither Heads nor Hands for the common Benefit, deſerve not to be expelled like Drones out of a well go⯑verned State?
4. Whether the four Elements, and Man's Labour therein, be not the true Source of Wealth?
5. Whether Money be not only ſo far uſeful, as it ſtirreth up Induſtry, enabling Men mutually to participate the Fruits of each others Labour?
6. Whether any other Means, equally conducing to excite and circulate the Induſtry of Mankind, may not be as uſeful as Money?
7. Whether the real End and Aim of Men be not Power? And whether he who could have every Thing elſe at his Wiſh or Will, would value Money?
[120] 8. Whether the public Aim in every well go⯑verned State be not, that each Member, according to his juſt Pretenſions and Induſtry, ſhould have Power?
9. Whether Power be not referred to Action; and whether Action doth not follow Appetite or Will?
10. Whether Faſhion doth not create Appetites; and whether the prevailing Will of a Nation is not the Faſhion?
11. Whether the Current of Induſtry and Com⯑merce be not determined by this prevailing Will?
12. Whether it be not owing to Cuſtom, that the Faſhions are agreeable?
13. Whether it may not concern the Wiſdom of the Legiſlature to interpoſe in the making of Faſhions; and not leave an Affair of ſo great In⯑fluence, to the Management of Women and Fops, Taylors and Vintners?
14. Whether reaſonable Faſhions are a greater Reſtraint on Freedom than thoſe which are un⯑reaſonable?
15. Whether a general good Taſte in a People would not greatly conduce to their thriving? And whether an uneducated Gentry be not the greateſt of national Evils?
16. Whether Cuſtoms and Faſhions do not ſup⯑ply the Place of Reaſon, in the Vulgar of all Ranks? Whether, therefore, it doth not very much import that they ſhould be wiſely framed?
17. Whether the imitating thoſe Neighbours in our Faſhions, to whom we bear no Likeneſs in our Circumſtances, be not one Cauſe of Diſtreſs to this Nation?
18. Whether frugal Faſhions in the upper Rank, and comfortable Living in the lower, be not the Means to multiply Inhabitants?
[121] 19. Whether the Bulk of our Iriſh Natives are not kept from thriving, by that Cynical Content in Dirt and Beggary, which they poſſeſs to a Degree beyond any other People in Chriſtendom?
20. Whether the creating of Wants be not the likelieſt Way to produce Induſtry in a People? And whether, if our Peaſants were accuſtomed to eat Beef and wear Shoes, they would not be more induſtrious?
21. Whether other Things being given, as Cli⯑mate, Soil, &c. the Wealth be not proportioned to the Induſtry, and this to the Circulation of Credit, be the Credit circulated or transferred by what Marks or Tokens ſoever?
22. Whether, therefore, leſs Money, ſwiftly cir⯑culating, be not, in effect, equivalent to more Money ſlowly circulating? Or, whether, if the Circulation be reciprocally as the Quantity of Coin, the Nation can be a Loſer?
23. Whether Money is to be conſidered as hav⯑ing an intrinſic Value, or as being a Commodity, a Standard, a Meaſure, or a Pledge, as is variouſly ſuggeſted by Writers? And whether the true Idea of Money, as ſuch, be not altogether that of a Ticket or Counter?
24. Whether the Value or Price of Things, be not a compounded Proportion, directly as the De⯑mand, and reciprocally as the Plenty?
25. Whether the Terms Crown, Livre, Pound Sterling, &c. are not to be conſidered as Exponents or Denominations of ſuch Proportion? And whether Gold, Silver and Paper, are not Tickets or Coun⯑ters for Reckoning, Recording, and Transferring thereof?
26. Whether the Denominations being retained, although the Bullion were gone, Things might not nevertheleſs be rated, bought and ſold, Induſtry [122] promoted, and a Circulation of Commerce main⯑tained?
27. Whether an equal raiſing of all Sorts of Gold, Silver, and Copper Coin, can have any Effect in bringing Money into the Kingdom? And whether altering the Proportions between the ſe⯑veral Sorts, can have any other Effect, but multiply⯑ing one Kind and leſſening another, without any Increaſe of the Sum total?
28. Whether arbitrary changing the Denomi⯑nation of Coin, be not a public Cheat?
29. What makes a wealthy People? Whether Mines of Gold and Silver are capable of doing this? And whether the Negroes amidſt the Gold Sands of Afric, are not poor and deſtitute?
30. Whether there be any Virtue in Gold or Silver, other than as they ſet People at Work, or create Induſtry?
31. Whether it be not the Opinion or Will of the People, exciting them to Induſtry, that truly enricheth a Nation? And whether this doth not principally depend on the Means for counting, tranſ⯑ferring, and preſerving Power, that is, Property of all Kinds?
32. Whether if there was no Silver or Gold in the Kingdom, our Trade might not nevertheleſs ſupply Bills of Exchange, ſufficient to anſwer the Demands of Abſentees in England. or elſewhere?
33. Whether current Bank-Notes may not be deemed Money? And whether they are not actually the greater Part of the Money of this Kingdom?
34. Provided the Wheels move, whether it is not the ſame Thing, as to the Effect of the Ma⯑chine, be this done by the Force of Wind, or Water, or Animals?
35. Whether Power to command the Induſtry of others be not real Wealth? And whether Money [123] be not in truth, Tickets or Tokens for convey⯑ing and recording ſuch Power, and whether it be of great Conſequence what Materials the Tickets are made of?
36. Whether Trade, either foreign or domeſtic, be in truth any more than this Commerce of In⯑duſtry?
37. Whether to promote, transfer, and ſecure this Commerce, and this Property in human Labour, or, in other words, this Power, be not the ſole Means of enriching a People, and how far this may be done independently of Gold and Silver?
38. Whether it were not wrong to ſuppoſe Land itſelf to be Wealth? And whether the Induſtry of the People is not firſt to be conſidered, as that which conſtitutes Wealth, which makes even Land and Silver to be Wealth, neither of which would have any Value, but as Means and Motives to In⯑duſtry?
39. Whether in the Waſtes of America, a Man might not poſſeſs twenty Miles ſquare of Land, and yet want his Dinner, or a Coat to his Back?
40. Whether a fertile Land, and the Induſtry of its Inhabitants, would not prove inexhauſtible Funds of real Wealth, be the Counters for convey⯑ing and recording thereof what you will, Paper, Gold, or Silver?
41. Whether a ſingle Hint be ſufficient to over⯑come a Prejudice? And whether even obvious Truths will not ſometimes bear repeating?
42. Whether if human Labour be the true Source of Wealth, it doth not follow that Idleneſs ſhould of all Things be diſcouraged in a wiſe State?
43. Whether even Gold, or Silver, if they ſhould leſſen the Induſtry of its Inhabitants, would not be ruinous to a Country? And whether Spain be not an Inſtance of this?
[124] 44. Whether the Opinion of Men, and their Induſtry conſequent thereupon, be not the true Wealth of Holland, and not the Silver ſuppoſed to be depoſited in the Bank at Amſterdam?
45. Whether there is in truth any ſuch Treaſure lying dead? And whether it be of great Conſe⯑quence to the Public, that it ſhould be real, rather than notional?
46. Whether in order to underſtand the true Nature of Wealth and Commerce, it would not be right to conſider a Ship's Crew caſt upon a de⯑ſert Iſland, and by degrees forming themſelves to Buſineſs and civil Life, while Induſtry begot Credit, and Credit moved to Induſtry?
47. Whether ſuch Men would not all ſet them⯑ſelves to Work? Whether they would not ſubſiſt by the mutual Participation of each other's Induſtry? Whether when one Man had in his Way procured more than he could conſume, he would not ex⯑change his Superfluities to ſupply his Wants? Whether this muſt not produce Credit? Whether to facilitate theſe Conveyances, to record and cir⯑culate this Credit, they would not ſoon agree on certain Tallies, Tokens, Tickets, or Counters?
48. Whether Reflexion in the better Sort might not ſoon remedy our Evils? And whether our real Defect be not in a wrong Way of Thinking?
49. Whether it would not be an unhappy Turn in our Gentlemen, if they ſhould take more Thought to create an Intereſt to themſelves in this or that County, or Borough, than to promote the real In⯑tereſt of their Country?
50. Whether if a Man builds a Houſe he doth not in the firſt Place provide a Plan which governs his Work? And ſhall the Public act without an End, a View, a Plan?
[125] 51. Whether by how much the leſs particular Folk think for themſelves, the Public be not ſo much the more obliged to think for them?
52. Whether ſmall Gains be not the Way to great Profit? And if our Tradeſmen are Beggars, whether they may not thank themſelves for it?
53. Whether ſome Way might not be found for making Criminals uſeful in public Works, inſtead of ſending them either to America, or to the other World?
54. Whether we may not, as well as other Na⯑tions, contrive Employment for them? And whether Servitude, Chains, and hard Labour, for a Term of Years, would not be a more diſcouraging, as well as a more adequate Puniſhment for Felons, than even Death itſelf?
55. Whether there are not ſuch Things in Hol⯑land as bettering Houſes, for bringing young Gen⯑tlemen to Order? And whether ſuch an Inſtitution would be uſeleſs among us?
56. Whether it be true, that the Poor in Hol⯑land have no Reſource but their own Labour, and yet there are no Beggars in their Streets?
57. Whether he whoſe Luxury conſumeth foreign Products, and whoſe Induſtry produceth nothing domeſtic to exchange for them, is not ſo far forth injurious to his Country?
58. Whether Neceſſity is not to be hearkened to before Convenience, and Convenience before Luxury?
59. Whether to provide plentifully for the Poor, be not feeding the Root, the Subſtance whereof will ſhoot upwards into the Branches, and cauſe the Top to flouriſh?
60. Whether there be any Inſtance of a State wherein the People, living neatly and plentifully, did not aſpire to Wealth?
[126] 61. Whether Naſtineſs and Beggary do not, on the contrary, extinguiſh all ſuch Ambition, making Men liſtleſs, hopeleſs, and ſlothful?
62. Whether a Country inhabited by People well fed, clothed and lodged, would not become every Day more populous? And whether a nume⯑rous Stock of People in ſuch Circumſtances would not conſtitute a flouriſhing Nation; and how far the Product of our own Country may ſuffice for the compaſſing of this End?
63. Whether a People, who had provided them⯑ſelves with the Neceſſaries of Life in good Plenty, would not ſoon extend their Induſtry to new Arts and new Branches of Commerce?
64. Whether thoſe ſame Manufactures which England imports from other Countries, may not be admitted from Ireland? And, if ſo, whether Lace, Carpets and Tapeſtry, three conſiderable Articles, of Engliſh Importation, might not find Encourage⯑ment in Ireland? And whether an Academy for Deſign might not greatly conduce to the perfect⯑ing thoſe Manufactures among us?
65. Whether France and Flanders could have drawn ſo much Money from England, for figured Silks, Lice, and Tapeſtry, if they had not had Academies for Deſigning?
66. Whether when a Room was once prepared, and Models in Plaiſter of Paris, the Annual Expence of ſuch an Academy need ſtand the Public in above two hundred Pounds a Year?
67. Whether our Linen-Manufacture would not find the Benefit of this Inſtitution? and whether there be any Thing that makes us fall ſhort of the Dutch, in Damasks, Diapers, and printed Linen but our Ignorance in Deſign?
68. Whether thoſe, who may ſlight this Affair as notional, have ſufficiently conſidered the exten⯑ſive [127] Uſe of the Art of Deſign, and its Influence in moſt Trades and Manufactures, wherein the Forms of Things are often more regarded than the Ma⯑terials*.
69. Whether there be any Art ſooner learned than that of making Carpets? And whether our Women, with little Time and Pains, may not make more beautiful Carpets than thoſe imported from Turkey? And whether this Branch of the Woollen-Manufacture be not open to us?
70. Whether human Induſtry can produce, from ſuch cheap Materials, a Manufacture of ſo great Value, by any other Art, as by thoſe of Sculpture and Painting?
71. Whether Pictures and Statues are not in Fact ſo much Treaſure? And whether Rome and Florence would not be poor Towns without them?
72. Whether they do not bring ready Money, as well as Jewels? Whether in Italy Debts are not paid, and Children portioned with them, as with Gold and Silver?
73. Whether it would not be more prudent, to ſtrike out, and exert ourſelves in permitted Branches of Trade, than to fold our Hands and repine, that we are not allowed the Woollen?
