THE NATURAL HISTORY OF BIRDS.
[]
The RED-LEGGED CROW.
• Le Crave ou Le Coracias *, Buff. , • Corvus-Graculus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Gracula Pyrrhocorax, Scop. , • Coracias, Aldrov. and Briſſ. , • Coracias, ſeu Pyrrhocorax, Ray. , • Cornix roſtro pedibuſque rubris †, Klein. ,
and • The Corniſh-Chough, Cornwall-Kae, or Killegrew, Alb. and Will.
[][]SOME authors have confounded this bird with the Alpine Crow; but the diſtinction is clearly marked. Its bill is longer, more ſlender, more hooked, and of a red colour; its tail is alſo ſhorter, its wings longer, and, as a natural conſequence, its flight is more lofty; and laſtly, its eyes are environed by a ſmall red circle.
It is true that the Red-legged Crow reſembles the Alpine Crow in the colour and in ſome com⯑mon [2] inſtincts. In both, the plumage is black with green reflections of blue and purple, which have an admirable effect on that dark ground. Both delight in the ſummits of the loftieſt mountains, and ſeldom deſcend into the plain. The former, however, is much more diffuſed than the latter.
The Red-legged Crow is of an elegant figure, lively, reſtleſs, turbulent, but can be tamed to a certain degree. At firſt it is fed with a ſort of paſte made with milk, bread, and grain, &c. and afterwards it is reconciled to whatever is ſerved for our tables.
Aldrovandus ſaw in Bologna in Italy, a bird of this ſort, which had an odd trick of breaking panes of glaſs from the outſide, as if to enter the houſe by the window: this inſtinct is un⯑doubtedly the ſame with that of the crows, the magpies, and daws, which are attracted by every thing that glitters. It has even been known to ſnatch from the chimney light pieces of wood, and thus ſet the houſe on fire; ſo that this dan⯑gerous bird adds the character of an incendiary to that of a domeſtic plunderer. But I ſhould imagine that this pernicious habit might be turned againſt itſelf, and, like the lark, it might be decoyed into ſnares, by means of mirrors.
Salerne ſaw at Paris two Red-legged Crows which lived peaceably with the houſe pigeons; but it is probable that he had not ſeen the Wild Crow of Geſner, nor the deſcription which that [3] author gives of it; ſince he ſays after Ray, that it agreed in every thing but in ſize with the coracias; whether he meant the bird to which this article is allotted, or the pyrrhocorax of Pliny. Theſe birds are widely different, and Geſner was careful not to confound them. He knew that the Wild Crow differs from the Red-legged Crow by its creſt, its carriage, the ſhape and length of its bill, the ſhortneſs of its tail, the excellence of its fleſh, at leaſt when young; that it was not ſo noiſy or ſo ſedentary, and that it changed its reſidence more regularly at certain times of the year*; not to mention other differences.
The Red-legged Crow has ſhrill though a pretty loud cry, very like that of the Sea-pie. It chatters almoſt inceſſantly; and Olina remarks that it is bred not for its voice, but for its beau⯑tiful plumage†. Belon, however, and the au⯑thors of the Britiſh Zoology ſay, that it learns to ſpeak.
The female lays four or five white eggs, ſpotted with dirty yellow. She builds her neſt on the tops of old deſerted towers, or on fright⯑ful [4] precipices; for, according to Edwards, theſe birds prefer the cliffs all along the weſt coaſt of England, to ſimilar ſituations on the flat ſhores of the eaſt and ſouth. I ſhall add ano⯑ther fact of the ſame kind, which I owe to a very reſpectable obſerver*. It is, that though theſe birds be inhabitants of the Alps, of the mountains of Switzerland, and of thoſe of Au⯑vergne, &c. they are never found on the moun⯑tains of Bugey, nor in all the chain that ſtretches along the confines of the country of Gex as far as Geneva. Belon, who ſaw them on Mount Jura in Switzerland, again obſerved them in the iſlands of Crete, and always on the ſummits of rocks. But Haſſelquiſt affirms that theſe birds arrive in Egypt, and ſpread through the country after the inundation of the Nile has ſubſided and the waters are about to return into their bed. If we admit this fact, which however ſeems to be repugnant to the general nature of theſe birds, we muſt ſuppoſe that they are drawn to Egypt by the abundance of food with which the lands are replete, after being left by the waters to the powerful influence of a tropical ſun: and in fact, they feed on inſects, and on ſeeds which have been lately committed to the ſoil, and ſwell with milky juice, the effect of incipient vegetation. It follows then, that theſe birds do not confine their reſidence excluſively to rocks and the ſummits of mountains, ſince at [5] certain ſeaſons they regularly appear in Lower Egypt. Nor do they ſeem to be equally at⯑tached to every bleak eminence; but to be directed in their choice by certain peculiar cir⯑cumſtances, which have hitherto eſcaped ob⯑ſervers.
It is probable that the coracias of Ariſtotle* is the ſame with the Red-legged Crow, and not the pyrrhocorax of Pliny†, which ſeems to differ in ſize and in the colour of its bill, which is yellow. But the bird of which we here treat, has a red bill and red feet; and as it was ſeen by Belon on the Cretan mountains, it was more likely known to Ariſtotle, than the pyrrhocorax, which was ſuppoſed by the ancients to be confined to the Alps, and in fact was not ſeen by Belon in Greece.
I muſt admit, however, that Ariſtotle makes his coracias a ſpecies of daw ( [...]), as we re⯑gard the pyrrhocorax of Pliny; which would ſeem to favour the identity, or at leaſt the prox⯑imity of theſe two ſpecies. But as in the ſame chapter I find a palmipede bird joined with the daws as of the ſame genus, the philoſopher evidently confounds birds that are of a very different nature; or rather, ſince the text traces a regular analogy, the confuſion muſt have ariſen from ſome miſtakes of the copyiſts. Beſides, the word pyrrhocorax, though entirely of Greek [6] derivation*, occurs not in any part of Ariſtotle's treatiſe; and Pliny, who was well acquainted with that work, could diſcover in it no account of the bird on which he beſtows that name; and in his deſcription of the pyrrhocorax, he does not copy what the Greek philoſopher had ſaid on the ſubject of the coracias.
The ſpecimen examined by the authors of the Britiſh Zoology weighed thirteen ounces, and its wings extended about two feet and a half: the tongue was almoſt as long as the bill, ſome⯑what hooked; the nails black, ſtrong, and hooked.
Gerini mentions a bird of this kind whoſe bill and feet were black, and which he conſi⯑ders as a variety of the Red-legged Crow, affected only by ſome accidental differences of colour, ariſing from the diſtinction of the age or ſex†. A
The HERMIT CROW *.
• Le Coracias Huppé ou Le Sonneur †, Buff. , • Corvus-Eremita, Linn. and Gmel. , • Coracia Criſtata, Briſſ. , • Corvus Sylvaticus, Geſneri. Will. , • Upupa Montana, Klein. , • Geſner's Wood-Crow, Will. ,
and • Wood-Crow from Switzerland, Alb.
[7]THIS bird is of the ſize of a hen; its plumage is black, with fine green reflections, which are variegated nearly as in the Red-legged Crow: like it, the bill and feet are red; but the bill is ſtill longer and more ſlender, very proper for inſerting into the fiſſures of rocks and the cracks in the ground, into the holes of trees and walls, in ſearch of inſects and worms, which are its principal food. In its ſtomach are found portions of the mole-crickets. It eats alſo the larvoe of the May-bug, and is uſeful on ac⯑count of the havock which it makes among theſe deſtructive inſects.
The feathers on the top of its head are longer than the reſt, and form a kind of creſt, which [8] hangs backwards; but this only appears after they are full grown, and again diſappears when they are aged. Hence the reaſon that in ſome places they are called Bald Crows, and in ſome deſcriptions they are repreſented as having a yellow head marked with red ſpots. Theſe co⯑lours are probably the tints of the ſkin, which age leaves bare.
The creſt, which has given occaſion to the name of Mountain-creſted *, is not the only diſtinction between this bird and the Red-legged Crow; its neck is longer and more ſlender, its head ſmaller, its tail ſhorter, &c. Beſides, it is known only as a bird of paſſage, while the Red-legged Crow, as we have already ſeen, is migratory, but only in certain countries and in particular circumſtances. Geſner has therefore divided them properly into two ſpecies; and I have diſ⯑tinguiſhed them by different names.
The Hermit Crows fly very lofty, and gene⯑rally go in flocks†. They ſeek their food often in the meadows and marſhy places, and always neſtle on the tops of old deſerted towers, or in the clefts of frightful inacceſſible rocks. Senſible, as it were, that their young are delicate meat, [9] and much valued by the luxurious, they are care⯑ful to breed them out of the reach of man. But there are ſtill ſome men hardy enough to riſk their lives for the moſt ſordid gain, and al⯑low themſelves to be let down by ropes from giddy heights, to plunder the infant brood in their receſſes, and reap the moſt dangerous of harveſts.
The females lay generally two or three eggs every hatch; and thoſe who wiſh to get the brood, commonly leave a young bird in each neſt, in order to invite them to return the fol⯑lowing year. When the young are plundered, the parents cry, ka, ka, kae, kae, but are ſeldom heard at any other time. The young are eaſily tamed, and the more ſo if they be taken early and before they can fly.
They arrive in the country of Zurich towards the beginning of April, at the ſame time with the ſtorks. Their neſts are ſought for about Whitſunday, and they depart, the earlieſt of all the birds, in the middle of June. I know not why Barrere has made the Hermit Crow a ſpe⯑cies of curlew.
The Hermit Crow inhabits the Alps, the lofty mountains of Italy, Stiria, Switzerland, Bavaria, and the high cliffs which border on the Danube, in the vicinity of Paſſau and Kelkeym. Theſe birds chooſe for their retreat certain natural breaſt-works, or cells of a good aſpect, among [10] the rocks, and hence the name Klauſs-rappen, or Monk-Raven. A
The RAVEN.
• Le Corbeau, Buff. , • Corvus-Corax, Linn and Gmel. , • Corvus, Briſſ. Klein, and Will. * ,
and • The Corbey, Sibb. Scotia Illuſtrata.
[][11]THIS bird has always been famous; but its bad reputation has been owing, moſt probably, to its being confounded with other birds, and loaded with their ill qualities. It has ever been regarded as the loweſt of the rapacious tribe; the moſt cowardly and the moſt diſguſting. Filth and rotten carcaſes, it is ſaid, are its chief food; and when it gluts its appetite on live prey, its victims are the weak or uſeful animals, lambs, leverets†, &c. yet it ſometimes attacks the large [12] animals with ſucceſs, ſupplying its want of ſtrength and agility by cunning; it plucks out the eyes of buffaloes*, and then, fixing on the back, it tears off the fleſh deliberately: and what renders the ferocity more deteſtable, it is not incited by the cravings of hunger, but by the appetite for carnage; for it can ſubſiſt on fruits, ſeeds of all kinds, and indeed may be conſidered as on omnivorous animal†.
This violence and indiſcriminating voracity of the Raven has procured it a various treat⯑ment: ſometimes it has been proſcribed as a pernicious, deſtructive animal; ſometimes it has been afforded the protection of law, as uſe⯑ful in extirpating noxious inſects. In poor, thinly inhabited ſtates, the Raven may prove a burthenſome and expenſive gueſt; but in [13] rich, populous countries, it will be ſervice⯑able by devouring the filth generated in them. For this reaſon it was formerly, ac⯑cording to Belon, forbidden in England* to hurt this bird; but in the narrow iſlands of Fer⯑roe, Malta, &c. a premium was offered for its deſtruction†.
If to the features which we have now traced of the Raven, we join its gloomy plumage; its cry, ſtill more gloomy, though very feeble; its ignoble port, in proportion to its bulk; its ſavage look; its body ſmelling perpetually of infection‡; we ſhall not be ſurpriſed that in all ages it has been regarded as an object of averſion and horror. Its fleſh was forbidden [14] to the Jews; ſavages never eat it*; and, among ourſelves, the moſt ſtarved wretches diſcover an extreme diſlike to it, and remove the coriaceous ſkin before they make their diſguſting meal. In every country it is reckoned an ominous bird, which announces impending calamities. Grave hiſtorians† have deſcribed pitched battles be⯑tween armies of crows and thoſe of other rave⯑nous birds, and have regarded theſe combats as foreboding the bloody wars kindled among na⯑tions. And how many perſons, at preſent, are alarmed and dejected at the noiſe of its croaking! The whole of its knowledge of futurity is li⯑mited, however, like that of the other inhabit⯑ants of the air, to a greater ſenſibility to the changes in its element, and to the expreſſion of its feelings by certain cries and actions. In the ſouthern provinces of Sweden, Linnaeus tells us, that the Ravens, in fine weather, ſoar to an im⯑menſe height, and make a clangorous noiſe, that is heard at a great diſtance§. The authors of the Britiſh Zoology add, that in this caſe they fly generally in pairs. Other writers‖, in leſs enlightened times, have given other remarks, mingled with fable and ſuperſtition.
[15] In thoſe times, when augury formed a part of religion, the Ravens, though bad prophets, could not fail to be birds of vaſt importance. The fondneſs of prying into futurity, how diſmal ſoever may be the proſpect, is an ancient malady of the human race. All the various motions of the Raven were ſtudied with the moſt ſcrupulous attention, all the circumſtances of its flight, all the differences of its voice, of which, not to mention the minute diſcriminations too difficult to be appretiated*, no leſs than ſixty-four diſtinct in⯑flexions were reckoned up. Each had its deter⯑mined ſignification; the artful applied themſelves to the profeſſion, and credulity drew multitudes to their oracles†. Pliny himſelf, though ſuperior to the prejudices of the vulgar, was ſo far carried by the tide of popular opinion as to mention its moſt infauſtous cries‡. Some even carried this folly to ſuch lengths as to eat the heart and en⯑trails of theſe birds, from the hope of acquiring the ſpirit of prophecy§.
But the Raven has not only a great number of inflections of voice correſponding to its interior affections, it has alſo the talent of imitating the cry of other animals‖, and even human diſcourſe; [16] and to improve this natural quality, the ligament of the tongue has been cut. Colas is the word which it pronounces the moſt eaſily*; and Scali⯑ger heard one which, when hungry, called diſ⯑tinctly on the cook by the name of Conrad †. Theſe words bear indeed ſome reſemblance to the ordinary cry of the Raven.
Theſe ſpeaking birds were highly prized at Rome, and a philoſopher has not diſdained to relate the hiſtory of one of them‡. They not only learn to prattle or repeat words, but become quite familiar. They can be tamed though old§, and appear even ſuſceptible of a laſting and perſonal attachment‖.
In conſequence of their pliancy of temper, they can be inſtructed, not indeed to diveſt them⯑ſelves [17] of their voracity, but to moderate it and direct it to the ſervice of man. Pliny ſpeaks of Craterus, an Aſiatic, who was noted for his ſkill in breeding Ravens to hunt, and who could make himſelf be followed even by the wild Ra⯑vens*. Scaliger relates, that king Louis (pro⯑bably Louis XII.) had one ſo trained, and uſed it in the chace of partridges†. Albertus ſaw one at Naples which caught partridges and pheaſants, and even other Ravens; but to hunt birds of its own ſpecies it required to be rouſed, and, as it were, forced by the preſence of the falconer‡. Laſtly, It can ſometimes be taught, it would ſeem, to protect its maſter and aſſiſt him againſt his enemies by its manoeuvres: at leaſt if we give credit to the ſtory which Aulus Gellius tells of the Crow of Valerius§.
[18] The Raven has alſo great ſagacity at ſcenting out* carrion from a diſtance: Thucydides aſ⯑cribes to it the inſtinct of abſtaining from the carcaſſes of animals that have died of the plague†. It has been ſaid alſo, that a bird of this kind, wanting to drink out of a veſſel which was too narrow to admit it, had the ſhrewdneſs to drop into it ſmall ſtones, which by degrees raiſed the water to the top‡. This thirſt, if the fact be true§, is a circumſtance which diſtinguiſhes the Raven from all the reſt of the birds of prey, eſpecially from thoſe which feed on live game, which are ſtimu⯑lated by hunger, and never deſire but to drink blood. Another difference is, that the Ravens are more ſocial than the other rapacious birds: but it is eaſy to account for this; ſince, as they eat every ſort of food, and have more reſources than the reſt of the carnivorous kind, they can ſubſiſt in greater numbers on the ſame extent, and have not therefore the ſame cauſes of ſepa⯑ration. We may here obſerve, that though tame Ravens feed on all ſorts of fleſh, and thoſe in the ſtate of liberty be generally ſuppoſed to commit great havock among the moles and field⯑mice*; [19] Hebert, who has noticed them atten⯑tively for a long courſe of years, never ſaw them tear or mangle dead carcaſſes, or even ſettle upon them: he is therefore of opinion, that they prefer inſects, and eſpecially earth⯑worms, to every other ſort of food. He adds, that earth is found in their excrements.
The Ravens, the real mountain Ravens, are not birds of paſſage, and in this reſpect they differ, more or leſs, from the Crows with which they aſſociate. They ſeem particularly attached to the rock where they were bred, or rather where they have paired; it is their ordinary reſidence, which they never entirely abandon. If they deſcend into the plains, it is to procure their ſubſiſtence; and this more rarely happens in ſummer than in winter, becauſe they avoid the heat, which appears to be the only influence that difference of ſeaſons produces on them. They do not paſs [20] the night in the woods, like the Carrion Crows; they chooſe, in their mountains, a retreat ſhel⯑tered from the northern blaſt, under the natural alcoves ſecured by the receſſes and projections of the rocks. Thither they retire during the night, to the number of fifteen or twenty. They ſleep perched on the buſhes that grow between the rocks, and build their neſts in the crevices, or in the holes of walls, on the tops of old deſerted towers, and ſometimes on the high branches of large ſtraggling trees*. Each male attaches itſelf to a female, with which it remains united for the courſe of many years†; for theſe birds, which we view with diſguſt, can yet in⯑ſpire mutual and conſtant love, and, like the turtle, expreſs the gradual ſwell of paſſion. The male, if we believe ſome authors, begins always with a ſort of love-ſong‡, then careſſes and bills with his mate; and it has even been alleged, that they copulate by the bill§. The fact is, that [21] we ſee their courtſhips frequently in the day-time; but the conſummation is performed in the ſilence and obſcurity of the moſt ſecret receſs*; and hence, probably, the origin of the fable. Nor muſt we aſcribe this to any motives of decency; wild animals are conſcious of the danger of their ſituation, and are anxious to provide for their ſecurity. The White-John, we have already ſeen, conceals itſelf while it drinks, becauſe, its head being plunged up to the eyes in the water, it is in danger of being ſurprized. The Raven has the more need of caution, ſince he is languid in the act of coition, which pro⯑bably laſts a conſiderable time; he therefore ſeeks a ſecret retreat, where, in undiſturbed ſe⯑curity, he may indulge his paſſion†.
The female is diſtinguiſhed from the male, according to Barrere, by its plumage being of a lighter black, and her bill weaker; and my own obſervations ſeem to confirm this remark. She lays, about the month of March‡, five or ſix eggs§, pale and bluiſh green, marked with a great number of ſpots and ſtreaks of a dirty co⯑lour*. [22] She ſits about twenty days†, during which time the male provides her with food, and the ſupply is large; for the peaſants ſome⯑times find in the Ravens' neſts, or near them, conſiderable heaps of grain, nuts, and fruits. It has been ſuſpected, indeed, that this hoarding is intended not only for the females during in⯑cubation, but for the ſubſiſtence of both through the winter‡. But whatever be their motives, certain it is, that the Ravens ſteal not only pro⯑viſions, but whatever tickles their fancy, par⯑ticularly bits of metal and glittering ſubſtances§. There was one at Erford, which had the aſſi⯑duity to carry, one by one, and conceal beneath a ſtone in a garden, a quantity of ſmall pieces, amounting to five or ſix florins‖. Every country furniſhes ſtories of ſuch domeſtic thefts.
When the young are hatched, they are far from being of the colour of their parents; they are rather white than black, contrary to the ſwans, which are originally brown, though de⯑ſtined to wear a ſnowy plumage¶. At firſt the mother ſeems to treat her offspring with indif⯑ference, nor does ſhe feed them till they begin to be feathered: it has been alleged, that ſhe alters her conduct the moment ſhe is convinced [23] by their plumage that they are not ſpurious*. But for my part, I can ſee nothing in this that has not place in other animals, and even in man, ſome days after birth; a certain time is ne⯑ceſſary to reconcile them to a new element and a new exiſtence. Nor is the young Raven then totally deſtitute of food; for a part of the yolk is included in the abdomen, and flows inſenſibly into the inteſtines by a particular duct†. After a few days, the mother feeds the young with the proper aliments, which previouſly undergo a preparation in her crop, and are then diſ⯑gorged into their bills, nearly as in the pigeons‡.
But the male not only provides for the fa⯑mily, but watches for its ſafety. If he perceive a kite, or other ſuch rapacious bird, approach the neſt, the danger animates his courage; he takes wing, gains above his foe, and daſhing downwards, he ſtrikes violently with his bill; both contend for the aſcendency, and ſometimes they mount entirely out of ſight, till, overcome with fatigue, one or both fall to the ground§.
Ariſtotle, and many others after him, pre⯑tend that, when the young are able to fly, the parents drive them out of the neſt; and if the tract where they are ſettled affords too ſcanty a ſubſiſtence, they entirely expel them from [24] their precincts*. If this fact were true, it would ſhew that they are really birds of prey; but it does not agree with the obſervations which Hebert has made on the Ravens which inhabit the mountains of Bugey; for they protract the education of their brood beyond the period when theſe are able to provide for themſelves. As it ſeldom happens that opportunity and ta⯑lents concur in making ſuch obſervations, I ſhall relate them in his own words:
‘The young Ravens are hatched very early in the ſeaſon, and againſt the month of May are able to quit their neſt. A family of them was every year bred oppoſite to my windows upon the rocks which terminate the proſpect. The young, to the number of four or five, ſat on the large detached fragments about the middle of the precipice, where they were ea⯑ſily ſeen, and drew notice by their continual wailing. Every time that the parents brought them food, which happened fre⯑quently during the courſe of the day, they called with a cry, crau, crau, crau, very dif⯑ferent from their other noiſe. Sometimes one tried to fly, and, after a ſlight eſſay, it returned to ſettle upon the rock. Almoſt always ſome one was left behind, and its wailing then be⯑came inceſſant. After the young had ſtrength ſufficient to fly, that is, fifteen days at leaſt [25] after their leaving the neſt, the parents con⯑ducted them every morning to the field, and in the evening led them back. It was com⯑monly five or ſix in the afternoon when the family returned, and they ſpent the reſt of the day in noiſy brawling. This practice laſted the whole ſummer, which would give reaſon to ſuppoſe that the Ravens have not two hatches annually.’
Geſner fed young Ravens with raw fleſh, ſmall fiſhes, and bread ſoaked in water. They are very fond of cherries, and ſwallow them greedily, with the ſtones and ſtalks; they digeſt, however, only the pulpy part, and in two hours afterwards vomit up the reſt. It is alſo ſaid that they diſgorge the bones of thoſe animals which they eat entire, like the keſtril, the nocturnal birds of prey, the fiſhing birds, &c.* Pliny ſays†, that the Raven is ſubject every ſummer to a periodical diſtemper, which laſts ſixty days, whoſe principal ſymptom is exceſſive thirſt: but I ſuſpect that this is nothing but moulting, which is more tedious in this bird than in many others of the rapacious tribe‡.
No perſon, as far as I know, has determined the age at which the young Ravens have ac⯑quired their full growth, and are able to pro⯑pagate. If in the birds, as in the quadrupeds, each period of life was proportional to the total [26] ſpace of exiſtence, we might ſuppoſe that the Crows required many years to reach their adult ſtate; for though the venerable age aſcribed by Heſiod* muſt be conſiderably curtailed, it ſeems well aſcertained that this bird ſometimes lives a century or more. In many cities of France they have been known to attain to that diſtant period; and in all countries and all ages, they have been reckoned as birds extremely long-lived. But the progreſs to maturity muſt be ſlow in this ſpecies compared to the duration of their life; for towards the end of the firſt ſummer, when all the family conſort together, it is difficult to diſtinguiſh the old from the young, and very probably they are capable of breeding the ſe⯑cond year.
We have already remarked that the Crow is not black at firſt. In the decline of life alſo, its plumage loſes the deep colour; and in extreme age, changes into yellow†. But at no time is this bird of a pure black, without the inter⯑mixture of other ſhades: Nature knows no ab⯑ſolute [27] uniformity. The black, which predomi⯑nates, is mingled with violet on the upper part of the body, with cinereous on the throat, and with green under the body and on the quills of the tail, and the largeſt feathers of the wings and the remoteſt of the back*. Only the feet, the nails, and the bill, are quite black; and this colour of the bill ſeems to penetrate to the tongue, as that of the feathers appears to tinc⯑ture the fleſh. The tongue is cylindrical at its baſe, flattened and forked near the tip, and roughened with ſmall points on the edges. The organ of hearing is very complicated, and more ſo, perhaps, than in the other birds†. It muſt alſo be more ſenſible, if we credit Plutarch, who ſays, that he has ſeen Crows fall down ſtunned with the noiſy acclamations of a numerous mul⯑titude, agitated by violent emotions‡.
The oeſophagus dilates at its junction with the ventricle, and forms a kind of craw, which was not overlooked by Ariſtotle. The inner ſurface of the ventricle is furrowed with wrinkles; the gall-bladder is very large, and adheres to the inteſtines‖. Redi found worms in the ca⯑vity of the abdomen §: the length of the gut is nearly twice that of the bird itſelf, meaſuring [28] from the tip of the bill to the extremities of the nails; that is, a medium between the extent of the inteſtines of the true carnivorous birds and the true granivorous: in a word, it is exactly ſuited for an animal which lives partly on fleſh, and partly on fruits*.
The appetite of the Raven, which is thus re⯑conciled to every ſort of aliment, proves often its deſtruction, from the eaſe with which bird⯑catchers can provide a bait. The powder of the nux vomica, which is mortal to ſo many qua⯑drupeds, is alſo a poiſon to the Raven; it is benumbed, and drops ſoon after eating the doſe; but the moment of intoxication muſt be ſeized, for the torpor is often only tranſient, and the bird recovers ſtrength ſufficient to reach its na⯑tive rock, there to languiſh or expire†. It is alſo caught by various ſorts of nets, ſnares, and gins, and even by the bird-call, like the little warblers; for it alſo entertains an anti⯑pathy to owls, and cannot ſee them without venting a cry‡. It is ſaid to wage war with the kite, the vulture, and the ſea-pie‖; but this [29] is nothing but the natural averſion to all carni⯑vorous birds, which are enemies or rivals of each other.
When the Ravens alight upon the ground, they walk, but do not hop. Like the birds of prey, they have long vigorous wings, extending nearly three feet and a half; theſe conſiſt of twenty quills, of which the two or three firſt* are ſhorter than the fourth, which is the longeſt of all; and the middle ones have a remarkable property, viz. that the ends of their ſhafts ſtretch beyond the vanes, and terminate in points. The tail contains twelve quills, which are about eight inches long, but ſomewhat unequal, the two middle ones being the longeſt, then thoſe next, ſo that the end of the tail appears ſome⯑what rounded on its horizontal plane†. This I ſhall afterwards call the tapered tail ‡.
From the extent of its wings we may infer the elevation of its flight. In ſtorms and tem⯑peſts the Raven, it is ſaid, has been ſeen gliding through the air, conveying fire at its bill‖. This is only the luminous ſtar formed at the point of its bill, in its paſſage through the ele⯑vated regions of the atmoſphere, then ſurcharged [30] with electricity. From ſome appearance of this kind, probably, the Eagle has been termed the miniſter of thunder; for there are few fables but are founded upon truth.
Since the Raven has a lofty flight, and is ca⯑pable of enduring every temperature, the wide world is opened for its reception*. In fact, it is ſcattered from the polar circle† to the Cape of Good Hope‡ and the iſland of Madagaſcar‖; and its number is determined by the quantity of food which the various intermediate regions ſupply, and the convenience of the ſituations which they afford§. It ſometimes migrates from the coaſts of Barbary to the iſland of Te⯑neriffe. It is found in Mexico, St. Domingo, and Canada¶, and undoubtedly in the other parts of the New Continent, and of the adjacent iſlands. When it is once ſettled in a country, and has become accuſtomed to its ſituation, it ſeldom quits it to roam into another**. It grows even attached to the neſt which it has built, and uſes it for ſeveral years together.
Its plumage is not the ſame in all countries. Beſide the changes which age introduces, the [31] colour is alſo ſubject to vary from the influence of climate. It is ſometimes entirely white in Norway and Iceland, where numbers are alſo quite black*. On the other hand, white Ravens are found in the heart of France and Germany†, in neſts where ſome are likewiſe black. The Mexican Raven, called Cacalotl by Fernandez‡, is variegated with two colours. That of the Bay of Saldagne has a white collar‖; that of Madagaſcar, named Coach, according to Flac⯑court, is white under the belly. The ſame mix⯑ture of black and white occurs in ſome indivi⯑duals of the European ſort, even in what Briſſon terms the White Raven of the North §, which ought rather to have been called the Black and White Raven, ſince the upper part of its body is black and the under white, its head white and black, and alſo its bill, its feet, its tail, and its wings: theſe have twenty-one quills, and the tail has twelve; and what is remarkable, the [32] quills, at an equal diſtance on either ſide, which are commonly alike, are in this ſubject marked with black and white, differently diſtributed. This circumſtance would induce me to ſuppoſe that this is only an accidental change produced on the natural colour, which is black, by the exceſſive rigour of the climate; and if this con⯑jecture be well founded, it would follow, that this is improperly reckoned a permanent ſpe⯑cies, eſpecially as all other animals that inhabit the arctic regions are clothed with a thicker fur than thoſe of the ſame kind which live in milder climates.
Theſe variations in the plumage of a bird ſo generally and ſo deeply impreſſed with black as the Raven, is another proof that colour can afford no permanent or eſſential character.
There is another kind of Raven which forms a variety in point of ſize. Thoſe of Mount Jura, for inſtance, appeared to Hebert, who had an opportunity of comparing them, to be larger than thoſe which inhabit the mountains of Bugey; and Ariſtotle* informs us, that the Ravens and Hawks were ſmaller in Egypt than in Greece. A [33]
FOREIGN BIRDS, RELATED TO THE RAVEN.
[34]The INDIAN RAVEN of BONTIUS.
• Buceros-Hydrocorax, Linn. and Gmel. , • Corvus Indicus Bontii, Ray and Will. , • Corvus Torquatus, Klein. ,
and • The Indian Hornbill, Lath.
THIS bird is found in the Molucca iſlands, and chiefly at Banda. Our knowledge of it is drawn from an imperfect deſcription and a wretched figure; ſo that we can only con⯑jecture the European ſpecies to which it belongs. Bontius, the firſt and I believe the only one who has ſeen it, reckons it a Raven, in which he is followed by Ray, Willoughby, and ſome others; but Briſſon conceives it to be a Calao. I would rather adhere to the former opinion; and my reaſons are briefly theſe:
This bird, according to Bontius, reſembles the Raven in the ſhape of its bill and in its part; though its neck is rather longer, and a ſlight pro⯑tuberance appears in the figure riſing on the bill.
This is a certain proof that he knew no other bird to which he could ſo readily compare it, and yet he was acquainted with the Calao of [35] India. He tells us indeed that it feeds upon nutmegs; and Willoughby conſiders this feature as different from the character of the Common Ravens; but we have already ſeen that theſe eat wild nuts, and are not ſo much carnivorous as ge⯑nerally ſuppoſed.
On the other hand, neither the deſcription of Bontius nor his figure diſcovers the leaſt trace of the indenting of the bill, which Briſſon re⯑gards as one of the characters of the Calaos; and the little bump which appears on the bill bears no reſemblance to the protuberance which diſtinguiſhes the Calao. Laſtly, the Calao has neither the ſpeckled temples, nor the black tail quills which are mentioned in the deſcription of Bontius; and its bill is ſo ſingularly ſhaped, that an obſerver could not, I ſhould ſuppoſe, have ſeen it, and not remarked its form, much leſs have taken it for the bill of a Common Raven.
The fleſh of the Indian Raven of Bontius has a pleaſant aromatic flavour, derived from the nutmegs, which conſtitute its principal food; and it is extremely probable that if our Raven had the ſame ſort of aliments, it would loſe its rank ſmell*.
It would require to have ſeen the Raven of the Deſert (graab el zahara), which Dr. Shaw [36] mentions*, to be able to refer it with certainty to its analogous European ſpecies. All that the Doctor ſays is, that it is rather larger than our Raven, and that its bill and feet are red. This laſt character has determined Dr. Shaw to reckon it a large Chough; that bird, as we have already ſeen, is indeed known in Africa; but how can we conceive a Chough to be greater than a Raven? I mention this to draw the attention of ſome intelligent traveller.
I find in Koempfer two other birds mentioned by the name of Ravens, without a ſingle cha⯑racter to juſtify that appellation. The one is, according to him, of a middle ſize, but extreme⯑ly audacious; it was brought from China to Japan as a preſent to the emperor. The other, which was alſo given to the emperor of Japan, was a bird from Corea, exceedingly rare, and called Coreigaras; that is, the Raven of Corea. Koempfer adds, that the Ravens which are common in Europe are not found in Japan, no more than the parrots and ſome other birds of India.
[Note. We ſhould here place the Armenian bird, which Tournefort calls the King of the Ra⯑vens, if it were really a Raven, or belonged to that family. But a glance of the miniature figure will convince us that it is more related to the peacocks and pheaſants, by its beautiful creſt, [37] its rich plumage, its ſhort wing, and the ſhape of its bill, though it is ſomewhat longer, and though other ſlight differences occur in the form of its tail and of its feet. It is properly termed on the figure Avis Perſica pavoni congener (Perſian bird akin to the peacock); I ſhould therefore have mentioned it among the foreign birds analogous to the peacocks and pheaſants, if I had been earlier acquainted with it.]
The CARRION CROW *.
• Le Corbine, ou Corneille Noire, Buff. , • Corvus Corone, Linn. and Gmel. ,
and • Cornix, Geſner, Ray, Will. Klein, Briſſ. &c.
[38]THESE birds ſpend the ſummer in the ex⯑tenſive foreſts, from which they occa⯑ſionally emerge to procure ſubſiſtence for them⯑ſelves and their infant brood. Their chief food in the ſpring is partridges eggs, of which they are very fond, and are ſo dexterous as to pierce them and carry them on the point of the bill to their young. The conſumption is prodigious; and though they are not the moſt ſanguinary of the rapacious tribe, we may reckon them the moſt deſtructive. Fortunately, they are not numerous; we ſhould hardly find two dozen of pairs in a foreſt of five or ſix miles compaſs in the environs of Paris.
But this mode of life, which is common to the three ſpecies of Crows, is not equally ſuited to them all; for the Hooded Crows and the Car⯑rion Crows become exceſſively fat, while the Rooks continue always lean. But this is not the only difference that ſubſiſts; towards the end of winter, which is the ſeaſon of their amours, the Rooks remove into other climates, while the Carrion Crows, which diſappear at the ſame time in the plains, make only a partial flitting, and retire into the next large foreſts, where they diſſolve the general ſociety to form new connexions more endearing and more intimate. They form into pairs, and ſeem to divide their territory into diſtricts of about a quarter of a league in diameter, each of which maintains its ſeparate family*. It is ſaid that [40] this connexion ſubſiſts inviolate during the reſt of their life; and it is even alleged that if one of the couple happen to die the ſurvivor will never enter into another union.
The female is diſtinguiſhed by her plumage, which is of inferior luſtre. She lays five or ſix eggs, and ſits about three weeks, during which time the male ſupplies her with food.