74. Whether it be true, that two Millions are yearly expended by England by foreign Lace and Linen?
75. Whether immenſe Sums are not drawn yearly into the Northern Countries, for ſupplying the Britiſh Navy with Hempen Manufactures?
76. Whether there be any Thing more profitable than Hemp? And whether there ſhould not be great Praemiums for encouraging our Hempen Trade? [128] What Advantages may not Great-Britain make of a Country where Land and Labour are ſo cheap?
77. Whether Ireland alone might not raiſe Hemp ſufficient for the Britiſh Navy? And whether it would not be vain to expect this from the British Colonies in America, where Hands are ſo ſcarce, and Labour ſo exceſſively dear?
78. Whether if our our own People want Will or Capacity for ſuch an Attempt, it might not be worth while for ſome undertaking Spirits in Eng⯑land to make Settlements, and raiſe Hemp in the Counties of Clare and Limerick, than which, per⯑haps, there is not fitter Land in the World for that Purpoſe? And whether both Nations would not find their Advantage therein?
79. Whether if all the idle Hands in this King⯑dom were employed on Hemp and Flax, we might not find ſufficient Vent for theſe Manufactures?
80. How far it may be in our own Power to better our Affairs, without interfering with our Neighbours?
81. Whether the Prohibition of our Woollen-Trade, ought not naturally to put us on other Me⯑thods, which give no Jealouſy?
82. Whether Paper be not a valuable Article of Commerce? And whether it be not true, that one ſingle Bookſeller in London yearly expended above four thouſand Pounds in that foreign Commodity?
83. How it comes to paſs, that the Venetians and Genoese, who wear ſo much leſs Linen, and ſo much worſe than we do, ſhould yet make very good Paper, and in great Quantity, while we make very little?
84. How long it will be before my Countrymen find out, that it is worth while to ſpend a Peny, in order to get a Groat?
[129] 85. If all the Land were tilled that is fit for Tillage, and all that ſowed with Hemp and Flax that is fit for raiſing them, whether we ſhould have much Sheep-walk beyond what was ſufficient to ſupply the Neceſſities of the Kingdom?
86. Whether other Countries have not flouriſhed without the Woollen-Trade?
87. Whether it be not a ſure Sign, or Effect of a Country's thriving, to ſee it well cultivated and full of Inhabitants? And if ſo, whether a great Quantity of Sheep-walk, be not ruinous to a Coun⯑try, rendering it waſte and thinly inhabited?
88. Whether the employing ſo much of our Land under Sheep, be not in fact an Irish Blunder?
89. Whether our hankering after our Woollen-Trade, be not the true and only Reaſon, which hath created a Jealouſy in England towards Ireland? And whether any Thing can hurt us more than ſuch Jealouſy?
90. Whether it be not the true Intereſt of both Nations, to become one People? And whether either be ſufficiently apprized of this?
91. Whether the upper Part of this People are not truly English, by Blood, Language, Religion, Manners, Inclination and Intereſt?
92. Whether we are not as much Englishmen, as the Children of old Romans born in Britain, were ſtill Romans?
93. Whether it be not our true Intereſt, not to interfere with them; and, in every other Caſe, whether it be not their true intereſt to befriend us?
94. Whether a Mint in Ireland might not be of great Convenience to the Kingdom; and whether it could be attended with any poſſible Inconvenience to Great-Britain? And whether there were not Mints in Naples and in Sicily, when thoſe Kingdoms were Provinces to Spain, or the Houſe of Austria?
[130] 95. Whether any Thing can be more ridiculous, than for the North of Ireland to be jealous of a Linen-Manufacture in the South?
96. Whether the County of Tipperary be not much better Land than the County of Armagh; and yet, whether the latter is not much better im⯑proved and inhabited than the former?
97. Whether every Landlord in the Kingdom doth not know the Cauſe of this? And yet how few are the better for ſuch their Knowledge?
98. Whether large Farms under few Hands, or ſmall ones under many, are likely to be made moſt of? And whether Flax and Tillage do not natu⯑rally multiply Hands, and divide Land into ſmall Holdings, and well-improved?
99. Whether, as our Exports are leſſened, we ought not to leſſen our Imports? And whether theſe will not be leſſened as our Demands, and theſe as our Wants, and theſe as our Cuſtoms or Faſhions? Of how great Conſequence therefore are Faſhions to the Public?
100. Whether it would not be more reaſonable to mend our State than to complain of it; and how far this may be in our own Power?
101. What the Nation gains by thoſe who live in Ireland upon the Produce of foreign Countries?
102. How far the Vanity of our Ladies in dreſ⯑ſing, and of our Gentlemen in drinking, contri⯑butes to the general Miſery of the People?
103. Whether Nations as wife and opulent as ours, have not made ſumptuary Laws; and what hinders us from doing the ſame?
104. Whether thoſe who drink foreign Liquors, and deck themſelves and their Families with foreign Ornaments, are not ſo far forth to be reckoned Abſentees?
[131] 105. Whether as our Trade is limited, we ought not to limit our Expences; and whether this be not the natural and obvious Remedy?
106. Whether the Dirt, and Famine, and Naked⯑neſs of the Bulk of our People, might not be remedied, even although we had no foreign Trade? And whether this ſhould not be our firſt Care; and whether, if this were once provided for, the Con⯑veniencies of the Rich would not ſoon follow?
107. Whether comfortable Living doth not pro⯑duce Wants, and Wants Induſtry, and Induſtry Wealth?
108. Whether there is not a great Difference between Holland and Ireland? And whether foreign Commerce, without which the one could not ſubſiſt, be ſo neceſſary for the other?
109. Might we not put a Hand to the Plough, or the Spade, although we had no foreign Com⯑merce?
110. Whether the Exigencies of Nature are not to be anſwered by Induſtry on our own Soil? And how far the Conveniences and Comforts of Life may be procured, by a domeſtic Commerce between the ſeveral Parts of this Kingdom?
111. Whether the Women may not few, ſpin, weave, embroider, ſufficiently for the Embelliſh⯑ment of their Perſons, and even enough to raiſe Envy in each other, without being beholden to foreign Countries?
112. Suppoſe the Bulk of our Inhabitants had Shoes to their Feet, Clothes to their Backs, and Beef in their Bellies? Might not ſuch a State be eligible for the Public, even though the 'Squires were condemned to drink Ale and Cider?
113. Whether if Drunkenneſs be a neceſſary Evil, Men may not as well drink the Growth of their own Country?
[132] 114. Whether a Nation within itſelf might not have real Wealth, ſufficient to give its Inhabitants Power and Diſtinction, without the Help of Gold and Silver?
115. Whether, if the Arts of Sculpture and Painting were encouraged among us, we might not furniſh our Houſes in a much nobler Manner with our own Manufactures?
116. Whether we have not, or may not have, all the neceſſary Materials for Building at home?
117. Whether Tiles and Plaiſter may not ſupply the Place of Norway Fir, for Flooring and Wainſcot?
118. Whether Plaiſter be not warmer, as well as more ſecure, than Deal? And whether a modern faſhionable Houſe, lined with Fir, daubed over with Oil and Paint, be not like a Fire-ſhip, ready to be lighted up by all Accidents?
119. Whether larger Houſes, better built and furniſhed, a greater Train of Servants, the Diffe⯑rence with regard to Equipage and Table, between finer and coarſer, more and leſs elegant, may not be ſufficient to feed a reaſonable Share of Vanity, or ſupport all proper Diſtinctions? And whether all theſe may not be procured, by domeſtic Induſtry out of the four Elements, without ranſacking the four Quarters of the Globe?
120. Whether any Thing is a nobler Ornament, in the Eye of the World, than an Italian Palace, that is, Stone and Morter skilfully put together, and adorned with Sculpture and Painting; and whether this may not be compaſſed without foreign Trade?
121. Whether an Expence in Gardens and Plan⯑tations would not be an elegant Diſtinction for the Rich, a domeſtic Magnificence, employing many Hands within, and drawing nothing from abroad?
122. Whether the Apology which is made for foreign Luxury in England, to wit, that they could [133] not carry on their Trade without Imports as well as Exports, will hold in Ireland?
123. Whether one may not be allowed to con⯑ceive and ſuppoſe a Society, or Nation of human Creatures, clad in Woollen Cloths and Stuffs, ea⯑ting good Bread, Beef, and Mutton, Poultry and Fiſh in great Plenty, drinking Ale, Mead, and Cider, inhabiting decent Houſes built of brick and Marble, taking their Pleaſure in fair Parks and Gardens, depending on no foreign Imports either for Food or Raiment? And whether ſuch People ought much to be pitied?
124. Whether Ireland be not as well qualified for ſuch a State, as any Nation under the Sun?
125. Whether in ſuch a State the Inhabitants may not contrive to paſs the twenty-four Hours, with tolerable Eaſe and Chearfulneſs? And whether any People upon Earth can do more?
126. Whether they may not eat, drink, play, dreſs, viſit, ſleep in good Beds, fit by good Fires, build, plant, raiſe a Name, make Eſtates, and ſpend them?
127. Whether upon the whole, a domeſtic Trade may not ſuffice in ſuch a Country as Ireland, to nouriſh and clothe its Inhabitants, and provide them with the reaſonable Conveniencies, and even Com⯑forts of Life?
128. Whether a general Habit of living well, would not produce Numbers and Induſtry; and, whether, conſidering the Tendency of human Kind, the Conſequence thereof would not be foreign Trade and Riches, how unneceſſary ſoever?
129. Whether, nevertheleſs, it be a Crime to enquire how far we may do without foreign Trade, and what would follow on ſuch a Suppoſition?
130. Whether the Number and Welfare of the Subjects be not the true Strength of the Crown?
[134] 131. Whether in all public Inſtitutions, there ſhould not be an End propoſed, which is to be the Rule and Limit of the Means? Whether this End ſhould not be the Well-being of the Whole? And whether, in order to this, the firſt Step ſhould not be to clothe and feed our People?
132. Whether there be upon Earth any Chriſtian, or civilized People, ſo beggarly, wretched, and deſtitute, as the common Irish?
133. Whether, nevertheleſs, there is any other People whoſe Wants may be more eaſily ſupplied from home?
134. Whether, if there was a Wall of Braſs a thouſand Cubits high, round this Kingdom, our Natives might not nevertheleſs live cleanly and comfortably, till the Land, and reap the Fruits of it?
135. What ſhould hinder us from exerting our⯑ſelves, uſing our Hands and Brains, doing ſome⯑thing or other, Man, Woman and Child, like the other Inhabitants of God's Earth?
136. Be the reſtraining our Trade well or ill ad⯑viſed in our Neighbours, with reſpect to their own Intereſt, yet whether it be not plainly ours to ac⯑commodate ourſelves to it?
137. Whether it be not vain to think of per⯑ſuading other People to ſee their Intereſt, while we continue blind to our own?
138. Whether there be any other Nation poſ⯑ſeſſed of ſo much good Land, and ſo many able Hands to work it, which yet is beholden for Bread to foreign Countries?
139. Whether it be true, that we import Corn to the Value of two hundred thouſand Pounds in ſome Years?*
[135] 140. Whether we are not undone by Faſhions made for other People? And whether it be not Madneſs in a poor Nation to imitate a rich one?
141. Whether a Woman of Faſhion ought not to be declared a public Enemy?
142. Whether it be not certain, that from the ſingle Town of Cork were exported, in one Year, no leſs than one hundred and ſeven thouſand one hundred ſixty-one Barrels of Beef; ſeven thouſand three hundred and ſeventy-nine Barrels of Pork; thirteen thouſand four hundred and ſixty-one Casks, and eighty-five thouſand ſeven hundred and twenty-ſeven Firkins of Butter? And what Hands were employed in this Manufacture?
143. Whether a Foreigner could imagine, that one half of the People were ſtarving, in a Country which ſent out ſuch Plenty of Proviſions?
144. Whether an Iriſh Lady, ſet out with French Silks, and Flanders Lace, may not be ſaid to con⯑ſume more Beef and Butter than a hundred of our labouring Peaſants?
145. Whether nine Tenths of our foreign Trade be not carried on ſingly to ſupport the Article of Vanity?
146. Whether it can be hoped, that private Perſons will not indulge this Folly, unleſs restrained by the Public?
147. How Vanity is maintained in other Coun⯑tries? Whether in Hungary for Inſtance, a proud Nobility are not ſubſiſted with ſmall Imports from abroad?
148. Whether there be a prouder People upon Earth than the noble Venetians, although they all wear plain black Clothes?
149. Whether a People are to be pitied, that will not ſacrifice their little particular Vanities to the public Good? And yet, whether each Part would [136] not except their own Foible from this public Sacri⯑fice, the 'Squire his Bottle, the Lady her Lace?
150. Whether Claret be not often drank rather for Vanity than for Health, or Pleaſure?
151. Whether it be true, that Men of nice Palates have been impoſed on, by Elder Wine for French Claret, and by Mead for Palm Sack?
152. Do not Engliſhmen abroad purchaſe Beer and Cider at ten Times the Price of Wine?
153. How many Gentlemen are there in England of a thouſand Pounds per Annum, who never drink Wine in their own Houſes? Whether the ſame may be ſaid of any in Ireland who have even one hundred Pounds per Annum?
154. What Reaſon have our Neighbours in England for diſcouraging French Wines, which may not hold with reſpect to us alſo?
155. How much of the neceſſary Suſtenance of our People is yearly exported for Brandy?
156. Whether, if People muſt poiſon them⯑ſelves, they had not better do it with their own Growth?
157. If we imported neither Claret from France, nor Fir from Norway, what the Nation would ſave by it?
158. When the Root yieldeth inſufficient Nou⯑riſhment, whether Men do not top the Tree to make the lower Branches thrive?
159. Whether, if our Ladies drank Sage or Baum Tea out of Iriſh Ware, it would be an in⯑ſupportable national Calamity?
160. Whether it be really true that ſuch Wine is beſt as moſt encourages drinking, i. e. that muſt be given in the largeſt Doſe to produce its Effect? And whether this holds with regard to any other Medicine?
[137] 161. Whether that Trade ſhould not be ac⯑counted moſt pernicious, wherein the Balance is moſt againſt us? And whether this be not the Trade with France?
162. Whether it be not even Madneſs, to en⯑courage Trade with a Nation that takes nothing of our Manufacture?
163. Whether Ireland can hope to thrive, if the major Part of her Patriots ſhould be found in the French Intereſt?
164. Whether great Plenty and Variety of ex⯑cellent Wines are not to be had on the Coaſts of Italy and Sicily? And whether thoſe Countries would not take our Commodities of Linen, Leather, Butter, &c. in exchange for them?
165. Particularly, whether the Vinum Mamerti⯑num, which grows on the Mountains about Meſ⯑ſina, a red, generous Wine, highly eſteemed (if we may credit Pliny) by the ancient Romans, would not come cheap, and pleaſe the Palates of our Iſlanders?
166. Why, if a Bribe by the Palate or the Purſe be in effect the ſame Thing, they ſhould not be alike infamous?
167. Whether the Vanity and Luxury of a few ought to ſtand in Competition with the Intereſt of a Nation?
168. Whether national Wants ought not to be the Rule of Trade? And whether the moſt preſſing Wants of the Majority ought not to be firſt con⯑ſidered?
169. Whether it is poſſible the Country ſhould be well improved, while our Beef is exported, and our Labourers live upon Potatoes?
170. If it be reſolved that we cannot do without foreign Trade, whether, at leaſt, it may not be worth while to conſider what Branches thereof de⯑ſerve [138] to be entertained, and how far we may be able to carry it on under our preſent Limitations?
171. What foreign Imports may be neceſſary, for clothing and feeding the Families of Perſons not worth above one hundred Pounds a Year? And how many wealthier there are in the King⯑dom, and what Proportion they bear to the other Inhabitants?
172. Whether Trade be not then on a right Foot, when foreign Commodities are imported in Exchange only for domeſtic Superfluities?
173. Whether the Quantities of Beef, Butter, Wooll and Leather, exported from this Iſland, can be reckoned the Superfluities of a Country, where there are ſo many Natives naked and famiſhed?
174. Whether it would not be wiſe ſo to order our Trade, as to export Manufactures rather than Provi⯑ſions, and of thoſe ſuch as employ moſt Hands?
175. Whether ſhe would not be a very vile Ma⯑tron, and juſtly thought either mad or fooliſh, that ſhould give away the Neceſſaries of Life, from her naked and famiſhed Children, in Exchange for Pearls to ſtick in her Hair, and ſweet Meats to pleaſe her own Palate?
176. Whether a Nation might not be conſidered as a Family?
177. Whether the Remark made by a Venetian Ambaſſador to Cardinal Richlieu—That France needed nothing to be rich and eaſy, but to know how to ſpend what ſhe diſſipates—may not be of uſe alſo to other People?
178. Whether hungry Cattle will not leap over Bounds? And, whether moſt Men are not hungry in a Country where expenſive Faſhions obtain?
179. Whether there ſhould not be publiſhed year⯑ly, Schedules of our Trade, containing an Account of the Imports and Exports of the foregoing Year?
[139] 180. Whether other Methods may not be found for ſupplying the Funds, beſides the Cuſtom on Things imported?
181. Whether any Art or Manufacture be ſo difficult as the making of good Laws?
182. Whether our Peers and Gentlemen are born Legiſlators? Or, whether that Faculty be acquired by Study and Reflexion?
183. Whether to comprehend the real Intereſt of a People, and the Means to procure it, doth not imply ſome Fund of Knowledge, historical, moral and political, with a Faculty of Reaſon improved by Learning?
184. Whether every Enemy to Learning be not a Goth? And whether every ſuch Goth among us be not an Enemy to the Country?
185. Whether, therefore, it would not be an Omen of ill Preſage, a dreadful Phaenomenon in the Land, if our great Men ſhould take it in their Heads to deride Learning and Education?
186. Whether on the contrary, it ſhould not ſeem worth while to erect a Mart of Literature in this Kingdom, under wiſer Regulations and better Diſcipline than in any other Part of Europe? And whether this would not be an infallible Means of drawing Men and Money into the Kingdom?
187. Whether the governed be not too nume⯑rous for the governing Part of our College? And whether it might not be expedient to convert thirty Natives-Places into twenty Fellowſhips?
188. Whether if we had two Colleges, there might not ſpring an uſeful Emulation between them? And whether it might not be contrived, ſo to divide the Fellows, Scholars and Revenues between both, as that no Member ſhould be a Loſer thereby?
189. Whether ten thouſand Pounds well laid out, might not build a decent College, fit to contain two [140] hundred Perſons; and whether the Purchaſe-Money of the Chambers, would not go a good Way to⯑wards defraying the Expence?
190. Where this College ſhould be ſituated?
191. Whether in Imitation of the Jeſuits at Paris, who admit Proteſtants to ſtudy in their Col⯑leges, it may not be right for us alſo to admit Ro⯑man-Catholics into our College, without obliging them to attend Chapel-Duties, or Catechiſms, or Divinity-Lectures? And whether this might not keep Money in the Kingdom, and prevent the Pre⯑judices of a foreign Education?
192. Whether it is poſſible a State ſhould not thrive, whereof the lower part were induſtrious, and the upper wiſe?
193. Whether the collected Wiſdom of Ages and Nations be not found in Books?
194. Whether Themiſtocles his Art of making a little City, or a little People, become a great one, be learned any where ſo well as in the Writings of the Ancients?
195. Whether a wiſe State hath any Intereſt nearer Heart than the Education of Youth?
196. Whether the Mind, like Soil, doth not by Diſuſe grow ſtiff; and whether Reaſoning and Stu⯑dy be not like ſtirring and dividing the Glebe?
197. Whether an early Habit of Reflexion, al⯑though obtained by ſpeculative Sciences, may not have its Uſe in practical Affairs?
198. Whether even thoſe Parts of Academical Learning which are quite forgotten, may not have improved and enriched the Soil, like thoſe Vegeta⯑bles which are raiſed, not for themſelves, but plow⯑ed in for a Dreſſing of Land?
199. Whether it was not an Iriſh Profeſſor who firſt opened the public Schools at Oxford? Whe⯑ther [141] this Iſland hath not been anciently famous for Learning? And whether at this Day it hath any better Chance for being conſiderable?
200. Whether we may not with better Grace ſit down and complain, when we have done all that lies in our Power to help ourſelves?
201. Whether the Gentleman of Eſtate hath a right to be idle; and whether he ought not to be the great Promoter and Director of Induſtry, among his Tenants and Neighbours?
202. Whether in the Cantons of Switzerland all under thirty Years of Age are not excluded from their great Councils?
203. Whether Homer's Compendium of Educa⯑tion, ‘ [...] *,’ would not be a good Rule for modern Educators of Youth? And whether half the Learning and Study of theſe Kingdoms is not uſeleſs, for want of a proper Delivery and Pronunciation being taught in our Schools and Colleges?
204. Whether in any Order a good Building can be made of bad Materials? Or whether any Form of Government can make a happy State out of bad Individuals?
205. What was it that Solomon compared to a Jewel of Gold in a Swine's Snout?
206. Whether the Public is more concerned in any Thing than in the Procreation of able Citizens?
207. Whether to the Multiplying of Human-Kind, it would not much conduce, if Marriages were made with good-liking?
208. Whether, if Women had no Portions, we ſhould then ſee ſo many unhappy and unfruitful Marriages?
[142] 209. Whether the Laws be not, according to Ariſtotle, a Mind without Appetite or Paſſion? And conſequently without Reſpect of Perſons?
210. Suppoſe a rich Man's Son marries a poor Man's Daughter, ſuppoſe alſo that a poor Man's Daughter is deluded and debauched by the Son of a rich Man; which is moſt to be pitied?
211. Whether the Puniſhment ſhould be placed on the Seduced, or the Seducer?
212. Whether a Promiſe made before God and Man in the moſt ſolemn Manner ought to be violated?
213. Whether it was Plato's Opinion that for the Good of the Community, rich ſhould marry with rich? de Leg. l. 4.
214. Whether as Seed equally ſcattered produ⯑ceth a goodly Harveſt, even ſo an equal Diſtribu⯑tion of Wealth doth not cauſe a Nation to flouriſh?
215. Whence is it that Barbs and Arabs are ſo good Horſes? And whether in thoſe Countries they are not exactly nice in admitting none but Males of a good Kind to their Mares?
216. What Effects would the ſame Care pro⯑duce in Families?
217. Whether the real Foundation for Wealth muſt not be laid in the Numbers, the Frugality and the Induſtry of the People? And whether all Attempts to enrich a Nation by other Means, as raiſing the Coin, Stock-Jobbing and ſuch Arts, are not vain?
218. Whether a Door ought not to be ſhut againſt all other Methods of growing rich, ſave on⯑ly by Induſtry and Merit? And whether Wealth got otherwiſe would not be ruinous to the Public?
219. Whether the Abuſe of Banks and Paper-Money is a juſt Objection againſt the uſe thereof? And whether ſuch Abuſe might not eaſily be pre⯑vented?
[143] 220. Whether national Banks are not found uſe⯑ful in Venice, Holland and Hamburgh? And whe⯑ther it is not poſſible to contrive one that may be uſeful alſo in Ireland?
221. Whether the Banks of Venice and Amſter⯑dam, are not in the Hands of the Public?
222. Whether it may not be worth while to in⯑form ourſelves in the Nature of thoſe Banks? And what Reaſon can be aſſigned, why Ireland ſhould not reap the Benefit of ſuch public Banks, as well as other Countries?
223. Whether a Bank of national Credit, ſup⯑ported by public Funds and ſecured by Parliament, be a Chimera or impoſſible Thing? and if not, what would follow from the Suppoſal of ſuch a Bank?
224. Whether the Currency of a Credit ſo well ſecured would not be of great Advantage to our Trade and Manufactures?
225. Whether the Notes of ſuch public Bank would not have a more general Circulation than thoſe of private Banks, as being leſs ſubject to Frauds and Hazards?
226. Whether it be not agreed that Paper hath in many Reſpects, the Advantage above Coin, as being of more Diſpatch in Payments, more eaſily transferred, preſerved and recovered when loſt?
227. Whether, beſides theſe Advantages, there be not an evident Neceſſity for circulating Credit by Paper, from the Defect of Coin in this King⯑dom?
228. Whether it be rightly remarked by ſome, that, as Banking brings no Treaſure into the King⯑dom like Trade, private Wealth muſt ſink as the Bank riſeth? And whether whatever cauſeth In⯑duſtry to flouriſh and circulate, may not be ſaid to increaſe our Treaſure?