I had an opportunity of examining a neſt of a Crow which was brought to me in the be⯑ginning of July. It was found in an oak eight feet high, in a wood planted on a little hill, where were other oaks larger. The neſt weighed two or three pounds; it was formed on the outſide with ſmall branches and thorns rudely interwoven, and plaiſtered with earth and horſe⯑dung; the inſide was ſofter, and lined carefully with fibrous roots. I found in it ſix young already hatched, all alive, though they had eaten nothing for twenty-four hours; their eyes were not open*, and no plumage was to be ſeen on them except the point of the wing quills; their fleſh was a mixture of yellow and black; the tip of the bill and their nails yellow; the edges of the mouth a dirty white, and the reſt of the bill and feet reddiſh.
When a buzzard or keſtril approaches the neſt, the parents unite to attack them, and dart with ſuch fury that they often kill them, ſplitting the ſkull with their bills. They alſo fight with the [41] ſhrikes; but theſe, though ſmaller, are ſo bold as often to prove victorious, drive them from the neſt, and plunder the young.
The ancients aſſert, that the Crows as well as the Ravens are watchful of their young after the period of their flight*. This ſeems to be probable, and I ſhould ſuppoſe that they do not ſeparate from their parents the firſt year; for theſe birds readily aſſociate with ſtrangers, and is it not natural to ſuppoſe that the ſociety which is formed in the ſame family will continue to ſubſiſt till interrupted by the breeding ſeaſon?
Like the Raven, the Crow can be taught to prattle; it is alſo omnivorous: inſects, worms, birds eggs, fiſh, grain, fruits, every thing, in ſhort, is ſuited to it. It breaks nuts by dropping them from a height†; it viſits ſnares and gins, and ſhares the plunder. It even attacks ſmall game when exhauſted or wounded, which in ſome countries has made it be bred for fal⯑conry‡; but in its turn it becomes the prey of a more powerful enemy, ſuch as the kite, the eagle, owl, &c.§
[42] Its weight is ten or twelve ounces; it has twelve tail feathers, all equal, and twenty in each wing, of which the firſt is the ſhorteſt and the fourth the longeſt; its wings ſpread three feet; the aperture of the noſtrils is round, covered with a ſort of briſtles projecting forward; it has ſome black ſpecks round the eyelids; the outer toe of each foot is united to that of the middle at the firſt joint; the tongue is forked and ſlender; the ventricle ſomewhat muſcular; the inteſtines rolled into a great number of circum⯑volutions; the coeca half an inch long; the gall bladder large, and communicating with the in⯑teſtinal tube by a double duct*. Laſtly, the bottom of the feathers, that is, the part which is concealed, is of a deep aſh-colour.
As this bird is exceedingly cunning, has an acute ſcent, and flies commonly in large flocks, it is difficult to come near it, and hardly poſſible to decoy it into ſnares. Some, however, are caught by imitating the ſcreech of the owl, and placing lime twigs on the high branches; or it is drawn within gun-ſhot by means of an eagle owl, or ſuch other nocturnal bird, raiſed on perches in an open ſpot. They are deſtroyed by throwing to them garden beans, of which they are very fond, and in which ruſty needles have been concealed: but the moſt ſingular mode of catching them illuſtrates the nature of the bird, which I ſhall for that reaſon relate.
[43] A Carrion Crow is faſtened alive on its back firmly to the ground, by means of a brace on each ſide at the origin of the wings. In this painful poſture the animal ſtruggles and ſcreams; the reſt of its ſpecies flock to its cries from all quarters, with the intention, as it were, to afford relief. But the priſoner, graſping at every thing within reach to extricate himſelf from his ſituation, ſeizes with his bill and claws, which are left at liberty, all that come near him, and thus delivers them a prey to the bird-catcher*. They are alſo caught with cones of paper baited with raw fleſh; as the Crow in⯑troduces his head to devour the bait, which is near the bottom, the paper, being beſmeared with birdlime, ſticks to the feathers of the neck, and he remains hooded, unable to get rid of this bandage, which covers his eyes entirely; he betakes to flight, riſes almoſt perpendicularly into the air, the better to avoid ſtriking againſt any thing, till quite exhauſted, he ſinks down always near the ſpot from which he mounted. In general, though the flight of the Carrion Crows be neither eaſy nor rapid, they mount to a very great height, where they ſupport them⯑ſelves long, and whirl much.
This ſpecies has, like the Raven, varieties of white†, and of white mixed with black‡, but which have the ſame inſtincts.
[44] Friſch ſays that he once ſaw a flock of ſwal⯑lows travelling with a troop of variegated Crows in the ſame direction. He adds, that theſe paſs the ſummer on the coaſts of the ocean, ſubſiſt⯑ing on what the waves caſt aſhore; that in au⯑tumn they migrate to the ſouth, never in large bodies, but in ſmall diviſions at certain intervals from each other; in which circumſtance they reſemble the Black Common Crows, of which they ſeem to be only a permanent variety.
It is very probable that the Crows of the Mal⯑divas, mentioned by Francis Pyrard, are of the ſame kind; ſince that traveller, who ſaw them very diſtinctly, remarks no difference. They ſeem however to be more familiar and bolder than ours; for they entered houſes to pick up whatever ſuited them, and often the preſence of a man did not diſcompoſe them. Another tra⯑veller ſays, that theſe Indian Crows, when they can get into a chamber, delight in doing all the miſchievous tricks that are aſcribed to monkeys; derange the furniture, and tear it with their bills, overturn lamps, ink-ſtands, &c.*
Laſtly, according to Dampier, there are in New Holland and New Guinea† many Carrion Crows which reſemble ours. There are alſo ſome in New Britain; but it would ſeem, that [45] though there are many in France, England, and part of Germany*; they are ſcarce in the north of Europe. Klein mentions that they are rare in Pruſſia. They muſt be very uncommon in Sweden, ſince not even the name occurs in the enumeration which Linnaeus has given of the birds of that country. Father Tertre aſſures us alſo that they are not to be found at all in the Antilles; though, according to another traveller, they are very common in Louiſiana. A
The ROOK *.
• Le Freux, ou La Frayonne, Buff. , • Corvus Frugilegus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Cornix Frugilega, Briſſ. and Klein. ,
and • Cornix Nigra Frugilega, Ray. Will. and Friſch.
[46]THIS bird is of an intermediate ſize be⯑tween the Raven and the Carrion Crow, and it has a deeper cry than them. What diſ⯑tinguiſhes it the moſt, is a naked white ſkin, ſcaly and ſometimes ſcabby, that encircles the baſe of the bill, inſtead of thoſe black projecting feathers, which in the other ſpecies of Crows extend as far as the aperture of the noſtrils. Its belly is not ſo thick or ſtrong, and ſeems, as it were, raſped. Theſe differences, apparently ſo ſuperficial, imply more radical diſtinctions.
The peculiarities of the Rook reſult from its mode of life. It feeds upon grain, roots, and worms; and as in ſearch of its proper ſubſiſtence, it ſcratches deep in the ground with its bill, which in time becomes rough, the feathers at the baſe are worn off by the continual rub⯑bing*. [47] However, the ſtraggling feathers are perceived there; a ſufficient proof that the bird is not naturally bald.
The appetite of the Rook is confined to grain, worms, and inſects; it never prowls in the ken⯑nel, nor eats any ſort of fleſh: it has alſo the muſcular ventricle and the broad inteſtines of the granivorous tribe.
Theſe birds fly in numerous flocks, which are ſometimes ſo immenſe as to darken the air. We may conceive what havock theſe hordes of reapers will commit on newly-ſown fields, or on crops nearly ripe. Accordingly, in ſome countries government has interfered†. The Britiſh Zoology vindicates them from the aſper⯑ſion, aſſerting that they do more good than harm, by deſtroying the caterpillars that gnaw the roots of the uſeful plants, and blaſt the honeſt [48] labours of the huſbandman. It would require a calculation to decide the point.
But not only the Rooks fly in flocks, they alſo neſtle in company, as it were, with thoſe of their own ſpecies; and their ſociety is very clamo⯑rous, eſpecially when they have young. Ten or twelve neſts are ſometimes found on the ſame tree, and a great number of trees thus furniſhed occur in the ſame foreſt, or rather in the ſame diſtrict*. They ſeek not retirement and ſoli⯑tude, but rather prefer ſettling near our dwell⯑ings. Schwenckfeld obſerves, that they commonly prefer the large trees planted round cemeteries; becauſe perhaps theſe are frequented ſpots, or afford worms in greater plenty; for we cannot ſuppoſe that they are attracted by the ſcent of the dead bodies, ſince we have already ſaid that they will not touch fleſh. Friſch aſſerts, that if, in the breeding ſeaſon, a perſon goes under the tree on which they are thus ſettled, he will in⯑ſtantly be deluged with their excrements.
One circumſtance will appear ſingular, though very like to what happens every day among animals of a different ſpecies. When a pair are employed in conſtructing their neſt, one muſt be left to guard it, while the other is procuring the ſuitable materials; without this precaution, it is alleged, the neſt would in an inſtant be completely pillaged by the other Rooks which [49] are ſettled on the ſame tree, each carrying off a ſprig to its own dwelling.
Theſe birds begin to build their neſt in the month of March, at leaſt in England*. They lay four or five eggs, ſmaller than thoſe of the Raven, but marked with broader ſpots, eſpecially at the large end. It is ſaid that the male and female ſit by turns. When the young are hatched, and able to eat, they diſgorge their food, which they keep in reſerve in their craw, or rather in a ſort of bag formed by the dilata⯑tion of the oeſophagus†.
I find in the Britiſh Zoology, that after their hatch is over, they leave the trees where they neſtled; and that they return not again till the month of Auguſt, and only begin to repair or rebuild their neſts in October‡. This would ſhew that they continue almoſt the whole year in England; but in France, in Sileſia, and in many other countries, they are undoubtedly birds of paſſage, if we except a few; the only difference is, that in France they announce the winter, while in Sileſia they are the forerunners of the ſummer§.
[50] The Rook is an inhabitant of Europe accord⯑ing to Linnaeus; but it would appear that there are ſome exceptions, ſince Aldrovandus is of opi⯑nion that there are none in Italy.
It is ſaid that the young ones are good eating, and that even the old ones are tolerable food when fat, but this is very rare. Country peo⯑ple have leſs averſion to their fleſh, knowing that they ſubſiſt not on carcaſes, like the Ravens and the Carrion Crows. A
The HOODED-CROW.
• Le Corneille Mantelée, Buff. , • Corvus Cornix, Linn. and Gmel. , • Cornix Cinerea, Briſſ. , • Cornix Cinerea Frugilega, Geſn. and Ald. ,
and • The Royſton Crow, Ray. and Will. *
[][51]THIS bird is eaſily diſtinguiſhed from the Carrion-Crow and the Rook by the co⯑lours of its plumage. Its head, tail, and wings are of a fine black, with bluiſh reflections; it is marked with a ſort of ſcapulary of a greyiſh white, which extends both ways, from the ſhoulders to the extremity of the body. On account of this appearance, it has been called by the Italians, Monacchia, or Nun, and Mantled Crow by the French†.
It aſſociates in numerous flocks, like the Rook, and perhaps is ſtill more familiar with man, preferring, eſpecially in winter, the vi⯑cinity [52] of our farms and hamlets, and picking up its food in the kennels and dunghills, &c.
Like the Rook alſo, the Hooded-Crows change their abode twice a-year, and may perhaps be conſidered as birds of paſſage; for we annually perceive immenſe flocks arrive near the middle of autumn, and depart about the beginning of ſpring, ſhaping their courſe towards the north; but we are uncertain where they ſtop. Moſt authors aſſert, that they paſs the ſummer on the loſty mountains*, and build their neſts in the pines or firs; it muſt therefore be on mountains uninhabited and little known, as in thoſe of the Shetland iſles, where they are actually ſaid to breed†. In Sweden alſo‡, they neſtle in the woods, eſpecially among the alders, and lay commonly four eggs; but they never ſettle in the mountains of Switzerland, of Italy§, &c.
Though, according to moſt naturaliſts, it lives on every ſort of food, worms, inſects, fiſh‖, [53] and even putrid fleſh, and, above all, on the products of milk*; and though theſe facts would rank it among the omnivorous tribe, yet as ſeeds of various kinds, mixed with ſmall ſtones, are found in its ſtomach†, we may infer, that they are the neareſt allied to the granivorous ſpecies; and this is another trait in their character common to the Rook. In other reſpects, they reſemble much the Car⯑rion-Crow; they have nearly the ſame ſize, the ſame port, the ſame cry, and the ſame flight; the ſtructure of their tail, wings, bill, and feet; the diſpoſition of their internal parts, are ex⯑actly the ſame‡; and if any difference can be perceived, they incline to the nature of the Rook. They often aſſociate together, and neſtle on the trees§; both lay four or five eggs, eat thoſe of ſmall birds, and ſometimes devour the helpleſs animals themſelves.
[54] Analogies ſo ſtriking to the Carrion-Crow and the Rook, would lead us to ſuſpect that the Hooded-Crow is only the hybridous offspring of theſe two ſpecies. If it were only a variety of the Carrion-Crow, why does it fly in flocks, and ſhift its abode twice a-year*? or, if it were merely a variety of the Rook, whence thoſe numerous relations which it bears to the Carrion-Crow? But this double reſemblance will be eaſily explained, if we admit it to be a croſs-breed, participating of the qualities of both. This opinion would appear plauſible to philo⯑ſophers who are accuſtomed to trace phyſical analogies; but it derives additional probability from the conſideration that the Hooded-Crow is a new family, entirely unknown to the an⯑cients.
Friſch ſays, that the Hooded-Crow has two cries; the one hollow and well-known, the other ſhrill and ſomewhat reſembling the crow⯑ing of a Cock. He adds, that it is ardently at⯑tached to its young, and that if the tree on which its neſt is built be cut down, it will fall with it, rather than abandon its offspring†.
[55] Linnaeus ſeems to apply to this bird what is ſaid in the Britiſh Zoology with reſpect to the Rook, that it is uſeful in deſtroying deſtructive inſects. But do they not themſelves deſtroy more grain than the inſects which they extirpate? In many parts of Germany a price is ſet on their head*.
They are caught in the ſame ſnares as are the other Crows. They are found in all the coun⯑tries of Europe, but at different times. Their fleſh has a ſtrong ſmell, and is little uſed, except by the lower ſort of people.
I know not for what reaſon Klein ranged the Hoexotototl, or the Willow-Bird of Fernandez, among the Crows, unleſs on the aſſertion of Seba, who, deſcribing this bird as the ſame with that mentioned by Fernandez, makes it as large as an ordinary pigeon, while Fernandez, in the very place quoted by Seba, ſays that the Hoexotototl is a ſmall bird of the ſize of a ſpar⯑row, having the ſong of the goldfinch, and being good eating†. This is not much like a Crow, and ſuch miſtakes, which are ſo pregnant in Seba's work, muſt only throw confuſion into the nomenclature of natural hiſtory. A [56]
FOREIGN BIRDS, WHICH ARE RELATED TO THE CROWS.
[57]I. The SENEGAL CROW.
• Corvus Dauricus, Gmel. and Pallas. ,
and • The White-breaſted Crow, Lath. and Kolben.
TO judge of this from its ſhape and colours, which is all that we know of it, we ſhould ſuppoſe it moſt analogous to the Hooded-Crow, and differing only becauſe its white ſcapulary is not ſo much extended. Some diſtinctions are alſo perceived in the length of its wings, the ſhape of its bill, and the colour of its feet. It is a new ſpecies, and little known*.
II. The JAMAICA CROW.
• Corvus Jamaicenſis, Gmel. , • Cornix Jamaicenſis, Briſſ. ,
and • The Chattering-Crow, or Cacao-Walk, Ray, Sloane, and Lath.
[58]This foreign Crow ſeems to be modelled from ours, only its tail and feet are ſmaller; its plu⯑mage is black, like that of the Carrion-Crow. In its ſtomach are found red berries, grain, and catterpillars; which ſhews that its ordinary food is the ſame with that of our Rook and our Hooded-Crow. Its ventricle is muſcular, and lined in the inſide with a very ſtrong coat. This bird abounds, in the ſouthern part of the iſland, and never leaves the mountains, in which reſpect it reſembles our Raven.
Klein characteriſes this ſpecies by the largeneſs of its noſtrils; but Dr. Sloane, whom he quotes, ſays only, that they are moderately large.
It is obvious that it belongs to the Crows; but it would be difficult to refer it to any one ſpe⯑cies, ſince it unites the qualities proper to each, and differs from them all by its continual chat⯑tering. A
The JACKDAWS.
• Les Choucas, Buff. , • Corvus-Monedula, Linn. and Gmel, , • Cornix Garrula, Klein. , • Graculus, ſeu Monedula, Geſner. , • Monedula, ſeu Lupus, Aldrov. Ray, and Briſſ. ,
and • The Kae, Sibbald *.
[][59]THESE birds are nearly related to the Crows; to inſtitute a compariſon between them would therefore throw light on the hiſtory of both. As there are three ſpecies of Crows, the black (the Carrion-Crow), the cinereous (the Hooded-Crow), and the bald (the Rook); ſo there are three correſponding ones among the Jack⯑daws: a black one (the Daw, properly ſo called); a cinereous (the Chough); and a bald. The only difference is, that the laſt is of America, and has little black in its plumage. In general the Jackdaws are ſmaller than the Crows; their cry, at leaſt that of the two European ſpecies, the [60] only kinds known to us, is ſhriller, and has influence in the forming of their names; ſuch as Choucas, Graccus, Kaw, Kae, &c. But it appears that they have more than one inflexion of voice; for I am aſſured that they ſometimes call out tian, tian, tian.
They live upon inſects, grain, fruits, and even fleſh, though very rarely; but they will not touch filth, nor do they haunt the coaſts to pick up the dead fiſh and other carcaſes that are caſt aſhore by the ſea*. In this circumſtance they reſemble more the Rook, and even the Hooded-Crow, than the Carrion-Crow; but they approach the latter by the habit of ſearch⯑ing and hunting for partridge eggs, of which they deſtroy great numbers.
They fly in large flocks, like the Rooks; like theſe, too, they form a ſort of cantonments, which are even more numerous, conſiſting of a mul⯑titude of neſts crouded upon one another, in a large tree, in a belfry, or in the ruins of an old deſerted caſtle†. The male and female, when once paired, remain a long time ſteadily united. When the genial ſeaſon returns, which awakens the ſenſibility of the animal frame, they eagerly court each other's ſociety, and prattle inceſſantly; they toy and kiſs, till they are worked up to a [61] fury which can no longer be ſatisfied with the calmer joys: nor do they omit theſe prelimi⯑naries when reduced to the ſtate of captivity*. After fecundation, the female lays five or ſix eggs, marked with a few brown ſpots on a greeniſh ground; and, after the young are hatched, ſhe watches, feeds, and rears them with an affection which the male is eager to ſhare. In this reſpect the Jackdaw reſembles the Crows, eſpecially the common ſort: but Charleton and Schwenckfeld aſſert that it has two hatches in the year; which has never been affirmed of any of the Crows, though it well correſponds to the order of nature, the ſmall ſpecies being always the moſt prolific.
The Jackdaws are birds of paſſage, though they are not ſo well entitled to that appellation as the Rooks and Hooded-Crows, ſince a num⯑ber of them continue in the country through the ſummer. The towers of Vincennes are at every ſeaſon ſtocked with them, and ſo are all old buildings which afford the ſame convenience and ſhelter; but in France there are always fewer in ſummer than in winter. Thoſe which migrate, form themſelves into great bodies, like the Rooks and the Hooded-Crows; ſometimes they join the ſame army, and continually chatter as they fly: yet they keep not the ſame periods in France as in Germany; for they leave Ger⯑many [62] in autumn with their young, and appear not again till the ſpring, after having wintered with us; and Friſch was right in maintaining that they do not hatch during their abſence, ſince neither the Jackdaws nor other birds breed in winter.
With reſpect to their internal ſtructure, I ſhall only obſerve that they have a muſcular ventricle, and near its ſuperior orifice a dilatation of the oeſophagus, which ſerves in place of a crop, as in the Crows, but that the gall-bladder is more elongated.
They can be eaſily tamed and taught to ſpeak. They ſeem fond of the domeſtic ſtate; but they are faithleſs ſervants, concealing the food which they cannot conſume, and ſecreting bits of money and jewels.
To complete the hiſtory of the Jackdaws, we have only to compare together the two kinds which are natives of Europe, and afterwards ſubjoin, as uſual, the foreign ſpecies and varieties.
THE COMMON JACKDAW* is of the ſize of a pigeon; its iris is whitiſh, it has ſome white ſtreaks under its throat, ſome dots of the ſame colour round its noſtrils, and ſome of an aſh colour on the hind part of the head and neck; the reſt is entirely black, which is deeper, how⯑ever, [63] on the upper parts, and gloſſed ſometimes with violet, ſometimes with green.
THE CHOUGH* differs from the preceding, in being rather ſmaller, and perhaps leſs com⯑mon; its iris is bluiſh, as in the Rooks; the prevailing colour of its plumage is black, with⯑out any cinereous mixture, and ſmall white points are obſerved round its eyes. But in every other reſpect they are exactly alike, and there is no reaſon to doubt that they belong to the ſame ſpecies, and would breed together.
We need not be ſurpriſed that birds ſo nearly related to the Crows, ſhould preſent the ſame varieties. Aldrovandus ſaw in Italy a Jackdaw with a white collar; this is probably the ſame with what is found in many parts of Switzer⯑land, and which for this reaſon the Engliſh call the Helvetian Daw †.
Schwenckfeld had occaſion to ſee a white Daw, with a yellowiſh bill. Theſe white Daws are more common in Norway and the cold countries; in the temperate climates even, as in Poland, a ſmall white Daw is ſometimes found in the neſt of the black Daws or Choughs‡: in this caſe the colour of the plumage does not depend on the [64] influence of climate, but ariſes from a natural defect; in the ſame way as white Ravens are bred in France, and white Negroes born in Africa.
Schwenckfeld ſpeaks: 1 ſt, of a variegated Daw, which reſembles the true Jackdaw, except that its wings are white, and its bill hooked. 2. Another Daw, which is very rare, and differs from the common kind in its being croſſed*. But theſe are, perhaps, individual varieties, or monſtrous productions. A
The ALPINE DAW *.
• Le Choquard, ou Choucas des Alpes, Buff. , • Corvus-Pyrrhocorax, Linn. and Gmel. , • Pyrrhocorax, Geſner, and Aldrovandus. ,
and • The Alpine Crow, Lath.
[][65]PLINY calls this bird Pyrrhocorax, which name alone includes an abridged deſcrip⯑tion. Korax, which ſignifies Crow, marks the blackneſs of its plumage, as well as the analogy of its ſpecies; and pyrrhos, which means rufous or orange, denotes the colour of its bill, which, in fact, varies between yellow and orange; and alſo that of its feet, which are ſtill more vari⯑able, ſince they were red in the ſubject examined by Geſner and black in the one deſcribed by Briſſon. That author mentions alſo their being ſometimes yellow, and others relate that they are yellow in winter, and red in ſummer. Theſe yellow feet and bill, which laſt is ſmaller than that of the Jackdaw, have made it be taken for the Blackbird, and termed the Great Alpine Black⯑bird. But if we draw a compariſon, we ſhall find that it approaches much nearer to the Jack⯑daws, by the ſize of its body, the length of its [66] wings, and even the ſhape of its bill, though ſlenderer, and by its noſtrils being covered with feathers, which are thinner, indeed, than in the Jackdaws.
In the article of the Red-legged Crow, or Corniſh Chough, I have ſtated the difference between theſe two birds; which Belon, and ſome others who have not ſeen them, have confounded together.
Pliny believed the Pyrrohocorax to be of the Alps*; but Geſner, who has accurately pointed out the diſtinction between it and the Red-legged Crow, ſays, that in certain parts of the country of the Griſons, this bird does not ap⯑pear in winter; and in other parts that it is ſeen nearly the whole year, but that its favourite re⯑ſidence, where it ſettles in numerous flocks, is the ſummit of lofty mountains. Theſe facts reſtrict ſomewhat the opinion of Pliny, but at the ſame time they confirm it.
The Alpine Daw is of a middle ſize, be⯑tween the Jackdaw and the Carrion-Crow: its bill is ſmaller, and more arched, than either; its cry is ſhriller, and more plaintive than the Jack⯑daw, and by no means agreeable†.
[67] It lives chiefly upon grain, and is very de⯑ſtructive among the crops; its fleſh is very in⯑different eating. The inhabitants of the moun⯑tains draw meteorological predictions from its manner of flying; if it riſes aloft, they lay their account for cold; if it keep near the ſur⯑face, they expect mild weather. A
FOREIGN BIRDS, WHICH ARE RELATED TO THE JACKDAWS.
[68]I. The MUSTACHIO DAW.
• Corvus Hottentottus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Monedula Capitis Bonae Spei, Briſſ. ,
and • The Hottentot Crow, Lath.
THIS bird is nearly the ſize of the Blackbird; its plumage is of a gloſſy black, like the Jackdaw's; and its tail is proportionably longer than in any of them; all the feathers which compoſe it are equal, and the wings, when cloſed, do not extend half its length; the fourth and fifth are the longeſt of all, reaching two inches and a half farther than the firſt.
There are two circumſtances to be remarked in the exterior of this bird: 1. Thoſe long and flexible black hairs which ariſe from the baſe of the upper mandible, and which are twice as long as the bill; beſides many other hairs, ſhorter and ſtiffer, and pointing forwards, and ſpreading over this ſame baſe, as far as the corners of the mouth. 2. Thoſe long and narrow feathers in⯑ſerted [69] in the upper part of the neck, which play on the back, and form a ſort of mane*.
II. The BALD-DAW.
• Corvus Calvus, Gmel. ,
and • The Bald-Crow, Lath.
This ſingular Daw correſponds to the Rook: the anterior part of its head is bare as in the Rook, and its throat is only ſhaded with a few ſtraggling feathers. Its relation to the Daws in general is marked by the length of its wings, the ſhape of its feet, its port, its bulk, and its wide noſtrils, which are almoſt round. But it differs becauſe its noſtrils are not covered with feathers, and are placed in a deep cavity on either ſide of the bill, and alſo becauſe its bill is broader near the baſe, and ſcalloped at the edges. I can ſay nothing with reſpect to its hiſtory. It has not even received a name in any treatiſe of ornithology. It is a native of Cayenne†.
III. The NEW GUINEA DAW.
• Corvus Novae Guineae, Gmel. ,
and • The New Guinea Crow.
[70]The natural place this bird ought to occupy is between our Daws and what I call Colnud. It has the figure of the Daws, the grey plumage of one of them, at leaſt, on the upper part of the body; but it is not ſo large, and its bill is broader in the baſe, in which it reſembles the Colnud. It differs from the laſt by the length of its wings, which reach almoſt to the end of its tail, and from the Colnud and the Daws by the colours of the under-ſide of the body, which conſiſt of black and white ſtripes, that extend to the wings, and which bear ſome reſemblance to thoſe in the variegated Wood-pecker*.
IV. The PAPUAN DAW.
• Le Choucari de la Nouvelle Guineé, Buff. , • Corvus Papuenſis, Gmel. ,
and • The Papuan Crow, Lath.
[71]The prevailing colour of this bird (for we know only its ſurface) is an aſh-grey, deeper in the upper ſide, and lighter in the under, and diluting, by degrees, almoſt to white under the belly and the parts adjacent. There are only two exceptions to this uniformity of plumage: 1. A black ring, which ſurrounds the baſe of the bill, and extends as far as the eyes. 2. The great quills of the wings, which are of a blackiſh brown.
In this bird the noſtrils are, as in the pre⯑ceding, entirely covered with white feathers; the bill is nearly ſimilar, except that the ridge of the upper mandible is not round as in the Jackdaws, but angular as in the Colnud. It bears other relations alſo to the laſt, and re⯑ſembles it in the proportions of its wings, which extend no farther than the middle of its tail; in the ſmallneſs of its feet, and in the ſhortneſs of its nails. In ſhort, we cannot heſitate to place it, as well as the preceding, between the Jack⯑daws and the Colnuds. Its length, reckoning from the point of the bill to the extremity of the tail, is about thirteen inches.
[72] We owe this new ſpecies, as well as the pre⯑ceding, to Sonnerat*.
V. The CAYENNE COLNUD †.
• Corvus Nudus, Gmel. ,
and • The Bare-necked Crow, Lath.
I rank this bird after the Daws, though it differs from them in ſome reſpects, becauſe it is certainly more analogous to theſe, than to any birds of our continent.
Like No. II. it has a very broad bill at the baſe, and reſembles it alſo in another reſpect, in being bald; but this is in a diffeent way, the neck being almoſt naked and featherleſs. Its head is covered from the noſtrils incluſively, with a ſort of black velvet cap, conſiſting of ſmall ſtraight feathers, ſhort, interwoven, and very ſoft to the feel; theſe are more ſtraggling under the neck, and much more ſo under the ſides and in the hind part.
The Colnud is nearly of the ſize of our Jack⯑daws, and we may add that it wears their li⯑very; for its plumage is entirely black, except [73] ſome of the coverts and the wing-quills, which are of a whitiſh grey.
To look at the feet of the one which I obſerved, one would ſuppoſe that the hind-toe was forcibly turned back; but this is its natural poſition, and it can be directed for⯑ward occaſionally, as in the martins. I have even remarked that it is connected with a membrane to the inner toe in each foot. It is a new ſpecies*.
VI. The PHILIPPINE BALICASE †.
• Corvus-Balicaſſius, Gmel. , • Monedula Philippenſis, Briſſ. ,
and • The Philippine Crow, Lath.
I cannot prevail upon myſelf to give this bird the appellation of a Daw, as Briſſon has done; ſince, from his deſcription even, it appears to differ widely from them. Its wings extend only fifteen or ſixteen inches, and it is ſcarcely larger than a Blackbird: its bill is thicker and longer in proportion than in any of the European Jack⯑daws; its feet ſlenderer, and its tail forked; [74] laſtly, inſtead of the ſhrill gloomy cries of the Jackdaws, it has a ſoft pleaſant ſong. Such differences would lead us to expect many more, when the bird is better known.
Its bill and feet are black; its plumage of the ſame colour, with green reflections; its colour, at leaſt, is the ſame, therefore, with that of the Jackdaw*.
The MAGPIE *.
• La Pie, Buff. , • Corvus-Pica, Linn. and Gmel. , • Pica Varia & Caudata, Geſner, and Aldrov. , • Pica Ruſticorum, Klein. ,
and • The Magpie, Pianet, or Piot, Will. Alb. &c.
[][75]THIS bird reſembles the crow ſo much in external appearance, that Linnaeus has claſſed them under the ſame genus; and Belon remarks, that if the tail of the Magpie was ſhortened, and the white removed from its plumage, it would be really a crow. In fact, the Magpie has the bill, the feet, the eyes, and the general ſhape of the crows and jackdaws; it has alſo many of their inſtincts and habits, for it is omnivorous, living on all ſorts of fruits, and devouring even carrion†, robbing the ſmall birds' neſts of the eggs and the young, and ſeizing ſometimes the parents, either by an [76] open attack, or by ſurpriſing them while en⯑ſnared. One has been known to fall upon a blackbird, another to ſnatch a crab, but ſtrangled by the cloſing of the claws, &c.*
Its fondneſs for live fleſh has ſuggeſted the breeding it for falconry, like the ravens†. It com⯑monly ſpends the warm ſeaſon paired with its female, and engaged in hatching and breeding its young. In the winter it goes in flocks, and approaches the hamlets, where it has greater re⯑ſources, which the ſeverity of the ſeaſon renders the more neceſſary. It is eaſily reconciled to the ſight of man, ſoon grows familiar in the houſe, and at laſt becomes maſter. I knew one which paſſed a day and night among a crew of cats, which it was ſhrewd enough to command.
It prattles nearly like the carrion-crow, and learns to imitate the cries of animals, and even the human voice. One is mentioned which could exactly mimic the calf, the kid, the ſheep, and even the notes of the ſhepherd's pipe: another repeated completely, the flouriſh of trumpets‡. Willoughby knew many which [77] could pronounce whole phraſes. Margot is the word commonly given them, becauſe they can the moſt readily articulate it; and Pliny aſſures us, that this bird is very fond of that ſort of imitation, is pleaſed with repeating the words it has learned, ſtudies patiently and earneſtly to recal thoſe it has loſt, is overjoyed with the diſ⯑covery, and ſometimes dies of vexation, if its recollection fails it, or if its tongue refuſes to pronounce a hard word*.
The tongue of the Magpie is like that of the raven, for the moſt part black. It alights on the backs of hogs and ſheep, like the jack⯑daw, and ſearches after the vermin which in⯑feſt theſe animals; with this difference, how⯑ever, that the hog receives its civilities with complaiſance; but the ſheep, no doubt more delicate and ſenſible, ſeems to dread it†. It alſo ſnaps, very dexterouſly, the flies and other winged inſects which come in its way.
The Magpie can be caught by the ſame ſnares, and in the ſame manner with the car⯑rion-crow, and it is addicted to the ſame bad habits of ſtealing and hoarding up proviſions‡; [78] habits almoſt ever inſeparable in the different ſpecies of animals. It is imagined alſo to fore⯑bode rain, when it chatters more than uſually*. On the other hand, many circumſtances concur to ſeparate it from the crows.
It is much ſmaller than even the jackdaw, not weighing more than eight or nine ounces; its wings are ſhorter, and its tail longer in pro⯑portion, and hence its flight is neither ſo lofty, nor ſo well ſupported. It never undertakes diſtant journies, but only flies from tree to tree, or from ſteeple to ſteeple. When on the ground, it is in a continual flutter, hopping as much as walking, and briſkly wagging its tail. It ſhews, in general, more reſtleſſneſs and ac⯑tivity than the crows; it is more malicious, and is diſpoſed to a ſpecies of raillery†. The fe⯑male accordingly diſplays greater art and con⯑trivance in the conſtruction of her neſt; whe⯑ther becauſe ſhe is more ardent for the male‡, and therefore more attached to its young, or becauſe ſhe is aware that many birds of rapine [79] are forward to plunder its eggs and its brood, and, beſides, that ſome of them are prompted to retaliate. She places her neſt on the tops of the loftieſt trees, or, at leaſt, on high buſhes*, and, with the aſſiſtance of the male, ſtrengthens it on the outſide with flexible twigs and worked mud, and environs the whole with a baſketing of ſmall thorny branches cloſely entangled, leaving only in the thickeſt and moſt acceſ⯑ſible ſide, a ſmall hole for entering. But not contented with ſafety alone, ſhe ſeeks conveni⯑ence; ſhe lines the bottom of the neſt with a ſort of round mattreſs†, on which the young repoſe ſoft and warm; and though this lining, which is the true neſt, be only ſix inches in diameter, the whole maſs, including the thorny embraſure, is at leaſt two feet every way.
But all theſe precautions are not ſufficient to remove her anxiety and apprehenſions: ſhe is [80] perpetually on the watch; if ſhe perceive a crow to approach, ſhe flies immediately to meet him, haraſſes him, and purſues him to a diſ⯑tance*. If the enemy be more formidable, a falcon for inſtance, or an eagle, yet will not fear reſtrain; ſhe ruſhes on danger with a te⯑merity which is not always crowned with ſuc⯑ceſs. Her conduct muſt ſometimes, however, be more conſiderate, if we believe what is al⯑leged, that when ſhe ſees a perſon ſpying her neſt with too envious an eye, ſhe tranſports the eggs to ſome other place, either between her claws, or in a way ſtill more incredible†. Sportſmen tell ſtories no leſs ſtrange about her ſkill in arithmetic, though her knowledge ex⯑tends not beyond the number five‡.