[144] 229 Whether the ruinous Effects of Miſſiſſippi, South-Sea, and ſuch Schemes, were not owing to an abuſe of Paper-Money or Credit, in making it a Means for Idleneſs and Gaming, inſtead of a Mo⯑tive and Help to Induſtry?
230. Whether the Riſe of the Bank of Amſter⯑dam was not purely caſual, for the Security and Diſ⯑patch of Payments? And whether the good Effects thereof, in ſupplying the Place of Coin, and pro⯑moting a ready Circulation of Induſtry and Com⯑merce, may not be a Leſſon to us, to do that by Deſign, which others fell upon by Chance?
231. Whether plenty of ſmall Caſh be not ab⯑ſolutely neceſſary for keeping up a Circulation among the People; that is, whether Copper be not more neceſſary than Gold?
232. Whether that, which increaſeth the Stock of a Nation, be not a Means of increaſing its Trade? And whether that, which increaſeth the current Credit of a Nation, may not be ſaid to in⯑creaſe its Stock?
233. Whether the Credit of the public Funds be not a Mine of Gold to England? And whether any Step that ſhould leſſen this Credit ought not to be dreaded?
234. Whether ſuch Credit be not the principal Advantage that England hath over France? I may add, over every other Country in Europe.
235. Whether by this the Public is not become poſſeſſed of the Wealth of Foreigners as well as Natives? And whether England be not in ſome ſort the Treaſury of Chriſtendom?
236. Whether as our current domeſtic Credit grew, Induſtry would not grow likewiſe? and if Induſtry, our Manufactures; and if theſe, our fo⯑reign Credit?
[145] 237. Whether foreign Demands may not be an⯑ſwered by our Exports without drawing Caſh out of the Kingdom?
238. Whether as Induſtry increaſed, our Manu⯑factures would not flouriſh? and as theſe flouriſhed, whether better Returns would not be made from Eſtates to their Landlords, both within and with⯑out the Kingdom?
239. Whether the ſure Way to ſupply People with Tools and Materials, and to ſet them at Work, be not a free Circulation of Money, whether Silver of Paper?
240. Whether in New England, all Trade and Buſineſs is not as much at a Stand, upon a Scarcity of Paper-Money, as with us from the Want of Specie?
241. Whether it be certain, that the Quantity of Silver in the Bank of Amſterdam be greater now than at firſt? but whether it be not certain that there is a greater Circulation of Induſtry and Ex⯑tent of Trade, more People, Ships, Houſes and Commodities of all Sorts, more Power by Sea and Land?
242. Whether Money, lying dead in the Bank of Amſterdam, would not be as uſeleſs as in the Mine?
243. Whether our viſible Security in Land could be doubted? And whether there be any Thing like this in the Bank of Amſterdam?
244. Whether it be juſt to apprehend Danger from truſting a national Bank with Power to extend its Credit, to circulate Notes which it ſhall be Felo⯑ny to counterfeit, to receive Goods on Loans, to purchaſe Lands, to ſell alſo or alienate them, and to deal in Bills of Exchange; when theſe Powers are no other than have been truſted for many Years [146] with the Bank of England, although in Truth but a private Bank?
245. Whether the Objection from Monopolies and an Over-Growth of Power, which are made againſt private Banks, can poſſibly hold againſt a national one?
246. Whether the evil Effects, which of late Years have attended Paper-Money and Credit in Europe, did not ſpring from Subſcriptions, Shares, Dividends and Stock-Jobbing?
247. Whether the great Evils attending Paper-Money in the Britiſh Plantations of America have not ſprung from the over-rating their Lands, and iſſuing Paper without Diſcretion, and from the Legiſlators breaking their own Rules in Favour of themſelves, thus ſacrificing the Public to their pri⯑vate Benefit? And whether a little Senſe and Ho⯑neſty might not eaſily prevent all ſuch Inconveni⯑encies?
248. Whether the Subject of Free-thinking in Religion be not exhauſted? And whether it be not high Time for our Free-Thinkers to turn their Thoughts to the Improvement of their Country?
249. Whether it muſt not be ruinous for a Na⯑tion to ſit down to game, be it with Silver or with Paper?
250. Whether, therefore, the circulating Paper, in the late ruinous Schemes of France and England, was the true Evil, and not rather the circulating thereof without Induſtry? And whether the Bank of Amſterdam, where Induſtry had been for ſo ma⯑ny Years ſubſiſted and circulated by Transfers on Paper, doth not clearly decide this Point?
251. Whether there are not to be ſeen in Ame⯑rica fair Towns, wherein the People are well lodg⯑ed, fed and clothed, without a Beggar in their [147] Streets, although there be not one Grain of Gold or Silver current among them?
252. Whether theſe People do not exerciſe all Arts and Trades, build Ships and navigate them to all Parts of the World, purchaſe Lands, till and reap the Fruits of them, buy and ſell, educate and provide for their Children? Whether they do not even indulge themſelves in foreign Vanities?
253. Whether, whatever Inconveniencies thoſe People may have incurred, from not obſerving either Rules or Bounds in their Paper-Money, yet it be not certain that they are in a more flouriſhing Condition, have larger and better built Towns, more Plenty, more Induſtry, more Arts and Civi⯑lity, and a more extenſive Commerce, than when they had Gold and Silver current among them?
254. Whether a View of the ruinous Effects of abſurd Schemes and Credit miſmanaged, ſo as to produce Gaming and Madneſs inſtead of Induſtry, can be any juſt Objection againſt a national Bank calculated purely to promote Induſtry?
255. Whether a Scheme for the Welfare of this Nation ſhould not take in the whole Inhabitants? And whether it be not a vain Attempt, to project the flouriſhing of our Proteſtant Gentry, excluſive of the Bulk of the Natives?
256. Whether an Oath, teſtifying Allegiance to the King and diſclaiming the Pope's Authority in Temporals, may not be juſtly required of the Ro⯑man-Catholics? And whether, in common Pru⯑dence or Policy, any Prieſt ſhould be tolerated who refuſeth to take it?
257. Whether there is any ſuch Thing as a Bo⯑dy of Inhabitants, in any Roman-Catholic Coun⯑try under the Sun, that profeſs an abſolute Submiſ⯑ſion to the Pope's Orders in Matters of an indif⯑ferent [148] Nature, or that in ſuch Points do not think it their Duty, to obey the civil Government?
258. Whether ſince the Peace of Utrecht, Maſs was not celebrated, and the Sacraments adminiſtred in divers Dioceſes of Sicily, notwithſtanding the Pope's Interdict?
259. Whether a Sum, which would go but a little Way towards erecting Hoſpitals for maintain⯑ing and educating the Children of the native Iriſh, might not go far in binding them out Apprentices to Proteſtant Maſters, for Husbandry, uſeful Trades, and the Service of Families?
260. Whether there be any Inſtance, of a Peo⯑ple's being converted in a Chriſtian Senſe other⯑wiſe than by preaching to them and inſtructing them in their own Language?
261. Whether Catechiſts in the Iriſh Tongue may not eaſily be procured and ſubſiſted? And whether this would not be the moſt practicable Means for converting the Natives?
262. Whether it be not of great Advantage to the Church of Rome, that ſhe hath Clergy ſuited to all Ranks of Men, in gradual Subordination from Cardinals down to Mendicants?
263. Whether her numerous poor Clergy are not very uſeful in Miſſions, and of much Influence with the People?
264. Whether in Defect of able Miſſionaries, Perſons converſant in low Life, and ſpeaking the Iriſh Tongue, if well inſtructed in the firſt Princi⯑ples of Religion and in the popiſh Controverſy, though for the reſt on a Level with the Pariſh Clerks, or the School-maſters of Charity-Schools, may not be fit to mix with and bring over our poor illiterate Natives to the eſtabliſhed Church? Whe⯑ther it is not to be wiſhed that ſome Parts of our [149] Liturgy and Homilies were publicly read in the Iriſh Language? And whether, in theſe Views, it may not be right to breed up ſome of the better Sort of Children in the Charity-Schools and qualify them for Miſſionaries, Catechiſts and Readers?
265. Whether a 'Squire poſſeſſed of Land to the Value of a thouſand Pounds per Annum, or a Merchant worth twenty thouſand Pounds in Caſh would have moſt Power to do good or evil upon any Emergency? And whether the ſuffering Roman Catholics to purchaſe forfeited Lands, would not be good Policy as tending to unite their Intereſt with that of the Government?
266. Whether the Sea-ports of Galway, Limerick, Cork, and Waterford, are not to be looked on as Keys of this Kingdom? And whether the Mer⯑chants are not poſſeſſed of theſe Keys; and who are the moſt numerous Merchants in thoſe Cities?
267. Whether a Merchant cannot more ſpeedily raiſe a Sum, more eaſily conceal or transfer his Effects, and engage in any deſperate Deſign with more ſafety than a landed Man, whoſe Eſtate is a Pledge for his Behaviour?
268. Whether a wealthy Merchant bears not great Sway among the Populace of a trading City? And whether Power be not ultimately lodged in the People?
269. Whether, as others have ſuppoſed an At⯑lantis, or Eutopia, we alſo may not ſuppoſe an Hy⯑perborean Iſland inhabited by reaſonable Creatures?
270. Whether an indifferent Perſon, who looks into all Hands, may not be a better Judge of the Game than a Party who ſees only his own?
271. Whether there be any Country in Chriſ⯑tendom more capable of Improvement than Ireland?
272. Whether we are not as far before other Nations with reſpect to natural Advantages, as [150] we are behind them with reſpect to Arts and In⯑duſtry?
273. Whether we do not live in a moſt fertile Soil and temperate Climate, and yet whether our People in general do not feel great Want and Miſery?
274. Whether my Countrymen are not readier at finding Excuſes than Remedies?
275. Whether the Wealth and Proſperity of our Country do not hang by a Hair, the Probity of one Banker, the Caution of another, and the Lives of all?
276. Whether we have not been ſufficiently ad⯑moniſhed of this by ſome late Events?
277. Whether a national Bank would not at once ſecure our Properties, put an End to Uſury, facilitate Commerce, ſupply the Want of Coin, and produce ready Payments in all Parts of the Kingdom?
278. Whether the Uſe or Nature of Money, which all Men ſo eagerly purſue, be yet ſufficiently underſtood or conſidered by all?
279. What doth Ariſtotle mean by ſaying— [...]. de Repub. l. ix. 9.
280. Whether Mankind are not governed by Imitation rather than by Reaſon?
281. Whether there be not a Meaſure or Limit within which Gold and Silver are uſeful, and beyond which they may be hurtful?
282. Whether that Meaſure be not the circulat⯑ing of Induſtry?
283. Whether a Diſcovery of the richeſt Gold Mine, that ever was, in the Heart of this Kingdom, would be a real Advantage to us?
284. Whether it would not tempt Foreigners to prey upon us?
285. Whether it would not render us a lazy, proud, and daſtardly People?
[151] 286. Whether every Man who had Money enough, would not be a Gentleman? And whether a Nation of Gentlemen would not be a wretched Nation?
287. Whether all Things would not bear a high Price? And whether Men would not increaſe their Fortunes without being the better for it?
288. Whether the ſame Evils would be appre⯑hended from Paper-Money under an honeſt and thrifty Regulation?
289. Whether, therefore, a national Bank would not be more beneficial than even a Mine of Gold?
290. Whether without private Banks what little Buſineſs and Induſtry there is would not ſtagnate? But whether it be not a mighty Privilege for a pri⯑vate Perſon, to be able to create an hundred Pounds with a Daſh of his Pen?
291. Whether the wiſe State of Venice was not the firſt that conceived the Advantage of a national Bank?
292. Whether the great Exactneſs and Integrity, with which this Bank is managed, be not the chief Support of that Republic?
293. Whether the Bank of Amſterdam was not begun about one hundred and thirty Years ago, and whether at this Day, its Stock be not conceived to amount to three thouſand Tons of Gold, or thirty Millions Sterling?
294. Whether all Payments of Contracts for Goods in groſs and Letters of Exchange, muſt not be made by Transfers in the Bank Books, provided the Sum exceed three hundred Florins?
295. Whether it be not owing to this Bank, that the City of Amſterdam, without the leaſt Con⯑fuſion, Hazard or Trouble, maintains and every Day promotes ſo general and quick a Circulation of Induſtry?
[152] 296. Whether it be not the greateſt Help and Spur to Commerce, that Property can be ſo readily conveyed and ſo well ſecured by a Compte en Banc, that is, by only writing one Man's Name for ano⯑ther's in the Bank-Book?
297. Whether at the beginning of the laſt Cen⯑tury, thoſe who had lent Money to the Public dur⯑ing the War with Spain, were not ſatisfied by the ſole Expedient of placing their Names in a Compte en Banc, with Liberty to transfer their Claims?
298. Whether the Example of thoſe eaſy Tranſ⯑fers in the Compte en Banc, thus caſually erected, did not tempt other Men to become Creditors to the Public, in order to profit by the ſame ſecure and expeditious Method of keeping and transferring their Wealth?
299. Whether this Compte en Banc hath not proved better than a Mine of Gold to Amſterdam?
300. Whether that City may not be ſaid to owe her Greatneſs to the unpromiſing Accident of her having been in Debt more than ſhe was able to pay?
301. Whether it be known that any State from ſuch ſmall Beginnings, in ſo ſhort a time, ever grew to ſo great Wealth and Power, as the Pro⯑vince of Holland hath done; and whether the Bank of Amſterdam hath not been the real Cauſe of ſuch extraordinary Growth?
302. Whether the Succeſs of thoſe public Banks, in Venice, Amſterdam, and Hamburgh, would not naturally produce in other States an Inclination to the ſame Methods?
303. Whether it be poſſible for a national Bank to ſubſiſt and maintain its Credit, under a French Government?
304. Whether our natural Appetites, as well as Powers, are not limited to their reſpective Ends [153] and Uſes? But whether artificial Appetites may not be infinite?
305. Whether the ſimple getting of Money, or paſſing it from Hand to Hand without Induſtry, be an Object worthy of a wiſe Government?
306. Whether, if Money be conſidered as an End, the Appetite thereof be not infinite? But whether the Ends of Money itſelf be not bounded?
307. Whether the total Sum of all other Powers, be it of Enjoyment or Action, which belong to Man, or to all Mankind together, is not in truth a very narrow and limited Quantity? But whether Fancy is not boundleſs?
308. Whether this capricious Tyrant, which uſurps the Place of Reaſon, doth not moſt cruelly torment and delude thoſe poor Men, the Uſurers, Stock-Jobbers and Projectors, of Content to them⯑ſelves from heaping up Riches, that is, from gather⯑ing Counters, from multiplying Figures, from en⯑larging Denominations, without knowing what they would be at, and without having a proper Regard to the Uſe, or End, or Nature of Things?
309. Whether the Ignis-fatuus of Fancy doth not kindle immoderate Deſires, and lead Men into end⯑leſs Purſuits and wild Labyrinths?
310. Whether Counters be not referred to other Things, which ſo long as they keep Pace and Pro⯑portion with the Counters, it muſt be owned the Counters are uſeful, but whether beyond that to value or covet Counters, be not direct Folly?
311. Whether the public Aim ought not to be that Mens Induſtry ſhould ſupply their preſent Wants, and the Overplus be converted into a Stock of Power?
312. Whether the better this Power is ſecured, and the more eaſily it is transferred, Induſtry be not ſo much the more encouraged?
[154] 313. Whether Money, more than is expedient for thoſe Purpoſes, be not upon the whole hurtful, rather than beneficial to a State?
314. Whether the promoting of Induſtry ſhould not be always in View, as the true and ſole End, the Rule and Meaſure of a national Bank? And whether all Deviations from that Object ſhould not be carefully avoided?
315. Whether it may not be uſeful, for ſupply⯑ing Manufactures and Trade with Stock, for regu⯑lating Exchange, for quickening Commerce, for putting Spirit into the People?
316. Whether we are ſufficiently ſenſible, of the peculiar Security there is in having a Bank, that conſiſts of Land and Paper, one of which cannot be exported, and the other is in no Danger of be⯑ing exported?
317. Whether it be not delightful to complain? And whether there be not many who had rather utter their Complaints than redreſs their Evils?
318. Whether, if the Crown of the Wiſe be their Riches *, we are not the fooliſheſt People in Chriſ⯑tendom?
319. Whether we have not all the while great civil as well as natural Advantages?
320. Whether there be any People, who have more Leiſure to cultivate the Arts of Peace, and ſtudy the public Weal?
321. Whether other Nations who enjoy any Share of Freedom, and have great Objects in View, be not unavoidably embaraſſed and diſtracted by Factions? But whether we do not divide upon Trifles, and whether our Parties are not a Burlesk upon Politics?
322. Whether it be not an Advantage that we are not embroiled in foreign Affairs, that we hold [155] not the Balance of Europe, that we are protected by other Fleets and Armies, that it is the true In⯑tereſt of a powerful People, from whom we are deſcended, to guard us on all Sides?
323. Whether England doth not really love us and wiſh well to us, as Bone of her Bone, and Fleſh of her Fleſh? And whether it be not our Part, to cultivate this Love and Affection all manner of Ways?
324. What Sea-Ports or foreign Trade have the Swiſſes; and yet how warm are thoſe People and how well provided?
325. Whether there may not be found a People who ſo contrive as to be impoveriſhed by their Trade? And whether we are not that People?
326. Whether it would not be better for this Iſland, if all our fine Folk of both Sexes were ſhipped off, to remain in foreign Countries, rather than that they ſhould ſpend their Eſtates at home in foreign Luxury, and ſpread the Contagion thereof through their native Land?
327. Whether our Gentry underſtand or have a Notion of Magnificence, and whether for Want thereof, they do not affect very wretched Diſ⯑tinctions?
328. Whether there be not an Art or Skill in governing human Pride, ſo as to render it ſubſer⯑vient to the public Aim?
329. Whether the great and general Aim of the Public ſhould not be to employ the People?
330. What right an eldeſt Son hath to the worſt Education?
331. Whether Mens Counſels are not the Reſult of their Knowledge and their Principles?
332. Whether there be not Labour of the Brains as well as of the Hands, and whether the former is beneath a Gentleman?
[156] 333. Whether the Public be more intereſted, to protect the Property acquired by mere Birth, than that which is the immediate Fruit of Learning and Virtue?
334. Whether it would not be a poor and ill-judged Project to attempt to promote the Good of the Community, by invading the Rights of one Part thereof, or of one particular Order of Men?
335. Whether there be a more wretched, and at the ſame time a more unpitied Caſe, than for Men to make Precedents for their own Undoing?
336. Whether to determine about the Rights and Properties of Men by other Rules than the Law, be not dangerous?
337. Whether thoſe Men, who move the Corner-Stones of a Conſtitution, may not pull an old Houſe on their own Heads?
338. Whether there be not two general Methods whereby Men become Sharers in the national Stock of Wealth or Power, Induſtry and Inheritance? And whether it would be wiſe in a civil Society to leſſen that Share which is allotted to Merit and In⯑duſtry?
339. Whether all Ways of ſpending a Fortune be of equal Benefit to the Public, and what Sort of Men are apteſt to run into an improper Expence?
340. If the Revenues allotted for the Encou⯑ragement of Religion and Learning were made he⯑reditary in the Hands of a dozen Lay-Lords and as many overgrown Commoners, whether the Public would be much the better for it?
341. Whether the Church's Patrimony belongs to one Tribe alone; and whether every Man's Son, Brother, or himſelf may not, if he pleaſe, be quali⯑fied to ſhare therein?
342. What is there in the Clergy to create a Jealouſy in the Public? Or what would the Public [157] loſe by it, if every 'Squire in the Land wore a black Coat, ſaid his Prayers, and was obliged to reſide?
343. Whether there be any Thing perfect under the Sun? And whether it be not with the World as with a particular State, and with a State or Body-Politic as with the human Body, which lives and moves under various Indiſpoſitions, perfect Health being ſeldom or never to be found?
344. Whether, nevertheleſs, Men ſhould not in all Things aim at Perfection? And, therefore, whether any wiſe and good Man would be againſt applying Remedies? But whether it is not natural to wiſh for a benevolent Phyſician?
345. Whether the public Happineſs be not pro⯑poſed by the Legiſlature, and whether ſuch Happi⯑neſs doth not contain that of the Individuals?
346. Whether, therefore, a Legiſlator ſhould be content with a vulgar Share of Knowledge? Whether he ſhould not be a Perſon of Reflexion and Thought, who hath made it his Study to un⯑derſtand the true Nature and Intereſt of Mankind, how to guide Mens Humours and Paſſions, how to incite their active Powers, how to make their ſeveral Talents co-operate to the mutual Benefit of each other, and the general Good of the whole?
347. Whether it doth not follow, that above all Things a Gentleman's Care ſhould be to keep his own Faculties ſound and entire?
348. Whether the natural Phlegm of this Iſland needs any additional Stupifier?
349. Whether all ſpirituous Liquors are not, in Truth, Opiates?
350. Whether our Men of Buſineſs are not ge⯑nerally very grave by fifty?
351. Whether all Men have not Faculties of Mind or Body, which may be employed for the public Benefit?
[158] 352. Whether the main Point be not to multiply and employ our People?
353. Whether hearty Food and warm Clothing would not enable and encourage the lower Sort to labour?
354. Whether in ſuch a Soil as ours, if there was Induſtry, there could be Want?
355. Whether the Way to make Men induſtri⯑ous, be not to let them taſte the Fruits of their In⯑duſtry? And whether the labouring Ox ſhould be muzzled?
356. Whether our Landlords are to be told, that Induſtry and Numbers would raiſe the Value of their Lands, or that one Acre about the Tholſel is worth ten thouſand Acres in Conaught?
357. Whether our old native Iriſh are not the moſt indolent and ſupine People in Chriſtendom?
358. Whether they are yet civilized, and whether their Habitations and Furniture are not more ſordid than thoſe of the Savage Americans?
359. Whether it be not a ſad Circumſtance to live among lazy Beggars? And whether, on the other hand, it would not be delightful to live in a Country ſwarming like China, with buſy People?
360. Whether we ſhould not caſt about, by all Manner of Means, to excite Induſtry, and to re⯑move whatever hinders it? And whether every one ſhould not lend an helping Hand?
361. Whether Vanity itſelf ſhould not be engag⯑ed in this good Work? And whether it is not to be wiſhed, that the finding of Employment for themſelves and others, were a faſhionable Diſtinc⯑tion among the Ladies?
362. Whether Idleneſs be the Mother or the Daughter of Spleen?
[159] 363. Whether it may not be worth while to publiſh the Converſation of Iſchomachus and his Wife in Xenophon, for the Uſe of our Ladies?
364. Whether it is true, that there have been, upon a Time, one hundred Millions of People em⯑ployed in China, without the Woollen-Trade, or any foreign Commerce?
365. Whether the natural Inducements to Sloth are not greater in the Mogul's Country than in Ireland, and yet, whether in that ſuffocating and diſpiriting Climate, the Banyans are not all, Men, Women and Children, conſtantly employed?
366. Whether it be not true, that the great Mogul's Subjects might underſell us even in our own Markets, and clothe our People with their Stuffs and Calicoes, if they were imported Duty-free?
367. Whether there can be a greater Reproach on the leading Men and the Patriots of a Country, than that the People ſhould want Employment? And whether Methods may not be found to employ even the Lame and the Blind, the Dumb, the Deaf, and the Maimed, in ſome or other Branch of our Manufactures?
368. Whether much may not be expected from a biennial Conſultation of ſo many wiſe Men about the public Good?
369. Whether a Tax upon Dirt would not be one Way of encouraging Induſtry?
370. Whether it would be a great Hardſhip if every Pariſh were obliged to find Work for their Poor?
371. Whether Children, eſpecially, ſhould not be inured to labour betimes?
372. Whether there ſhould not be erected, in each Province, an Hoſpital for Orphans and Found⯑lings at the Expence of old Bachelors?
[160] 373. Whether it be true, that in the Dutch Work-Houſes, Things are ſo managed, that a Child four Years old, may earn its own Livelihood?
374. What a Folly is it to build fine Houſes, or eſtabliſh lucrative Poſts and large Incomes, under the Notion of providing for the Poor?
375. Whether the poor grown up and in Health need any other Proviſion, but their own Induſtry under public Inſpection?
376. Whether the Poor-Tax in England hath leſſened, or increaſed the Number of the Poor?
377. Whether Work-Houſes ſhould not be made at the leaſt Expence, with Clay-Floors and Walls of rough Stone, without plaiſtering, cieling, or glazing?
378. Whether it be an impoſſible Attempt to ſet our People at work, or whether Induſtry be a Habit which like other Habits, may by Time and Skill be introduced among any People?