She lays ſeven or eight eggs at each hatch, and breeds only once a year, unleſs the neſt be deſtroyed or deranged, in which caſe ſhe con⯑ſtructs another, and both parents exert them⯑ſelves [81] with ſuch ardour as to complete it in leſs than a day. They have afterwards a ſecond hatch, conſiſting of four or five eggs; and if they be again diſturbed, they will rebuild the neſt, and make a third hatch, though ſtill ſmaller than the preceding*. The eggs of the Magpie are never ſo large, or of ſo deep a colour, as thoſe of the Raven; they are marked with brown ſpots, ſtrewed on a blue-green ground, moſt crowded about the thick end. John Liebault, quoted by Salerne, is the only one who affirms that the male and female ſit al⯑ternately.
The Magpies are hatched blind and ſhapeleſs, and it is ſome time before they aſſume their de⯑ſtined form. The mother not only rears them with an anxious care, but takes an intereſt in them after they are grown up. Their fleſh is indif⯑ferent eating, though it is not held in ſuch averſion as that of young crows.
With reſpect to the difference remarked in the plumage, I conceive it to be not abſolutely ſpecific; ſince, among the ravens, the crows, and the jackdaws, individuals are found varie⯑gated, like the Magpie, with black and white: we muſt admit, indeed, that in the former black [82] [...] [83] [...] [82] is the ordinary colour, as the mixture of white and black is in the latter. But this is not uni⯑form; and if we examine the bird cloſely, or view it in certain lights, we may perceive ſhades of green, purple, and violet, though not ex⯑pected in a bird ſo little celebrated for beauty of plumage*. The male is diſtinguiſhed from the female by the deeper blue gloſs on the upper part of its body, and not by the blackneſs of its tongue, as ſome have alleged.
The Magpie is ſubject to moult, like the other birds; but it is obſerved, that the feathers drop ſucceſſively and by degrees, except thoſe on the head, which are detached all at once, ſo that at the annual return of the ſeaſon it appears bald†. The young ones do not get their long tail before the ſecond year; and, no doubt, this is the time when they become adult.
All that I can learn with reſpect to the dura⯑tion of the life of the Magpie is, that Dr. Der⯑ham kept one twenty years, when it grew blind with age‡.
This bird is very common in France, Eng⯑land, Germany, Sweden, and in every part of Europe, except Lapland‖; it is alſo rare in mountainous countries, which ſhews that it [83] cannot ſupport exceſſive cold. I ſhall cloſe this account with a ſhort deſcription, which will il⯑luſtrate what cannot be repreſented at all, or which the figure expreſſes imperfectly.
It has twenty quills in each wing, the firſt of which is very ſhort, and the fourth and fifth the longeſt; twelve unequal quills in the tail, diminiſhing always in length, the farther they are from the two middle ones, which are the longeſt of all; the noſtrils round; the internal eye-lids marked with a yellow ſpot; the edges of the chops beſet with hairs; the tongue blackiſh, and forked; the inteſtines about twenty-two inches long; the coecums half an inch; the oeſophagus dilated and covered with glands at its junction with the ventricle, which is but little muſcular; the kidney oblong; and the gall-bladder of the ordinary ſize*.
I have already ſaid that there are white Mag⯑pies as well as white ravens; and though the principal cauſe of this change of the plumage is the influence of northern climates, as may be ſuppoſed of the white Magpie of Wormius†, which was brought from Norway, and even [84] of ſome of thoſe mentioned by Rzacynſki*: I muſt confeſs, however, that they are ſometimes found in temperate climates; for inſtance, the one caught ſome years ago in Sologne, which was entirely white, except a ſingle black feather in the middle of its wings†; whether it had mi⯑grated from the northern countries to France, after having undergone this change, or was bred in France, and the change of colour owing to ſome accidental cauſe. We muſt ſay the ſame of the white Magpies that have ſometimes been ſeen in Italy‡.
Wormius remarks, that the head of his white Magpie was ſmooth and bare, becauſe he pro⯑bably ſaw it in the moulting ſeaſon; which con⯑firms what I have ſaid with regard to the com⯑mon Magpies.
Willughby ſaw, in the king of England's collection, Magpies of a brown or ruſty colour, which may be eſteemed a ſecond variety of the ordinary ſort. A
FOREIGN BIRDS, RELATED TO THE MAGPIE.
[85]I. The SENEGAL MAGPIE.
IT is ſomewhat leſs than ours; but its wings, being proportionably longer, are nearly of the ſame extent; its tail, on the contrary, is ſhorter, though of the ſame ſhape. The bill, the feet, and the nails, are black, as in the common Magpie, but the plumage is very dif⯑ferent. It has not a particle of white, and all the colours are dull; the head, the neck, the back, and the breaſt, are black, with violet re⯑flections; the quills of the tail and the great quills of the wings are brown. All the reſt is blackiſh, with different degrees of intenſity.
II. The JAMAICA MAGPIE.
This bird weighs only ſix ounces, and is about a third ſmaller than the common Magpie, [86] which it reſembles in its bill, its feet, and its tail.
The plumage of the male is black, with purple reflections; that of the female is brown, darker on the back and all the upper ſide of the body, and lighter under the belly.
They build their neſt on the branches of trees. They are found in every part of the iſland, but are moſt numerous at a diſtance from the ſcene of buſtle. After breeding, they quit their con⯑cealments, and in autumn they ſpread over the ſettlements in ſuch prodigious multitudes, as ſometimes to darken the air. They fly thus in flocks for miles, and wherever they alight, they occaſion conſiderable damage to the planters. In winter, their reſource is to crowd to the barn-doors. Such facts would lead us to ſup⯑poſe that they are frugivorous; but they have a ſtrong ſmell, and their fleſh is rank and coarſe, and ſeldom eaten.
It follows from what I have ſaid, that this bird differs from our Magpie, not only in its mode of feeding, in its ſize, and in its plumage, but is beſides diſtinguiſhed by its being able to continue long on wing, by its aſſociating in numerous flocks, and by the rankneſs of its fleſh. The difference of ſex is attended with a ſtill greater in the colours. In ſhort, if we add that the common Magpie could not tra⯑verſe the immenſe ocean which ſeparates the two continents, and could not ſupport the in⯑tenſe [87] cold of a northern paſſage, we may con⯑clude the American Magpies to be analogous to ours, and their repreſentatives in the new world, but not derived from the ſame common ſtock.
The teſquizana* of Mexico ſeems to bear a great reſemblance to this Jamaica Magpie; ſince, according to Fernandez, its tail is very long, and its ſize is inferior to that of the ſtare; its plumage is of a gloſſy black; it flies in nu⯑merous flocks, which are deſtructive to the cul⯑tivated fields where they alight; it breeds in the ſpring, and its fleſh is tough and rank. In a word, this bird might be conſidered as a ſort of ſtare or jackdaw; but if we except the plu⯑mage, a jackdaw with a long tail reſembles much a Magpie.
It is quite different with reſpect to the iſana† of Fernandez, which Briſſon confounds with the Jamaica Magpie. The bill, indeed, the feet, and the plumage, have the ſame colours in both; but the iſana is larger, and its bill is twice as long: beſides, it prefers the coldeſt parts of Mexico, and in its inſtincts, its habits, and its cry, it reſembles the ſtare. It would be difficult, I imagine, to trace theſe characters in [88] the Jamaica Magpie of Cateſby; and, if it muſt be referred to the ſame genus, it ought at leaſt to be formed into a ſeparate ſpecies. The au⯑thority of Fernandez, the only naturaliſt who has had an opportunity of viewing the bird, is ſurely of more weight than the artificial claſſi⯑fication of a ſyſtem-maker; and that expe⯑rienced obſerver ſays, that it bore a ſtronger analogy to the ſtare than to the Magpie. How⯑ever we may be deceived in a ſubject of this kind, where our information is drawn from imperfect deſcriptions and inaccurate figures; I ſhall add, that the iſana has a ſort of jeering note, common to moſt of the birds termed American Magpies.
III. The MAGPIE of the ANTILLES *.
• Corvus Caribaeus, Gmel. , • Galgalus Antillarum, Briſſ. , • Pica Cauda Indica, Ray. , • The Perſian Pie, Will. ,
and • The Carribaean Crow, Lath.
Briſſon has claſſed this bird with the rollers, for no other reaſon that I can diſcover, except that in Aldrovandus's figure the noſtrils are [89] naked, which Briſſon reckons one of the cha⯑racters of the roller: but, 1, we cannot with certainty infer from a figure, which Briſſon himſelf conſiders as inaccurate, a property ſo minute that it would eſcape the notice of a deſigner. 2. To this we may oppoſe a re⯑markable character, which could not be over⯑looked, viz. the long quills in the middle of the tail, which Briſſon conſiders as belonging ex⯑cluſively to the Magpie. 3. The Magpie of the Antilles reſembles ours in its cry, in its con⯑fident diſpoſition, in its neſtling on trees, in its ſauntering by the margin of ſtreams, and in the coarſeneſs of its fleſh*: in ſhort, if we muſt rank it with the moſt analogous European birds, it ought to be placed among the Magpies.
It differs, however, by the exceſſive length of the two middle quills of the tail, which ſtretch ſix or eight inches beyond the lateral ones†; its colours are alſo different, the bill and [90] feet being red; the neck blue, with a white col⯑lar; the head of the ſame blue, tinged with a white ſpot, ſtreaked with black, which extends from the origin of the upper mandible to the junction of the neck; the back of a tawny co⯑lour, the rump yellow, the two long quills of the tail ſtriped with blue and white, thoſe of the wing mixed with green and blue, and the under ſide of the body white.
Upon comparing Father du Tertre's deſcrip⯑tion of the Magpie of the Antilles, with that of Aldrovandus's long-tailed Magpie of India, we cannot doubt but they were formed from a bird of the ſame ſpecies, and conſequently it is an American bird, as we are aſſured by Father du Tertre, who ſaw it at Guadaloupe, and not a native of Japan, as Aldrovandus aſſerts from a very uncertain tradition*; unleſs we ſuppoſe that it had penetrated towards the north, and thus ſpread through both continents.
IV. The HOCISANA *.
• Corvus Mexicanus, Gmel. , • Pica Mexicana Major, Briſſ. , • Le Criard, Pernetty's Voy. ,
and • The Mexican Crow, Lath.
[91]Though Fernandez calls this bird a great ſtare, we may, from his own account, refer it to the genus of Magpies; for he tells us, that it would be exactly like the common jackdaw, if it were ſomewhat ſmaller, its tail and nails ſhorter, and its plumage of a purer black, and not mixed with blue. But a long tail is the property, not of the ſtare, but of the Magpie, and what diſ⯑criminates it the moſt in its external appearance from the jackdaw. With regard to the other characters which ſeparate the Hociſana from the jackdaw, they are as much foreign to the ſtare as to the Magpie, if not more ſo.
This bird courts the reſidence of man; it is as familiar as the Magpie, chatters like it, and has a ſhrill cry; its fleſh is black, and very well taſted†.
V. The VARDIOLE *.
[92]Seba has given this bird the appellation of the Bird of Paradiſe, as he has to almoſt all foreign birds with long tails. In this reſpect the Var⯑diole was entitled to the name, ſince its tail is double the extreme length of its body. But this tail is not formed as in the bird of paradiſe, for its quill feathers are furniſhed with vanes through their whole length, beſides many other differences.
White is the prevailing colour in this bird: we muſt only except the head and neck, which are black, with very bright purple reflections; the feet, which are of a light red; the wings, whoſe quills have black vanes, and the two middle ones of the tail, which ſtretch much be⯑yond the reſt, and which are marked with black along their ſhaft, from the baſe to half of their length.
The eyes of the Vardiole are lively, and en⯑circled with white; the baſe of the upper man⯑dible is ſhaded with little hair-like black fea⯑thers, that meet behind and cover the noſtrils; its wings are ſhort, and extend not beyond the origin of its tail. So far it reſembles the Mag⯑pie; but it differs on account of the ſhortneſs of its feet, which are only the half in proportion, [93] a circumſtance attended with other differences in its figure and port.
It is found in the iſland of Papoe, according to Seba, whoſe deſcription is the only original one, and comprehends all that is known about this bird.
VI. The ZANOE *.
• Corvus-Zanahoe, Gmel. , • Pica Mexicana Minor, Briſſ. ,
and • The Leſſer Mexican Crow, Lath.
Fernandez compares this Mexican bird to the common Magpie, for its ſize, for the length of its tail, for the perfection of its ſenſes, for its talents for ſpeaking, and for its proneneſs to ſteal whatever pleaſes its fancy. He adds, that its plumage is entirely black, except on the neck and head, where we can perceive a fulvous tinge†.
The JAY *.
• Le Geai, Buff. , • Corvus Glandarius, Linn. and Gmel. , • Garrulus, Briſſ. ,
and • Pica Glandaria, Geſner, Aldrov. and Ray.
[94]WHAT we have ſaid with regard to the in⯑ſtinct of the Magpie, we hold almoſt en⯑tirely in reſpect to the Jay; it will be ſuf⯑ficient, therefore, to notice the characteriſtic differences.
The male is diſtinguiſhed by the bulk of his head and the luſtre of his colours†. The old ones differ alſo from the young in their plu⯑mage, and hence the various inconſiſtent de⯑ſcriptions‡.
The Jays are of a petulant diſpoſition; they have keen ſenſations and briſk movements, and in their frequent burſts of rage they hurry into danger, and often entangle their head between two branches, and die thus ſuſpended in the air§. When they feel reſtraint, their violence exceeds bounds; and hence, in a cage, they entirely loſe their beauty, by the continual rumpling, wearing, and breaking of their feathers.
Their ordinary cry is harſh and frequent; they are alſo fond of imitating other birds whoſe notes are not more agreeable, ſuch as the keſtril, the tawny owl, &c.‖ If they perceive in the wood a fox or other ravenous animal, they give [96] a certain ſhrill ſcream, to alarm their compa⯑nions; they quickly aſſemble, preſuming that they ſhall be formidable by their numbers, or at leaſt by their noiſe*. This inſtinct, which the Jays have, of ſummoning their force, together with their violent antipathy to the brown owl, ſuggeſt ſeveral ways of enſnaring them, and the ſport is commonly very ſucceſsful†; for they are more petulant than the magpies, and by no means ſo ſuſpicious or crafty; nor is their natural cry ſo various, though they have great flexibility of throat, and have a turn for imitating all the cries and ſounds of animals which they ha⯑bitually hear, and even human diſcourſe. The word Richard they can the moſt eaſily imitate. The have alſo, like the magpie, and all the fa⯑mily of the daws, crows, and ravens, the habit of burying their ſuperfluous proviſions‡, and of ſtealing whatever they can obtain. But they cannot always recognize the ſpot where they have buried their treaſure, or, like all miſers, they are more actuated by the fear of en⯑croaching on their ſtock, than by the deſire of uſing it; ſo that in the ſucceeding ſpring, the acorns and nuts that were concealed, perhaps forgotten, germinate in the earth, and their tender leaves diſcover the uſeleſs heap, though too late, to the frugal ſordid hoarders.
[97] The Jays breed in woods remote from human dwellings, preferring the moſt branchy oaks, whoſe trunks are entwined with ivy*: but they are not ſo artful and cautious as the mag⯑pies in building their neſts. I have received many of theſe in the month of May; they were hollow hemiſpheres, formed with ſmall inter⯑woven roots, open above, without any ſoft lining, and without any exterior defence. I always found them to contain four or five eggs; others ſay that the number is five or ſix. They were ſmaller than pigeons eggs, gray, with more or leſs of a greeniſh hue, and with ſmall ſpots faintly marked.
The young undergo their moulting in July: they keep company with their parents till the ſucceeding ſpring†, when they ſeparate, to form new pairs. By this time the blue plate on their wings, which appears very early, has attained its higheſt beauty.
In the domeſtic condition, to which they eaſily conform themſelves, they become accuſ⯑tomed to all ſorts of food, and live in this way eight or ten years‡. In the ſtate of freedom, they feed not only on acorns and filberts, but on cheſnuts, peas, beans, ſorbs, gooſberries, cherries, raſberries, &c. They alſo prey on the young of other birds, when they can ſurpriſe them in the neſt during the abſence of the pa⯑rents; [98] and ſometimes they venture to attack the old ones, when they diſcover them entangled in ſnares; and in this caſe they advance with their uſual imprudence, and are often caught them⯑ſelves*. Their fleſh, though not delicate, is eatable, particularly if it be boiled firſt, and af⯑terwards roaſted.
In Jays, the firſt phalanx of the outer toe is in each foot connected with that of the middle toe; the inſide of the mouth is black; the tongue of the ſame colour, forked, thin, membranous, and almoſt tranſparent; the gall-bladder is ob⯑long; the ſtomach not ſo thick, and lined with weaker muſcles than the gizzard in the grani⯑vorous tribe. Their gullet muſt be very wide, for they ſwallow acorns, filberts, and even cheſnuts entire, like the ring-doves†; I know, however, that they never thus treat the flower-cup of a pink, though they are exceedingly fond of the ſeed which it contains. I have often admired their procedure: if a pink be thrown to them, they ſeize it greedily, and if others be offered, they continue to ſnatch them till their bill can hold no more. When they want to eat theſe, they lay aſide all the reſt but one, hold it with the right foot, and pluck off the petals one by one, keeping a watchful eye all the time, and caſting a glance on every ſide: at laſt, when the ſeed appears, they de⯑vour [99] it greedily, and again begin to pluck a ſecond flower.
This bird is found in Sweden, Scotland, Eng⯑land, Germany, and Italy; and is, I believe, a native of every country in Europe, and even of the correſponding climates of Aſia.
Pliny mentions a kind of Jays or magpies with five toes, which learned to ſpeak better than the reſt*. This is not more wonderful than that there ſhould exiſt hens with five toes, eſpecially as the Jays become more familiar and domeſtic than hens; and we know well, that all animals which live with man, and feed richly, are ſubject to exuberance of growth. The pha⯑langes of the toes might be multiplied in ſome individuals beyond the uſual number; a de⯑viation which has been aſcribed too generally to every ſpecies†.
But another variety, more generally known in this ſpecies, is the White Jay. It has the blue mark on the wings‡, but is diſtinguiſhed from the common Jay by the almoſt univerſal whiteneſs of its plumage, which extends even to its bill and nails, and by the red colour of its eyes, a property obſerved in ſo many other white animals. But we muſt not imagine that this white complexion is entirely pure; it is often ſhaded with a yellowiſh tinge of various intenſity. In a ſubject which I examined, the [100] coverts of the wings were the whiteſt; its feet alſo ſeemed to be more ſlender than thoſe of the common Jay. A
FOREIGN BIRDS, WHICH ARE RELATED TO THE JAY.
[101]I. The RED-BILLED JAY of CHINA.
• Corvus Erythrorynchos, Gmel. ,
and • The Red-billed Jay, Lath.
THIS new kind of Jay has been juſt intro⯑duced into France. Its red bill is the more remarkable, as the whole of the fore-part of the head, the neck, and even the breaſt, is of a fine velvet black. The hind part of its head and neck is of a ſoft gray, which mixes in ſmall ſpots on the crown, with the black of the fore-part; the upper ſide of the body is brown, the under whitiſh. But to form a clear idea of the colours, we muſt ſuppoſe a violet tint ſpread over them all, except the black, deeper on the wings, fainter on the back, and ſtill more dilute under the belly. The tail is ta⯑pered, and the wings exceed not one-third of its length, and each of its quills is marked with three colours, viz. a light violet at its origin, black at its middle, and white at its extremity; [102] but the violet is more extenſive than the black, and that ſtill more than the white.
The feet are red, like the bill; the nails whitiſh at their origin, and brown near the point, and are, beſides, very long and hooked.
This Jay is ſomewhat larger than ours, and may be only a variety ariſing from the influence of climate*.
II. The PERUVIAN JAY.
• Le Geai du Perou, Buff. ,
and • Corvus Peruvianus, Gmel.
The plumage of this bird is of ſingular beauty; it conſiſts of an aſſemblage of the fineſt colours, ſometimes melting with inimitable art, and ſometimes forming a contraſt which heightens the effect. The delicate green which prevails in the upper part of its body, extends on the one ſide over the ſix mid-quills of the tail, and on the other it advances, paſſing by inſenſible ſhades, and receiving, at the ſame time, a bluiſh tint, to join a ſort of white crown on the head. The baſe of the bill is ſurrounded with a fine blue, which appears again behind the eye, and [103] in the ſpace below it. A kind of black velvet, which covers the throat and all the fore-part of the neck, is contraſted at its upper margin with the fine blue colour, and at its lower to the jon⯑quil yellow which is ſpread over the breaſt, the belly, and the three lateral quills on each ſide of the tail. The tail is tapered, and more ſo than the Siberian Jay.
Nothing is known with regard to the qua⯑lities of this bird, which has never been ſeen in Europe.
III. The BROWN CANADA JAY, or CINE⯑REOUS CROW. Lath.
• Corvus Canadenſis, Linn. and Gmel. , • Garrulus Canadenſis Fuſcus, Briſſ. ,
and • The Cinereous Crow, Penn, and Lath.
If it were poſſible to ſuppoſe that the Jay could migrate into America, I ſhould be in⯑clined to ſuppoſe that this is a variety of our European ſpecies; for it has the appearance and the port, and alſo thoſe ſoft ſilky feathers which are conceived to belong peculiarly to the Jay. It is diſtinguiſhed only by its inferior ſize, by the colours of its plumage, and by the length and ſhape of its tail, which is tapered. Such ſlight differences might be aſcribed to climate; [104] but our Jay is unable to traverſe the intervening ocean. Till, therefore, we receive a fuller ac⯑count of the habits of the Brown Jay of Ca⯑nada, we ſhall conſider it as one of the foreign ſpecies the moſt analogous to our Jay.
The upper ſide of the body is of a brown co⯑lour; the under ſide, and alſo the crown of the head, the throat, and the fore-part of the neck, are of a dirty white, which alſo appears at the ex⯑tremity of the tail and wings. In the indivi⯑dual which I obſerved, the bill and the legs were of a deep brown, the under ſide of the body of a deeper brown, and the lower man⯑dible broader than in the figure: laſtly, the feathers on the throat, jutting forward, formed a ſort of barbil*.
IV. The SIBERIAN JAY.
• Corvus Sibiricus, Gmel.
[105]The points of analogy between this new ſpe⯑cies and our Jay conſiſt in a certain family likeneſs, and that the ſhape of the bill and feet, and the poſition of the noſtrils, are nearly the ſame; and alſo that the Siberian Jay has, like ours, narrow feathers on its head, which it can raiſe at pleaſure as a creſt. The diſcri⯑minating properties are theſe: it is ſmaller, its tail is tapered, and the colours of its plumage are very different. Its hiſtory is totally un⯑known.
V. The WHITE COIF, or CAYENNE JAY.
• Corvus Cayanus, Linn. and Gmel. ,
and • Garrulus Cayanenſis, Briſſ.
It is nearly of the ſize of the common Jay, only it is taller, its bill ſhorter, its tail and wings proportionally longer, which gives it a ſpright⯑lier air.
There are alſo other differences, chiefly in the plumage; gray, white, black, and the dif⯑ferent [106] ſhades of violet, conſtitute all the variety of its colours. The gray appears on the bill, the legs, and the nails; the black on the front, the ſides of the head, and the throat; the white round the eyes, on the crown of the head, and on the nape as far as the origin of the neck, and alſo over all the lower part of the body; the violet lighter on the back and wings, and deeper on the tail, which is tipped with white, and compoſed of twelve quills, of which the two middle ones are rather longer than thoſe towards the ſide.
The ſmall black feathers on its front are ſhort, and ſcarce flexible; part of them project over the noſtrils, and the reſt are reflected, ſo as to form a ſort of ruffled creſt*.
VI. The GARLU, or the YELLOW-BELLIED JAY of CAYENNE.
• Corvus Flavus, Gmel.
This alſo is a native of Cayenne; but of all the Jays it is the one which has the ſhorteſt wings; we ſhould therefore be the fartheſt from [107] ſuſpecting that it croſſed the Atlantic, eſpecially as it can ſubſiſt only in warm climates. Its feet are ſhort and ſlender. I can add nothing with reſpect to its colours, but what the ſight of the figure will ſuggeſt; and with reſpect to its habits, we are totally ignorant. We know not even whether, like the other Jays, it can erect the crown feathers. It is a new ſpecies*.
VII. The BLUE JAY of NORTH-AMERICA.
• Corvus Criſtatus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Garrulus Canadenſis Coeruleus, Briſſ. , • Pica Glandaria Criſtata, Klein. ,
and • The Blue Jay, Cateſby, Edw. Penn. and Lath.
This bird is noted for the fine blue colour of its plumage, which, with a ſlight intermixture of white, black, and purple, is ſpread over all the upper part of its body, from the crown of the head to the extremity of the tail.
Its throat is white, with a tint of red; under it is a kind of black gorget, and ſtill lower a reddiſh zone, which melts by degrees into the gray and white that predominate in the lower part of the body. The feathers on the crown [108] of the head are long, and the bird raiſes them at pleaſure like a creſt, which is larger and more beautiful than in our Jay: this is termi⯑nated on the front by a kind of black fillet, which, ſtretching on both ſides over a white ground as far as the nape, joins the branches of the gorget. This fillet is divided from the bottom of the upper mandible by a white line formed by the ſmall feathers which cover the noſtrils.
The tail is almoſt as long as the bird itſelf, and conſiſts of twelve ſtaged quills.
Cateſby remarks, that the American Jay has the ſame petulance in its actions as the common Jay; that its notes are leſs diſagreeable, and that the female is diſtinguiſhed from the male by its duller colours. Admitting this, Cateſby's figure muſt repreſent a female, and that of Ed⯑wards a male; but the age of the bird muſt alſo affect the vivacity and perfection of its colours.
This Jay is brought from Carolina and Ca⯑nada; and in thoſe countries it muſt be very common, for many are ſent to Europe*.
The NUTCRACKER *.
• Le Caiſſe-Noix, Buff. , • Corvus Caryocatactes, Linn. and Gmel. , • Nucifraga, Briſſ. , • Caryocatactes, Geſner, Ray, and Will. ,
and • Merula Saxatilis, Aldrov.
[][109]THIS bird is diſtinguiſhed from the jays and magpies by the ſhape of its bill, which is ſtraighter, blunter, and compoſed of two un⯑equal pieces. Its inſtinct is alſo different, for it prefers the reſidence of high mountains, and its diſpoſition is not ſo much tinctured with cunning and ſuſpicion. However, it is cloſely related to theſe two ſpecies of birds; and moſt authors not fettered by their ſyſtems, have ranged it with the jays and magpies, and even with the jackdaws†, which, it is well known, bear a great analogy to the magpies; but it is [110] aſſerted that it chatters more than any of theſe.
Klein diſtinguiſhes two varieties of the Nut⯑cracker; the one, ſpeckled like the ſtare, has a ſtrong angular bill, a long forked tongue, as in all the magpies; the other is of inferior ſize, and its bill (for he ſays nothing of the plumage) is more ſlender and rounder, compoſed of two unequal mandibles, the upper of which is the longer, and its tongue divided deeply, very ſhort, and almoſt loſt in the throat*.
According to the ſame author, theſe two birds eat hazel-nuts; but the former breaks them, and the latter pierces them: they feed alſo on acorns, wild berries, the kernels of pine⯑tops, which they pluck dextrouſly, and even inſects. And laſtly, like the jays, the magpies, and the jackdaws, they conceal what they can⯑not conſume.
Beſides the brilliancy of the plumage, the Nutcracker is remarkable for the triangular white ſpots which are ſpread over its whole body, ex⯑cept the head. Theſe ſpots are ſmaller on the [111] upper part, and broader on the breaſt; their effect is the greater, as they are contraſted with the brown ground.
Theſe birds are moſt attached, as I have ob⯑ſerved above, to mountainous ſituations. They are common in Auvergne, Savoy, Lorraine, Franche-Compté, Switzerland, the Bergamaſque, in Auſtria in the mountains which are covered with foreſts of pines. They alſo occur in Sweden, though only in the ſouthern parts of that country*. The people in Germany call them Turkey birds, Italian birds, African birds; which language means no more than that they are foreign†.
Though the Nutcrackers are not birds of paſ⯑ſage, they fly ſometimes from the mountains to the plains. Friſch ſays, that flocks of them are often obſerved to accompany other birds into different parts of Germany, eſpecially where there are pine foreſts. But in 1754, great flights of them entered France, particularly Bur⯑gundy, where there are few pines; they were ſo fatigued on their arrival, that they ſuffered themſelves to be caught by the hand‡. One [112] was killed in the month of October that ſame year at Moſtyn in Flintſhire, which was ſup⯑poſed to have come from Germany. We may remark, that that year was exceedingly arid and hot, which muſt have dried up moſt of the ſprings, and have much affected thoſe fruits on which the Nutcrackers uſually feed. Be⯑ſides, as on their arrival they ſeemed to be fa⯑miſhed, and were caught by all ſorts of baits, it is probable that they were conſtrained to abandon their retreats for want of ſubſiſtence.
One of the reaſons, it is ſaid, why the Nut⯑crackers do not ſettle and breed in the inviting climates, is the perpetual war waged againſt them by the proprietors of the woods, for the injuries which they commit on the large trees, by piercing the trunks, like the wood-peckers*. Part of them is ſoon deſtroyed, and the reſt is forced to ſeek an aſylum in the deſert unpro⯑tected foreſts.
[113] Nor is this the only circumſtance in which they reſemble the Woodpeckers; they neſtle, like them, in the holes of trees, which, perhaps, they themſelves have formed; for the middle quills of the tail are alſo worn near the end*, which ſhews that they, as well as the wood⯑peckers, clamber upon trees. In ſhort, Na⯑ture ſeems to have placed the Nutcrackers between the Woodpeckers and the Jays; and it is ſingular, that Willughby has given them this preciſe arrangement in his Ornithology, though his deſcription ſuggeſts no relation be⯑tween theſe ſpecies.
The iris is of a hazel-colour; the bill, the feet, and the nails black; the noſtrils round, ſhaded with whitiſh feathers, ſtraight, ſtiff, and projecting; the feathers of the wing and tail are blackiſh, without ſpots, but only terminated for the moſt part with white; though there are ſome varieties in the different individuals, and in the different deſcriptions, which ſeems to confirm the opinion of Klein with regard to the two races or varieties, which he admits into the ſpecies of the Nutcrackers.
We cannot find, in writers of natural hiſ⯑tory, any details with regard to their laying, their incubation, the training of their young, the duration of their life, &c. for they haunt [114] inacceſſible ſpots, where they enjoy undiſturbed ſafety and felicity. A
The ROLLERS.
• Les Rolliers, Buff.
[115]IF we regard the European Roller as the type of the genus, and reſt its diſtinctive cha⯑racter, not upon one or two ſuperficial qua⯑lities, but upon the general combination of its properties, we ſhall be obliged to make conſi⯑derable changes in the enumeration given by Briſſon.
On this principle, which appears to be well founded, I reduce, 1. The European Roller and the Shaga-Rag of Barbary, mentioned by Dr. Shaw, to the ſame ſpecies. 2. I range to⯑gether the Abyſſinian and the Senegal Roller, with which Briſſon ſeems not to have been ac⯑quainted. 3. I claſs together the Roller of Mindanao; that of Angola, which Briſſon makes his twelfth and thirteenth Rollers; and that of Goa, which Briſſon does not mention. 4. I exclude from the genus of Rollers the fifth ſpecies of Briſſon, or the Chineſe Roller, be⯑cauſe it is a different bird, and is much more like the Cayenne Grivert, with which I ſhall claſs it: I ſhall place both of them, under the common name of Rolle, before the Rollers, be⯑cauſe [116] they appear to form the intermediate ſhade between the Jays and the Rollers. 5. I transfer the Roller of the Antilles to the Jays, which is the ſixth ſpecies of Briſſon. 6. I leave among the birds of prey the Ytzquauhtli, of which Briſſon has made his ſeventh ſpecies of Roller, by the name of the Roller of New Spain, the hiſtory of which has been given after the Eagles. In fact, according to Fernandez, who is the original au⯑thor, and even according to Seba, who copies him, it is really a bird of prey, devouring hares and rabbits, and conſequently is very different from the Rollers. Fernandez ſubjoins, that it is proper for falconry, and that its bulk is equal to that of a ram. 7. I omit alſo the Hoxetot, or Yellow Roller of Briſſon, which I have ranged after the magpies, as being more related to that kind than to any other. Laſtly, I ex⯑clude the Ococolin of Fernandez, for the reaſons already ſtated in the article of the quails; nor can I admit the Ococolin of Seba, which is very different from that of Fernandez, though it bears the ſame name; for it is of the ſize of a crow, its bill is thick and ſhort, its toes and nails very long, its eyes encircled with red pa⯑pillae, &c. In ſhort, after this reduction, and the addition of the new ſpecies or varieties which have been hitherto unknown, the genus will conſiſt of two ſpecies of Rolles, and ſeven of Rollers with their varieties.
The CHINESE ROLLE.
• Coracias Sinenſis, Gmel. , • Galgalus Sinenſis, Briſſ. ,
and • The Chineſe Roller, Lath.
[117]This bird has wide noſtrils like the Rollers, and a bill reſembling theirs; but are theſe characters ſufficient to juſtify its claſſification with the Rollers? or are theſe not counter-balanced by more numerous and more im⯑portant differences? Its feet are longer, its wings ſhorter, and conſiſt of a ſmaller number of quills, and theſe differently proportioned*; its tail is tapered, and its creſt is preciſely like that of the blue Canada Jay. Theſe circum⯑ſtances, but particularly the length of its wings, have induced me to aſſign it a place between the Jays and the Rollers†.
The GRIVERT, or CAYENNE ROLLE.
• Coracias Cayanenſis, Gmel. ,
and • The Cayenne Roller, Lath.
[118]This bird ought not to be ſeparated from the preceding, which it is entirely like, except be⯑cauſe it is ſmaller, and the colours of its plu⯑mage different. With regard to the inſtincts and habits of theſe birds, we can draw no com⯑pariſon, though the reſemblance in their exte⯑rior properties ſeems to denote a radical con⯑nection*.
The GARRULOUS ROLLER †.
• Le Rollier d'Europe, Buff. , • Coracias-Garrula, Linn. and Gmel. , • Galgulus, Briſſ. , • Coracias-Coerulea, Gerini. ,
and • Garrulus-Coeruleus, Friſch.
The appellation of Straſburg Jay is ſtill more abſurd; for M. Hermann, profeſſor of medicine and natural hiſtory in that city, writes me, [120] ‘The Rollers are ſo rare here, that ſcarcely three or four ſtragglers are ſeen in the courſe of twenty years.’ One of theſe had been ſent to Geſner, who, not being acquainted with the fact, denominated it the Straſburg Jay.
Beſides, it is a bird of paſſage, and performs its migrations regularly once a-year, in the months of May and September*; yet it is not ſo common as the magpie or the jay. It is found in Sweden† and in Africa‡; but we muſt not ſuppoſe it ſettled in the intermediate regions. It is unknown in many parts of Ger⯑many§, France, and Switzerland‖, &c. We may therefore conclude that, in its paſſage, it moves only in a narrow zone, from Smoland and Scania to Africa. There are even points enow given to mark nearly its tract through Sax⯑ony, Franconia, Suabia, Bavaria, Tirol, Italy¶, Sicily**, and laſtly, the iſland of Malta††, which is a ſort of general rendezvous for all [121] the birds that croſs the Mediterranean. The one deſcribed by Edwards was killed on the rock of Gibraltar, whence it could wing its lofty* courſe to the African ſhore. It is alſo ſeen ſometimes in the vicinity of Straſburg, as we have already noticed, and even in Lorraine, and in the heart of France†; but theſe are probably young ones, which ſtray from the main body.
The Roller is more wild than the jay or the magpie: it ſettles in the thickeſt and the moſt ſolitary woods; nor, as far as I know, has it ever been tamed or taught to ſpeak‡. Its plumage is beautiful; it has an aſſemblage of the fineſt ſhades of blue and green, mixed with white, and heightened by the contraſt of duſky colours§. But a good figure is ſuperior to any deſcription. The young do not aſſume the de⯑licate azure till the ſecond year; whereas the jays are decorated with their moſt beautiful feathers before they leave the neſt.
[122] The Rollers build, when it is in their power, on birches, and it is only when they cannot find theſe that they lodge in other trees*. But in countries where wood is ſcarce, as in the iſland of Malta and in Africa, they form their neſt, it is ſaid, on the ground†. If this be a fact, it would follow, that the inſtincts of animals can be modified by ſituation, cli⯑mate, &c.
Klein ſays, that contrary to what happens in other birds, the young Rollers void their ex⯑crements in the neſt‡; and this circumſtance has perhaps given riſe to the notion that this bird beſmears its neſt with human ordure, as has been alleged of the hoopoe§; but this is inconſiſtent with its lonely ſylvan haunt.
Theſe birds are often ſeen in company with the wood-peckers and crows, in the tilled [123] grounds which are in the vicinity of their fo⯑reſts. They pick up the ſmall ſeeds, roots, and worms which the plough throws to the ſurface, and even the grain that is lately ſown. When this ſupply fails them, they have recourſe to wild berries, caterpillars, graſshoppers, and even frogs*. Schwenckfeld adds, that they ſometimes devour carrion; but this muſt be during winter, and only in caſes of abſolute want†; for they are in general regarded as not carnivorous, and Schwenckfeld himſelf re⯑marks that they are very fat in autumn, and then are good eating‡, which can hardly be ſaid of birds that feed on garbage.
The Roller has long narrow noſtrils placed obliquely on the bill near its baſe, and open; the tongue is black, not forked, but ragged at the tip, and terminated towards the root by two forked appendices, one on each ſide; the palate is green, the gullet yellow, the ventricle of a ſaffron colour, the inteſtines about a foot long, and the caeca twenty-ſeven lines. The wings extend twenty-two inches, each con⯑ſiſting of twenty quills, or, according to others, of twenty-three, the ſecond of which is the longeſt of all. Laſtly, it is obſerved that [124] wherever theſe quills are black on the outſide, they are blue beneath.
Aldrovandus, who ſeems to have been well acquainted with theſe birds, and who lived in a country which they inhabit, aſſerts that the female differs much from the male, its bill being thicker, and its head, neck, breaſt, and belly of a cheſnut colour, bordering on aſh⯑gray, while the correſponding parts in the male are of the colour of the beryl, with different reflections of a duller green. I ſuſpect that the two long outſide quills of the tail, and the warts behind the eyes, which appear only in ſome individuals, are the attributes of the male, as the ſpur in the gallinaceous tribe, the long tail in the peacocks, &c. 255 A
VARIETIES of the ROLLER.
Dr. Shaw mentions, in his Travels, a bird of Barbary, called by the Arabs Shaga-Rag, which is of the bulk and ſhape of the jay, but with a ſmaller bill and ſhorter feet.
[125] The upper part of the body of this bird is brown; the head, neck, and belly of a light green, and on the wings, as well as on the tail, are ſpots of a deep blue. Dr. Shaw adds, that it makes its neſt on the banks of rivers, and that its cry is ſhrill.
This ſhort deſcription agrees ſo well with our Roller, that we cannot doubt but the Shaga-Rag belongs to the ſame ſpecies; and the re⯑ſemblance which the name bears to moſt of the German appellations of the Roller, derived from its voice, adds to the probability*.
FOREIGN BIRDS, WHICH ARE RELATED TO THE ROLLER.
[126]I. The ABYSSINIAN ROLLER.
• Coracias Abyſſinica, Gmel.
THIS bird is, in its plumage, much like the European Roller; only its colours are more lively and brilliant, which muſt be aſcribed to the influence of a drier and hotter climate. On the other hand, it reſembles the Angola Roller, by the length of the two ſide feathers of its tail, which project five inches beyond the reſt. In ſhort, this bird ſeems to occupy a place be⯑tween the European and Angola Rollers. The point of its upper mandible is very hooked. It is entirely a new ſpecies.
VARIETY of the ABYSSINIAN ROLLER.
We may conſider the Senegal Roller as a va⯑riety of that of Abyſſinia. The chief differ⯑ence between them is, that in the Abyſſinian [127] bird the orange colour of the back does not extend, as in that of Senegal, ſo far as the neck and the hind part of the head: a difference which would not be ſufficient to conſtitute two diſtinct ſpecies, eſpecially as they belong to nearly the ſame climate, as the two lateral quills are double the length of the intermediate ones, as in both the wings are ſhorter than thoſe of the European Roller; and laſtly, as they are alike in the ſhades, the luſtre, and the diſtri⯑bution of their colours*.
II. The ANGOLA ROLLER, or the MINDANAO ROLLER.
Theſe two Rollers reſemble each other ſo ex⯑actly, that it is impoſſible to ſeparate them. That of Angola is diſtinguiſhed from the other only by the length of the exterior quills of its tail, which is double that of the intermediate ones, and by ſlight variations of colour. But differences ſo minute may be the effect of age, of ſex, or even of moulting; and the inſpec⯑tion of our figures, nay, the deſcriptions of [128] Briſſon, who makes two ſpecies of them, will confirm our conjecture of the identity of the two ſpecies. They are both nearly of the bulk of the European Roller, have the ſame general ſhape, its bill ſomewhat hooked, its naked noſtrils, its ſhort legs, its long toes, its long wings, and even the colours of its plumage, though dif⯑ferently diſtributed: they are always blue, green, and brown, which are ſometimes diſ⯑tinct, ſometimes mixed, melted together, form⯑ing many intermediate ſhades, and having va⯑rious reflections. The bluiſh green, or ſea green, is however ſpread on the crown of the head; the brown, more or leſs intenſe, and more or leſs greeniſh, covers all the fore-part of the body, with ſome tints of violet on the throat; and the blue, the green, and all the ſhades which ariſe from their mixture, appear on the rump, the tail, the wings, and the belly: only the Mindanao Roller has under its breaſt a kind of orange tincture, which is not found in that of Angola.
To this opinion it will be objected, perhaps, that the kingdom of Angola is at a great diſ⯑tance from Bengal, and ſtill farther from the Philippines. But is it impoſſible, or is it not natural, that theſe birds ſhould be ſpread through the different parts of the ſame continent, or the neighbouring iſlands, which are connected with it perhaps by the continuation of the ſame [129] chain, eſpecially in climates ſo nearly alike? Be⯑ſides, we cannot always expect the moſt ſcrupu⯑lous exactneſs in thoſe who import the produc⯑tions of foreign countries; and the intercourſe of European veſſels with the various regions of the globe is ſo extenſive and multiplied, that a bird found in the Eaſt Indies, might have been carried to Guinea, and afterwards imported as a native of Africa. Admitting this, if we aſcribe the ſlight differences between the Roller of Mindanao and that of Angola to the effect of age, we muſt reckon the latter the older; or if we impute them to the diſtinction of ſex, we muſt conſider it as the male: for we know that in the Rollers, the fine colours of the fea⯑thers do not appear till the ſecond year; and it is a general principle, that in all birds, the male, when it differs from the female, is diſ⯑tinguiſhed by an exuberance of growth, or a ſu⯑perior richneſs of plumage*.
VARIETY of the ANGOLA and MINDANAO ROLLERS.
[130]The Royal Cabinet has lately received from Goa a new Roller, which is very like that of Mindanao. It differs only by its ſize, and by a ſort of collar, like wine-lees in colour, which graſps only the hind part of the neck, a little under the head. It has not, any more than the Angola Roller, the orange cincture of the Min⯑danao Roller; but if in this reſpect it differs from the latter, it is ſo much the more allied to the former, which is certainly of the ſame ſpecies.
III. The ROLLER of the INDIES.
• Coracias Orientalis, Gmel. , • Galgulus Indicus, Briſſ. ,
and • The Oriental Roller, Lath.
This Roller, which is the fourth of Briſſon, differs leſs from the preceding in the nature of its colours, which are always blue, green, brown, &c. than in the order of their diſtribu⯑tion; but in general its plumage is more duſky, its bill is alſo broader at the baſe, more hooked, [131] and of a yellow colour: laſtly, of all the Rollers it has the longeſt wings.
M. Sonerat has lately ſent to the Royal Cabinet a bird, which is almoſt in every reſpect like the Indian Roller; only its bill is ſtill broader, and for this reaſon it has received the epithet of large-toad-mouthed: but that appellation would better ſuit the Goat-ſucker*.
IV. The MADAGASCAR ROLLER.
• Coracias Madagaſcarienſis, Gmel.
[][131]This ſpecies differs from all the preceding in ſeveral properties: its bill is thicker at the baſe, its eyes are larger, its wings and tail longer, though the exterior pupils of the latter do not project beyond the reſt: laſtly, the plumage is of an uniform purple-brown, excepting only that the bill is yellow, the largeſt quills of the wings black, the lower belly of a light blue, the tail of the ſame colour, edged at its extre⯑mity with a bar of three ſhades, viz. purple, light blue, and dark purple approaching to black. It has all the other characters which belong to [132] the Rollers; ſhort feet, the edges of the upper mandible ſcalloped near the point, the ſmall feathers which reflect from its baſe, and the naked noſtrils, &c.
V. The MEXICAN ROLLER.
• Coracias Mexicanus, Gmel. ,
and • Galgulus Mexicanus, Briſſ.
This is the Mexican Black-bird of Seba, which Briſſon makes his eighth Roller. It would require the inſpection of it to fix its true ſpecies; for this would be difficult, from the ſhort notice given by Seba, who is here the original author. I place it among the Rollers, becauſe I know of no reaſon to exclude it; I therefore follow the opinion of Briſſon, till more perfect information confirm or deſtroy the temporary arrangement. The colours are different from thoſe which are common in the Rollers. The upper part of the body is of a dull gray, mixed with a rufous tint, and the under of a light gray, with ſome marks of fire-colour*.
VI. The PARADISE ROLLER.
• Oriolus Aureus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Paradiſea Aurea, Lath. , • Ictericus Indicus, Lath. ,
and • The Golden Bird of Paradiſe, Edw.
[133]I place this bird between the Rollers and the Birds of Paradiſe, as forming the ſhade which connects theſe two kinds, becauſe it ſeems to have the ſhape of the former, and to reſemble the latter by its ſmallneſs, and the ſituation of the eyes under and very near the junction of the mandibles, and by a ſort of natural velvet which covers the throat and part of the head. Beſides, the two long quills of the tail, which ſometimes occur in the European Roller, and which are much longer in that of Angola, is another analogical character that connects the genus of the Roller with that of the Bird of Paradiſe.
The upper part of the body of this bird is of a vivid and brilliant orange, the under of a fine yellow; it has no black but under the throat, on part of the ſhoulders, and on the quills of the tail. The feathers which cover the hind part of the neck are long, narrow, flexible, and recline on each ſide over the lateral parts of the neck and breaſt.
[134] The feet and legs had been torn from the ſubject deſcribed and deſigned by Edwards, as if it had been a real Bird of Paradiſe; and this circumſtance probably led that naturaliſt to re⯑fer it to that genus, though it has none of the principal characters. The quills of the wings were wanting, though thoſe of the tail were complete; they were, as I have ſaid, twelve in number, and terminated with yellow. Ed⯑wards ſuſpects that the quills of the wing are alſo black, whether becauſe they are of the ſame colour with thoſe of the tail, or that they were wanting in the individual which he obſerved; for dealers in birds, in drying the ſpecimens, pluck all the feathers which are of a bad colour, to increaſe the beauty of the plumage*.
The GREATER BIRD of PARADISE *.
• L'Oiſeau de Paradis, Buff. , • Paradiſea Apoda, Linn. and Gmel. , • Manucodiata, Briſſ. ,
and • Paradiſea Avis, Cluſius, Seba, Wormius, &c.
[][135]THIS ſpecies is more famous for the ficti⯑tious and imaginary qualities aſcribed to it, than for any real and remarkable properties. The name of the Bird of Paradiſe commonly ſuggeſts the idea of a bird which has no feet; which flies conſtantly, even in its ſleep, or at moſt ſuſpends itſelf but for a few moments from the branches of trees, by means of the long fila⯑ments of its tail†; which copulates in its flight, like certain inſects, and lays and hatches in a way unexampled in nature‡; which lives only on vapours and dews, and which has the ca⯑vity [136] of its abdomen entirely filled with fat, in⯑ſtead of ſtomach and inteſtines*, (which would be quite ſuperfluous, ſince it eats nothing, and therefore needs not to digeſt or to void:) in ſhort, which has no exiſtence but motion, no element but air, where it is ſupported as long as it retains breath, as fiſh are buoyed up in water, and which never touches the ground till after death†.
This monſtrous heap of abſurdities is only a chain of conſequences juſtly drawn from a ra⯑dical error, that the Bird of Paradiſe has no legs, though it is furniſhed with even pretty large ones‡.
The fact§ is, that the Indian merchants, who trade with the feathers of this bird, or the [137] fowlers who ſell them, are accuſtomed, whether for the ſake of preſerving and tranſporting the ſpecimens with more eaſe, or perhaps of coun⯑tenancing an error which is favourable to their intereſt, to dry the bird with its feathers, after having previouſly ſeparated the thighs and ex⯑tracted the entrails. This practice has been ſo long continued, as to have ſtrengthened the prejudice to ſuch a degree, that thoſe who firſt aſſerted the truth were, as uſual, regarded as un⯑worthy of credit*.
The fable, that the Bird of Paradiſe conti⯑nually flies, derived an appearance of probabi⯑lity from the conſideration of the quantity of feathers with which it is furniſhed; for beſides thoſe common to other birds, it has many long feathers, which riſe on each ſide between the wing and the thigh, and which, extending much beyond the true tail, and mingling with it, form a ſort of falſe tail, which many ob⯑ſervers have miſtaken. Theſe ſubalar feathers are what the naturaliſts term decompoſed; they are very light themſelves, and form a bunch [138] almoſt devoid of weight, and aërial; they will therefore increaſe the apparent bulk of the bird*, diminiſh its ſpecific gravity, and thus aſſiſt in ſupporting it in the air. But if the wind be contrary, the abundance of plumage will rather obſtruct its motion; accordingly it is obſerved, that the bird of Paradiſe avoids the bluſtering gales†, and commonly ſettles in countries the leaſt ſubject to them.
Theſe feathers are of the number of forty or fifty on each ſide, of unequal lengths; the greater part ſpread under the true tail, and others lie over it, without concealing it; for their texture is delicately ſlender, and almoſt tranſparent, which is very difficult to repreſent in a figure.
Theſe feathers are highly eſteemed in India, and much ſought after. It is not more than a century ſince they were employed in Eu⯑rope for the ſame purpoſes as thoſe of the Oſtrich; and, indeed, their lightneſs and bril⯑liancy make them elegant ornaments. But the prieſts of Aſia aſcribe to them miraculous vir⯑tues, which give them a new value in the eyes of the vulgar, and have procured the bird the appellation of the Bird of God.
[139] Next to this, the moſt remarkable property of the Bird of Paradiſe is thoſe two long fila⯑ments which take their riſe above the true tail, and extend more than a foot beyond the falſe tail, formed by the ſubalar feathers. Theſe, indeed, are real filaments only at their middle; for at their origin and their termination, they are furniſhed with webs of the ordinary breadth. In the females the extremities are narrower, which, according to Briſſon, is the only diſ⯑tinction between it and the male*.
The head and throat are covered with a ſort of velvet, formed by ſmall erect feathers, which are ſhort, ſtiff, and cloſe; thoſe of the breaſt and back are longer, but always ſilky and ſoft to the feel. They are all of different colours, which vary according to the poſition and the light in which they are viewed.
The head is very ſmall in proportion to the body; the eyes ſtill ſmaller, and placed very near the opening of the bill. Cluſius reckons only ten quills in the tail; but this aſſertion was certainly not founded on the examination of a living ſubject, and it is doubtful whether the plumage of a bird brought from ſo great a diſtance be entire, eſpecially as it is ſubject to an annual moulting, which laſts ſeveral months. During that time, which happens [140] in the rainy ſeaſon, it lives concealed; but, in the beginning of Auguſt, after hatching, its feathers are reſtored, and in the months of Sep⯑tember and October, in which calm weather prevails, it flies in flocks, like the Stares in Europe*.
This beautiful bird is not much diffuſed: it is almoſt entirely confined to that part of Aſia which produces the ſpiceries, and eſpecially the iſlands of Arou. It is known alſo in the part of New Guinea oppoſite to theſe iſlands; but the name which it there receives, Burung-Arou, ſeems to indicate its natal ſoil.
Since warm regions of ſpices alone are proper for the Bird of Paradiſe, it probably ſubſiſts on ſome aromatic productions†; at leaſt it does not live ſolely on dew. J. Otto Helbigius, who travelled into India, tells us, that it feeds on red berries, which grow on a very tall tree. Linnaeus ſays, that it ſubſiſts on large butter⯑flies‡; and Bontius, that it ſometimes preys on ſmall birds. Its ordinary haunt is the woods, where it perches on the trees, and the Indians watch it in ſlender huts, which they [141] attach to the branches, and ſhoot it with their arrows of reeds*. It flies like the ſwallow, whence it has been called the Ternate-ſwal⯑low †; though others ſay, that its ſhape, indeed, reſembles the ſwallow, but that it flies higher, and always ſoars in the aërial regions‡.
Though Marcgrave ranges it among the birds of Brazil, there is no reaſon to ſuppoſe that it exiſts in America; at leaſt no European veſſels have ever imported it from thence. Beſides, that naturaliſt does not, as uſual, men⯑tion the name which it receives in the language of the Brazilians, and a bird, clothed in ſuch delicate ſwelling plumage, could not traverſe the wide expanſe of ocean which divides the equatorial parts of the two continents.
The ancients ſeem to have been totally un⯑acquainted with the Bird of Paradiſe: no men⯑tion is ever made of its rich decorations. Belon pretends that it was the phoenix of antiquity; but his opinion is founded on the fabulous qualities of both§. The phoenix, too, appeared [142] in Arabia and Egypt, while the Bird of Pa⯑radiſe has remained always attached to the Oriental parts of Aſia, which were very little known to the ancients.
Cluſius mentions, on the authority of ſome mariners, who themſelves learned the fact from report, that there are two kinds of this bird; the one large and beautiful, which inhabits the iſlands of Arou; the other inferior to it in ſize and elegance, which is ſettled in the country of the Papous, next Gilolo*. Helbigius, who heard the ſame in the iſlands of Arou, adds, that the Birds of Paradiſe of New Guinea, or of the Papous, differ from thoſe of Arou, not only in point of ſize, but alſo in the colours of the plumage, which is white and yellowiſh. I ſhould regard theſe authorities as ſuſpicious, and inſufficient to found any general conclu⯑ſion. The dried ſpecimens indeed, which are brought to Europe, preſent great diverſity of appearance; in ſize, in the number and po⯑ſition of the feathers, in the colours of the plumage, &c. But, in ſuch mutilated and im⯑perfect preparations, it is impoſſible to decide what muſt be aſcribed to the effect of age, of ſex, of ſeaſon, of climate, and of other acci⯑dental cauſes. Beſides, the Birds of Paradiſe [143] being very expenſive articles of commerce, many other birds, with long tails and an ele⯑gant plumage, have been paſſed on the credu⯑lity of the public, and the legs and thighs pulled off, to conceal the fraud and enhance the price. We have already had an example in the Paradiſe Roller, mentioned by Edwards, on which the honours of mutilation had been con⯑ferred. I have myſelf ſeen ſeveral paroquets, promerops, and other birds, which had been thus treated, and many inſtances are to be found in Aldrovandus and Seba: and it is very common to disfigure the real Birds of Pa⯑radiſe, with a view to add to their value. I ſhall therefore take notice only of two principal ſpecies of theſe birds, without venturing to vouch for the accuracy of that diviſion till new obſervations illuſtrate the matter*.
The MANUCODE.
• Paradiſea Regia, Gmel. , • Manucodiata Minor, Briſſ. , • Rex Avium Paradiſaearum, Gaza, Seba, Cluſius, &c. , • The King's Bird, Forreſt. ,
and • The King Paradiſe Bird, Lath.
[144]The King Bird of Paradiſe reſembles much the reſt. Like them, his head is ſmall, his eyes ſtill ſmaller, placed near the corner of the opening of the bill; his feet pretty long and firm; the colours of his plumage gloſſy; the two filaments of his tail nearly ſimilar, except that they are ſhorter, and their extremity, which is furniſhed with webs, forms a curl, by rolling into itſelf, and is ornamented with ſpangles, reſembling in miniature thoſe of the peacock*. He alſo has beneath the wing, on each ſide, a bunch of ſeven or eight feathers, which are longer than in moſt birds, but not ſo long as thoſe of the Bird of Paradiſe, and of a different ſhape, for they are edged through their whole extent with webs of adhering fila⯑ments. The Manucode is ſmaller, the bill white and long in proportion; the wings are alſo longer, the tail ſhorter, and the noſtrils are co⯑vered with feathers.
Cluſius counted only thirteen quills in each wing, and ſeven or eight in the tail; but he did not conſider that in a dried ſpecimen theſe might be complete. The ſame author remarks as a ſingularity, that in ſome the two filaments of the tail croſs each other, though this might [146] often happen from accident, conſidering their flexibility and their length*.
The MAGNIFICENT BIRD OF PARADISE †.
• Le Magnifique de la Nouvelle Guinée, ou Le Manucode à Bouquets, Buff. ,
and • Paradiſea Magnifica, Gmel.
The two tufts (bouquets) which I regard as the diſtinctive character of this bird, appear be⯑hind the neck and at its origin. The firſt con⯑ſiſts of ſeveral narrow feathers of a yellow co⯑lour, marked near the point with a ſmall black ſpot, and which, inſtead of lying flat as or⯑dinary, ſtand erect, thoſe near the head at right angles, and the ſucceeding ones with ſmaller inclinations.
Under the firſt tuft we perceive a ſecond, which is larger, but not ſo much raiſed, and more reclined: it is compoſed of long detached filaments, which ſprout from very ſhort ſhafts, and of which fifteen or twenty join together, [147] forming ſtraw-coloured feathers. Theſe fea⯑thers ſeem to be cut ſquare at the end, and make angles, more or leſs acute, with the plane of the ſhoulders.
This ſecond tuft is bounded on the right and left by common feathers, variegated with brown and orange, and is terminated behind by a reddiſh and ſhining brown ſpot, of a triangular ſhape, with the vertex turned towards the tail, and the filaments of the feathers looſe and de⯑compoſed, as in the ſecond tuft.
Another characteriſtic feature of this bird is the two filaments of the tail, which are about a foot long and a line broad, and of a blue co⯑lour, changing into a lucid green, and taking their origin above the tail. So far they much reſemble the filaments of the preceding ſpe⯑cies, but are of a different form, for they do not end in a point, and are furniſhed with webs on the middle only of the inner ſide.
The middle of the neck and breaſt is marked from the throat by a row of very ſhort fea⯑thers, diſplaying a ſeries of ſmall tranſverſe lines, which are alternately of a fine light green, changing into blue, and of a deep duck⯑green.
Brown is the prevailing colour on the lower belly, the rump, and the tail; ruſty yellow is that of the quills, the wings, and of their co⯑verts; [148] but the quills have more than one brown ſpot at their extremity, at leaſt this is the caſe in the ſpecimen preſerved in the Royal Cabinet; for it may be proper to mention that the long quills of the wings, as well as the feet, have been removed*.
This bird is rather larger than the preceding; its bill is ſimilar, and the feathers of the front extend over the noſtrils, which they partly cover: this is inconſiſtent with the character that has been eſtabliſhed of theſe birds by one of our moſt intelligent ornithologiſts†.
The feathers of the head are ſhort, ſtraight, cloſe, and very ſoft to the touch. They form a ſort of velvet of a changing colour, as in al⯑moſt all the Birds of Paradiſe, and of a browniſh ground. The throat is alſo covered with velvet feathers; but theſe are black, with golden-green reflections. A
The BLACK MANUCODE of NEW GUINEA, called the SUPERB.
• Paradiſea Superba, Gmel. ,
and • The Superb Paradiſe Bird, Lath.
[149]The predominant colour of the plumage of this bird is a rich velvet black, decorated under the neck with reflections of deep violet. Its head, breaſt, and the hind part of its neck, are brilliant, with the variable ſhades of a fine green; the reſt is entirely black, not even excepting the bill.
I place this bird immediately after the Birds of Paradiſe, though it wants the filaments of the tail; but we may ſuppoſe that moulting, or ſome accidental cauſe, is the reaſon of this de⯑fect; for in other reſpects it reſembles theſe birds, not only in its general ſhape, and in that of its bill, but is alſo related by the identity of climate, by the richneſs of its colours, and a certain ſuperabundance or luxuriancy of fea⯑thers which is peculiar to the Birds of Paradiſe: for there are two ſmall tufts of black feathers which cover the noſtrils, and two other bunches of the ſame colour, but much longer, and di⯑rected to the oppoſite extremity. Theſe riſe on the ſhoulders, and ſpreading more or leſs over the back, but always bent backwards, form a [150] ſort of wings, which extend almoſt to the ex⯑tremity of the true, when theſe are cloſed.
We muſt add, that theſe feathers are of un⯑equal lengths, and that thoſe of the anterior ſurface of the neck and the ſides of the breaſt are very long and narrow. A
The SIFILET, or MANUCODE with Six Filaments.
• Paradiſea Aurea, Gmel. ,
and • The Gold-breaſted Bird of Paradiſe.
If we adopt the filaments as the ſpecific cha⯑racter of the Manucodes, the preſent is entitled to be ranged at their head; for inſtead of two, it has ſix, and of theſe not one riſes on the back, but all of them take their origin from the head, three on each ſide. They are half a foot long, and reflect backwards. They have no webs but at their extremity for the ſpace of ſix lines, and theſe are black and pretty long.
Beſides theſe filaments, this bird has two properties which belong to the Bird of Pa⯑radiſe; luxuriancy of feathers and richneſs of colours.
[151] The luxuriancy of feathers conſiſts; 1. In a ſort of tuft compoſed of ſtiff narrow feathers, and which riſes at the baſe of the upper man⯑dible. 2. In the length of the feathers of the belly and of the abdomen, which is four inches or more; one part of theſe feathers, extending directly, conceals the under-ſide of the tail, while another part, riſing obliquely on each ſide, co⯑vers the upper ſurface of the tail as far as the third of its length, and all of them correſpond to the ſubalar feathers of the Bird of Paradiſe, and of the Manucode.
With regard to the plumage, the moſt bril⯑liant colours appear on the neck; behind, it is gold-green and bronze violet; before, topaz-gold reflections, which wanton in all the ſhades of green, and derive new luſtre from the con⯑traſt with the darkneſs of the contiguous parts; for the head is black, changing into a deep violet, and the reſt of the body is brown, in⯑clining to black, and with reflections of the ſame deep violet.
The bill of this bird is nearly the ſame as in the Birds of Paradiſe; the only difference is, that its upper ridge is angular and ſharp, while in moſt of the other kinds it is rounded.
Nothing can be ſaid with reſpect to the feet and the wings, becauſe they were extirpated in the ſubject from which this deſcription is drawn; a practice which, as we have re⯑marked, [152] is uſual with the Indian hunters or merchants. A
The CALYBE' of NEW GUINEA *.
• Paradiſea Viridis, Gmel. ,
and • The Blue Green Paradiſe Bird, Lath.
If this bird has not the luxuriant plumage of the Paradiſe tribe, it has at leaſt the rich co⯑lours and the peculiar ſoftneſs of texture.
Its head is covered with a beautiful blue velvet, changing into green, and exhibiting the reflections of the beryl. The neck is clothed with a longer ſhag, but which dazzles with the ſame colours, except that each feather, being of a ſhining black in the middle, of a green changing into blue only at the edges, there re⯑ſult waving ſhades, which play ſtill more than thoſe of the head. The back, the rump, the tail and the belly are blue, like poliſhed ſteel, and with very brilliant reflections.
[153] The ſmall velvet feathers on its forehead project forwards as far as the noſtrils, which are deeper than in the preceding kinds. The bill is alſo longer and thicker, but it is of the ſame ſhape, and its edges are ſcalloped in the ſame manner near the point. Six quills only are reckoned in the tail, but probably it was not entire.
In the ſubject on which this deſcription is founded, as well as thoſe of the three preceding deſcriptions, a ſtick was paſſed through their whole length, and projected two or three inches out of the bill*. In that ſimple way, and by extirpating the feathers which would ſpoil the effect, the Indians can in an inſtant form an elegant ſort of plume with any ſmall bird which they meet. But the ſpecimens are thus de⯑ranged, and their proportions altered. On this account it was difficult to diſcover in the Calybé the inſertion of the wings; inſomuch that credulity might have aſſerted that this bird had neither feet nor wings.
The Calybé differs from the Manucodes more than the preceding: for this reaſon I have ranged it in the laſt place, and beſtowed on it a par⯑ticular name†.
The OX-PECKER.
• Le Pique-Boeuf, Buff. , • Buphaga Africana, Linn. and Gmel. , • Buphaga, Briſſ. ,
and • The African Beef-eater, Lath.
[154]BRISSON is the firſt who has deſcribed this little bird, which Adanſon brought from Senegal. It is ſcarcely larger than the creſted lark, and its wings extend only fourteen inches. Its plumage has nothing remarkable; in general a grayiſh brown prevails on the upper part of the body, and grayiſh yellow on the under. The bill is not of an invariable colour; in ſome individuals it is entirely brown; in others red at the point, and yellow at the baſe; in all it is nearly of a quadrangular ſhape, and the points of the two mandibles are reflected in a contrary direction. The tail is tapered in ſteps, and a ſingular circumſtance is obſerved, that the twelve quills, of which it conſiſts, are all pointed. Laſtly, the firſt phalanx of the ex⯑terior toe is cloſely connected to that of the mid-toe.
This bird is very fond of certain worms, or the larvae of inſects, which lodge under the epi⯑dermis in oxen. It alights on the backs of theſe animals, and pierces their ſkin with its bill, to extract theſe worms, and hence its name.
The COMMON STARE *.
• L'Etourneau, Buff. , • Sturnus Vulgaris, Linn. Gmel. Scop. Kram, &c. , • Sturnus, Geſner, Belon, Aldrov. Briſſ. &c. ,
and • The Stare, or Starling, Will. Ray. Sibb. Alb. Penn, &c.
[155]FEW birds are ſo generally known, eſpecially in the temperate climates, as the Stare; for as it is a conſtant reſident of the diſtrict where it ſettles†, and as it can be trained in the do⯑meſtic ſtate, its habits have been obſerved, whether when ſubjected to reſtraint, or ranging without controul.
The Blackbird is that, of all the feathered race, which the Stare reſembles the moſt; their [156] young can hardly be diſtinguiſhed*: but after their characters are developed, the Stare is found to be diſtinguiſhed by the ſtreaks and re⯑flections of its plumage; by the blunter form of its bill, which is broader, and not ſcalloped near the point†; and by the greater flatneſs of its head, &c. But another very remarkable difference, and which is derived from a more intimate cauſe is, that the ſpecies of the Stare is ſolitary in Europe; whereas the ſpecies of the Blackbird are extremely numerous.
The evening is the time when the Stares aſ⯑ſemble in the greateſt numbers, to provide more effectually againſt the dangers of the night; which they commonly ſpend among the reeds, whither they haſten about the cloſe of the day, in a noiſy flight*. They chatter much in the [158] evening and morning, at the forming and diſ⯑perſing of their forces; are leſs clamorous during the reſt of the day, and quite ſilent during the night.
So attached are the Stares to ſociety, that they not only join thoſe of their own ſpecies, but alſo birds of a different kind. In the ſpring, before the breeding ſeaſon, they often aſſociate with the crows and jackdaws, and even with the red-wings and field-fares, and ſometimes with the pigeons.
Their loves commence about the end of March. Violence decides their choice: they continue as noiſy as ever; their twitter is in⯑ceſſant; and to ſing and toy ſeem then their ſole occupation. The care of the expected pro⯑geny ſucceeds; but they are not over-anxious in providing for the reception. They often take poſſeſſion of the neſt of a wood-pecker, which often retaliates in its turn. When they would conſtruct one for themſelves, they only heap a few dry leaves, ſome herbage or moſs, in the hole of a tree or of a wall. In this artleſs bed the female drops five or ſix eggs, of a greeniſh aſh-colour, and covers them for the ſpace of eighteen or twenty-one days. Some⯑times ſhe hatches in dove-cotes, in the roofs of dwelling-houſes, and even in the holes of rocks on the ſea-coaſt, as in the Iſle of Wight and [159] in other places*. I have ſometimes received, in the month of May, neſts which were pretended to belong to the Stare, and to be found in trees; but as two of them reſemble exactly thoſe of the Thruſh, I ſuſpect that the perſons whom I em⯑ployed wanted to impoſe on me, unleſs we ſup⯑poſe that the Stare had diſpoſſeſſed the Thruſh, and occupied its place. In ſome caſes, however, they make their own neſts; a ſkilful obſerver told me, that he has ſeen ſeveral of them on the ſame tree. The young continue long with their mother, which would make me doubt the aſſertion of ſome authors†, that the Stare hatches thrice a-year; except this relate to warm countries, where the progreſs of incubation and of growth is rapid.
The feathers of the Stares are in general long and narrow, as Belon deſcribes; their colour is at firſt of a blackiſh-brown, uniform, and without ſtreaks or reflections. The ſtreaks begin to ap⯑pear after the firſt moulting, emerging about the end of July, on the lower part of the body, then on the head, and towards the 20th of Auguſt, are ſpread over the upper part of the body. I always mean the young Stares, which were hatched in the beginning of May.
I have remarked, that in this firſt moulting, the feathers which ſurround the baſe of the [160] bill, dropped almoſt all at once, ſo that this part was bald during the month of July*, as it happens conſtantly in the rook through the reſt of the year. I alſo obſerved that the bill was almoſt all yellow on the 15th of May; this ſoon changed into a horn colour, and Belon aſſures us, that in time it becomes orange.
In the males, the eyes have a larger ſhare of brown, or it is more uniform†; the ſtreaks of the plumage more diſtinct and yellower; and the dark colour of the feathers which are not ſtreaked is brightened by more vivid re⯑flections, that vary between purple and deep green. Beſides, the male is larger, weighing three ounces and a half. Salerne adds, another diſtinguiſhed character of the ſex is, that the tongue is pointed in the male, but forked in the female. It would appear that Linnaeus had ſeen it pointed in ſome individuals, and forked in others‡. In thoſe which came under my examination, it was forked.
The Stares live on ſnails, worms, and cater⯑pillars; eſpecially on thoſe large caterpillars of a [161] fine green, with reddiſh reflections, which ap⯑pear, in the month of June, upon the flowers, and chiefly upon the roſes. They feed alſo on wheat, buckwheat, millet, panic, hemp-ſeed, elder-berries, olives, cherries, raiſins, &c. It is pretended that the laſt is what corrects beſt the natural bitterneſs of their fleſh, and that cherries are what they are the fondeſt of*; and theſe afford an almoſt infallible bait for weel-nets, which are laid among the reeds, where they retire in the evenings; and in this way an hundred may often be caught in one night: but this diverſion laſts no longer than the ſeaſon of cherries.