379. Whether all manner of Means ſhould not be employed to poſſeſs the Nation in general, with an Averſion and Contempt for Idleneſs and all idle Folk?
380. Whether it would be a Hardſhip on People deſtitute of all Things, if the Public furniſhed them with Neceſſaries which they ſhould be obliged to earn by their Labour?
381. Whether other Nations have not found great Benefit from the Uſe of Slaves in repairing High-Roads, making Rivers navigable, draining Bogs, erecting public Buildings, Bridges, and Ma⯑nufactures?
382. Whether temporary Servitude would not be the beſt Cure for Idleneſs and Beggary?
383. Whether the Public hath not a Right to employ thoſe who cannot, or who will not find Employment for themſelves?
[161] 384. Whether all ſturdy Beggars ſhould not be ſeized and made Slaves to the Public, for a certain Term of Years?
385. Whether he who is chained in a Jail or Dungeon hath not, for the Time, loſt his Liberty? And if ſo, whether temporary Slavery be not al⯑ready admitted among us?
386. Whether a State of Servitude, wherein he ſhould be well worked, fed and clothed, would not be a Preferment to ſuch a Fellow?
387. Whether Criminals in the freeſt Country may not forfeit their Liberty, and repair the Da⯑mage they have done the Public, by hard Labour?
388. What the Word Servant ſignifies in the New-Teſtament?
389. Whether the View of Criminals chained in Pairs and kept at hard Labour, would not be very edifying to the Multitude?
390. Whether the Want of ſuch an Inſtitution be not plainly ſeen in England, where the Disbelief of a future State hardeneth Rogues againſt the Fear of Death, and where, through the great Growth of Robbers and Houſe-breakers it becomes every Day more neceſſary?
391. Whether it be not eaſier to prevent than to remedy, and whether we ſhould not profit by the Example of others?
392. Whether Felons are not often ſpared, and therefore encouraged, by the Compaſſion of thoſe who ſhould proſecute them?
393. Whether many that would not take away the Life of a Thief, may not nevertheleſs be willing to bring him to a more adequate Puniſhment?
394. Whether the moſt indolent would be fond of Idleneſs, if they regarded it as the ſure Road to hard Labour?
[162] 395. Whether the Induſtry of the lower Part of our People doth not much depend on the Expence of the upper?
396. What would be the Conſequence, if our Gentry affected to diſtinguiſh themſelves by fine Houſes rather than fine Clothes?
397. Whether any People in Europe are ſo meanly provided with Houſes and Furniture in proportion to their Incomes, as the Men of Eſtates in Ireland?
398. Whether Building would not peculiarly encourage all other Arts in this Kingdom?
399. Whether Smiths, Maſons, Bricklayers, Plaiſterers, Carpenters, Joiners, Tylers, Plummers, and Glaziers, would not all find Employment if the Humour of Building prevailed?
400. Whether the Ornaments and Furniture of a good Houſe do not employ a Number of all Sorts of Artificers, in Iron, Wood, Marble, Braſs, Pewter, Copper, Wool, Flax, and divers other Materials?
401. Whether in Buildings and Gardens, a great Number of Day-Labourers do not find Em⯑ployment?
402. Whether by theſe Means much of that Suſtenance and Wealth of this Nation which now goes to Foreigners would not be kept at home, and nourish and circulate among our own People?
403. Whether as Induſtry produceth good Liv⯑ing, the Number of Hands and Mouths would not be increaſed; and in proportion thereunto, whether there would not be every Day more occaſion for Agriculture? And whether this Article alone would not employ a World of People?
404. Whether ſuch Management would not equally provide for the Magnificence of the Rich, and the Neceſſities of the Poor?
[163] 405. Whether an Expence in Building and Im⯑provements doth not remain at Home, paſs to the Heir, and adorn the Public? And whether any of thoſe Things can be ſaid of Claret?
406. Whether Fools do not make Faſhions, and wiſe Men follow them?
407. Whether, for one who hurts his Fortune by Improvements, twenty do not ruin themſelves by foreign Luxury?
408. Whether in proportion as Ireland was im⯑proved and beautified by fine Seats, the Number of Abſentees would not decreaſe?
409. Whether he who employs Men in Build⯑ings and Manufactures doth not put Life in the Country, and whether the Neighbourhood round him be not obſerved to thrive?
410. Whether Money circulated on the Land⯑lords own Lands, and among his own Tenants, doth not return into his own Pocket?
411. Whether every 'Squire that made his Do⯑main ſwarm with buſy Hands, like a Bee-Hive or Ant-Hill, would not ſerve his own Intereſt, as well as that of his Country?
412. Whether a Gentleman, who hath ſeen a little of the World and obſerved how Men live elſewhere, can contentedly ſit down in a cold, damp, ſordid Habitation, in the midſt of a bleak Country, inhabited by Thieves and Beggars?
413. Whether on the other hand, a handſom Seat amidſt well-improved Lands, fair Villages, and a thriving Neighbourhood, may not invite a Man to dwell on his own Eſtate, and quit the Life of an inſignificant Santerer about Town, for that of an uſeful Country-Gentleman?
414. Whether it would not be of Uſe and Orna⯑ment, if the Towns throughout this Kingdom were provided with decent Churches, Town-Houſes, [164] Work-Houſes, Market-Places, and paved Streets, with ſome Order taken for Cleanlineſs?
415. Whether if each of theſe Towns were ad⯑dicted to ſome peculiar Manufacture, we ſhould not find, that the employing many Hands together on the ſame Work was the Way to perfect our Work⯑men? And whether all theſe Things might not ſoon be provided by a domeſtic Induſtry, if Money were not wanting?
416. Whether Money could ever be wanting to the Demands of Induſtry, if we had a national Bank?
417. Whether the Fable of Hercules and the Carter, ever ſuited any Nation like this Nation of Ireland?
418. Whether it be not a new Spectacle under the Sun, to behold in ſuch a Climate and ſuch a Soil, and under ſuch a gentle Government, ſo many Roads untroden, Fields untilled, Houſes deſolate, and Hands unemployed?
419. Whether there is any Country in Chriſten⯑dom, either Kingdom or Republic, depending or independent, free or inſlaved, which may not afford us an uſeful Leſſon?
420. Whether the frugal Swiſſes have any other Commodities, but their Butter and Cheeſe and a few Cattle, for Exportation; whether, nevertheleſs, the ſingle Canton of Bern hath not in her public Treaſury two Millions Sterling?
421. Whether that ſmall Town of Bern, with its ſcanty, barren Territory, in a mountainous Corner, without Sea-Ports, without Manufactures, without Mines, be not rich by mere Dint of Fru⯑gality?
422. Whether the Swiſſes in general have not ſumptuary Laws, prohibiting the uſe of Gold, Jewels, Silver, Silk and Lace in their Apparel, and indulg⯑ing [165] the Women only to wear Silk on Feſtivals, Weddings, and public Solemnities?
423. Whether there be not two Ways of grow⯑ing Rich, ſparing and getting? But whether the lazy Spendthrift muſt not be doubly poor?
424. Whether Money circulating be not the Life of Induſtry; and whether the Want thereof doth not render a State gouty and inactive?
425. But, whether if we had a national Bank, and our preſent Caſh (ſmall as it is) were put into the moſt convenient Shape, Men ſhould hear any public Complaints for want of Money?
426. Whether all Circulation be not alike a Cir⯑culation of Credit, whatſoever Medium (Metal or Paper) is employed, and whether Gold be any more than Credit for ſo much Power?
427. Whether the Wealth of the richeſt Nations in Chriſtendom doth not conſiſt in Paper, vaſtly more than in Gold and Silver?
428. Whether Lord Clarendon doth not aver of his own Knowledge, that the Prince of Orange, with the beſt Credit, and the Aſſiſtance of the rich⯑eſt Men in Amſterdam, was above ten Days en⯑deavouring to raiſe twenty thouſand Pounds in Specie, without being able to raiſe half the Sum in all that Time? See Clarendon's Hiſtory, B. 12.
429. Suppoſing there had been hitherto no ſuch Thing as a Bank, and the Queſtion were now firſt propoſed, whether it would be ſafer to circulate un⯑limited Bills in a private Credit, or Bills to a limited Value on the public Credit of the Community, what would Men think?
430. Whether the Maxim, What is every Body's Buſineſs is no Body's, prevails in any Country under the Sun more than in Ireland?
431. Whether the united Stock of a Nation be not the beſt Security? And whether any Thing [166] but the Ruin of the State can produce a national Bankruptcy?
432. Whether the total Sum of the public Trea⯑ſure, Power and Wiſdom, all co-operating, be not moſt likely to eſtabliſh a Bank of Credit, ſufficient to anſwer the Ends, relieve the Wants, and ſatisfy the Scruples of all People?
433. Whether London is not to be conſidered as the Metropolis of Ireland? And whether our Wealth (ſuch as it is) doth not circulate through London, and throughout all England, as freely as that of any Part of his Majeſty's Dominions?
434. Whether therefore it be not evidently the Intereſt of the People of England, to encourage rather than to oppoſe a national Bank in this King⯑dom, as well as every other Means for advancing our Wealth, which ſhall not impair their own?
435. Whether it is not our Intereſt to be uſeful to them rather than rival them; and whether in that Caſe we may not be ſure of their good Offices?
436. Whether we can propoſe to thrive, ſo long as we entertain a wrongheaded Diſtruſt of Eng⯑land?
437. Whether, as a national Bank would in⯑creaſe our Induſtry, and that our Wealth, England may not be a proportionable Gainer; and whether we ſhould not conſider the Gains of our Mother-Country as ſome Acceſſion to our own?
438. Whether there be any Difficulty in com⯑prehending, that the whole Wealth of the Nation is in truth the Stock of a national Bank? And whether any more than the right Comprehenſion of this, be neceſſary to make all Men eaſy with regard to its Credit?
439. Whether the Prejudices about Gold and Silver are not ſtrong, but whether they are not ſtill Prejudices?
[167] 440. Whether Paper doth not by its Stamp and Signature acquire a local Value, and become as precious and as ſcarce as Gold? And whether it be not much fitter to circulate large Sums, and there⯑fore preferable to Gold?
441. Whether it doth not much import to have a right Conception of Money? And whether its true and juſt Idea be not that of a Ticket, intitling to Power, and fitted to record and transfer ſuch Power?
442. Though the Bank of Amſterdam doth very rarely, if at all, pay out Money, yet whether every Man poſſeſſed of Specie be not ready to convert it into Paper, and act as Caſhier to the Bank? And whether, from the ſame Motive, every monied Man throughout this Kingdom, would not be Caſhier to our national Bank?
443. Whether we may not obtain that as Friends, which it is in vain to hope for as Rivals?
444. Whether in every Inſtance by which we prejudice England, we do not in a greater Degree prejudice ourſelves?
445. Whether in the rude Original of Society, the firſt Step was not the exchanging of Commo⯑dities, the next a ſubſtituting of Metals by Weight as the common Medium of Circulation, after this the making uſe of Coin, laſtly a further Refine⯑ment by the uſe of Paper with proper Marks and Signatures? And whether this, as it is the laſt, ſo it be not the greateſt Improvement?
446. Whether we are not in Fact the only People, who may be ſaid to ſtarve in the midſt of Plenty?
447. Whether there can be a worſe Sign than that People ſhould quit their Country for a Live⯑lihood? Though Men often leave their Country for Health, or Pleaſure, or Riches, yet to leave it [168] merely for a Livelihood? Whether this be not ex⯑ceeding bad, and ſheweth ſome peculiar Miſma⯑nagement?
448. Whether in Order to redreſs our Evils, artificial Helps are not moſt wanted, in a Land where Induſiry is moſt againſt the natural Grain of the People?
449. Whether, although the Prepoſſeſſions about Gold and Silver have taken deep Root, yet the Example of our Colonies in America doth not make it as plain as Day-Light, that they are not ſo ne⯑ceſſary to the Wealth of a Natiion, as the Vulgar of all Ranks imagine?
450. Whether it be not evident that we may maintain a much greater inward and outward Com⯑merce, and be five Times richer than we are, nay, and our Bills abroad be of far greater Credit, though we had not one Ounce of Gold or Silver in the whole Iſland?
451. Whether wrongheaded Maxims, Cuſtoms, and Faſhions, are not ſufficient to deſtroy any People which hath ſo few Reſources as the Inha⯑bitants of Ireland?