They are fond of following oxen and other large cattle as they feed in the meadows, at⯑tracted, it is ſaid, by the inſects which flutter round them, or by thoſe, perhaps, which ſwarm in their dung, or in meadows in general. From this habit is derived the German name Rinder-Staren. They are alſo accuſed of feeding on the carcaſſes that are expoſed on gibbets†; but it is probably in ſearch only of inſects. I have raiſed ſome of theſe birds, and have obſerved, that when bits of raw fleſh were offered to [162] them, they fixed on the prey with great avidity. If they were preſented with the flower-cup of a pink, containing ſeed already formed, they did not graſp it with their claws, and pluck it like the jay, but ſhook it and ſtruck it againſt the bars in the bottom of the cage, till the grains dropped out. I remarked alſo, that they drank nearly like the gallinaceous tribe, and took great delight in bathing. It is probable that one of thoſe which I raiſed died of cold, in conſequence of bathing too often during the winter.
Theſe birds live ſeven or eight years, or even longer, in the domeſtic ſtate. The wild ones cannot be decoyed by the call, becauſe they re⯑gard not the ſcream of the owl. But beſides the contrivance of the limed threads and the weel-nets, which I have already mentioned, a method has been fallen on to take entire families, by fix⯑ing to the walls and the trees where they lodge pots of earthen ware of a convenient form, which the birds often prefer to place their neſts in*. Many are alſo caught by the gin and draw-net. In ſome parts of Italy it is com⯑mon to employ tame weaſels to drag them out of their neſts, or rather their holes; for the ar⯑tifice of man conſiſts in employing one enſlaved race to extend his dominion over the reſt.
The Stares have the membrana nictitans; their noſtrils are half-ſheathed by a membrane; the [163] legs are of a reddiſh brown*; the outer toe is connected to the mid one as far as the firſt pha⯑lanx; the hind nail is ſtronger than the reſt; the gizzard is preceded by a dilatation of the aeſophagus, is a little fleſhy, and contains ſome⯑times ſmall ſtones. The inteſtinal tube is twenty inches in length, from the one orifice to the other; the gall-bladder is of the ordinary ſize; the caeca very ſmall, and placed nearer the anus than is common in birds.
In diſſecting a young Stare, one of thoſe which I had raiſed, I remarked that the contents of the gizzard and of the inteſtines were entirely black, though it had been fed on bread and milk only. This circumſtance denotes an abundance of black bile; and at the ſame time accounts for the bitterneſs of the fleſh of theſe birds, and the uſe which has been made of their excrements in the preparation of coſmetics.
The Stare can be taught to ſpeak either French, German, Latin, Greek†, &c. and to pronounce phraſes of ſome length. Its pliant throat ac⯑commodates itſelf to every inflexion and every accent. It can readily articulate the letter R‡, [164] and acquires a ſort of warbling which is much ſuperior to its native ſong*.
This bird is ſpread through an extenſive range in the ancient continent. It is found in Sweden, Germany, France, Italy, the Iſle of Malta, the Cape of Good Hope†, and every where nearly the ſame; whereas thoſe American birds which have been called Stares, preſent a great diverſity of appearance. A
VARIETIES of the STARE.
Though the Stares retain uniformly the ori⯑ginal impreſſion, they are not entirely exempted from the tendency to variety in nature; but the varieties which occur are always ſuperficial, and often confined to individuals. The following have been noticed by authors:
I. The WHITE STARE of Aldrovandus‡, with fleſh-coloured legs and a reddiſh yellow [165] bill, as in the common kind after they have grown old. Aldrovandus ſays, that it was taken along with the ordinary Stares; and Rzaczynſki informs us, that in a certain part of Poland* it was uſual to ſee a Black and a White Stare riſing from the ſame neſt. Willughby alſo ſpeaks of two White Stares which were obſerved in Cum⯑berland.
II. The BLACK and WHITE STARE.—To this variety I refer; 1. The White-headed Stare of Aldrovandus†: In this bird, the head, the bill, the neck, the whole of the under part of the body, the coverts of the wings, and the two exterior quills of the tail, were white; the other quills of the tail, and all thoſe of the wings, were as in the ordinary Stare; the white of the head was ſet off by two ſmall black ſpots placed above the eyes, and the white of the un⯑der part of the body was variegated with bluiſh ſpots. 2. The Pied Stare of Schwenckfeld, in which the top of the head, the half of the bill next the baſe, the neck, the quills of the wing, and thoſe of the tail, were black, and all the reſt white. 3. The Black-headed Stare, ſeen by Wil⯑lughby, the reſt of the body entirely white‡.
[166] III. The GREY CINEREOUS STARE of Aldrovandus*. This author is the only perſon who has ſeen one of that colour, which is nothing but black melted with white. It is eaſy to con⯑ceive how theſe varieties might be multiplied from the different diſtribution of the black and white, and from the numerous ſhades of gray, which reſult from the different proportions in which the two original colours enter into the mixture.
FOREIGN BIRDS, RELATED TO THE STARE.
[167]I. The CAPE STARE, or the PIED STARE.
• Sturnus Capenſis, Linn. & Gmel.
THIS African bird reſembles in its general ſhape the Common Stare, and the black and white colours of its plumage are diſtributed as in the Magpie.
Were it not that its bill is thicker and longer than in the European Stare, we might regard it as merely a variety, eſpecially as our Stare is to be met with at the Cape of Good Hope; and this variety would coincide with the one already mentioned, in which the black and white are diſtributed in large ſpots. The moſt remark⯑able character in this bird is a very large white ſpot, of a round ſhape, placed on each ſide of the head, and which ſtretches forward to the baſe of the bill, and incloſing the eye ſhoots into a ſort of appendix, variegated with black, that deſcends along its neck.
This bird is the ſame with Edwards's Black and White Indian Starling, Pl. 187.; with Albin's [168] Contra of Bengal, vol. iii. Pl. 31.; with Briſ⯑ſon's Cape of Good Hope Stare, vol. ii. p. 448.; and even with his ninth tropic bird. He acknowledges this, and rectifies it, p. 54. of the Supplement; and conſidering the chaos of incomplete deſcription, and of mutilated figures, which diſgraces Natural Hiſtory, he is certainly excuſable. To avoid confuſion, there⯑fore, it is of the utmoſt importance to collate the different names which have been beſtowed on a bird by different authors, and at different times*.
II. The LOUISIANA STARE, or the STOURNE.
• Sturnus Ludovicianus, Linn. & Gmel.
I have applied the name of Stourne, which is formed from the Latin Sturnus, to an American bird, which, though conſiderably different, is allied to our Stare. The under part of its body [169] is gray, variegated with brown, and the upper is yellow. The moſt characteriſtic marks of this bird, in reſpect to colour, are, 1. A blackiſh plate intermixed with gray at the lower part of the neck, and riſing diſtinctly out of the yellow ground. 2. Three white bars on its head, which riſe from the baſe of the upper mandible, and extend as far as the occiput; the one reſts on the top of the head, while the two others, which are parallel to it, ſtretch on each ſide over the eyes. In general this bird reſembles the European Stare, by the proportions of its wings and tail, and alſo by the diſperſion of theſe colours in ſmall ſpots: its head is likewiſe flat, but its bill is longer.
A correſpondent of the Cabinet informs us, that Louiſiana is much incommoded by clouds of theſe Stares; which would ſhow that their manner of flying reſembles that of the European ſort. But we are not very certain if he means the ſpecies of this article*.
III. The TOLCANA *.
• Sturnus Obſcurus, Gmel. , • Sturnus Novae Hiſpaniae, Briſſ. ,
and • The Brown-head Stare, Lath.
[170]The ſhort account which Fernandez has given of this bird is not only incomplete, but care⯑leſsly drawn up; for though he ſays that the Tolcana is, in ſize and figure, like the Stare, he afterwards adds that it is rather ſmaller. Yet he is the only original author from whom we can obtain information with regard to this bird, and on his evidence Briſſon has ranged it among the Stares. It appears to me, however, that theſe two authors adopt very different characters of the Stare: Briſſon, for inſtance, makes it the diſtinguiſhing feature of the genus, that the bill is ſtraight, blunt, and convex; and Fernandez, ſpeaking of a bird of the Tzanatl or Stare kind, mentions, that it is ſhort, thick, and rather hooked; and in another place he refers the ſame bird named Cacalotototl to the genus of the Raven (which is called Cacalotl in the Mexican [171] language), and to that of the Stare*. The ar⯑rangement of the Tolcana is therefore not deter⯑mined; I have retained its Mexican name, with⯑out venturing to pronounce whether it is a Stare or not.
This bird is, like the European Stares, fond of places abounding in ruſhes and aquatic plants. Its head is brown, and the reſt of its plumage black. It has no ſong, or even cry. In that it partakes of the qualities of many other Ame⯑rican birds, which are more remarkable for the richneſs of their plumage than the ſweetneſs of their warble†.
IV. The CACASTOL ‡.
• Sturnus Mexicanus, Gmel. , • Cotinga Mexicana, Briſſ. ,
and • The Mexican Stare, Lath.
I here range this bird on the very ſuſpicious authority of Fernandez, and the analogy which [172] its name bears in the Mexican language to that of the Stare; nor am I acquainted with any European bird to which I can refer it. Briſſon, who conceives it to be a Cottinga, has been obliged, in order to ſupport his preconceptions, to reject from the deſcription of Fernandez, al⯑ready too ſhort, the words which indicate the lengthened and pointed ſhape of its bill; this ſhape being really related more cloſely to the Stare than to the Cottinga. Beſides, the Ca⯑caſtol is nearly of the bulk of the Stare; and, like that bird, it has a ſmall head, and is indif⯑ferent food; it likewiſe inhabits the temperate and warm regions. It is indeed a bad ſinger, but we have ſeen that the native notes of the European Stare are not very captivating; and, if it were carried into America, we may pre⯑ſume that its imitation of the harſh muſic of the foreſt would ſoon deſtroy every harmonious mo⯑dulation*.
V. The PIMALOT †.
The broad bill of this bird might lead us to ſuſpect that it is not a Stare; but if what Fernan⯑dez [173] ſays be true, that its habits and inſtincts are the ſame with thoſe of the other Stares, we can⯑not heſitate to infer that it is of an analogous ſpecies; eſpecially as it generally haunts the coaſts of the South Sea, lodging probably, like the European ſort, among the aquatic plants.—The Pimalot is rather larger.
VI. The STARE of TERRA MAGELLANICA, or, the WHITE RAY.
• Sturnus Milibaris, Gmel. ,
and • The Magellanic Stare, Lath.
I have given this laſt name to a bird, brought by M. Bougainville, on account of the white ray which, riſing on each ſide near the junction of the mandibles, bends under the eye and ſtretches along the neck. This white ray is the more remarkable, as it is environed by a deep brown; the dark colours prevail on the upper part of the body, only the wings and their coverts are edged with yellow. The tail is of a full black, forked, and extending not far beyond the wings, which are very long. The under ſide of the body, including the throat, is of a fine crimſon red, ſprinkled with black on the ſides; the an⯑terior [174] part of the wing is alſo of crimſon, and not ſpotted; and the ſame colour appears round the eyes, and in the ſpace lying between theſe and the bill, which, though blunt as in the Stares, and leſs pointed than that of the Troupiales, may be regarded as neareſt the ſhape of the lat⯑ter. If we conſider alſo that the White Ray re⯑ſembles much the appearance of the Troupiales, we may eſteem it as intermediate between theſe two kinds*.
The TROUPIALES.
[175]THESE birds, as I have juſt obſerved, are nearly related to the European Stares, and often the vulgar and the naturaliſts have con⯑founded them. We may regard them as re⯑preſenting the Stares in the New World; their habits are the ſame, except in the mode of build⯑ing their neſts.
The American continent is the native region of theſe birds, and of all others that have been claſſed with them; ſuch as the Caſſics, the Balti⯑mores, the Bonanas, &c.; and though ſome are ſaid to belong to the Old World, theſe have re⯑ally been brought from the New World; for in⯑ſtance, probably, the Troupiale of Senegal, called the Cape-More *, the Bonana of the Cape of Good Hope, and all the pretended Troupiales of Madras.
I ſhall exclude from the genus of the Troupi⯑ales, 1. The four ſpecies brought from Madras, and which Briſſon has borrowed from Ray; becauſe the law of climate will not admit the ſuppoſition, and the deſcriptions are not deci⯑ſive, and the figures ſo ill executed, that they might as well be taken for magpies, jays, black-birds, loriots, and gobe-mouches, &c.
[176] A ſkilful ornithologiſt (Mr. Edwards) is of opinion, that the yellow jay and the chop jay of Petiver, which Briſſon has made his ſixth and his fourth Troupiale, are only the male and fe⯑male loriot; and that the variegated jay of Ma⯑dras of the ſame Petiver, which is the fifth Troupiale of Briſſon, is his yellow Indian Stare; and laſtly, that the creſted Troupiale of Madras, which is Briſſon's ſeventh ſpecies, is the ſame bird with the creſted gobe-mouche of the Cape of Good Hope of the ſame Briſſon*.
2. I ſhall exclude the Bengal Troupiale, which is Briſſon's ninth ſpecies, ſince that au⯑thor has himſelf perceived that it is his ſecond of the Stare.
3. I ſhall exclude the Forked-tail Troupiale, which is the ſixth of Briſſon, and the Thruſh of Seba. All that the latter ſays is, that it is much larger than the thruſh; that its plumage is black, its bill yellow, the under ſurface of its tail white, the upper and its back ſhaded by a light tint of blue; that its tail is long, broad, and forked; and laſtly, that, excepting the difference in the ſhape of its tail, and in its bulk, it is much like the European thruſh. But in all this, I can perceive nothing that relates to a Troupiale; and the figure given by Seba, and which Briſſon rec⯑kons [177] a very bad one, no more reſembles a Trou⯑piale than it does a Thruſh.
4. I ſhall exclude the Blue Bonana of Ma⯑dras, becauſe, on the one hand, it is inconſiſtent with the law of the climate, and on the other, the figure and deſcription of Ray have nothing which would characteriſe the Bonana, not even the plumage. According to that author, its head, tail, and wings are blue, but the tail of a brighter tinge; the reſt of the plumage black or cinereous, except the bill and the feet, which are ruſty.
5. Laſtly, I ſhall exclude the India Troupiale, not only on account of the difference of climate, but for other ſtronger reaſons, which before in⯑duced me to place it between the Rollers and the Birds of Paradiſe.
Though we have ranged along with the Troupiales, the Caſſies, the Baltimores, and the Bonanas, theſe, as they have received ſeparate names, are diſtinguiſhed by differences that are ſufficiently important to form ſmall ſubordinate genera. I am able, from the compariſon of a number of theſe birds, to aſſert that the Caſſies have the ſtrongeſt bill, next to them the Trou⯑piales, and then the Bonanas. With reſpect to the Baltimores, their bill is not only ſmaller than in the reſt, but it is ſtraighter, and of a peculiar ſhape. They ſeem alſo to have different in⯑ſtincts; I therefore retain their proper names, and treat of each ſeparately.
[178] The common characters which Briſſon aſ⯑cribes to them are the naked noſtrils, and the elongated conical form of the bill. I have al⯑ready obſerved that the upper mandible extends over the cranium, or that the tuft, inſtead of making a point, makes a conſiderable re-entrant⯑angle; a circumſtance which ſometimes occurs in other ſpecies, but is moſt remarkable in the preſent.
The TROUPIALE *.
• Oriolus Ictericus, Gmel. , • Icterus, Briſſ. , • Coracias Xanthornus, Scop. , • The Yellow and Black Pye, Cateſby. , • The Banana Bird from Jamaica, Albin. ,
and • The Icteric Oriole, Lath.
The feet and nails are ſometimes black, ſome⯑times of a leaden colour. The bill ſeems to have no conſtant colour, for it has been obſerved to be in ſome white gray†, in others brown cine⯑reous above‡, and blue below; and laſtly, in others black above, and brown below§.
This bird is nine or ten inches long from the point of the bill to the end of the tail; and, ac⯑cording to Marcgrave, its wings extend fourteen inches, and its head is very ſmall. It is diſperſed through the region lying between Carolina and Brazil, and through the Caribbean iſlands. It is of the bulk of a blackbird; it hops like the magpie, and has many of its geſtures, according to Sloane. It has even, according to Marcgrave, the ſame cries; but Albin aſſerts that in all its actions it reſembles the Stare; and adds, that ſometimes four or five unite to attack a larger bird, which, after they have killed, they devour [180] orderly, each maintaining his rank. Sloane, an author worthy of credit, ſays, that the Trou⯑piales live on inſects. Yet there is no abſolute contradiction; for every animal which feeds on the ſmalleſt reptile is rapacious, and would feed on larger animals if it could do it with ſafety.
Theſe birds muſt be of a very ſocial diſpoſi⯑tion, ſince love, which divides ſo many other ſocieties, ſeems on the contrary to knit theirs more cloſely together. They do not ſeparate to accompliſh in retirement and ſecrecy the views of nature; a great many pairs are ſeen on the ſame tree, which is almoſt always lofty and ſequeſ⯑tered, conſtructing their neſt, laying their eggs, hatching and cheriſhing their infant brood.
Theſe neſts are of a cylindrical form, ſuſ⯑pended from the extremity of high branches, and waving freely in the air; ſo that the young are continually rocked. But ſome who believe that the birds act from deliberation, aſſert that the parents hang their neſt to avoid the attack of certain land animals, and eſpecially ſerpents.
The Troupiale is alſo reckoned very docile, and eaſily ſubjected to domeſtic ſlavery; which pro⯑penſity almoſt always attends a ſocial temper*
The ACOLCHI of SEBA *.
• Oriolus Novae Hiſpaniae, Gmel. , • Icterus Mexicanus, Briſſ. ,
and • The Mexican Oriole, Lath.
[181]Seba, having found this name in Fernandez, has, according to his way, applied it arbi⯑trarily to a bird entirely different from the one meant by that author, at leaſt with regard to its plumage; and he has again aſcribed to the ſame bird what Fernandez has ſaid of the true Acolchi, which the Spaniards call Tordo, or Stare.
This falſe Acolchi of Seba has a long yellow bill; its head is all black, and alſo its throat; the tail and wings are blackiſh, and theſe are or⯑namented with ſmall feathers of a golden colour, which have a fine effect on the dark ground.
Seba reckons his Acolchi an American bird, and I know not for what reaſon Briſſon, who quotes no authority but Seba, ſubjoins that it is moſt common in Mexico. It is certain that the word Acolchi is Mexican, but we are not war⯑ranted to conclude the ſame thing of the bird on which Seba beſtows it†
The RING-TAILED ORIOLE, Lath.
• L'Arc-en Queue, Buff. , • Oriolus Annulatus, Gmel. , • Icterus Caudâ Annulatâ, Briſſ. ,
and • Cornix Flava, Klein.
[182]Fernandez gives the name of Oziniſcan to two birds which bear no reſemblance; and Seba has taken the freedom to apply the ſame name to a third entirely different from either, except in ſize, which is that of the pigeon.
The third Oziniſcan is the Ring-tail (Arc-en-Queue) of this article. I give it this name on account of a black arch or creſcent with its con⯑cavity turned towards the head, which appears diſtinctly on the tail when ſpread, and the more remarkable, as this is of a fine yellow colour, which is alſo that of the bill and of the whole body; the head and neck are black, and the wings of the ſame colour, with a ſlight tint of yellow.
Seba adds, that he received many of theſe birds from America, where they are looked upon as ravenous. perhaps their habits are the ſame with thoſe of our Troupiales; the figure which Seba gives has a bill ſomewhat hooked near the point*.
The JAPACANI *.
• Oriolus Japacani, Gmel. ,
and • Luſcinia pullo-lutea, Klein.
[183]Sloane conſiders his Little Yellow and Brown Fly-catcher as the ſame with the Japacani of Marcgrave; but beſides the differ⯑ences of the plumage, the Japacani is eight times larger, each dimenſion being double; for Sloane's bird is only four inches long, and ſeven over the wings, while Marcgrave's is of the bulk of the Bemptère, which is equal to that of the Stare, whoſe extreme length is ſeven inches, and its alar extent fourteen. It would be difficult to refer to the ſame ſpecies two birds, eſpecially two wild birds, ſo widely different.
The Japacani has a long pointed black bill, a little curved; its head is blackiſh, its iris of a gold colour; the hind part of its neck, its back, its wings, and its rump, are variegated with black and light brown; its tail is blackiſh below, and marked with white above; its breaſt, its belly, its legs are variegated with yellow and white, with blackiſh tranſverſe lines; its feet brown, its nails black and pointed†.
[184] Sloane's little bird* has a round bill, almoſt ſtraight, and half an inch long; the head and back are of a light brown, with ſome black ſpots; the tail eighteen inches long, and of a brown colour, as alſo the wings, which have a little white at their tips. The orbits, the throat, the ſides of the neck, the coverts of the tail, yel⯑low; the breaſt of the ſame colour, but with brown marks; the belly white; the legs brown, about fifteen lines long, and yellow in the toes.
This bird is common in St. Jago, once the capital of Jamaica; it lodges generally in the buſhes. Its ſtomach is very muſcular, and lined with a thin, looſe, inſenſible membrane. Sloane found nothing in the gizzard of the individual which he diffected, but he obſerved that the in⯑teſtines made a great number of circumvolutions.
The ſame author mentions a variety, which differs only becauſe it has leſs yellow in its plumage.
This bird may be reckoned a Troupiale, on account of the form of its bill; but it is cer⯑tainly different from the Japacani†.
The XOCHITOL and the COSTOTOL.
• Oriolus Coſtototl, Gmel. ,
and • The New Spain Oriole, Lath.
[185]Briſſon makes the Xochitol of Fernandez the tenth ſpecies of his Troupiale of New Spain, and which the Spaniſh naturaliſt conſiders as only the adult Coſtotol. But he takes notice of two Coſtotols, which are pretty much alike; but if they differ in ſome degree, we muſt refer what Fernandez ſays here to the Coſtotol of Chap. xxviii.
If we compare the deſcription of the Xochitol of Chap. cxxii. to that of Chap. xxviii. we ſhall meet with contradictions which it will be diffi⯑cult to reconcile; for is it poſſible that the Coſ⯑totol, which when ſo much grown as to be able to ſing is only of the ſize of a Canary bird, ſhould afterwards acquire the bulk of a Stare? that when young it has the ſweet warble of the Goldfinch, but after it is adult, and received the name of the Xochitol, it ſhould have the diſ⯑agreeable chatter of the Magpie? But wide dif⯑ferences alſo occur in the plumage; in the Coſ⯑totol, the head and the under part of the body are yellow, while in the Xochitol they are black: in the former, the wings are yellow [186] tipped with black; in the latter, they are va⯑riegated with black and white above, and cine⯑reous below, without a ſingle yellow feather.
But all theſe contradictions will vaniſh, if, inſtead of the Xochitol of Chap. cxxii. we ſub⯑ſtitute the Xochitol or Flowery bird of Chap. cxxv. The ſize is nearly the ſame, being that of the Sparrow; its warble is pleaſant, like that of the Coſtotol, the yellow of which is mingled with other colours that variegate the plumage of the former: they are both an agreeable food. The Xochitol reſembles in two circumſtances the Troupiales; it lives upon inſects and ſeeds, and hangs its neſt from the ends of ſmall branches. The only difference which can be remarked be⯑tween the Xochitol of Chap. cxxv. and the Coſtotol, is, that the latter is found in warm countries only, while the former inhabits all cli⯑mates without diſtinction. But is it not likely that Xochitols go to breed in warm countries, where their young, or the Coſtotols, remain till they are grown up, or are Xochitols, and able to accompany their parents into colder climates? In the Coſtotol, the plumage is yellow, as I have ſaid, and the tips of the wings black; and in the Xochitol of Chap. cxxv. the plumage is va⯑riegated with pale yellow, brown, white, and blackiſh.
Briſſon has indeed made the latter his firſt carouge; but as it ſuſpends its neſt like the Troupiales, we have a deciſive reaſon to range [187] it with theſe; except we reckon as another Troupiale the Xochitol of Chap. cxxii. of Fer⯑nandez, which is of the ſize of a Stare; its breaſt, belly, and tail of a ſaffron colour, vari⯑egated with a little black; its wings variegated with black and white below and cinereous above; its head, and the reſt of its body, black; it has the chatter of the Magpie, and its fleſh is good eating.
The TOCOLIN *
• Oriolus Cinereus, Gmel. , • Icterus Cinereus, Briſſ. ,
and • The Gray Oriole, Lath.
Fernandez conſidered this bird as a Wood-pecker, on account of its long and pointed bill; but this character belongs alſo to the Trou⯑piales, nor can I perceive in the deſcription of Fernandez any other diſcriminating qualities of the Wood-peckers. I ſhall therefore leave it among the Troupiales, where Briſſon has placed it.
It is of the bulk of a Stare; it lives in the woods, and neſtles on trees. Its plumage is [188] beautifully variegated with yellow and black, excepting the back, the belly, and the feet, which are cinereous.
The Tocolin is deſtitute of ſong, but its fleſh is good; it inhabits Mexico*.
The COMMANDER.
• Oriolus Phoeniceus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Icterus Pterophoeniceus, Briſſ. , • The Scarlet-feathered Indian Bird, Will. , • The Red-winged Starling, Cateſby, Alb. and Kalm. ,
and • The Red-winged Oriole, Penn. and Lath.
This is the true Acolchi of Fernandez. It is called the Commander†, on account of a fine red mark on the anterior part of its wings, which in ſome meaſure reſembles the badge of the order of knighthood. The effect is here the more ſtriking, as it is thrown upon a ground of ſhining gloſſy black; for that is the general colour not only of its plumage, but of its bill, feet, and nails. There are, however, ſome ſlight exceptions; the iris is white, and the baſe of the bill is encircled by a narrow ring of red; the [189] bill alſo inclines ſometimes to brown rather than black, according to Albin. But the real colour of the mark on the wings is not a pure red, ac⯑cording to Fernandez, but is tarniſhed with a rufous tint, which increaſes and becomes at laſt the predominant colour. Theſe ſometimes ſe⯑parate, the red occupying the anterior and the more elevated part of the ſpot; yellow, the poſ⯑terior and lower. But is this true with regard to all the individuals, or has not that been aſcribed to the whole ſpecies which is applicable only to the females? We are certain that in theſe the ſpot on the wings is not of ſo bright a red; beſides that diſtinction, the black of their plumage is mixed with gray, and they are ſmaller.
The Red-Wing is nearly of the ſize and ſhape of the Stare; its extreme length is eight or nine inches, and its alar extent thirteen or fourteen; it weighs three ounces and a half.
Theſe birds inhabit the cold as well as the warm countries: They are found in Virginia, Carolina, Louiſiana, Mexico, &c. They are pe⯑culiar to the New World, though one was killed in the environs of London; but this had doubt⯑leſs eſcaped from its cage. They can be eaſily tamed, and taught to ſpeak; and they are fond of ſinging and playing, whether they be con⯑fined, or allowed to run through the houſe; for they are very familiar and lively.
[190] The one killed near London was opened; in its ſtomach were found caterpillars, beetles, and maggots. But in America they feed on wheat, maize, &c. and are very deſtructive. They fly in numerous flocks, and, like the Stares of Eu⯑rope, joining other birds equally deſtructive, as the Jamaica Magpies, they pour their fa⯑miſhed ſquadrons on the ſtanding crops and ſown fields; but the havock which they commit is by far greateſt in the warm regions, and near the ſea-coaſt.
When the planters fire on theſe combined flocks, birds fall of different kinds, and before the piece can be again charged, another flight arrives.
Cateſby informs us, that in Carolina and Vir⯑ginia they always breed among the ruſhes; they interweave the points of theſe ſo as to form a ſort of roof or ſhed, under which they build their neſt, and at ſo proper a height that it can never be reached by the higheſt floods. This conſtruction is very different from that of our firſt Troupiale, and ſhews a different inſtinct, and therefore proves that it is a diſtinct ſpecies.
Fernandez pretends that they neſtle on the trees near the plantations: Has this ſpecies dif⯑ferent cuſtoms accommodated to the different countries where it is found?
The Red-Wings appear in Louiſiana in the winter only, but they are then ſo numerous that three hundred have been ſometimes caught in a [191] ſingle draw of the net. For this purpoſe is uſed a long and very narrow net of ſilk, in two parts, like that for larks. ‘When they intend to ſpread it,’ ſays Le Page Dupratz, ‘they clear a place near the wood, and make a kind of path, which is ſmooth and beaten, on which they ſtrew a train of rice or other grain, and retire to conceal themſelves behind a buſh where the drag-cord is brought. When the flocks of Red-Wings paſs over the ſpot, they quickly deſcry the bait, light, and are caught in an inſtant. It is neceſſary to diſpatch them, it being impoſſible to collect ſo many alive.’
But they are deſtroyed chiefly as being per⯑nicious birds, for though they ſometimes grow very fat, their fleſh is always indifferent eating; another point of reſemblance to the Stares of Europe.
I have ſeen at Abbé Aubri's a variety of this ſpecies, in which the head and the upper part of the neck was of a light fulvous colour. The reſt of its plumage was the ſame as uſual. This firſt variety ſeems to ſhew that the bird repre⯑ſented in the Planches Enluminées, No. 343, by the name of Cayenne Carouge, is a ſecond, which differs from the firſt in wanting the red ſpots on the wings only; for the reſt of its plumage is exactly the ſame; the ſize is nearly alike, and the ſame proportions take place; and the dif⯑ference between the climates is not ſo great, but [192] that we may ſuppoſe a bird could be equally re⯑conciled to both.
We need only compare No. 402, and Fig. 2, No. 236, of the Planches Enluminées, to be con⯑vinced that the bird engraved in the latter un⯑der the name of Cayenne Troupiale, is only a ſecond variety of the ſpecies of No. 402, under the name of Red-winged Troupiales of Louiſiana, which is the ſubject of the preſent article. It is nearly the ſame in ſize, ſhape, and in the kind and diſtribution of the colours; except that in No. 236, the red tinges not only the an⯑terior part of the wings, but is ſpread over the throat, the origin of the neck, a portion of the belly, and even the iris.
If we next compare this bird, No. 236, with the one repreſented, No. 536, under the name of Guiana Troupiale, we ſhall perceive that the latter is a variety of the former, ariſing from the difference of age or ſex. All the colours are fainter; the red feathers are edged with white, and the black or blackiſh with light gray; ſo that the figure of each feather is diſtinctly marked, and the bird looks as if it were covered with ſcales. But the diſtribution of the colours is the ſame, the bulk the ſame, the climate the ſame, &c. It is impoſſible to diſcover ſo many relations ſubſiſting between birds of different ſpecies.
[193] I am informed that theſe frequent the Savan⯑nas, in the iſland of Cayenne, and commonly lodge in the buſhes, and that ſome people give them the name of Cardinal *.
The BLACK TROUPIALE.
• Oriolus Niger, Gmel. , • Icterus Niger, Briſſ. , • Cornix parva profunde nigra, Klein. ,
and • The Black Oriole, Penn. and Lath.
The dark colour of this bird has procured it the names of Crow, Blackbird, and Daw.—But this is not ſo deep nor ſo uniform as has been alleged; the plumage in certain poſitions is of a black, changing with greeniſh reflexions, eſpe⯑cially on the head, the upper part of the body, the tail, and the wings.
It is of the ſize of a Blackbird, being ten inches long, and fifteen or ſixteen acroſs the [194] wings, which when cloſed reach to the middle of the tail; this is four inches and a half in length, tapered, and conſiſting of twelve quills. The bill is more than an inch, and the mid-toe is longer than the leg, or rather the tarſus.
This bird is ſettled in St. Domingo, and is very common in ſome parts of Jamaica, particularly between Spaniſh-town and Paſſage-fort. Its ſtomach is muſcular, and generally contains ca⯑terpillars and other inſects*.
The Little BLACK TROUPIALE.
• Oriolus Minor, Gmel. ,
and • The Leſſer Black Oriole, Lath.
I have ſeen another Black Troupiale from America, but much ſmaller, and even in⯑ferior to the Red-wing Thruſh in ſize: It was ſix or ſeven inches long, and its tail, which was ſquare, only two inches and a half, and extend⯑ed an inch beyond the wings.
[195] The plumage was entirely black, but more gloſſy and floating with bluiſh reflexions on the head and the contiguous parts. It is ſaid that this bird can be eaſily tamed, and taught to live familiarly in the houſe.
The bird of No. 606, Planches Enlumineés, is probably the female of this; for it is entirely of a black or blackiſh colour, except the head and the tail, which are of a lighter tint, as is commonly the caſe in females. We alſo per⯑ceive the bluiſh reflexions which were remarked in the plumage of the male; but theſe appear not on the feathers of the head, but on thoſe of the tail and the wings.
No naturaliſt has, I apprehend, taken notice of this ſpecies*.
The BLACK-CAPPED TROU⯑PIALE.
• Le Troupiale a Calotte Noire, Buff. , • Oriolus Mexicanus, Gmel. ,
and • The Black-crowned Oriole, Lath.
This bird appears to be entirely the ſame ſpecies with Briſſon's Brown Troupiale of New Spain. To form an idea of its plumage, [196] imagine a bird of a fine yellow, with a black cap and mantle. The tail is of the ſame colour, and ſpotleſs; but the black on the wings is ſome-what interrupted by the white which borders the coverts, and again appears on the tips of the quills. Its bill is of a light-gray, with an orange tinge, and the legs are cheſnut.—It is found in Mexico, and in the iſland of Cayenne*.
The SPOTTED TROUPIALE of Cayenne.
• Oriolus Melancholicus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Anthornus Naevius, Briſſ. ,
and • The Schomburger, Edw. and Lath.
The ſpots which occur in this ſmall Trou⯑piale are owing to this circumſtance, that almoſt all the feathers, which are brown or blackiſh in the middle, are edged with yellow, more or leſs inclined to orange on the wings, the tail, and the lower part of the body. The throat is of a pure white; a ſtreak of the ſame colour which paſſes cloſe under the eye ſtretches back between two parallel black ſtreaks, one of which accompanies the white above, and the other bends round the eye below; the iris is of [197] a bright orange, almoſt red:—All theſe give a lively appearance to the male; for though the iris is orange alſo in the female, its plumage is of a tarniſhed yellow, which, mingling with a pale white, produces an unpleaſant uniformity.
The bill is thick and pointed, as in the Trou⯑piales, and cinereous; the legs are fleſh-colour⯑ed. Its proportion may be conceived from the figure.
The ſpotted Carouge of Briſſon, which in many reſpects reſembles the Troupiale of this article, differs from it in ſeveral important cir⯑cumſtances. It is not half the ſize, its hind nail is longer, its iris is hazel, its bill fleſh-coloured, its throat, and the ſides of its neck, black; and laſtly, the belly, the legs above and below the tail are without a ſingle ſpot.
Edwards heſitated to which of two ſpecies he ſhould refer it; to the Thruſh, or to the Or⯑tolan. Klein decides very readily, that it be⯑longs to neither, but to the Chaffinch; yet not⯑withſtanding his deciſion, the ſhape of its bill, and the identity of the climate, determine me to adopt the opinion of Briſſon, who makes it a Carouge*.
The OLIVE TROUPIALE of Cayenne.
• Oriolus Olivaceus, Gmel. ,
and • The Cayenne Olive Oriole, Lath.
[198]This bird is only ſix or ſeven inches long. It owes its name to the olive colour which prevails on the hind part of its neck, its back, its tail, its belly, and the coverts of its wings. But this colour is not uniform; it is darker on the neck, the back, and the adjacent coverts of the wings, and ſomewhat leſs ſo on the tail; it is much lighter under the tail, and alſo on a great part of the coverts of the wings, which are furtheſt from the back; with this difference between the large and the ſmall ſort, that the latter have no mixture of colour, while the former are variegated with brown. The head, the throat, the fore-part of the neck and the breaſt, are of a gloſſy brown, deeper under the throat, and inclining to orange on the breaſt, and running into the olive colour of the lower part of the body. The bill and legs are black; the wing-quills, and the large coverts neareſt the outer edge, are of the ſame colour, but bordered with white.