452. Whether it would not be an horrible Thing, to ſee our Matrons make Dreſs and Play their chief Concern?
453. Whether our Ladies might not as well endow Monaſtries as wear Flanders Lace? And whether it be not true that Popiſh Nuns are main⯑tained by Proteſtant Contributions?
454. Whether England, which hath a free Trade, whatever ſhe remits for foreign Luxury with one hand, doth not with the other receive much more from abroad? Whether, nevertheleſs, this Nation would not be a Gainer, if our Women would content themſelves, with the ſame Moderation in point of Expence, as the Engliſh Ladies?
[169] 455. But whether it be not a notorious Truth, that our Iriſh Ladies are on a Foot, as to dr [...]s, with thoſe of five times their Fortune in England?
456. Whether it be not even certain, that the Matrons of this forlorn Country ſend out a greater Proportion of its Wealth, for fine Apparel, than any other Females on the whole Surface of this terraqueous Globe?
457. Whether the Expence, great as it is, be the greateſt Evil; but whether this Folly may not produce many other Follies, an entire derange⯑ment of domeſtic Life, abſurd Manners, neglect of Duties, bad Mothers, a general Corruption in both Sexes?
458. Whether the firſt beginning of Expedients do not always meet with Prejudices? And whether even the Prejudices of a People ought not to be reſpected?
459. Whether a national Bank be not the true Philoſopher's Stone in a State?
460. Whether all Regulations of Coin ſhould not be made with a View to encourage Induſtry, and a Circulation of Commerce, throughout the Kingdom?
461. Whether to oil the Wheels of Commerce, be not a common Benefit? And whether this be not done by avoiding Fractions and multiplying ſmall Silver?
462. Whether, all Things conſidered, a general raiſing the Value of Gold and Silver be not ſo far from bringing greater Quantities thereof into the Kingdom, that it would produce a direct contrary Effect, inaſmuch as leſs, in that Caſe, would ſerve, and therefore leſs be wanted? And whether Men do not import a Commodity, in Proportion to the Demand or Want of it?
[170] 463. Whether the lowering of our Gold would not create a Fever in the State? And whether a Fever be not ſometimes a Cure, but whether it be not the laſt Cure a Man would chooſe?
464. Whether raiſing the Value of a particular Species will not tend to multiply ſuch Species, and to leſſen others in Proportion thereunto? And whether a much leſt Quantity of Caſh in Silver would not, in reality, enrich the Nation more than a much greater in Gold?
465. Whether, caeteris paribus, it be not true that the Prices of Things increaſe, as the Quantity of Money increaſeth, and are diminiſhed as that is diminiſhed? And whether, by the Quantity of Money, is not to be underſtood the Amount of the Denominations, all Contracts being nominal for Pounds, Shillings and Pence, and not for Weights of Gold or Silver?
466. Whether our Exports do not conſiſt of ſuch Neceſſaries as other Countries cannot well be without?
467. Whether upon the Circulation of a national Bank more Land would not be tilled, more Hands employed, and conſequently more Commodities exported?
468. Whether Silver and ſmall Money be not that which circulates the quickeſt, and paſſeth through all Hands, on the Road, in the Market, at the Shop?
469. Whether, all Things conſidered, it would not be better for a Kingdom that its Caſh conſiſted of half a Million in ſmall Silver, than of five Times that Sum in Gold?
470. Whether there be not every Day five hun⯑dred leſſer Payments made for one that requires Gold?
[171] 471. Whether Spain, where Gold bears the higheſt Value, be not the lazieſt; and China, where it bears the loweſt, be not the moſt induſtrious Country in the known World?
472. Whether it be not evidently the Intereſt of every State, that its Money ſhould rather circulate than ſtagnate?
473. Whether the principal Uſe of Caſh be not its ready paſſing from hand to hand, to anſwer com⯑mon Occaſions of the common People, and whether common Occaſions of all Sorts of People are not ſmall ones?
474. Whether Buſineſs at Fairs and Markets is not often at a Stand and often hindred, even though the Seller hath his Commodities at hand, and the Purchaſer his Gold, yet for Want of Change?
475. As Wealth is really Power, and Coin a Ticket conveying Power, whether thoſe Tickets which are the fitteſt for that Uſe, ought not to be preferred?
476. Whether thoſe Tickets which ſingly tranſ⯑fer ſmall Shares of Power, and being multiplied, large Shares, are not fitter for common Uſe than thoſe which ſingly transfer large Shares?
477. Whether the Public is not more benefited by a Shilling that circulates, than a Pound that lies dead?
478. Whether Six-pence twice paid, be not as good as a Shilling once paid?
479. Whether the ſame Shilling circulating in a Village may not ſupply one Man with Bread, another with Stockings, a third with a Knife, a fourth with Paper, a fifth with Nails, and ſo anſwer many Wants which muſt otherwiſe have remained unſatisfied?
480. Whether facilitating and quickening the Circulation of Power to ſupply Wants, be not the [172] promoting of Wealth and Induſtry among the lower People? And whether upon this the Wealth of the Great doth not depend?
481. Whether, without the proper Means of Cir⯑culation, it be not vain to hope for thriving Ma⯑nufacturers and a buſy People?
482. Whether four Pounds in ſmall Caſh may not circulate and enliven an Iriſh Market, which many Four-pound Pieces would permit to ſtag⯑nate?*
483. Whether a Man that could move nothing leſs than an hundred Pound Weight would not be much at a loſs to ſupply his Wants; and whether it would not be better for him to be leſs ſtrong and more active?
484. Whether the natural Body can be in a State of Health and Vigour, without a due Circu⯑lation of the Extremities, even in the Fingers and Toes? And whether the political Body, any more than the natural, can thrive without a proportionable Circulation through the minuteſt and moſt incon⯑ſiderable Parts thereof?
485. If we had a Mint for coining only Shil⯑lings, Six-pences, and Copper Money, whether the Nation would not ſoon feel the good Effects thereof?
486 Whether the greater Waſte by wearing of ſmall Coins would not be abundantly overbalanced by their Uſefulneſs?
487. Whether it be not the Induſtry of com⯑mon People that feeds the State, and whether it be poſſible to keep this Induſtry alive without ſmall Money?
[173] 488. Whether the Want of this be not a great Bar to our employing the People in theſe Manufac⯑tures which are open to us, and do not interfere with Great Britain?
489. Whether therefore ſuch Want doth not drive Men into the lazy Way of employing Land under Sheep-Walk?
490. Whether the running of Wooll from Ire⯑land can ſo effectually be prevented, as by encou⯑raging other Buſineſs and Manufactures among our People?
491. Whatever Commodities Great Britain im⯑porteth, which we might ſupply, whether it be not her real Intereſt to import them from us rather than from any other People?
492. Whether the Apprehenſion of many among us (who for that very Reaſon ſtick to their Wooll) that England may hereaſter prohibit, limit, or diſ⯑courage our Linen-Trade, when it hath been once, with great Pains and Expence thoroughly intro⯑duced and ſettled in this Land, be not altogether groundleſs and unjuſt?
493. Whether it is poſſible for this Country, which hath neither Mines of Gold, nor a free Trade, to ſupport, for any time, the ſending out of Specie?
494. Whether in Fact our Payments are not made by Bills? And whether our foreign Credit doth not depend on our domeſtic Induſtry, and our Bills on that Credit?
495. Whether, in order to mend it, we ought not firſt to know the peculiar Wretchedneſs of our State? And whether there be any knowing of this but by Compariſon?
496. Whether there are not ſingle Market-Towns, in England, that turn more Money in buy⯑ing [174] and ſelling, than whole Counties (perhaps Pro⯑vinces) with us?
497. Whether the ſmall Town of Birmingham alone doth not, upon an Average, circulate every Week one Way or other, to the Value of fifty thouſand Pounds? But whether the ſame Crown may not be often paid?
498. Whether any Kingdom in Europe be ſo good a Cuſtomer at Bourdeaux as Ireland?
499. Whether the Police and OEconomy of France be not governed by wiſe Councils? And whether any one from this Country, who ſees their Towns, and Manufactures, and Commerce, will not wonder what our Senators have been doing?
500. What Variety and Number of excellent Manufactures are to be met with throughout the whole Kingdom of France?
501. Whether there are not every where ſome or other Mills for many Uſes, Forges and Furna⯑ces for Iron Work, Looms for Tapeſtry, Glaſs-Houſes and ſo forth?
502. What Quantities of Paper, Stockings, Hats, what Manufactures of Wooll, Silk, Linen, Hemp, Leather, Wax, Earthen-Ware, Braſs, Lead, Tin, &c.
503. Whether the Manufactures and Commerce of the ſingle Town of Lions do not amount to a greater Value, than all the Manufactures and all the Trade of this Kingdom taken together?
504. Whether in the Anniverſary Fair at the ſmall Town of Beaucair upon the Rhone, there be not as much Money laid out as the current Caſh of this Kingdom amounts to?
505. Whether the very Shreds ſhorn from Woollen-Cloth, which are thrown away in Ireland, do not make a beautiful Tapeſtry in France?
[175] 506. Whether there be not French Towns ſub⯑ſiſted merely by making Pins?
507. Whether the coarſe Fingers of thoſe very Women, thoſe ſame Peaſants, who one Part of the Year till the Ground and dreſs the Vineyards, are not another employed in making the fineſt French Point?
508. Whether there is not a great Number of idle Fingers among the Wives and Daughters of our Peaſants?
509. Whether the French do not raiſe a Trade from Saffron, dying Drugs and the like Products, which may do with us as well as with them?
510. Whether we may not have Materials of our own Growth to ſupply all Manufactures, as well as France, except Silk, and whether the Bulk of what Silk, even France manufactures, be not im⯑ported?
511. Whether it be poſſible for this Country to grow rich, ſo long as what is made by domeſtic Induſtry is ſpent in foreign Luxury?
512. Whether our natural Iriſh are not partly Spaniards, and partly Tartars? and whether they do not bear Signatures of their Deſcent from both theſe Nations, which is alſo confirmed by all their Hiſtories?
513. Whether the Tartar Progeny is not nume⯑rous in this Land? And whether there is an idler Occupation under the Sun than to attend Flocks and Herds of Cattle?
514. Whether the Wiſdom of the State ſhould not wreſtle with this hereditary Diſpoſition of our Tartars, and with a high hand introduce Agri⯑culture?
515. Whether once upon a Time France did not, by her Linen alone, draw yearly from Spain about eight Millions of Livres?
[176] 516. Whether the French have not ſuffered in their Linen-Trade with Spain, by not making their Cloth of due Breadth? and whether any other Peo⯑ple have ſuffered, and are ſtill likely to ſuffer through the ſame Prevarication?*
517. Whether the Spaniards are not rich and lazy, and whether they have not a particular Incli⯑nation and Favour for the Inhabitants of this Iſland? But whether a punctual People do not love punctual Dealers?
518. Whether about fourteen Years ago we had not come into a conſiderable Share of the Linen-Trade with Spain, and what put a Stop to this?
519. Whether if the Linen-Manufacture were carried on in the other Provinces, as well as in the North, the Merchants of Cork, Limerick and Galway would not ſoon find the Way to Spain?
520. Whether the Woollen-Manufacture of Eng⯑land is not divided into ſeveral Parts or Branches, appropriated to particular Places, where they are only, or principally manufactured; fine Cloths in Somerſetſhire, coarſe in Yorkſhire, long Ells at Exeter, Saies at Sudbury, Crapes at Norwich, Linſeys at Ken⯑dal, Blankets at Whitney, and ſo forth?
521. Whether the united Skill, Induſtry and Emulation of many together on the ſame Work, be not the Way to advance it? And whether it had been otherwiſe poſſible for England, to have carried on her Woollen-Manufacture to ſo great Per⯑fection?
522. Whether it would not on many Accounts be right, if we obſerved the ſame Courſe with re⯑ſpect to our Linen-Manufacture; and that Diapers [177] were made in one Town or Diſtrict, Damasks in another, Sheeting in a third, fine wearing Linen in a fourth, coarſe in a fifth, in another Cambricks, in another Thread and Stockings, in others ſtamped Linen, or ſtriped Linen, or Tickings, or dyed Linen, of which laſt Kinds, there is ſo great a Conſumption among the Sea-faring Men of all Nations?
523. Whether it may not be worth while, to in⯑form ourſelves of the different ſorts of Linen, which are in Requeſt among different People?
524. Whether we do not yearly conſume of French Wines about a thouſand Tuns more than either Sweden or Denmark, and yet, whether thoſe Nations pay ready Money as we do?