[199] The ſhape of its bill is the ſame as that of the other Troupiales; its tail is long, and its wings when cloſed do not reach the third of the length*.
The WEAVER ORIOLE.
• Le Cap-More †, Buff. ,
and • Oriolus Textor, Gmel.
The two birds figured No. 375 and 376, Pl. Enl. were brought by the captain of a ſhip who had collected forty birds from dif⯑ferent countries, Senegal, Madagaſcar, &c. and who had called them Senegal Chaffinches. They have been termed Senegal Troupiales; but that appellation ſeems very improper; for the cli⯑mate is different from that of the Troupiales, and the Weaver is widely diſtinguiſhed by the proportions of its bill, tail, and wings, and the manner in which it builds its neſt. It is perhaps the African repreſentative of the Ame⯑rican ſpecies. The two which we have men⯑tioned belonged to a lady of high rank, who al⯑lowed [200] them to be deſigned at her houſe, and has obligingly communicated ſome particulars that occurred with regard to the way in which they conducted themſelves. This is the only ſource of information which we have.
The eldeſt had a kind of cowl which appear⯑ed of a brown-gold gloſs in the ſun; this cowl diſappeared in the moulting during the au⯑tumn, leaving the head of a yellow colour; but it again returned in the ſpring, and was con⯑ſtantly renewed the ſucceeding years. The chief colour of the reſt of the body was yellow, more or leſs inclined to orange; this was the predominant colour on the back, and on the lower part of the body; it bordered the coverts of the wings, their quills, and thoſe of the tail, which were all of a blackiſh ground.
The young one had no cowl till the end of the ſecond year, and did not even change its colours before that time; which occaſioned its being miſtaken for a female, and deſigned as ſuch, No. 376. This miſtake was excuſable, ſince the diſtinction of ſexes is not apparent during infancy, and one of the principal cha⯑racters of the females is that of preſerving long the marks of youth.
Before the change which took place in the colours of its plumage, the yellow was of a lighter tint than in the old one; it ſpread over the throat, the neck, the breaſt, and bordered, as in the other, all the quills of the tail and of [201] the wings. The back was of an olive-brown, which extended beyond the neck as far as the head. In both the iris was orange, the bill of a horn colour, thicker and ſhorter than in the Troupiale, and the legs reddiſh.
Theſe two birds lived in the ſame cage, and at firſt upon good terms with each other; the young one ſat generally on the higheſt bar, holding its bill cloſe to the other, which it an⯑ſwered, by clapping its wings, and with a ſub⯑miſſive air.
They were obſerved in the ſpring to inter-weave chickweed in the grating of their cage; this was therefore conceived as an indication of their deſire to neſtle. They were ſupplied with ſmall ruſhes, and they built a neſt ſo capacious as to conceal one of them entirely. The fol⯑lowing year they renewed their labour; but the young one being new clothed in the plum⯑age of its ſex, was driven off by the other, and obliged to conduct its work alone in another corner of the cage. But it was ſtill perſecuted, and notwithſtanding its ſubmiſſive behaviour, it was often ſo roughly treated as to be left in⯑ſenſible. They were ſeparated, and each was intent on building; but the labours of one day were often deſtroyed in the ſucceeding—A neſt is not the production of an individual.
They had both a ſingular kind of ſong, ſome⯑what ſhrill, but very ſprightly. The old one died ſuddenly, and the young one was cut off [202] by epileptic ſits. Their ſize was rather inferior to that of our firſt Troupiale; and their wings and tail were alſo proportionably ſhorter*.
The WHISTLER.
• Oriolus Viridis, Gmel. , • Icterus minus Viridis, Briſſ. ,
and • The Whiſtler Oriole, Lath.
I ſee no reaſon why Briſſon has reckoned this bird a Baltimore, for both in the ſhape of its bill and in the proportions of its tarſus it ſeems more related to the Troupiales. But I leave the matter undecided, placing it between the Trou⯑piales and Baltimores, and applying the vulgar name which it receives in St. Domingo, on ac⯑count of its ſhrill notes.
This bird is in general brown above, except the rump and the ſmall coverts of the wings, which are of a greeniſh yellow, as alſo in the whole under-part of the body; but this colour is duſky below the throat, and variegated with ruſty on the neck and breaſt; the great coverts and the quills of the wings, as well as the twelve of the tail, are edged with yellow. But to form [203] an accurate idea of the plumage of the Whiſtler, we muſt imagine an olive tint of various in⯑tenſity ſpread over all the colours without ex⯑ception. To characterize the predominant co⯑lour of the plumage of this bird, therefore, we ought to take olive and not green, as Briſſon has done.
The Whiſtler is of the ſize of a Chaffinch; it is about ſeven inches long, and ten or twelve inches acroſs the wings; the tail, which is un⯑equally tapered, is three inches in length, and the bill nine or ten lines.
The BALTIMORE.
• Oriolus Baltimore, Linn. and Gmel. , • Icterus Minor, Briſſ. , • Icterus ex auro nigroque varius, Klein. ,
and • The Baltimore Bird, Cateſby, Penn. and Lath.
This bird owes its name to ſome reſemblance that is perceived between the nature and diſtri⯑bution of the colours of its plumage, and the arms of Lord Baltimore*. It is a ſmall bird of the ſize of a houſe Sparrow, and weighing little more than an ounce; its length is ſix or ſeven inches, its alar extent eleven or twelve, its tail compoſed of twelve quills, and two or three [204] inches long, ſtretching more than a half beyond the wings when cloſed. A ſort of cowl of a fine black covers the head, and deſcends before upon the throat, and behind as far as the ſhoul⯑ders: the great coverts and the quills of the wings are alſo black, like thoſe of the tail; but the former are edged with white, and the latter tipped with orange, which is the broader the farther they are from the mid-ones, in which it is wanting. The reſt of the plumage is of a beautiful orange; and laſtly, the bill and legs are of a lead colour.
In the female, which I examined in the Royal Cabinet, all the fore-part was of a fine black, as in the male, the tail of the ſame co⯑lour, the great coverts and the wing-quills black⯑iſh, the whole without any mixture of other colour; and what was ſo beautiful an orange in the male, was only a dirty red in the female.
I have already ſaid, that the bill of the Balti⯑mores was not only proportionably ſhorter and ſtraighter than in the Carouges, the Troupiales, and the Caſſiques, but of a peculiar ſhape: It is a pyramid of five ſides, two belonging to the upper mandible, and three to the lower. I ſhall add, that its leg, or rather its tarſus, is more ſlender than in the Carouges and Troupiales.
The Baltimores diſappear in the winter, at leaſt in Virginia and Maryland, where Cateſby obſerved them. They are alſo found in Canada, but Cateſby met with none in Carolina.
[205] They build their neſts on large trees, ſuch as the poplars, the tulip trees*, &c. They fix it to the end of a thick branch, and commonly ſupport it by two ſmall ſhoots which enter its ſides; in which circumſtance the neſts of the Baltimores ſeem to reſemble thoſe of the Lo⯑riots†.
The BASTARD BALTIMORE.
• Oriolus Spurius, Gmel. , • Icterus Minor Spurius, Briſſ. ,
and • Tardus Minor gutture nigro, Klein.
This bird was no doubt ſo called becauſe the colours of its plumage are not ſo lively as in the Baltimore, and for this reaſon it may be con⯑ſidered as a degraded race. In fact, when we compare theſe birds, and find an exact corre⯑ſpondence in every thing, except in the colours, and not even in the diſtribution of theſe, but only in the different tints which they aſſume; [206] we cannot heſitate to infer that the Baſtard Bal⯑timore is a variety of a more generous race, de⯑generated by the influence of climate, or ſome other accidental cauſe. The black on the head is ſomewhat mottled, that of the throat pure; that part of the hood which falls behind is of an olive gray, which becomes darker as it ap⯑proaches the back. Whatever in the preceding was bright orange, is in the preſent yellow, bor⯑dering on orange, and more vivid on the breaſt and the coverts of the tail than on any other place. The wings are brown, but their great coverts and their quills are of a dirty white. Of the twelve tail quills, the two central ones are blackiſh near their middle, olive at their origin, and yellow at their extremity; the next one on either ſide ſhews the two firſt colours mixed con⯑fuſedly; and in the four following quills, the two laſt colours are melted together. In a word, the true Baltimore bears the ſame relation to the baſtard one in reſpect to the colours of the plum⯑age, that the latter bears to its female; in which the upper-part of the body is of a duſky white, and the under of a yellowiſh white. A
The YELLOW CASSIQUE of Brazil, or, the YAPOU.
• Oriolus Perſicus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Caſſicus Luteus, Briſſ. ,
and • The Black and Yellow Oriole, Lath. *
[207]When we compare the Caſſiques with the Troupiales, the Carouges, and the Baltimores, all which have many common properties, we perceive that they are larger, that their bill is ſtronger, and their legs proportionably ſhorter; not to mention the difference in the general ap⯑pearance which it would be difficult to deſcribe.
Several authors have given figures and de⯑ſcriptions of the Yellow Caſſique under dif⯑ferent names, and ſcarcely two of theſe exactly correſpond.—But before we proceed to conſider the varieties in detail, it will be proper to ſepa⯑rate a bird, the characters of which ſeem to be widely diſtant from thoſe of the Yellow Caſſique of Brazil: It is the Perſian Magpie of Aldro⯑vandus. That naturaliſt deſcribes it merely from a drawing, which had been ſent from Ve⯑nice. He reckons it to be of the ſize of our Magpie. Its predominant colour is not black, [208] but only duſkiſh (ſubfuſcum): Its bill is very thick, ſomewhat ſhort (breviuſculum) and whit⯑iſh; its eyes white, and its nails ſmall; whereas the Yapou is ſcarcely larger than a Blackbird, and the dark part of its plumage is jet black; its bill is pretty long, of the colour of ſulphur; its iris is like ſapphire, and its nails of conſider⯑able ſtrength, according to Edwards, and even very ſtrong and hooked, according to Belon. We cannot doubt that birds ſo diſtinct belong to different ſpecies; eſpecially if Aldrovandus's in⯑formation be true, that his bird is a native of Perſia, for we are certain that the Yapou is American.
The principal colours of the Yapou are con⯑ſtantly black and yellow, but the diſtribution is not uniformly the ſame, and varies in different individuals.—The one, for inſtance, which we have cauſed to be deſigned is entirely black, ex⯑cept the bill and the iris, as we have ſaid, and the great coverts of the wings neareſt the body, which are yellow, as alſo all the hind-part of the body, both above and below, from the thighs incluſively as far as the middle of the tail, and even beyond it.—In another, which was brought from Cayenne and lodged in the Royal Cabinet, and which is larger than the preceding, there is leſs yellow on the wings, and none at all on the lower part of the thigh, and the legs appear pro⯑portionably ſtronger:—it is probably a male.—In the Black and White Pye of Edwards, which [209] is evidently the ſame bird with ours, there is on four or five of the yellow coverts of the wings a black ſpot near their extremity; and beſides this, the black has purple reflexions, and the bird is rather larger.—In the Yapou or Jupujuba of Marcgrave, the tail is mottled with black and white only below, for its upper ſurface is en⯑tirely black, except the outmoſt feather on each ſide, which is yellow half its length.
It follows, therefore, that the colours of the plumage are by no means fixed and invariable in this ſpecies, which inclines me to believe with Marcgrave*, that the bird which Briſſon calls the Red Caſſique, is only a variety of the ſame.—I ſhall afterwards ſtate my reaſons†.
VARIETY of the YAPOU.
I. The RED CASSIQUE of Brazil, or, the JUPUBA.
• Oriolus Perſicus, var. 1. Gmel.
This is one of the names which Marcgrave gives to the Yapou, and which I apply to the [210] Red Caſſique of Briſſon, becauſe it reſembles that bird in the eſſential points; the ſame pro⯑portions, the ſame ſize, the ſame aſpect, the ſame bill, the ſame legs, and the ſame deep black diffuſed through moſt of its plumage. It is true, that the lower part of the back is red, inſtead of yellow, and the under ſurface of the body and of the tail entirely black; but this cannot be conſidered as a material diſtinction in a bird whoſe plumage, we have already obſerved, is ſubject to conſiderable variations. Beſides, yellow and red are contiguous colours, and apt to melt into orange; a circumſtance which may be occaſioned by difference of age, of ſex, of cli⯑mate, or of ſeaſon.
Theſe birds are about twelve inches long, and ſeventeen acroſs the wings; the tail is forked and bluiſh; the two mandibles are equally arched downwards; the firſt phalanx of the outer toe in each foot ſeems to grow into the mid-toe; the tail conſiſts of twelve quills, and the under ſurface is white both below the black and the yellow part of the plumáge.
They conſtruct their neſts with graſs, inter-woven with horſe hair and hogs briſtles, or with vegetable productions which ſupply their place, and they imitate the form of a cucurbit fitted to its alembic. The neſts are brown on the out⯑ſide, and about eighteen inches deep, though the interior cavity is only a foot; the upper part is thick and prominent for the ſpace of half a foot; and here they are ſuſpended from the extremi⯑ties [211] of ſmall branches. Sometimes four hundred of theſe neſts have been ſeen at once hanging in a ſingle tree, of the kind which the Brazilians call Uti; and as the Yapous hatch thrice a-year, the multiplication muſt be prodigious. This in⯑ſtinct of neſtling in ſociety on the ſame tree, marks ſome analogy to our Daws*.
II. The GREEN CASSIQUE of Cayenne.
• Oriolus Criſtatus, var. 2. Gmel.
I ſhall not here be obliged to compare or diſ⯑cuſs the relations of other authors; for none has taken notice of this bird. Nor can I produce any information reſpecting its diſpoſitions and inſtincts. It is larger than the preceding; its bill is thicker at the baſe, and longer; and its legs, though ſtill as ſhort, would appear to be ſtronger. It has been very properly named the Green Caſſique, for all the fore-part both above and below, and even the coverts of the wings, are of that colour; the hind-part is cheſnut; the wing-quills are black, and thoſe of the tail partly [212] black, partly yellow; the legs are entirely black, and the bill is all red.
The length of this Caſſique is fourteen inch⯑es, and its alar extent eighteen or nineteen.
III. The CRESTED CASSIQUE of Cayenne.
• Oriolus Criſtatus, Gmel. , • Anthornus Maximus, Pallas. ,
and • The Creſted Oriole, Lath.
This is alſo a new ſpecies, and the largeſt with which we are acquainted. Its bill is proportion⯑ably longer and firmer than in the others, but its wings are ſhorter. Its extreme length is eighteen inches, its tail five, and its bill two. It is alſo diſtinguiſhed from the preceding, by ſmall feathers, which it briſtles at pleaſure on the top of its head, and which form a ſort of moveable creſt. All the fore-part of this Caſ⯑ſique, both above and below, including the wings and the legs, is black, and the whole of the re [...] of a deep cheſnut. In the tail, which is tapered, the two middle quills are black, like thoſe of the wings, but all the lateral ones are yellow; and the bill is of the ſame colour.
I have ſeen in the Royal Cabinet, a ſpecimen which was rather of an inferior ſize, and in which the tail was entirely yellow; but I am [213] not certain whether the two mid-quills were plucked, for it had only eight quills in all*.
IV. The CASSIQUE of Louiſiana.
• Oriolus Ludovicianus, Gmel. ,
and • The White-headed Oriole, Penn. and Lath.
White, and changing violet, ſometimes mixed together, ſometimes ſeparated, are all the co⯑lours of this bird. Its head is white, and alſo its tail, belly, and rump; the feathers of the wings and of the tail are of a waving violet, and edged with white; the reſt of the plumage is dyed with a mixture of theſe colours.
It is a new ſpecies, lately brought from Loui⯑ſiana. We may add, that it is the ſmalleſt of the Caſſiques known; its whole length is only ten inches, and its wings when cloſed reach only to the middle of the tail, which is ſomewhat tapered.
The CAROUGE.
• Oriolus Bonana, Linn. and Gmel. , • Xanthornus, Briſſ. * , • Turdus Minor Varius, Klein. ,
and • The Bonana Bird, Brown and Lath.
[214]In general the Bonanas are ſmaller, and have a ſlenderer bill in proportion than the Troupi⯑ales. The ſubject of this article has its plumage painted with three colours, applied in large bo⯑dies.—Theſe are, 1. Reddiſh-brown, which is ſpread over all the fore-part of the bird, on the head, the neck, and the breaſt. 2. A velvet black on the back, the feathers of the tail, thoſe of the wings, and their great coverts, and even on the bill and the legs. 3. Deep orange on the ſmall coverts of the wings, the rump, and the coverts of the tail. All theſe colours are more obſcure in the female.
The length of the Bonana is ſeven inches, that of its bill ſix lines, that of its tail above three inches; its wings when ſpread meaſure eleven inches, and when cloſed extend to the middle of the tail, or beyond it. This bird was brought from Martinico; that of Cayenne [215] (Fig. 1. No. 607, Pl. Enl.) is ſmaller, and the ſort of cowl which covers its head, neck, &c. is black, ſprinkled with ſome ſmall white ſpots on the ſides of the neck, and little reddiſh ſtreaks on the back; and laſtly, the great coverts and the middle feathers of the wings are edged with white. But theſe differences are, I conceive, too inconſiderable to prevent our ſuppoſing the Cayenne Bonana a variety of that of Martinico. They conſtruct a curious kind of neſt, reſem⯑bling the quarter of a hollow globe; and few it under the leaf of a Bonana, which ſhelters the neſt, and forms a part of it; the reſt conſiſts of the fibres of the leaves.
In what has been ſaid, it would be difficult to recogniſe the Spaniſh Nightingale of Sloane*; for that bird is in every reſpect ſmaller than the Bonana, being only ſix Engliſh inches in length, and nine acroſs the wings; its plumage is dif⯑ferent, and it conſtructs its neſt in another mode. It is a ſort of bag, ſuſpended from the extremity of ſmall branches by a thread which they ſpin out of a ſubſtance that they extract from a pa⯑raſite plant, called old man's beard, which many have miſtaken for horſe-hair. In Sloane's bird the baſe of the bill was whitiſh, and encircled by a black ring; the crown of the head, the neck, the back, and the tail, were of a light [216] brown, or rather reddiſh gray; the wings of a deeper brown, variegated with ſome white fea⯑thers, the lower part of the tail marked in its middle with a black line; the ſides of the neck, the breaſt, and the belly, of the colour of a dead leaf.
Sloane mentions a variety, either from age or ſex, which differs from the preceding, only be⯑cauſe its back has more of the yellow tint, the breaſt and belly of a brighter yellow, and there is a greater ſhare of black under the bill.
Theſe birds haunt the woods, and have an agreeable ſong. They feed on inſects and worms, for fragments of theſe are found in their gizzard or ſtomach, which is not muſcular. Their liver is divided into a great number of lobes, and of a blackiſh colour.
I have ſeen a variety of the St. Domingo Ca⯑rouges, or the Yellow Bottoms of Cayenne, which I proceed to conſider: it reſembled much the female Bonana of Martinico, except that its head and neck were blacker. This confirms my idea, that moſt of theſe ſpecies are related, and that notwithſtanding our conſtant endeavour to reduce their number, we have ſtill carried the ſubdiviſions too far; eſpecially with regard to foreign birds, with which we are ſo imperfectly acquainted*.
The LESSER BONANA.
• Le Petit Cul Jaune de Cayenne, Buff. , • Oriolus Xanthornus, Linn. and Gmel. ,
and • Xanthornus Mexicanus, Briſſ. *
[217]The male and female of this ſpecies are repre⯑ [...]ented No. 5. fig. 1. and fig. 2. Pl. Enl. They [...]ave a jargon nearly like that of our Loriot, and [...]rill like that of our Magpie.
They ſuſpend their neſts, which are of a [...]urſe ſhape, from the extremity of ſmall branch⯑ [...]s, like the Troupiales; but I am informed they [...]hooſe the branches that are long and naked, and [...]elect the trees that are ſtunted and ill-formed, [...]nd lean over the courſe of a river. It is alſo ſaid that theſe neſts are ſubdivided into compart⯑ments for the ſeparate families, which has not been obſerved in the Troupiales.
Theſe birds are exceedingly crafty, and diffi⯑cult to enſnare. They are nearly of the ſize of a Lark; their length eight inches, their alar ex⯑ [...]ent twelve or thirteen, the tail three or four [...]nches, and tapered, ſtretching more than half beyond the cloſed wings. The principal colours [218] of thoſe repreſented No. 5, are yellow and black. In fig. 1. the black is ſpread over the throat, the bill, and the ſpace between that and the eye, the great coverts, and the quills of the wings, and of the tail, and the legs; all the reſt is yellow. But we muſt obſerve, that the middle quills and the great coverts of the wings are edged with white, and the latter ſometimes entirely white. In fig. 2. a part of the ſmall coverts of the wings, the thighs, and the belly, as far as the tail, are yellow, and the reſt all black*.
We may conſider, as varieties of this ſpecies, 1. The Yellow-headed American Carouge, or Bonana, of Briſſon. The crown of its head, the ſmall coverts of its tail, thoſe of the wings, and the lower part of the thigh, are yellow, the reſt of the body entirely black or blackiſh: it is about eight inches long, twelve inches acroſs the wings, the tail conſiſting of layers, containing twelve quills, each four inches long†. 2. The Bonana, or Carouge, of the iſland of St. Thomas, whoſe plumage is alſo black, except a little yellow ſpot on the ſmall coverts of the wings: it has twelve quills in the tail, which is tapered, as in the Leſſer Bonana, but ſomewhat longer. Edwards has deſigned one of the ſame ſpecies, Pl. 322, [219] which has a remarkable depreſſion at the baſe of the upper mandible*. 3. The Jamac of Marcgrave, which differs very little from it with reſpect to ſize, and of which the colours are the ſame, and diſtributed nearly in the ſame way as in fig. 1. except that the head is black, that the white on the wings is collected in a ſingle ſpot, and that a black line extends acroſs the back from the one wing to the other†.
The YELLOW-HEADED ORIOLE.
• Les Coiffes Jaunes, Buff. , • Oriolus Icterocephalus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Xanthornus Icterocephalus Cayanenſis, Briſſ. ,
and • The Yellow-headed Starling, Edw.
Theſe are Cayenne Bonanas, which have a black plumage, and a ſort of cap that covers the head and part of the neck, but deſcends lower before than behind. A black ſtreak, which ſtretches from the noſtrils to the eyes, and turns round the bill, has been omitted in the figure. The ſubject repreſented Pl. 343, appears to be conſiderably larger than another which I have ſeen in the Royal Cabinet. Muſt this be aſcribed [220] to the difference of age, of ſex, of climate, or to the defect of the preparation? But from that variety Briſſon has drawn his deſcription: its ſize is equal to that of the Brambling: it is about ſeven inches long, and eleven acroſs the wings.
The OLIVE CAROUGE of Louiſiana.
• Oriolus Capenſis, Gmel. , • Xanthornus Capitis Bonoe Spei, Briſſ. ,
and • The Olive Oriole, Lath.
This bird is repreſented Pl. Enl. No. 607, Fig. 2, under the name of the Carouge (Bonana) of the Cape of Good Hope. I had long ſuſ⯑pected that this bird, though brought from the Cape to Europe, was really not a native of Afri⯑ca; and the point is decided by the late arrival (October 1773) of a Bonana from Louiſiana, which is evidently of the ſame ſpecies, and dif⯑fers in nothing but in the colour of the throat, which in the latter is black, and orange in the former. I am convinced that we ought to en⯑tertain the ſame opinion of all the pretended Bonanas and Troupiales of the ancient conti⯑nent; and that we ſhall diſcover ſooner or later that they are either of a different ſpecies, or have derived their origin from America.
[221] The Olive Bonana of Louiſiana has much of the olive tinge in its plumage, eſpecially on the upper part of the body; but this colour is not uniform; it is tinctured with gray on the crown of the head, and with brown behind the neck, on the back, the ſhoulders, the wings, and the tail; with a light-brown on the rump and the origin of the tail; and with yellow on the flanks and the thighs, and the large coverts and quills of the wings, whoſe fundamental colour is brown, are edged with yellow. All the un⯑der-part of the body is yellow, except the throat, which is orange; the bill and the legs are of a cinereous brown.
This bird is nearly of the ſize of a houſe ſparrow; its length ſix or ſeven inches, its alar extent ten or eleven inches. The bill is near an inch long, and the tail more than two; it is ſquare, and conſiſts of twelve quills. The firſt quill is the ſhorteſt of the wing, and the third and fourth the longeſt*.
The KINK.
• Oriolus Sinenſis, Gmel. ,
and • The Kink Oriole, Lath.
[222]This new ſpecies, brought very lately from China, appears to reſemble ſo much the Bonana on the one hand, and the Blackbird on the other, that it may be regarded as the intermediate ſhade. The ſides of its bill are compreſſed as in the Blackbird, but not ſcalloped like thoſe of the Bonana; and Daubenton the younger has pro⯑perly given it a diſtinct name, as being really different from theſe two ſpecies, though it con⯑nects the common chain.
The Kink is ſmaller than our Blackbird: its head, its neck, origin of its back, and its breaſt, are of aſh-gray, and this colour acquires a deeper hue as it approaches the back; the reſt of the body, both above and below, is white, as alſo the coverts of the wings, whoſe quills are of a poliſhed ſteel-colour, gliſtening with reflexions that play between greeniſh and violet. The tail is ſhort, tapered, and parted by this ſame ſteel colour and white; ſo that on the two mid⯑quills, the white is only a ſmall ſpot at their ex⯑tremity; this white ſpot extends higher on the following quills, the farther they remove from the middle, and the ſteel colour retiring, is at laſt reduced on the two exterior quills to a ſmall ſpot near their origin.
The LORIOT *.
• Oriolus Galbula, Linn. and Gmel. , • Oriolus, Briſſ. , • Galbula, Ray, and Will. , • Turdus Luteus, Friſch. , • Turdus Aureus, Klein. , • The Witwall, Will. , • The Yellow-bird from Bengal, Alb. ,
and • The Golden Oriole, Penn. and Lath.
[][223]IT has been ſaid, that the young of this bird are excluded by degrees, and in detached parts, and that the firſt object of the parents is to col⯑lect and combine the ſcattered limbs, and, by virtue of a certain herb, to form them into an animated whole. The difficulty of this marvel⯑lous re-union hardly exceeds, perhaps, that of properly ſeparating the ancient names which the moderns have confuſedly applied to this ſpecies, [224] retaining thoſe which really belong to it, and referring the others to thoſe kinds which the ancients intended them to denote. I ſhall here obſerve only that, though this bird is diſperſed through a wide extent, there are certain coun⯑tries which it ſeems to avoid. It is not found in Sweden, in England, in the Bugey mountains, nor in the heights of Nantua, though it appears in Switzerland regularly twice a year. Belon ſays that he never ſaw it in Greece; and how can we ſuppoſe that Ariſtotle knew this bird, with⯑out being acquainted with the ſingular con⯑ſtruction of its neſt, or if he knew it, that he ſhould have omitted to take notice of it?
Pliny ſpeaks of the Chlorion *, from the account of Ariſtotle; but is not always attentive to com⯑pare the information which he borrows from the Greeks, with what he draws from other ſources. He has mentioned the Loriot by four different terms†, without acquainting us whether it is the ſame bird with the Chlorion.
[225] The Loriot is a roving bird, continually changing its abode; it lives with us only dur⯑ing the ſeaſon of love. It obeys the primary impulſes with ardour and fidelity. The union is formed on the arrival, about the middle of the ſpring. The pair build their neſt on lofty trees, but often at no conſiderable height; they form it with ſingular induſtry, and in a way very different from that of the Blackbird, though they have been referred to the ſame genus. They commonly faſten to the fork of a ſmall branch long ſtraws or hemp-ſtalks; ſome of which, extending directly acroſs, form the margin of the neſt; others penetrate through its texture; while others, bending under it, give ſolidity to the ſtructure. The neſt is thus pro⯑vided with an exterior cover, and the inner bed, prepared for receiving the eggs, is a matting of the ſmall ſtems of dog-graſs, the beards of which are ſo much concealed that the neſt has often been ſuppoſed to be lined with the roots of plants. The interſtices between the outer and inner caſe are filled with moſs, lichens, and other ſuch ſubſtances, which compact the whole. Af⯑ter the neſt is conſtructed, the female drops in it four or five eggs, the ground colour of which is a dirty white, and ſprinkled with ſmall diſ⯑tinct [226] ſpots of a brown, approaching to black, moſt numerous on the ſmall end. She ſits cloſely three weeks, and not only retains long her af⯑fection* to her young, but defends them againſt their enemies, and even againſt man, with more intrepidity than could be expected from ſo ſmall a bird. The parents have been ſeen to dart re⯑ſolutely upon the plunderers of their brood; and what is ſtill more remarkable, a mother, taken with her neſt, continued to hatch in the cage, and expired on her eggs.
After the young are reared, the family pre⯑pares for its journey. This commonly happens in the end of Auguſt, or the beginning of Sep⯑tember. They never aſſemble in numerous flocks, nor do the families remain united, for ſeldom are more than two or three found toge⯑ther. Though they fly rather heavily, flapping their wings like the Blackbird, they probably win⯑ter in Africa: for on the one hand, the Chevalier des Mazy, Commander of the Order of Malta, aſſures me, that they paſs that iſland in the month of September, and repaſs it in the ſpring; and on the other, Thevenot ſays, that they migrate into Egypt in the month of May, and return in September†. He adds, that in May they are very fat, and their fleſh good eating. Aldro⯑vandus is ſurpriſed that in France they are never brought to our tables.
[227] The Loriot is about as large as the Blackbird; its length nine or ten inches, its alar extent ſix⯑teen, its tail three and a half long, and its bill fourteen lines. The male is of a fine yellow over all the body, the neck, and head, except a black ſtreak which ſtretches from the eye to the corner of the aperture of the bill. The wings are black, except a few yellow ſpots, which ter⯑minate moſt of the great quills, and ſome of the coverts: the tail is divided by yellow and black, ſo that the black prevails on the part which ap⯑pears of the two mid-quills, and the yellow gra⯑dually exends over the lateral quills, beginning at the tips of thoſe which are next the two mid⯑dle ones. But the plumage is very different in the two ſexes. Almoſt all that was of a pure black in the male, is, in the female, of a brown, with a greeniſh tinge; and what was of a beau⯑tiful yellow in the former, is in the latter olive and pale brown:—olive on the head, and the upper part of the body dirty white, variegated with brown ſtreaks under the body, white at the tips of moſt of the wing-quills, and pale yellow at the extremity of their coverts; and there is no pure yellow, except at the end of the tail and on the lower coverts. I have beſides obſerved in a female, a ſmall ſpace behind the ear, with⯑out feathers, and of a light ſlate colour.
The young males reſemble the females with re⯑ſpect to plumage, and the more ſo the tenderer their age. At firſt they are ſtill more ſpeckled [228] than the female, and even on the upper part of the body; but in the month of Auguſt the yel⯑low begins to appear under the body. Their cry is different alſo from that of the old ones; they ſcream yo, yo, yo, ſucceeded ſometimes with a ſort of mewing like that of a cat*. But they have alſo a ſort of whiſtling, eſpecially before rain†; if this be not really the ſame with the mewing.
Their iris is red, the bill reddiſh brown, the inſide of the bill reddiſh, the edges of the lower mandible ſomewhat arched lengthwiſe, the tongue forked, and, as it were, jagged at the tip, the gizzard muſcular, terminating in a bag formed by the dilatation of the oeſophagus, the gall bladder green, the coeca very ſmall and ſhort, and the firſt phalanx of the outer toe glued to that of the middle toe.
When they arrive in the ſpring, they feed on caterpillars, worms, inſects, whatever in ſhort they can catch; but they are fondeſt of cherries, figs‡, the berries of the ſervice tree, peas, &c. A couple of theſe birds could in one day com⯑pletely plunder a rich cherry-tree; for they peck [229] the cherries one after another, and only eat the ripe part.
The Loriots are not eaſy to breed or tame. They can be caught by the call, placing limed twigs where they drink, and by various ſorts of nets.
Theſe birds have ſometimes ſpread from one end of the continent to another, without ſuffer⯑ing any alteration in their external form, or in their plumage; for Loriots have been ſeen in Bengal, and even in China, which were pre⯑ciſely like ours. But others have been brought from nearly the ſame countries, which had ſome differences in their colours, and which may be regarded, for the moſt part, as varieties of cli⯑mate, till accurate obſervations, of their in⯑ſtincts, their habits, and manner of life, throw light on our conjectures*.
VARIETIES of the LORIOT.
[230]I. The COULAVAN.
• Oriolus Chinenſis, Linn. and Gmel. ,
and • Oriolus Cochinenſis, Briſſ.
This bird is brought from Cochin-China: it is perhaps rather larger than our Loriot, its bill is alſo proportionably ſtronger; the colours of the plumage are preciſely the ſame, and every where diſtributed in a ſimilar manner, except on the coverts of the wings, which are entirely yellow, and on the head, where there is a ſort of black horſe-ſhoe, of which the convex part bounds the occiput, and its branches, paſſing be⯑low the eye, terminate in the corners of the opening of the bill. This is the moſt remark⯑able diſtinction of the Coulavan, and yet there is in the Loriot a black ſpot between the eye and the bill, which appears to be the rudiment of the horſe-ſhoe.
I have ſeen ſome ſpecimens of the Coulavan, in which the upper part of the body was of a brown yellow. In all, the bill is yellowiſh, and the legs black*.
II. The CHINESE LORIOT.
• Oriolus Melanocephalus, Gmel. , • Sturnus Luteolus, Linn. , • Oriolus Bengalenſis, Briſſ. ,
and • The Black-headed Indian Icterus, Edw.
[231]It is ſomewhat leſs than ours, but is of the ſame ſhape, proportions, and colours, though theſe are differently diſpoſed. The head, the throat, and the fore-part of the neck, are en⯑tirely black*, and in the tail there is no black, but a broad ſtripe, which croſſes the two inter⯑mediate quills near their extremity, and two ſpots placed very near the tips of the two fol⯑lowing quills. Moſt of the coverts of the wings are yellow, the others are parted with black and yellow; the largeſt quills are black where they are ſeen when the wings are cloſed, and the others are edged or tipt with yellow; all the reſt of the plumage is of the fineſt yellow.
The female is different†; for the front or the ſpace between the eye and the bill is of a vivid yellow, the throat and the fore-part of the [232] neck of a light yellowiſh caſt, with brown ſpec⯑kles; the reſt of the under-part of the body is of a deeper yellow, the upper of a ſhining yellow, all the wings variegated with brown and yel⯑low, the tail alſo yellow, except the two mid⯑quills, which are brown, marked with a yel⯑lowiſh ſpangle, and tipt with yellow.
III. The INDIAN LORIOT.
• Oriolus Galbula, var. 2. Gmel. , • Oriolus Indicus, Briſſ. ,
and • Chloris Indicus, Aldr.
It has more yellow than any of the Loriots, for it is entirely of that colour, except, 1. A horſe-ſhoe, which bends round the crown of the head, and terminates on each ſide in the corners of the bill. 2. Some longitudinal ſpots on the coverts of the wings. 3. A belt which croſſes the tail near the middle; the whole of an azure colour, but the bill and legs are of a glowing bright red.
IV. The STRIPED-HEADED ORIOLE.
• Le Loriot Rayé, Buff. , • Oriolus Radiatus, Gmel. , • Oriolus Capite ſtriato, Briſſ. ,
and • Merula Bicolor, Aldrov.
[233]This bird has been regarded by ſome as a Blackbird, by others as a Loriot: its true place ſeems to be between the Loriots and the Black⯑birds, and ſince its proportions are different from thoſe of either of theſe two ſpecies, I would conſider it as an intermediate or related ſpecies, rather than as a mere variety.
The radiated Loriot is not ſo large as a Black⯑bird, and of a more ſlender ſhape: its bill, tail, and legs, are ſhorter, but its toes longer; its head is brown, delicately radiated with white; its wing-quills are alſo brown, and edged with white; all the body is of a beautiful orange, deeper on the upper-part than on the lower; the bill and the nails are nearly of the ſame colour, and the legs are yellow.
The THRUSHES.
• Les Grives, Buff. ,
and • Turdi, Linn. &c.
[234]THE family of the Thruſhes is certainly much related to that of the Blackbirds*; but it would be improper, as ſeveral naturaliſts have done, to confound them together. The com⯑mon people appear to have acted more wiſely, who have applied different names to objects which are really diſtinct. Thoſe are termed Thruſhes, whoſe plumage is ſpeckled†, or marked with little ſtrokes, diſpoſed with a kind of regularity; on the contrary, thoſe are Black⯑birds whoſe plumage is uniform, or varied with large ſpots. We readily adopt this diſtinction, and reſerving the Blackbirds for a ſeparate ar⯑ticle, we ſhall treat of the Thruſhes in the pre⯑ſent. We ſhall diſtinguiſh four principal ſpecies in our own climate, and to them we ſhall refer, as uſual, their varieties and the foreign ſpecies moſt analogous.
The firſt ſpecies is the Throſtle, Pl. Enl. No. 406; and I conſider as varieties, the White-headed [235] Thruſh of Aldrovandus, the Creſted Thruſh of Schwenckfeld; and as foreign analo⯑gous ſpecies, the Guiana Thruſh, Pl. Enl. No. 398, fig. 1. and the Little American Thruſh, mentioned by Cateſby.
The ſecond ſpecies is the Miſſel, Pl. Enl. No. 489, which is the turdus viſcivorus of the an⯑cients, and to which I ſhall refer the White Miſſel as a variety.
The third ſpecies is the Fieldfare, Pl. Enl. No. 490; it is the turdus pilaris of the ancients. The varieties, the Spotted Fieldfare of Klein, and the White-headed Fieldfare of Briſſon. I reckon as the analogous foreign kinds, the Ca⯑rolina Fieldfare of Cateſby, which Briſſon makes his eighth ſpecies of Thruſhes, and the Canada Fieldfare of Cateſby, which Briſſon makes his ninth ſpecies.
The fourth ſpecies is the Red-Wing, Pl. Enl. No. 51, which is the turdus iliacus of the ancients.
Laſtly, I ſhall ſubjoin ſome foreign Thruſhes, which are too little known to be referred to their proper ſpecies: ſuch are the Green Barbary Thruſh of Doctor Shaw, and the Chineſe Hoami of Briſſon, which I ſhall admit into the Thruſhes, upon the authority of that naturaliſt, though it appears to me to differ from them in its plumage and in its ſhape.
Of the four principal ſpecies belonging to our climate, the two firſt, which are the Throſtle [236] and the Miſſel, reſemble each other. Both ap⯑pear to be leſs ſubject to the neceſſity of migra⯑tion, ſince they often breed in France, Germany, Italy, and in ſhort in thoſe countries where they paſs the winter. Both ſing delightfully, and they are of the ſmall number of birds whoſe warble is compoſed of a ſucceſſion of notes; and they both ſeem to be of an unſocial diſpoſition, for, according to ſome obſervers, they perform their journies alone. Friſch traces other ana⯑logies alſo between the colours of their plumage, and the order of their diſtribution, &c.
The two other ſpecies, viz. the Fieldfare and the Red-wing, are alſo analogous in ſome cir⯑cumſtances. They travel in numerous flocks, are more tranſitory, and ſeldom neſtle in our climates; for which reaſon they ſing very ſel⯑dom*, and their ſong is unknown not only to many naturaliſts, but even to moſt ſportſmen. It is rather a ſort of chirping, and when a ſcore meet on a poplar, they chatter all at once, mak⯑ing a very loud noiſe, which is far from being melodious.
Both ſexes of the Thruſh are nearly of the ſame ſize, and equally liable to change their plumage from one ſeaſon to another†. In all [237] of them the firſt phalanx of the outer toe is joined to that of the mid-toe, the edges of the bill ſcalloped near the tip. None of them ſubſiſts on ſeeds; whether becauſe it ſuits not their ap⯑petite, or that their bill and ſtomach are too weak to break and digeſt them. Berries are their chief food, and hence they have received the epithet of baccivorous. They alſo eat in⯑ſects, worms, &c. and it is in queſt of theſe that they come abroad after rain, rove in the fields, and ſcrape the ground, eſpecially the Miſſels and the Fieldfares. They make the ſame ſearch in winter in places of a warm aſpect where the ground is thawed.
Their fleſh is a delicate food, eſpecially that of the firſt and fourth ſpecies, which are the Throſtle and the Red-Wing: but the ancient Romans held it in ſtill higher eſtimation than we, and kept theſe birds the whole year in a ſort of voleries, which deſerve to be deſcribed*.
Each volery contained many thouſand Thruſhes and Blackbirds, not to mention other birds excellent for eating, ſuch as Ortolans, Quails, &c. So numerous were theſe voleries in the vicinity of Rome, and in the territory of the Sabines, that the dung of the Thruſhes was employed to manure the lands, and what is remarkable, to fatten oxen and hogs†.
[238] Theſe Thruſhes had leſs liberty in their vo⯑leries than our field pigeons in their dovecotes; for they were never ſuffered to go abroad, and they laid no eggs: but as they were ſupplied with abundance of choice food, they fattened to the great profit of the proprietor*. The vo⯑leries were a kind of vaulted courts, the inſide furniſhed with a number of rooſts. The door was very low, the windows were few, and placed in ſuch manner as to prevent the pri⯑ſoners from ſeeing the fields, the woods, the birds fluttering at liberty, or whatever might awaken their ſenſibility, and diſturb the calm ſo conducive to corpulence. A little glimmer⯑ing was ſufficient to direct them to their food; which conſiſted of millet, and a ſort of paſte made with bruiſed figs and flour. They had alſo given them the berries of the lentiſk, of the myrtle, of the ivy, and whatever in ſhort would improve the delicacy and flavour of their fleſh. They were ſupplied with a little ſtream of wa⯑ter, which ran in a gutter through the volery. Twenty days before they were intended for killing, their allowance was augmented; nay ſo far was the attention carried, that they gently removed into a little anti-chamber the Thruſhes [239] which were plump and in good order, to enjoy more quiet; and frequently to heighten the illuſion, they hung boughs and verdure imitat⯑ing the natural ſeenery; ſo that the birds might fancy themſelves in the midſt of the woods. In ſhort, they treated their ſlaves well, becauſe they knew their intereſt. Such as were newly caught, were put in ſmall ſeparate voleries along with others that had been accuſtomed to con⯑finement; and every contrivance, every ſooth⯑ing art, was employed to habituate them ſome⯑what to bondage; yet theſe were birds never completely tamed.
We can at preſent perceive ſome traces of the ancient practice, improved indeed by the ſkill of the moderns. It is common in certain provinces of France to hang pots in the tops of trees which are haunted by the Thruſhes; and theſe birds finding convenient ſheltered neſts, ſeldom fail to lay their eggs in them to hatch and rear their young*. This plan con⯑tributes doubly to the multiplication of the ſpe⯑cies; for it both preſerves the brood, and by ſaving the time ſpent in building neſts, it ena⯑bles them to make two hatches in the year†. When they find no pots, they conſtruct their [240] neſts in trees or even buſhes, and with great art; they cover the outſide with moſs, ſtraw, dried leaves, &c. but they line the inſide with a hard caſe formed of mud, compacted with ſtraws and ſmall roots. In this reſpect they differ from the Pies and Blackbirds, which lay their eggs on a ſoft mattreſs. Theſe neſts are hollow hemiſpheres about four inches in dia⯑meter. The colour of the eggs varies in the different ſpecies between blue and green, with ſome dull ſpots that are moſt frequent on the large end. Every ſpecies has alſo its peculiar ſong; and ſometimes they have even been taught to ſpeak*. But this muſt be under⯑ſtood chiefly of the Throſtle and the Miſſel, in which the organs of voice ſeem to be the moſt perfect.
It is ſaid that the Thruſhes ſwallow the ber⯑ries entire of the juniper, the miſletoe, the ivy, &c.†, and void them ſo little altered, that when they fall in a proper ſoil, they germi⯑nate and produce. But Aldrovandus affirms that, having made theſe birds ſwallow the grapes of the wild vine and the berries of the miſletoe, he could never diſcover in their ex⯑crements any of theſe that retained its form.
The Thruſhes have a ventricle more or leſs muſcular, no craw, nor even a dilatation of the [241] oeſophagus which may ſupply its place, and ſcarce any caecum; but all of them have a gall bladder, have the end of the tongue parted into two or three threads, and have eighteen quills in each wing, and twelve in the tail.
Theſe birds are ſad and melancholy, and as the natural conſequence of that diſpoſition, they are the more enamoured of liberty. They ſel⯑dom play or even fight together; ſtill leſs will they bend to domeſtic ſlavery. But their love of freedom is not equalled by their reſources for preſervation. Their oblique and tortuous flight is almoſt their only protection againſt the ſhot of the ſportſman, or the talons of the bird of prey*. If they reach a cloſe branchy tree, they remain ſtill through fear, and can hardly be beat out†. Thouſands of them are caught in ſnares; but the Throſtle and the Red-Wing are the two ſpecies which can the moſt eaſily be caught by the nooſe, and almoſt the only ones that can be taken by the call.
Theſe nooſes are nothing but two or three horſe-hairs twiſted together, and forming a run⯑ning knot. They are placed round the juni⯑pers or ſervice-trees in the neighbourhood of a fountain or a mere, and when the place is well choſen, and the ſprings properly ſet, ſeveral [242] hundred Thruſhes have been caught in a day in the ſpace of a hundred acres.
It is aſcertained from obſervations made in different countries, that when the Thruſhes ap⯑pear in Europe about the beginning of the au⯑tumn, they arrive from the countries of the north in company with thoſe numerous flocks of birds which, on the approach of winter, traverſe the Baltic ſea, and leave Lapland, Siberia, Livonia, Poland, and Pruſſia, for more temperate climates. So abundant are the Thruſhes then on the ſouthern ſhore of the Baltic, that, according to the computation of Klein, the ſingle city of Dantzic conſumes every year ninety thouſand pairs. It is equally certain that the ſurvivors which emigrate again after the rigors of winter, direct their courſe towards the north. But the different ſpecies arrive not all of them at the ſame time. In Burgundy, the Throſtle appears the firſt about the end of September, next the Red-Wing, and laſt of all, the Fieldfare and the Miſſel; but the latter ſpecies is much leſs nu⯑merous than the three others, which might be expected, ſince it is more diſperſed.
We muſt not ſuppoſe that all the ſpecies of Thruſhes paſs conſtantly in the ſame number; ſometimes they are very few, becauſe the ſeaſon has either been unfavourable to their multiplica⯑tion, or to their migration*; at other times they [243] are extremely numerous: and a very intelligent obſerver* has informed me, that he ſaw prodigi⯑ous clouds of Thruſhes, chiefly Red-Wings and Fieldfares, alight in the month of March at Brie, and cover an extent of ſeven or eight leagues. This appearance, which was unexampled, laſted near a month, and it was remarked that the cold had continued very long that winter†.
The ancients ſaid that the Thruſhes came every year into Italy from beyond ſeas about the autumnal equinox, and that they returned about the vernal equinox, and that in both paſſages‡ they aſſembled and reſted in the iſlets of Pontia, Palmaria, and Pandataria, which are nigh the Italian coaſts. They repoſe too in the iſland of Malta, where they arrive in October and November; the north-weſt wind brings ſome flocks, the ſouth or ſouth-weſt ſometimes beats them back. But they do not always ar⯑rive with certain winds, and their appearance depends oftener on the ſtate of the air than on its motion; for if, in calm weather, the ſky ſuddenly darkens with the preludes of a ſtorm, the ground is then covered with Thruſhes.
Nor does the iſland of Malta appear to limit the migration of the Thruſhes towards the [244] ſouth; for they are found in the interior parts of the African continent, from whence they an⯑nually paſs, it is ſaid, into Spain*.
Thoſe which remain in Europe ſpend the ſummer in the mountain foreſts: and on the approach of winter, they remove from the heart of the woods where the fruits and inſects begin to fail, and ſettle on the ſkirts of the adjacent plains. It is, no doubt, during this flitting that in the beginning of November ſo great a num⯑ber are caught in the foreſt of Compigne. It is uncommon, ſays Belon, to find the different ſpecies in numbers at the ſame time, and in the ſame place.
In all of them the edges of the upper man⯑dible are ſcalloped near the point, the inſide of the bill is yellow, its baſe has ſome black hairs or briſtles projecting forwards, the firſt phalanx of the outer-toe is joined to that of the middle⯑toe, the upper-part of the body is of a deeper brown, and the under lighter and ſpeckled; laſtly, in all, or in moſt of them, the tail is [245] nearly a third of the total length of the bird, which varies in the different ſpecies between eight and eleven inches, and is only two-thirds of the alar extent; the wings when cloſed reach as far as the middle of the tail, and the weight of the bird is between two ounces and a half and four and a half.
Klein aſſerts, he is well informed that Thruſhes are found alſo in the northern parts of India, but which differ from ours in not mi⯑grating.
The THROSTLE *.
• La Grive, Buff. , • Turdus Muſicus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Turdus Minor, Briſſ. , • Turdus in altiſſimis, Klein. ,
and • The Mavis, Throſtle, or Song-Thruſh, Will.
[246]THIS ſpecies, in the French language, gives name to the whole genus. I have there⯑fore ranged it in the firſt place, though in point of ſize it occupies only the third. It is very common in ſome parts of Burgundy, and called by the country people The Little Thruſh †, or Little Red-Wing ‡. It commonly arrives every year about the time of vintage, probably at⯑tracted by the maturity of the grapes; and hence undoubtedly it has received the name of Vine-Thruſh. It diſappears during the froſts, and again makes a tranſient viſit in the months of March or April before its migration in May. On the departure of the flock, they always leave a few ſtragglers behind, which are either un⯑able to follow the main body, or, yielding to [247] the mild influence of ſpring, ſtop and breed in the foreſts that occur in their route*. This is the reaſon why ſome Throſtles conſtantly re⯑main in our woods, where they build their neſt on the wild apple and pear-trees, and even in junipers and in the buſhes, as has been obſerved in Sileſia† and in England‡. Sometimes they fix it in the trunk of a thick tree ten or twelve feet high, and prefer, for the materials, wood rotten and worm-eaten.
They generally pair about the end of winter, and form laſting unions. They make two hatches in the year, and ſometimes a third, when their former have not ſucceeded. The firſt laying conſiſts of five or ſix eggs, of a deep blue with black ſpots, moſt frequent at the large end; and in the ſubſequent hatches the number regularly diminiſhes. It is difficult in this ſpe⯑cies to ſeparate the males from the females; their ſize being the ſame in both ſexes, and the co⯑lours of their plumage, as I have ſaid, ſubject to vary. Aldrovandus ſaw, and cauſed to be de⯑lineated, three of theſe birds, caught in different [248] ſeaſons; all which differed in the colours of their bill, of their legs, and of their feathers: in one of them the ſtreaks on the breaſt were hardly perceptible. Friſch aſſerts, however, that the old males have a white ray above the eyes, and Linnaeus makes theſe white eyelids one of the characters of the ſpecies. Almoſt all the other naturaliſts agree, that the young males can hardly be diſtinguiſhed but by their early inclination to chant: for the Throſtle ſings de⯑lightfully, eſpecially in the ſpring*, whoſe re⯑turn it announces; and as it breeds ſeveral times in the year, it enjoys a ſucceſſion of the vernal pleaſures, and may be ſaid to warble three-fourths of the year. It ſits whole hours on the top of a tall tree, ſtraining its delicate throat. Its warbling conſiſts of ſeveral different couplets, like that of the Miſſel, but ſtill more varied and more charming; which has obtained for it in many countries the denomination of the Singing Thruſh. The ſong is undoubtedly in⯑tended to attract the female; for even the imperfect imitation of it will produce that effect.
Each brood follows ſeparately their parents; ſometimes ſeveral of theſe chancing to meet in the ſame wood, would induce us to think that [249] they aſſociate in numerous flocks*; but their union is fortuitous and momentary; the fami⯑lies ſoon ſeparate, and even the individuals diſ⯑perſe after they are able to provide ſingly their ſubſiſtence†.
Theſe birds are found in Italy, France, Lor⯑raine, England, Scotland, Sweden, where they haunt the foreſts which abound with maples‡. They migrate from Sweden into Poland fifteen days before and after the feſtival of St. Michael, when the weather is warm and calm.
Though the Throſtle is quick-ſighted, and very alert to avoid its declared enemies, and to eſcape from manifeſt dangers; it has at bottom but little cunning, and is quite unguarded againſt concealed ſtratagems: it is eaſily caught either by the call or the gin, though leſs ſo than the Red-Wing. In ſome parts of Poland, ſuch numbers are taken that ſmall barks are loaded with them for exportation§. It is a bird that delights in woods, and in ſuch places the ſnares may be laid with ſucceſs. It ſeldom is met with in the plains, and even when it viſits the vines it conſtantly retires into the neighbouring copſes in the evening, and during the heat of the day; [250] ſo that to ſucceed in catching the Throſtle, we ought to chooſe the proper time; its departure in the morning, and its return in the evening, or the mid-day, when the ſun's rays are moſt oppreſſive. Sometimes they are intoxicated with eating ripe grapes, and then they fall an eaſy prey.
Willughby informs us, that this ſpecies breeds in England, and reſides there the whole year; and he adds, that its fleſh is excellent, but par⯑takes of the quality of its food. Our Throſtle ſubſiſts in autumn on cheſnuts, beech-maſt, grapes, figs, ivy-berries, juniper-berries, the fruit of the ſervice-tree, and ſuch like aliments. We are not ſo certain what it lives upon in the ſpring. In that ſeaſon it commonly appears on the ground in the woods, in wet places, and among the buſhes which ſkirt the flooded mea⯑dows, where it may be ſuppoſed to ſearch for earth-worms, ſnails, &c. If an intenſe vernal froſt happens, the Throſtles, inſtead of flying to milder climates, retire to the ſprings, and languiſh and pine; and a continuance of this ſevere weather will deſtroy many of them. This would ſeem to ſhew, that cold is not the ſole cauſe of their migrations, but that they have a certain circuit to deſcribe annually in a given time. It is ſaid that pomegranates prove a poiſon to them. In Bugey, the neſts of the Throſtles are much ſought after, or rather [251] their young, which are dreſſed into delicate diſhes.
I ſhould ſuppoſe that this ſpecies was un⯑known to the ancients; for Ariſtotle reckons only three kinds*, which are all different from the preſent, and of which we ſhall treat in the following articles. Nor can we imagine that Pliny meant this when he ſpeaks of a new ſpe⯑cies which appeared in Italy in the time of the war between Otho and Vitellius; for that bird was almoſt as large as a Pigeon†, and therefore four times the ſize of the Throſtle, which weighs only three ounces.
I have obſerved in a Throſtle which lived ſome time with me, that when it was angry it cracked and ſnapped with its bill; its upper mandible was alſo moveable, though much leſs than the lower; alſo its tail was ſomewhat forked, which is not very evident from the figure‡.
VARIETIES of the THROSTLE.
[252]1. The WHITE THROSTLE. The ſole difference conſiſts in the whiteneſs of its plum⯑age; a quality which, though commonly aſcribed to the influence of the northern cli⯑mates, may be produced by accidental cauſes in the more temperate countries, as we have remarked in the hiſtory of the Raven: but this colour is not ſpread over the whole body, nor is it pure. The breaſt and neck are marked with the ſpeckles peculiar to the Thruſhes, though far more dilute and faint; the back is ſhaded with a mixture of brown, and the breaſt tinged with rufous, as in thoſe figured by Friſch, pl. 33, but without any deſcription. Sometimes none of the upper part of the body, except the head, is white, as in that deſcribed by Aldrovandus; at other times the lower part of the neck only is marked by a white-croſs-bar, like a half col⯑lar; and, in different individuals, this colour certainly mingles variouſly with thoſe proper to the ſpecies.—But diſtinctions of that ſort can⯑not form even permanent varieties.
II. The CRESTED THRUSH, mentioned by Schwenckfeld, muſt alſo be regarded as a variety of this ſpecies; not only becauſe it is of the ſame ſize, and its plumage ſimilar, ex⯑cept [253] a whitiſh tuft, formed like that of the Creſted Lark, and alſo its collar white, but be⯑cauſe it is very rare. It may be even ſaid, that hitherto it is unique, ſince Schwenckfeld is the only perſon who has ſeen it, and that only once when it was caught in 1599 in the foreſts of the Dutchy of Lignitz.—It may be proper to mention, that theſe birds have ſometimes a creſt formed in drying, from the contraction of cer⯑tain muſcles of the ſkin which cover the head.
FOREIGN BIRDS, THAT ARE RELATED TO THE THROSTLE.
[254]I. The GUIANA THRUSH.
• La Grive de la Guyane, Buff. ,
and • Turdus Guianenſis, Gmel.
THE coloured figure conveys nearly all the information which we poſſeſs with regard to this little bird. Its tail is longer, and its wings proportionably ſhorter than in the Throſtle; but its colours are nearly the ſame, only the ſpeckles are ſpread as far as the laſt of the infe⯑rior coverts of the tail.
As the Throſtle viſits the countries of the north, and is beſides very fond of changing its reſidence, it may have thence migrated into North America, and penetrated towards the ſouth, where it would experience the alterations produced by the difference of climate and of food*.
II. The LITTLE THRUSH.
• La Grivette d'Amerique, Buff. , • Turdus Minor, Gmel. , • Turdus Iliacus Carolinenſis, Briſſ. , • Turdus Minimus, Klein. ,
and • Merula Tuſca, Sloane.
[255]This birds occurs not only in Canada, but in Pennſylvania, Carolina, and as far as Jamaica: it ſpends only the ſummer in the northern pro⯑vinces; though in the milder regions of the ſouth it reſides the whole year. In Carolina it haunts the thickeſt woods contiguous to the ſwamps; but in the hotter climate of Jamaica it retires to the foreſts that cover the moun⯑tains.
The ſpecimens deſcribed or figured by natu⯑raliſts differ in the colours of their feathers, of their bill, and of their legs; which would imply (if they all belong to the ſame ſpecies), that the plumage of the American Throſtles is no leſs variable than thoſe of Europe, and that they all ſpring from a common ſtem. This conjecture derives force from the numerous analogies which this bird has to the Thruſhes, in its ſhape, in its port, in its propenſity to migrate, and to feed upon berries, in the yellow colour of its internal parts, obſerved by Sloane, and in the ſpeckles [256] which appear on its breaſt; but it ſeems the moſt nearly related to our Throſtle and Red-Wing, and a compariſon of the points of ſimi⯑larity is neceſſary to determine the ſpecies to which it belongs.
This bird is ſmaller than any of our Thruſhes, as in general are all the birds of America, if compared with their archetypes in the old con⯑tinent. Like the Red-Wing, it does not ſing, and has fewer ſpeckles than that ſpecies, and there⯑fore than any of the genus; like the Red-Wing alſo, its fleſh is delicate.—So far the American Thruſh reſembles the Red-Wing, but it has more numerous relations to our Throſtle; and, in my opinion, more deciſive ones. It has beards round the bill, a ſort of yellowiſh plate on the breaſt; it readily ſettles and remains in a coun⯑try which affords it ſubſiſtence; its cry is like the winter-notes of the Throſtle, and therefore un⯑pleaſant, as generally are the cries of all birds that live in wild countries inhabited by ſavages. Beſides, the Throſtle, and not the Red-Wing, is found in Sweden, whence it could eaſily mi⯑grate into America.
This Throſtle arrives in Pennſylvania in the month of May; it continues there the whole of the ſummer, during which time it hatches and raiſes its young. Cateſby tells us, that few of theſe Throſtles are ſeen in Carolina, whether becauſe a part only ſettle of what arrive, or that, as we have already obſerved, they conceal them⯑ſelves [257] in the woods. They ſubſiſt on the berries of the holly, of the white-thorn, &c.
In the ſpecimens deſcribed by Sloane, the noſtrils were wider, and the feet longer than in thoſe deſcribed by Cateſby and Briſſon. Nor was their plumage the ſame; and if theſe dif⯑ferences were conſtant, we ſhould have reaſon to conclude that they belong to another family, or at leaſt are a permanent variety of this ſpecies. A
III. The REED THRUSH *.
• La Rouſſerole, Buff. , • Turdus Arundinaceus, Linn. Gmel. and Briſſ. ,
and • Junco, Geſner, Aldrov. Ray, and Will.
[][257]This bird has been called the River Night⯑ingale, becauſe the male chants night and [258] day, while the female is employed in hatching, and becauſe it haunts wet places. But though its ſong has a greater extent, it is far from be⯑ing ſo pleaſant as that of the Nightingale. It is commonly accompanied with a very briſk mo⯑tion, and a trembling of the whole body. The bird climbs like the Creepers along the reeds and the low willows in ſearch of inſects, which conſtitute its food.
The habit of this bird in frequenting the marſhes would ſeem to exclude it from the family of the Thruſhes; but it reſembles them ſo much in its external form, that Klein, who ſaw one almoſt alive, ſince it was killed in his preſence, doubts whether it could be referred to another genus. He informs us, that theſe birds inhabit the iſlands in the mouth of the Viſtula, and make their neſt on the ground along the ſides of the little hillocks covered with moſs*. He ſuſpects that they paſs the winter in the denſe marſhy foreſts†; and he adds, that the upper-part of their body is a rufous brown, the lower of a dirty white, with ſome aſh ſpots; the [259] bill black, the inſide of the mouth orange, as in the Thruſhes, and the legs lead-coloured.
An intelligent obſerver has aſſured me that he was acquainted in Brie with a ſmall bird of this kind, and vulgarly called Effarvatte, which alſo prattles continually, and lodges among the reeds like the other. This recon⯑ciles the oppoſite opinions of Klein and Briſſon with regard to the ſize of the Reed-Thruſh; the former maintaining that it is as large as a Throſtle, the latter that it does not exceed the Lark. It flies heavily, and flaps with its wings; the feathers on its head are longer than the reſt, and form an indiſtinct creſt.
Sonnerat brought from the Philippines a true Reed-Thruſh, exactly ſimilar to that of No. 513*.
IV. The MISSEL THRUSH *.
• La Drains, Buff. , • Turdus Viſcivorus, Linn. Gmel. Geſner, Aldrov. &c. , • Turdus Major, Briſſ. , • Turdus Viſcivorus Major, Ray. , • The Miſeltoe-Thruſh, or Shreitch, Charl. ,
and • The Miſſel-Bird, or Shrite, Will.
[260]The Miſſel weighs five ounces, and is diſtin⯑guiſhed by its magnitude from all the other Thruſhes: but it is far from being ſo large as a Magpie, which Ariſtotle is made to aſſert†; an error probably of the copyiſt; or perhaps it attains to a greater ſize in Greece than with us.
The Greeks and Romans conſidered the Thruſhes as birds of paſſage‡, not excepting the Miſſel, with which they were perfectly ac⯑quainted under the name of viſcivorous Thruſh, or feeder on miſletoe-berries §.
[][261] In Burgundy, the Miſſels arrive in flocks about the months of September and October, coming moſt probably from the mountains of Lorraine*. Part of them purſue their journey, and depart always in numerous bodies in the beginning of winter, while the reſt remain till the month of March; for ſome of them always continue during the ſummer both in Burgundy, and in other provinces of France, of Germany, of Poland†, &c. In Italy alſo, and in Eng⯑land, ſo many neſtle that Aldrovandus ſaw the new brood ſold in the markets; and Albin re⯑gards the Miſſels as not birds of paſſage‡. Thoſe [262] which remain lay and hatch ſucceſsfully. They build their neſts, ſometimes in trees of a mid⯑dling height, and ſometimes on the top of ſuch as are extremely tall, but always prefer thoſe which are moſt covered with moſs. They con⯑ſtruct both the inſide and outſide with herbage, leaves, and moſs, eſpecially the white moſs; and their neſt reſembles more that of the Blackbird than of the other Thruſhes, except its being lined with bedding. They lay four or five gray-ſpotted eggs; they feed their young with caterpillars, worms, ſlugs, and even ſnails, the ſhell of which they break. The parents eat all ſorts of berries during the ſummer, cherries, grapes, olives, the fruits of the cornel and the ſervice-trees; and in winter they ſubſiſt upon the berries of the juniper, of the holly, of the ivy, of the buck-thorn; upon beech-maſt, ſloes, fennel, and, above all, upon miſletoe berries. When diſturbed they cry tré, tré, tré; hence their name in the dialect of Burgundy draine and even ſome of the Engliſh names. In the ſpring the females have no other notes; but the males, ſitting on the tops of the trees, ſing charmingly, and their warble conſiſts of dif⯑ferent airs that form a conſtantly varied ſuc⯑ceſſion. In winter they are no longer heard. The male differs not in external appearance from the female, except that he has more black in his plumage.
[263] Theſe birds are of a gentle pacific temper; they never fight with one another, but yet are anxious for their own ſafety. They are more cautious even than the Blackbirds, which are generally reckoned very ſhy and timorous; for theſe are ſometimes decoyed by the call, while the Miſſels reſiſt the allurement. They are, how⯑ever, caught ſometimes in gins, though leſs fre⯑quently than the Throſtles or Red-Wings.
Belon aſſerts, that the fleſh of the Miſſel, which he calls the Great Thruſh, is of a ſupe⯑rior flavour to that of the other ſpecies; but this is contrary to the account of all other natural⯑iſts, and to my own experience. Our Miſſels live not indeed upon olives, nor our ſmall Throſ⯑tles upon miſletoe-berries, as thoſe of which he ſpeaks; and it is well known how much the dif⯑ference of food affects the quality of game*.
VARIETY of the MISSEL THRUSH.
[264]The only variety I find in this ſpecies is the Whitiſh Miſſel noticed by Aldrovandus. The quills of its tail and wings were of a light and almoſt whitiſh colour, the head and all the up⯑per-part of the body cinereous.
We may remark in this variety the alteration of the colour of the quills, of the wings, and of the tail, which are commonly ſuppoſed to be the leaſt liable to change, and as being of a deeper dye than the other feathers.
I may add that there are always ſome Miſſels which breed in the Royal Garden on the leaf⯑leſs trees; they ſeem to be very fond of yew berries, and eat ſo plentifully of them that their excrements are red; they are alſo attached to the fruit of the lote.
In Provence the people have a ſort of call with which they imitate the vernal ſong of the Miſſel Thruſh and of the Throſtle. The perſon con⯑ceals himſelf in a green arbour, from which he can ſee through a loop-hole a pole, which he has faſtened to a neighbouring tree; the Thruſhes are invited by the call, and ex⯑pecting to meet with their companions, alight on the pole, and fall by the ſhot of the fowler.
The FIELDFARE *.
• La Litorne, Buff. , • Turdus Pilaris, Linn. Gmel. Geſner, and Aldrov. ,
and • Turdus Pilaris, ſeu Turdela, Briſſ.
[265]THIS Thruſh is the largeſt after the Miſſel; and like it can hardly be decoyed by the call, but may be caught by a nooſe. It differs from the other Thruſhes by the yellow colour of its bill, the deeper brown of its legs, and the cinereous ſometimes variegated with black, which ſpreads over its head, behind its neck, and upon its rump.
The male and female have the ſame cry, which will equally attract the wild Fieldfares in the ſeaſon of migration†. But the female is diſtinguiſhed from the male by the colour of her bill, which is much duller. Theſe birds, which breed in Poland and Lower Auſtria‡, never neſtle in France. They arrive in flocks with the Red-Wing about the beginning of De⯑cember, and make a loud noiſe as they fly§. [266] They haunt the unploughed fields which are interſperſed with juniper buſhes, and when they appear again in the ſpring*, they prefer the wet meadows. In general they inhabit the woods much leſs than the two preceding ſpecies. Some⯑times they make an early but tranſient appear⯑ance when the ſervices are ripe, of which they are very fond, though they nevertheleſs return at the uſual time.
It is not an uncommon thing to ſee the Fieldfares aſſemble to the number of two or three thouſand in a ſpot where there are ripe ſervices, which they devour with ſuch voracity, that they throw half of them on the ground. After rains they frequently run along the ditches in ſearch of worms and ſlugs. In the time of hard froſts, they live upon the haws of the white-thorn, the berries of the miſletoe, and thoſe of other plants†.
We may infer then that the Fieldfares are of a much more ſocial diſpoſition than the Throſ⯑tles or the Miſſels. They ſometimes go ſingle, but for the moſt part they form, as I have al⯑ready remarked, very numerous flocks, fly in a body, and ſpread through the meadows in ſearch of food, never loſing ſight of their ſociety. They all collect together upon the ſame tree at certain hours of the day, or when at any time [267] they are alarmed at the near approach of a perſon.
Linnaeus mentions a Fieldfare, which was bred in the houſe of a wine-merchant, and be⯑came ſo familiar that it would run along the ta⯑ble and drink the wine out of the glaſſes; it drank ſo much that it grew bald, but being ſhut up in its cage and denied wine, it recovered its plumage*. This little anecdote preſents two remarkable facts; the effect of wine upon the feathers of a bird, and the inſtance of a tame Fieldfare, which is very uncommon; for the Thruſhes cannot be, as I have before ſaid, eaſily domeſticated.
The Fieldfares are the more numerous in pro⯑portion to the ſeverity of the weather; they ſeem to be even a ſign of its continuance, for the fowlers and thoſe who live in the country judge that the winter is not over as long as the Fieldfares are heard. They retire in ſummer into the northern countries, where they breed and find abundance of junipers. Friſch aſcribes to this ſort of food the excellent quality he diſ⯑covered in their fleſh. I own that there is no diſputing about taſtes, but I muſt ſay that in Bur⯑gundy this Thruſh is reckoned very indifferent eating, and that in general the flavour commu⯑nicated by juniper is always ſomewhat bitter. Others aſſert that the fleſh of the Fieldfares is [268] never better or more ſucculent than when it feeds on worms and inſects.
The Fieldfare was known by the ancients un⯑der the name of Turdus Pilaris; not becauſe it has been always caught with a nooſe, as Salerne ſays, a quality which would not have diſtin⯑guiſhed it from the other Thruſhes, but becauſe the hairs or black briſtles round its bill, which project forwards, are longer in this ſpecies than in the Throſtle or the Miſſel. We may add, that its claws are very ſtrong, as remarked in the Britiſh Zoology. Friſch relates, that if the young of the Miſſel be put in a Fieldfare's neſt, it will feed and educate them as its own; but I would not thence infer, as Friſch has done, that we might expect to obtain an hybridous race; for no perſon ſurely looks for a new breed be⯑tween the hen and the drake, though the hen often rears whole hatches of ducklings. A
VARIETY of the FIELDFARE.
[269]The PIED or SPOTTED FIELDFARE. It is variegated with white, black, and many other colours, ſo diſtributed that except the head and the neck, which are white ſpotted with black, and the tail, which is entirely black, the duſky hues, interſperſed with white ſpots, prevail on the upper-part of the body; and, on the con⯑trary, the light colours, eſpecially the white, are ſpread over the lower-part marked with black ſpeckles, moſt of which are ſhaped like ſmall creſcents. This Fieldfare is of the ordinary ſize.