525. Whether it be not a Cuſtom for ſome thou⯑ſands of Frenchmen to go about the Beginning of March into Spain, and having tilled the Lands and gathered the Harveſt of Spain, to return home with Money in their Pockets, about the End of November?
526. Whether of late Years our Iriſh Labour⯑ers do not carry on the ſame Buſineſs in England, to the great Diſcontent of many there? But whe⯑ther we have not much more Reaſon than the Peo⯑ple of England to be diſpleaſed at this Com⯑merce?
527. Whether, notwithſtanding the Caſh ſup⯑poſed to be brought into it, any Nation is, in truth, a Gainer by ſuch Traffic?
528. Whether the Induſtry of our People em⯑ployed in foreign Lands, while our own are left un⯑cultivated, be not a great Loſs to the Country?
529. Whether it would not be much better for us, if, inſtead of ſending our Men abroad, we could draw Men from the neighbouring Countries to cul⯑tivate our own?
[178] 530. Whether, nevertheleſs, we are not apt to think the Money imported by our Labourers to be ſo much clear Gains to this Country; but whether a little Reflexion and a little political Arithmetic, may not ſhew us our Miſtake?
531. Whether our Prejudices about Gold and Silver are not very apt to infect or miſguide our Judgments and Reaſonings about the public Weal?
532. Whether it be not a good Rule whereby to judge of the Trade of any City, and its Uſeful⯑neſs, to obſerve whether there is a Circulation through the Extremities, and whether the People round about are buſy and warm?
533. Whether we had not, ſome Years ſince, a Manufacture of Hats at Athlone, and of Earthen-Ware at Arklow, and what became of thoſe Manu⯑facures?
534. Why do we not make Tiles of our own, for Flooring and Roofing, rather than bring them from Holland?
535. What Manufactures are there in France and Venice of gilt Leather, how cheap and how ſplen⯑did a Furniture?
536. Whether we may not for the ſame Uſe, manufacture divers Things at home, of more Beau⯑ty and Variety than Wainſcot, which is imported at ſuch Expence from Norway?
537. Whether the Uſe and the Faſhion will not ſoon make a Manufacture?
538. Whether if our Gentry uſed to drink Mead and Cider, we ſhould not ſoon have thoſe Liquors in the utmoſt Perfection and Plenty?
539. Whether it be not wonderful, that with ſuch Paſtures, and ſo many black Cattle, we do not find ourſelves in Cheeſe?
540. Whether great Profits may not be made by Fiſheries? but whether thoſe of our Iriſh who live [179] by that Buſineſs, do not contrive to be drunk and unemployed, one half of the Year?
541. Whether it be not Folly to think, an in⯑ward Commerce cannot enrich a State, becauſe it doth not increaſe its Quantity of Gold and Silver? And whether it is poſſible a Country ſhould not thrive, while Wants are ſupplied, and Buſineſs goes on?
542. Whether Plenty of all the Neceſſaries and Comforts of Life be not real Wealth?
543. Whether Lions by the Advantage of her midland Situation and the Rivers Rhone and Sone, be not a great Magazine, or Mart for inward Com⯑merce? And whether ſhe doth not maintain a con⯑ſtant Trade with moſt Parts of France; with Pro⯑vence for Oils and dried Fruits, for Wines and Cloth I with Languedoc, for Stuffs with Champaign, for Li⯑nen with Picardy, Normandy and Bretagny, for Corn with Burgundy?
544. Whether ſhe doth not receive and utter all thoſe Commodities, and raiſe a Profit from the Diſ⯑tribution thereof, as well as of her own Manufac⯑tures, throughout the Kingdom of France?
545. Whether the Charge of making good Roads and navigable Rivers acroſs the Country, would not be really repaid by an inward Com⯑merce?
546. Whether as our Trade and Manufactures increaſed, Magazines ſhould not be eſtabliſhed in proper Places, fitted by their Situation, near great Roads and navigable Rivers, Lakes or Canals, for the ready Reception and Diſtribution of all Sorts of Commodities, from and to the ſeveral Parts of the Kingdom; and whether the Town of Athlone, for Inſtance, may not be fitly ſituated for ſuch a Ma⯑gazine, or Centre of domeſtic Commerce?
[180] 547. Whether an inward Trade would not cauſe Induſtry to flouriſh, and multiply the Circulation of our Coin, and whether this may not do as well as multiplying the Coin itſelf?
548. Whether the Benefits of a domeſtic Com⯑merce are ſufficiently underſtood and attended to, and whether the Cauſe thereof be not the preju⯑diced and narrow Way of thinking about Gold and Silver?
549. Whether there be any other more eaſy and unenvied Method of increaſing the Wealth of a People?
550. Whether we of this Iſland are not from our peculiar Circumſtances determined to this very Commerce above any other, from the Number of Neceſſaries and good Things that we poſſeſs within ourſelves, from the Extent and Variety of our Soil, from the navigable Rivers and good Roads which we have or may have, at a leſs Expence than any People in Europe, from our great Plenty of Mate⯑rials for Manufactures, and particularly from the Reſtraints we lie under with regard to our foreign Trade?
551. Whether annual Inventories ſhould not be publiſhed of the Fairs throughout the Kingdom, in order to judge of the Growth of its Commerce?
552. Whether there be not every Year more Caſh circulated at the Card-Tables of Dublin, than at all the Fairs of Ireland?
553. Whether the Wealth of a Country will not bear Proportion to the Skill and Induſtry of its Inhabitants?
554. Whether foreign Imports that tend to pro⯑mote Induſtry ſhould not be encouraged, and ſuch as have a Tendency to promote Luxury ſhould not be diſcouraged?
[181] 555. Whether the annual Balance of Trade be⯑tween Italy and Lions be not about four Millions in Favour of the former, and yet, whether Lions be not a Gainer by this Trade?
556. Whether the general Rule, of determining the Profit of a Commerce by its Balance, doth not, like other general Rules, admit of Excep⯑tions?
557. Whether it would not be a monſtrous Fol⯑ly to import nothing but Gold and Silver, ſuppoſing we might do it, from every foreign Part to which we trade? And yet, whether ſome Men may not think this fooliſh Circumſtance a very happy one?
558. But whether we do not all ſee the Ridicule of the Mogul's Subjects, who take from us nothing but our Silver, and bury it under Ground, in order to make ſure thereof againſt the Reſurrection?
559. Whether he muſt not be a wrong-headed Patriot or Politician, whoſe ultimate View was drawing Money into a Country, and keeping it there?
560. Whether it be not evident, that not Gold but Induſtry cauſeth a Country to flouriſh?
561. Whether it would not be a ſilly Project in any Nation, to hope to grow rich by prohibiting the Exportation of Gold and Silver?
562. Whether there can be a greater Miſtake in Politics, than to meaſure the Wealth of the Na⯑tion by its Gold and Silver?
563. Whether Gold and Silver be not a Drug, where they do not promote Induſtry? Whether they be not even the Bane and undoing of an idle People?
564. Whether Gold will not cauſe either Induſ⯑try or Vice to flouriſh? And whether a Country, where it flowed in without Labour, muſt not be [182] wretched and diſſolute like an Iſland inhabited by Buccaneers?
565. Whether Arts and Virtue are not likely to thrive, where Money is made a Means to Induſtry? But whether Money without this would be a Bleſ⯑ſing to any People?
566. Whether keeping Caſh at home, or ſend⯑ing it abroad, juſt as it moſt ſerves to promote In⯑duſtry, be not the real Intereſt of every Nation?
567. Whether Commodities of all Kinds do not naturally flow where there is the greateſt Demand? Whether the greateſt Demand for a Thing be not where it is of moſt Uſe? Whether Money, like other Things, hath not its proper Uſe? Whether this Uſe be not to circulate? Whether therefore there muſt not of courſe be Money where there is a Circulation of Induſtry?
568. Whether it is not a great Point to know what we would be at? And whether whole States, as well as private Perſons, do not often fluctuate for want of this Knowledge?
569. Whether Gold may not be compared to Sejanus's Horſe, if we conſider its Paſſage through the World, and the Fate of thoſe Nations which have been ſucceſſively poſſeſſed thereof?
570. Whether Means are not ſo far uſeful as they anſwer the End? And whether, in different Circumſtances, the ſame Ends are not obtained by different Means?
571. If we are a poor Nation, abounding with very poor People, will it not follow, that a far greater Proportion of our Stock ſhould be in the ſmalleſt and loweſt Species, than would ſuit with England?
572. Whether, therefore, it would not be high⯑ly expedient, if our Money were coined of pecu⯑liar Values, beſt fitted to the Circumſtances and [183] Uſes of our own Country; and whether any other People could take Umbrage at our conſulting our own Convenience, in an Affair entirely domeſtic, and that lies within ourſelves?
573. Whether every Man doth not know, and hath not long known, that the Want of a Mint cauſech many other Wants in this Kingdom?
574. What Harm did England ſuſtain about three Centuries ago, when Silver was coined in this Kingdom?
575. What Harm was it to Spain that her Pro⯑vinces of Naples and Sicily had all along Mints of their own?
576. Whether it may not be preſumed, that our not, haying a Privilege, which every other King⯑dom in the World enjoys, be not owing to our own want of Diligence and Unanimity in ſoliciting for it?
577. Whether it be not the Intereſt of England, that we ſhould cultivate a domeſtic Commerce among ourſelves? And whether it could give them any poſſible Jealouſy, if our ſmall Sum of Caſh was contrived to go a little further, if there was a little more Life in our Markets, a little more buying and ſelling in our Shops, a little better Proviſion for the Backs and Bellies of ſo many forlorn Wretches throughput the Towns and Villages of this Iſland?
578. Whether Great Britain ought not to pro⯑mote the Proſperity of her Colonies, by all Me⯑thods conſiſtent with her own? And whether the Colonies themſelves ought to wiſh or aim at it by others?
579. Whether the remoteſt Parts from the Me⯑tropolis, and the loweſt of the People, are not to be regarded as the Extremities and Capillaries of the political Body?
[184] 580. Whether, although the capillary Veſſels are ſmall, yet Obſtructions in them do not produce great chronical Diſeaſes?
581. Whether Faculties are not enlarged and improved by Exerciſe?
582. Whether the Sum of the Faculties put into Act, or in other Words, the united Action of a whole People doth not conſtitute the Momentum of a State?
583. Whether ſuch Momentum be not the real Stock or Wealth of a State; and whether its Cre⯑dit be not proportionable thereunto?
584. Whether in every wiſe State the Faculties of the Mind are not moſt conſidered?
585. Whether the Momentum of a State doth not imply the whole Exertion of its Faculties, intel⯑lectual and corporeal; and whether the latter with⯑out the former, could act in concert?
586. Whether the divided Force of Men, act⯑ing ſingly, would not be a Rope of Sand?
587. Whether the particular Motions of the Members of a State, in oppoſite Directions, will not deſtroy each other, and leſſen the Momentum of the whole; but whether they muſt not conſpire to produce a great Effect?
588. Whether the ready Means to put Spirit in⯑to this State, to fortify and increaſe its Momentum, would not be a national Bank, and Plenty of ſmall Caſh?
589. Whether that which employs and exerts the Force of a Community, deſerves, not to be well conſidered and well underſtood?
590. Whether the immediate Mover, the Blood and Spirits, be not Money, Paper or Metal, and whether the Soul or Will of the Community, which is the prime Mover that governs and directs the Whole, be not the Legiſlature?
[185] 591. Suppoſing the Inhabitants of a Country quite ſunk in Sloth, or even faſt aſleep, whether upon the gradual Awakening and Exertion, firſt, of the ſenſitive and locomotive Faculties, next of Reaſon and Reflexion, then of Juſtice and Piety, the Momentum of ſuch Country or State, would not, in Proportion thereunto, become ſtill more and more conſiderable?
592. Whether that which in the Growth is laſt attained, and is the finiſhing Perfection of a People, be not the firſt Thing loſt in their Declenſion?
593. Whether Force be not of Conſequence, as it is exerted; and whether great Force without great Wiſdom may not be a Nuſance?
594. Whether the Force of a Child applied with Art, may not produce greater Effects than that of a Giant? And whether a ſmall Stock in the Hands of a wiſe State, may not go further, and produce more conſiderable Effects, than immenſe Sums in the Hands of a fooliſh one?
595. Whoſe Fault is it if poor Ireland ſtill con⯑tinues poor?