We ought to refer to this the White-headed Fieldfare of Briſſon. It has no black ſpeckles, and as its white is what alone diſtinguiſhes it from the common Fieldfare, we may conſider it as intermediate between that and the Spotted Fieldfare. It is even natural to ſuppoſe that the change of plumage would begin at the head, ſince the colour of that part varies in different individuals.
FOREIGN BIRDS, WHICH ARE RELATED TO THE FIELDFARE.
[270]I. The CAYENNE FIELDFARE.
• Turdus Cayanenſis, Gmel. ,
and • The Cayenne Thruſh, Lath.
IREFER this Thruſh to the Fieldfare, becauſe it appears to be more cloſely related to that ſpecies than to any other, by the colour of the upper-part of its body and of its legs. It differs in many reſpects from the whole genus: its breaſt and the under-part of its body are not ſo diſtinctly dappled; its plumage is more exten⯑ſively variegated, though in a different manner, almoſt all the feathers of the upper and under⯑ſide of the body being edged with a lighter co⯑lour, which marks nicely their ſhape; and laſtly, the lower mandible is ſcalloped near the point;—and theſe differences are ſufficient to conſtitute it a diſtinct ſpecies, till we are better acquainted with its habits and diſpoſitions*.
II. The CANADA FIELDFARE.
• Turdus Migratorius, Linn. Gmel. and Klein. , • Turdus Canadenſis, Briſſ. , • The Fieldfare of Carolina, Cateſby. ,
and • The Red-breaſted Thruſh, Penn. and Lath.
[271]Fieldfare is the name which Cateſby applies to the Thruſh deſcribed and figured in his Na⯑tural Hiſtory of Carolina; and I adopt it the more readily, ſince that ſpecies ſpends at leaſt a part of the year in Sweden, and could thence migrate into the New World, and produce other varieties. In the Canada Fieldfare the orbits are white, there is a ſpot of the ſame colour between the eye and the bill, the upper-part of the body is brown, the under orange before, and varie⯑gated behind with dirty white and ruſty brown, ſhaded with a greeniſh tinge; there are alſo ſome ſpeckles under its throat, whoſe ground colour is white. In winter it advances in numerous flocks from the northern parts of America to Virginia and Carolina, and returns in the ſpring. It reſembles our Fieldfare in this circumſtance, but it ſings better*. Cateſby ſays that it has a [272] ſharp note like the Guy Thruſh or Miſſel. He alſo tells us that one of theſe Canada Field-fares having diſcovered the firſt privet that was planted in Virginia, took ſo great a liking to the fruit, that it remained all the ſummer. Cateſby was informed that theſe birds breed in Maryland, where they remain the whole year. A
III. The RED-WING *.
• Le Mauvis, Buff. , • Turdus Iliacus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Turdus Minor, Geſner. , • Turdus Illas, ſeu Tylas, Aldrov. ,
and • The Red-Wing, Swinepipe, or Wind Thruſh, Will.
[273]This ſmall Thruſh is the moſt uſeful of them all, ſince it is the beſt to eat, eſpecially in Bur⯑gundy, where its fleſh is delicious†. Beſides, it is oftener caught in the nooſe than any other, and is therefore the moſt valuable ſpecies both for its quantity and its quality‡. It generally appears the ſecond, that is, after the Throſtle and before the Fieldfare; and it arrives in large bodies in November, and departs before Chriſt⯑mas. It breeds in the woods near Dantzic§, [274] but ſeldom or never ſettles in our provinces, or in Lorraine, where it arrives in April, and re⯑tires about the end of the ſame month, and ap⯑pears not again till autumn; though that coun⯑try affords abundance of proper food in its vaſt foreſts. It halts there a certain time at leaſt, and does not, as Friſch aſſerts, remove merely into ſome parts of Germany. Its common food is berries and ſmall worms, which it finds by ſcraping the ground. It is diſtinguiſhed from the other Thruſhes, by its feathers being more gloſſy and ſhining, its bill and eyes of a deeper black than the Throſtle, whoſe ſize it approaches, and by its having fewer ſpeckles on the breaſt. It is alſo remarkable for the orange colour under its wing, a circumſtance which has occaſioned its being called in ſeveral languages, Red-winged Thruſh.
Its ordinary cry is tan, tan, kan, kan; and when it perceives a fox, its natural enemy, it leads him off to a great diſtance; as do alſo the Blackbirds, repeating always the ſame notes. Moſt naturaliſts remark that it never ſings; but this aſſertion needs to be qualified, and we can only ſay that it is ſeldom heard to ſing in countries where it does not appear in the ſeaſon of love, as in France, England, &c. An excellent ob⯑ſerver, M. Hebert, has informed me, that he has witneſſed its chanting in the ſpring in Brie; twelve or fifteen of them ſat on a tree and war⯑bled like linnets. Another obſerver, who lives [275] in the ſouth of Provence, tells me, that the Red-Wing only whiſtles, which it does inceſſantly; we may infer, therefore, that it does not breed in that country.
Ariſtotle mentions it by the name of Ilian Thruſh, as being the ſmalleſt and the leaſt ſpot⯑ted of the Thruſhes*. This epithet ſeems to imply that it was brought into Greece from the coaſts of Aſia, where once ſtood Ilium, the city of Troy.
I have traced an analogy between this ſpecies and the Fieldfare. They are both foreign, and only viſit our climate twice a year†; they aſ⯑ſemble in numerous flocks at certain hours to chirp together; they are ſimilarly marked with ſpeckles on the breaſt. But the Red-Wing is alſo related to the Throſtle; its fleſh is not in⯑ferior in quality, the under-ſurface of its wing is yellow, but more lively indeed, and of an orange tinge; it often occurs ſingle in the woods, and viſits the vineyards, like the Throſ⯑tle, with which Lottinger has obſerved it often to fly in company, eſpecially in the ſpring. From the whole it appears that this ſpecies is furniſhed with the means of ſubſiſting of the other two, [276] and that in many reſpects it may be regarded as forming the ſhade between the Throſtle and the Fieldfare. A
FOREIGN BIRDS, WHICH ARE RELATED TO THE THRUSHES AND BLACKBIRDS.
[277]I. The BARBARY THRUSH *.
• La Grive Baſſette de Barbarie, Buff. , • Turdus Barbaricus, Gmel. ,
and • The Greek Thruſh, Shaw.
IT reſembles the Thruſhes in its general ſhape, in its bill, and the ſtreaks on its breaſt diſperſed regularly upon a white ground; in ſhort, by all the exterior characters, except its legs and its wings. Its legs are not only ſhorter, but ſtrong⯑er; in which it is oppoſite to the Hoamy, and ſeems to reſemble ſomewhat our Miſſel, which has its legs ſhorter in proportion than the other three ſpecies. With regard to the plum⯑age, it is extremely beautiful: the prevailing colour on the upper-part of the body, including the head and the tail, is a light brilliant green, and the rump is tinged with a fine yellow, as alſo the extremity of the coverts of the tail and [278] of the wings, of which the quills are of a leſs vivid colour. But this enumeration of the co⯑lours, were it even more complete, will by no means give a juſt idea of the effect which they produce in the bird itſelf; a pencil, and not words, can exhibit its beauty. Dr. Shaw, who ſaw this Thruſh in its native country, compares its plumage to that of the richeſt birds of Ame⯑rica; he adds, that it is not very common, and appears only in the ſeaſon when the figs are ripe. This would ſhew that theſe fruits direct its mi⯑gration, and in this ſingle fact I perceive two analogies betweeen this bird and the Thruſhes; both birds of paſſage, and both exceſſively fond of figs*.
II. The RED-LEGGED THRUSH.
• Le Tilly, ou La Grive Cendree d'Amerique, Buff. , • Turdus Plumbeus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Merula Americana Cinerea, Briſſ. , • Turdus Thilius, Molin. ,
and • Merula Tilli, Feuillée.
All the upper-part of the body of this bird, its head and neck, are of a deep aſh-colour; [279] which extends over the ſmall coverts of the wings, and, paſſing under the body, riſes on the one hand as far as the throat, without ſuf⯑fering any change; and, on the other, deſcends to the lower belly, ſhading however gradually into white, which is alſo the colour of the co⯑verts under the tail. The throat too is white, but dappled with black; the quills and the great coverts of the wings are blackiſh, and edged ex⯑teriorly with cinereous. The twelve quills of the tail are tapered and blackiſh, like thoſe of the wing, but the three outer ones on each ſide are terminated by a white ſpot, which is the larger, the nearer it is to the margin. The iris, the orbits, the bill, and the legs, are red; the ſpace between the eye and the bill black, and the palate tinged with a vivid orange.
The total length is about ten inches; its alar extent near fourteen, its tail four, its leg eighteen lines, its bill twelve, its weight two ounces and a half; laſtly, its wings when cloſed do not reach the middle of the tail.
This bird is ſubject to variety; for in the one obſerved by Cateſby, the bill and throat were black. May we not aſcribe this difference of colours to ſex? Cateſby only ſays that the male is a third ſmaller than the female; he adds, that theſe birds feed on the berries of the tree which produces gum elemi.
[280] It is found in Carolina, and, according to Briſſon, it is very common in the iſlands of Andros and Ilathera.
III. The SMALL THRUSH of the Philippines.
• Turdus Philippenſis, Gmel. ,
and • The Philippine Thruſh, Lath.
We owe this to Sonnerat. The fore-part of its neck and breaſt are dappled with white upon a rufous ground; the reſt of the lower-part of the body is dirty white, bordering on yellow, and the upper-part of the body is of a deep brown, with an olive tinge.
The ſize of this bird is inferior to that of the Red-Wing; we cannot aſcertain its alar extent, ſince the wing-quills in the ſpecimen which we have obſerved are incomplete.
IV. The HOAMY of China.
• Turdus Sinenſis, Linn. and Gmel. ,
and • The Chineſe Thruſh, Lath.
Briſſon is the firſt who has deſcribed this bird, or rather the female of it. This female is ſome⯑what [281] ſmaller than a Red-Wing, which it re⯑ſembles as well as the Throſtle, and ſtill more the Canada Thruſh, its legs being proportion⯑ably longer than in the other Thruſhes; they are yellowiſh, as is the bill; the upper-part of the body is of a brown, bordering upon refous, the under of a light and uniform rufous; the head and neck are ſtriped longitudinally with brown; the tail is alſo of the ſame colour, only barred tranſverſely.
Such is nearly the deſcription of the external appearance of this bird; but we are not in⯑formed with regard to its inſtincts and habits. If it be really a Thruſh, as it is ſaid, its breaſt is like that of the Red Thruſh, not dappled.
V. The LITTLE THRUSH of St. Domingo.
This Thruſh is, in point of ſmallneſs, like the American Thruſh; its head is ornamented with a ſort of crown or cap of bright orange, ver⯑ging upon red.
The ſpecimen figured by Edwards, Pl. 252, differs from ours in not being dappled under the belly. It was caught in November 1751, at ſea, eight or ten leagues off the iſland of St. Domingo; which led Edwards to ſuppoſe that it was one of thoſe birds of paſſage which every [282] year leave the continent of North America on the approach of winter, and depart from the Cape of Florida in queſt of milder ſeaſons. This conjecture was verified. Bartram informed Ed⯑wards, that theſe birds arrived in Pennſylvania in the month of April, and remained there dur⯑ing the whole ſummer. He added, that the fe⯑male built its neſt on the ground, or rather in heaps of dry leaves, where it formed a ſort of excavation; that it lined it with graſs, and al⯑ways choſe the ſlope of a hill facing the ſouth, and that it layed four or five eggs ſpotted with brown. Such differences in the colour of the eggs, in that of the plumage, and in the mode of neſtling, ſeem to point at a nature diſtinct from that of our European Thruſhes.
VI. The LITTLE CRESTED OUZEL of China.
I place this bird between the Thruſhes and the Ouzels, or Blackbirds, becauſe it has the port and the ground colours of the Thruſhes, but without the dapples, which we may con⯑ſider in general as the diſtinctive character of that genus. The feathers on the crown of the head are longer than the reſt, and the bird can erect them into a creſt. It has a roſe-colour [283] mark behind the eye; another more conſiderable of the ſame colour, but not ſo bright, under the tail; and its legs are of a reddiſh brown. Its ſize is nearly that of the Lark, and its wings, which when diſplayed extend ten inches, ſcarcely reach, when cloſed, to the middle of the tail. The tail conſiſts of twelve tapered quills. Brown more or leſs deep is the prevailing co⯑lour of the upper-part of the body, including the wings, the creſt, and the head, but the four lateral quills on either ſide of the tail are tipt with white. The under-part of the body is of this laſt colour, with ſome tints of brown over the breaſt. I muſt not forget two blackiſh ſtreaks, which, riſing from the corners of the bill, and extending over a white ground, make a kind of muſtachoe, which has a remarkable effect.
The MOCKING BIRDS.
• Les Moqueurs, Buff.
[284]EVERY remarkable bird has always many names, but if it be at the ſame time a na⯑tive of a foreign climate, this embarraſſing mul⯑titude, diſgraceful to Natural Hiſtory, is in⯑creaſed by the confuſion of ſpecies. Such is the caſe with the American Mocking Birds. It is eaſy to perceive that Briſſon's Mocking Bird, and the Cinereous Blackbird of St. Domingo, Pl. Enl. No. 558, both belong to the ſame ſpecies, the only difference being that the former has ſomewhat leſs of the gray colour in the under-ſide of the body than the latter. It will alſo appear, from compariſon, that Briſſon's Blackbird of St. Domingo is likewiſe the ſame, diſtinguiſhed only by ſome lighter or deeper tints on its plumage and its tail-quills, which are hardly at all tapered. In like manner we ſhall find that the Tzonpan of Fernandez is either the female of the Cencontlatolli, that is, of the Mocking Bird, as Fernandez himſelf ſuſpects, or at leaſt a permanent variety of that ſpecies*. [285] It is true that its plumage is leſs uniform, be⯑ing mixed above with white, black, and brown, and below with white, black, and cinereous; but the fundamental colour is the ſame, as alſo its ſize, its general ſhape, its ſong, and climate. We may ſay the ſame of the Tetzonpan and Centzonpantli of Fernandez*; for in the ſhort mention which that author has made of it, fea⯑tures of analogy are to be met with in ſize, in colour, and in ſong, and no inſtance of diſparity occurs. Beſides, the reſemblance between the names Tzonpan, Tetzonpan, Centzonpantli, ſeems to ſhew that they mark a ſingle ſpecies, and that the diverſity has ariſen from the miſtake of the tranſcriber, or the difference of the Mexican dia⯑lects.—Laſtly, we can ſcarcely heſitate to admit among the ſpecies the bird, called by Briſſon the Great Mocking Bird, and which he ſays is the ſame with Sloane's Mocking Bird, though, ac⯑cording to the dimenſions given by Sloane, this is the ſmalleſt of the kind; but Sloane regards it as the Cencontlatolli of Fernandez, which Briſſon makes his ordinary Mocking Bird. But Briſſon has himſelf, without perceiving it, admitted the poſition which I hold; for he quotes two paſ⯑ſages from Ray, which applied to the ſame bird, and refers one to his great, and the other to his ſmall ſpecies. The only difference between the two is, that the great Mocking Bird has a [286] ſomewhat browner plumage, and longer legs*; and its deſcribers have taken no notice of its ta⯑pered tail.
After this reduction, there remains only two ſpecies of Mocking Birds, viz. The French Mocking Bird and the Ordinary Mocking Bird. I ſhall treat of them in the order I have named them, as it is nearly that of their relation to the Thruſhes.
The FRENCH MOCKING BIRD.
• Turdus Rufus, Linn. Gmel. and Klein. , • Turdus Carolinenſis, Briſſ. , • Fox-coloured Thruſh, Cateſby, and Penn. , • The Ground Mocking-Bird, Lawſon. ,
and • The Ferruginous Thruſh, Lath.
None of the American Mocking Birds reſem⯑bles ſo much our Thruſhes in the ſpeckles on the breaſt, as this; but it differs widely from them in the proportions between the tail and wings, theſe ending, when cloſed, almoſt where the tail begins. The tail is more than four inches long, which exceeds the third of the whole length of the bird, that being only eleven [287] inches. Its ſize is intermediate between that of the Miſſel and the Fieldfare. Its eyes are yel⯑low, its bill blackiſh, its legs brown, and all the upper-part of the body of a fox colour, but with a mixture of brown. Theſe two colours alſo predominate on the wing-quills, though ſepa⯑rately; the rufous on the outer webs, the brown on the inner. The great and middle coverts of the wings are tipt with white, which forms two ſtreaks that croſs the wings obliquely.
The under-ſide of the body is dirty white, ſpotted with a duſky brown, but theſe ſpots are more ſtraggling than in our Thruſhes: the tail is tapered ſomewhat drooping, and entirely ru⯑fous. The ſong of the French Mocking Bird has ſome variety, but not comparable to that of the proper Mocking Bird.
It feeds commonly on a kind of black cher⯑ries, which are very different from thoſe of Eu⯑rope, ſince they hang in cluſters. It remains all the year in Carolina and Virginia, and con⯑ſequently is not, at leaſt in thoſe provinces, a bird of paſſage:—another analogous circum⯑ſtance to our Thruſhes*.
The MOCKING BIRD.
• Turdus Polyglottus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Mimus Major, Briſſ. , • The American Nightingale, Song Thruſh, or Gray Mocking Bird, Sloane. , • The Mocking Bird, Cateſby. ,
and • The Mimic Thruſh, Penn. and Lath.
[288]We have here a ſtriking exception to the ge⯑neral remark made by travellers, that in pro⯑portion as the plumage of the birds in the New World are rich, elegant, and ſplendid, ſo their notes are harſh, raucous, and monotonous. The Mocking Bird is, on the contrary, if we believe Fernandez, Nieremberg, and the native Ame⯑ricans, the ſweeteſt choriſter of the feathered race, not excepting the Nightingale. It equals that charming bird in the melody of its ſong; but it poſſeſſes beſides the power of imitating the cries of other animals: hence is derived its name. Nor is it ſatisfied with barely re-echoing the ſounds. It gives them ſoftneſs and grace. Accordingly the ſavages have beſtowed upon it the appellation of cencontlatolli; that is, four hundred languages; and the learned have em⯑ployed the epithet polyglot. But the Mock⯑ing Bird mingles action with its ſong, and its meaſured movements accompany and expreſs the ſucceſſion of its emotions. Its prelude is to riſe ſlowly with expanded wings, and ſoon [289] ſink back to the ſame ſpot, its head hanging downwards. Its action now correſponds with the varied nature of its muſic. If the notes are briſk and lively, it deſcribes in the air a number of circles croſſing each other; or it aſcends and deſcends continually in a ſpiral line. If they are loud and rapid, it with equal briſkneſs flaps its wings. Is its ſong unequal? it flutters, it bounds. Do its tones ſoften by degrees, melt into tender ſtrains, and die away in a pauſe more charming than the ſweeteſt melody? it gently diminiſhes its action, glides ſmoothly above its tree, till the wavings of its wings begin to be imperceptible, at leaſt ceaſe, and the bird re⯑mains ſuſpended and motionleſs in the air.
The plumage of this American Nightingale by no means correſponds with the beauty of its ſong; the colours are very ordinary, and have neither brilliancy nor variety. The upper-ſide of the body is a grayiſh brown; the upper-ſide of the wings and of the tail are ſtill of a deeper brown; only it is interrupted, 1. on the wings by a white mark which croſſes it obliquely near the middle of its length, and ſometimes a few ſmall white ſpeckles are ſcattered on the fore⯑part. 2. On the tail by an edging of the ſame white colour; and laſtly, on the head with a circle of the ſame, which forms a ſort of crown*, and extending over the eyes appears like two diſtinct eye-lids. The under-ſide of the body [290] is white from the throat as far as the end of the tail. We perceive in the figure given by Ed⯑wards a few dapples, ſome on the ſides of the neck, and others on the white of the great co⯑verts under the wings.
The Mocking Bird approaches the Red-Wing in ſize; its tail is ſomewhat tapered*, and its feet are blackiſh; its bill is of the ſame colour, and with long briſtles that grow above the angles of its opening; laſtly, its wings are ſhorter than thoſe of our Thruſhes, but longer than thoſe of the French Mocking Bird.
It is found in Carolina, Jamaica, New Spain, &c. It in general loves the hot climates, but can ſubſiſt in the temperate. In Jamaica it is very common in the ſavannas of the woody parts of the iſland; it perches on the higheſt branch⯑es, and chants its ſong. It often builds its neſt on the ebony trees. Its eggs are ſpotted with brown. It feeds on cherries and the berries of the white-thorn and cornel tree†, and even on inſects. Its fleſh is eſteemed excellent. It is not eaſily raiſed in a cage; but this may be accompliſhed by care and kind treatment. It is beſides a fa⯑miliar bird, which ſeems to be fond of man, ap⯑proaches his dwellings, and even perches on the chimney tops.
In the ſubject which Sloane diſſected, the ſto⯑mach was a little muſcular, the liver whitiſh, and [291] the inteſtines were folded in a vaſt number of circumvolutions. A
The BLACKBIRD *.
• Le Merle, Buff. , • Turdus Merula, Linn. and Gmel. ,
and • Merula, Belon, Geſner, Briſſ. &c.
[292]THE adult male of this ſpecies is of a deeper and purer black than the Raven, and hence its Engliſh name. Indeed, except the orbits, the talons, and the ſole of the foot, which have always a yellow caſt, it is entirely black in every poſition. In the female, on the contrary, the ſame decided black is not ſpread through the whole of the plumage; it is mixed with dif⯑ferent ſhades of brown, ferruginous, and gray, the bill is but ſeldom yellow, and the ſong is different from that of the male;—all theſe cir⯑cumſtances combined have made it be miſtaken for a bird of another ſpecies.
When they are ſhut up with other birds, their natural inquietude degenerates into petulance; they purſue and continually haraſs their com⯑panions in ſlavery; and for that reaſon they cannot be admitted into voleries, where ſeveral kinds of ſmall birds are kept.
They may be raiſed apart for the ſake of their ſong; not indeed on account of their na⯑tural muſic, which is hardly tolerable except in the fields, but becauſe they have a facility of im⯑proving their notes and of learning others, of imitating tones of different inſtruments*, and even the human voice†.
As the Blackbirds, like the Thruſhes, early engage in love, they ſoon begin to warble; and [294] as they have more than one hatch, they chant before the vernal warmth, and continue their ſtrain when the other ſongſters of the grove droop in ſilence. This circumſtance has-led ſome to fancy that they never ſuffer any change of plumage; but ſuch a ſuppoſition is neither true nor probable*. They are found in the woods, towards the end of the ſummer, in moult, ſome having their head entirely bald: Olina and the author of the Britiſh Zoology ſay, that, like the other birds, it is ſilent during that time; the latter adds, that ſometimes it renews its ſong in the beginning of winter, but moſt commonly it has in that ſeaſon only a harſh diſcordant cry.
The ancients pretended that in winter its plumage changed into rufous†; and Olina, one of the moderns the beſt acquainted with the birds which he deſcribes, ſays, that this happens in autumn: whether it be becauſe this alteration of colour is the effect of moulting, or that the females and the young Blackbirds, which really incline to rufous rather than to black, are then more numerous and oftener ſeen than the adult males.
Theſe birds make their firſt hatch in the end of winter; it conſiſts of five or ſix eggs of a bluiſh green, with frequent and indiſtinct ſpots [295] of a ruſt colour. This firſt hatch ſeldom pro⯑ſpers, becauſe of the ſeverity of the weather; the ſecond ſucceeds better, though it is only of four or five eggs. The Blackbirds neſt is con⯑ſtructed nearly like that of the Thruſhes, except that it is lined with a matting. It is com⯑monly placed in buſhes or trees of a moderate height. They would ſeem naturally diſpoſed to place it near the ground; and experience alone of the danger of ſuch a ſituation inſtructs them to give it ſome elevation*. A neſt was brought to me only once, which had been found in the trunk of a hollow pear-tree.
Moſs, which always occurs on the trunk, and mud, which is to be found at the foot of the tree, or in its neighbourhood, are the mate⯑rials that form the body of the neſt. Stalks of graſs and ſmall roots are the ſofter ſubſtances with which they line it; and they labour with ſuch aſſiduity that in eight days they complete the work. The female hatches alone, and the male is no farther concerned than in providing her ſubſiſtence. The Author of the Treatiſe on the Nightingale affirms, that he has ſeen a young Blackbird of the ſame year, but already ſtrong, cheerfully engage in rearing the infant [296] brood of its own ſpecies; but he does not in⯑form us of its ſex.
I have remarked that the young drop their feathers more than once the firſt year; and that, at each time, the plumage of the male becomes blacker, and the bill yellower, beginning at its baſe. With regard to the females, they retain, as I have ſaid, the colours of infancy, as they alſo retain moſt of its qualities. However, the inſide of their mouth and throat is yellow, like the males; and in both may be perceived a fre⯑quent motion of the tail upwards and down⯑wards, with a ſlight ſhudder of the wings, ac⯑companied by a feeble broken cry.
Theſe birds do not leave the country in win⯑ter*, but chooſe ſituations the beſt ſheltered, ſet⯑tling commonly in the thickeſt woods, eſpecially when theſe are ſupplied with perennial ſprings, and conſiſt of evergreens, ſuch as pines, firs, laurels, cypreſſes, myrtles, junipers, which both afford them ſubſiſtence, and protect them from the rigour of the ſeaſon. They ſometimes ſeek for cover and food in our gardens.
[297] The wild Blackbirds feed on all ſorts of ber⯑ries, fruits, and inſects; and as no country is ſo ſterile as not to afford ſome of theſe, and as the Blackbird is reconciled to all climates, it is found in almoſt every part of the world, but va⯑rying according to the impreſſions which it re⯑ceives.
Thoſe which are kept in the cage, eat fleſh alſo, either dreſſed or minced, bread, &c. but it is ſaid that the kernels of pomegranates prove poiſonous to them as to the Thruſhes. They are very fond of bathing, and they muſt have plenty of water in the voleries. Their fleſh is good, and not inferior to that of the Miſſel or the Fieldfare, and ſeems even to be preferred to that of the Throſtle and of the Red-Wing, in countries where it can require a ſucculence from the olives, and a perfume from the myr⯑tle-berries. The birds of prey are as fond of feaſting on them as man, and commit an equal havoc: without that their multiplication would be exceſſive. Olina fixes their period of life at ſeven or eight years.
I diſſected a female, which was taken on its eggs about the 15th of May, and which weighed two ounces and two gros. In the ovarium was a cluſter conſiſting of a great number of unequal ſized eggs; the largeſt two lines in diameter, and of an orange colour; the ſmalleſt were of a lighter colour, and of a ſubſtance leſs opaque, and about one-third of a line in diameter. Its [298] bill was quite yellow, alſo the tongue and the whole inſide of the mouth, the inteſtinal tube ſeventeen or eighteen inches long, the gizzard very muſcular, and preceded by a bag formed by the dilatation of the oeſophagus; the gall blad⯑der oblong, and the coecum wanting. A
VARIETIES of the BLACKBIRD.
THOSE THAT ARE WHITE, OR SPOTTED WITH WHITE.
The plumage of the Blackbird is ſubject, like that of the Raven, the Crow, the Jackdaw, and other birds, to great changes, from the influence of the climate, or from the action of leſs ob⯑vious cauſes. In fact, white ſeems to be in moſt animals, what it is in many plants, the colour into which all the others, and even the black, degenerate by a quick tranſition, and without paſſing through the intermediate ſhades.
The only varieties of this ſort which appear to belong to the common Blackbird, are, 1. the White one, which was ſent to Aldrovandus at Rome; and, 2. the White-headed one of the ſame author. Both theſe have the yellow bill and feet of the ordinary ſpecies.
The RING OUZEL *.
• Le Merle a Plaſtron Blanc, Buff. , • Turdus Torquatus, Linn. and Gmel. ,
and • Merula Torquata, Briſſ. Ray, and Will.
[][299]THIS ſpecies is marked above the breaſt with a horſe-ſhoe, which, in the male, is of a very bright white, but in the female is of a dirty tawny colour; and as the reſt of the fe⯑male's plumage is a rufous brown, the horſe-ſhoe appears much leſs diſtinct, and is ſometimes en⯑tirely obſcured†. Hence ſome nomenclators have imagined that the female belonged to a par⯑ticular ſpecies, which they termed The Mountain Blackbird.
The Ring Ouzel much reſembles the com⯑mon Blackbird; the ground colour of their plumage is black, the corners and the inſide of their bill yellow; they are nearly of the ſame ſize and the ſame port: but the former diſtin⯑quiſhed by the horſe-ſhoe, by the white enamel of its plumage, chiefly on the breaſt, belly, and wings‡; by its bill, which is ſhorter and not [300] ſo yellow; by the ſhape of the middle-quills of the wings, which are ſquare at the end, with a ſmall projecting point in the centre, formed by the extremity of the ſhaft; laſtly, by its cry*, which is different, as alſo its habits and diſpo⯑ſitions. It is a real bird of paſſage, though its route cannot be preciſely traced. It follows the chain of the mountains, but does not keep in any certain track†. It ſeldom appears in the neighbourhood of Montbard, except in the be⯑ginning of October, when it arrives in ſmall bodies of twelve or fifteen, and never in larger numbers. Theſe ſeem to be a few families that have ſtraggled from the great body; they ſel⯑dom ſtay more than two or three weeks, and on the ſlighteſt froſt entirely diſappear. But I muſt own that Klein informs us that theſe birds were brought to him alive in winter. They repaſs about April or May, at leaſt in Burgundy, Brie‡, and even in Sileſia and in Friſia, accord⯑ing to Geſner.
It is uncommon for the Ring Ouzels to in⯑habit the plains in the temperate part of Europe; [301] yet Salerne affirms that their neſts have been found in Sologne and in the foreſt of Orleans; that theſe neſts were not conſtructed like thoſe of the ordinary Blackbird; that they contained five eggs of the ſame ſize and colour (a circum⯑ſtance different from what happens in the Black⯑birds); that theſe birds breed in the ground at the foot of buſhes, and hence probably they are called Buſh-Birds or Terrier Black-birds *. Certain it is that in ſome ſeaſons of the year they are very frequent on the lofty mountains of Sweden, of Scotland, of Auvergne, of Savoy, of Switzerland, of Greece, &c. It is even probable that they are ſpread in Aſia, and in Africa as far as the Azores; for this ſpe⯑cies, ſo ſocial, ſo fond of dwelling in mountains, and having its plumage marked with white, correſponds well to what Tavernier ſays of the flocks of Blackbirds which paſs from time to time on the frontiers of Media and Armenia, and rid the country of graſshoppers. It alſo agrees with the account which Adanſon gives of thoſe Blackbirds ſpotted with white, which he ſaw on the ſummits of the mountains in the iſland of Fayal, keeping in flocks among the arbutes, on the fruit of which they fed, chatter⯑ing continually†.
Thoſe which ramble in Europe ſubſiſt like-wiſe on berries. Willughby found in their ſto⯑mach [302] veſtiges of inſects, and berries reſembling goodſeberries; but they prefer thoſe of ivy and grapes. It is in the ſeaſon of vintage that they are generally ſo fat, and their fleſh ſo ſavoury and ſucculent.
Some fowlers ſay that the Ring Ouzels at⯑tract the Thruſhes; they remark too that they allow themſelves to be more eaſily approached than the common Blackbirds, though they are more difficult to decoy into ſnares.
I found, on diſſection, that their gall-bladder is oblong, very ſmall, and conſequently quite different from what Willughby deſcribes it to be; but the ſituation and form of the ſoft parts, it is well known, are very ſubject to vary in animals. The ventricle was muſcular, its inner coat wrinkled as uſual, and inadheſive. In this membrane I ſaw fragments of juniper berries and nothing elſe. The inteſtinal canal, mea⯑ſured between its two extreme orifices, was about twenty inches; the ventricle or gizzard was placed between the fourth and fifth of its length. Laſtly, I perceived ſome traces of caecum, of which one appeared to be double. A
VARIETIES of the RING-OUZEL.
[303]I. THOSE WHICH ARE WHITE, OR SPOTTED WITH WHITE.
Ariſtotle was acquainted with White Ouzels, and made them a diſtinct ſpecies, though they have the ſame ſong and the ſame bulk with the common Ouzel or Blackbird; but he knew that their inſtincts were different, ſince they pre⯑ferred the mountains*: and theſe are the only diſtinctive characters which Belon admits†. They are found not only in the mountains of Arcadia, of Savoy, and of Auvergne, but alſo in thoſe of Sileſia, and among the Alps and Ap⯑pennines, &c.‡. They are alſo birds of paſ⯑ſage, and migrate with the Ring-Ouzel at the ſame ſeaſon. The white colour of the horſe-ſhoe in the Ring-Ouzel may extend over the reſt of the plumage. I ſhould therefore con⯑ceive that theſe, though uſually referred to the Blackbirds, belong really to the Ring-Ouzels. In the white one which I obſerved, the quills of the wings and tail were whiter than any of the reſt, and the upper-part of the body, except [304] the top of the head, was of a lighter gray than the under. The bill was brown, with a little yellow on the edges; there was alſo yellow un⯑der the throat and on the breaſt, and the legs were of a deep gray brown. It was caught in the vicinity of Montbard in the beginning of November before the froſt; that is, at the exact time of the paſſage of the Ring-Ouzel; for a few days before, two of that ſpecies were brought to me.
In thoſe which are ſpotted, the white is com⯑bined variouſly with the black; ſometimes it is confined to the quills of the wings and tail, which are commonly ſuppoſed to be leaſt ſub⯑ject to change of colour*; ſometimes it forms a collar that encircles the neck, but is not ſo broad as the white horſe-ſhoe of the Ring-Ouzel. This variety did not eſcape Belon, who ſays that he ſaw in Greece, in Savoy, and in the valley of Maurienne, a great number of collared Black-birds, ſo called on account of a white line which bent quite round the neck. Lottinger, who had an opportunity of obſerving theſe birds in the mountains of Lorraine, where they ſometimes breed, informs me, that they commence breeding very early; that they conſtruct and place their neſt nearly like the Thruſh; that the education of their young is completed before the end of June; that they retire every year, but that the time of their departure is not fixed; that this uſually be⯑gins [305] about the end of July, and laſts the whole of Auguſt, during which time not one is ſeen in the plain, a proof that they follow the chain of the mountains, but their retreat is uncertain. Lottinger adds, that this bird, which formerly was very common in the Voſges, is now ſeldom found there.
II. The GREAT MOUNTAIN OUZEL.
It is ſpotted with white, has no horſe-ſhoe, and is larger than the Miſſel. It arrives in Lor⯑raine about the end of autumn, and is then ex⯑ceſſively fat. The bird-catchers ſeldom ſucceed with it; it feeds upon ſnails, and is dexterous in breaking the ſhells. When theſe fail, it ſub⯑ſiſts on ivy-berries. It is excellent eating; its ſtrains, far inferior to thoſe of the Blackbird, are harſh and diſmal*.
The ROSE-COLOURED OUZEL *.
• Le Merle Couleur de Roſe, Buff. , • Turdus Roſeus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Merula Roſea, Briſſ. Ray, and Will. , • Sturnus Roſeus, Scopoli. ,
and • The Roſe, or Carnation-coloured Ouzel, Penn.
[306]The plumage of the male is remarkable; its head and neck, and the quills of its wings and of its tail, are black, with brilliant reflexions which play between green and purple. The belly, the back, the rump, and the ſmall co⯑verts of the wings are of a roſe colour, which has two tints, the one light, the other deep, with a few black ſpots ſcattered here and there on a kind of ſcapulary, which deſcends above as far as the tail, and below to the abdomen. Beſides, its head is ornamented with a ſort of creſt which reclines like that of the Chatterer, and which muſt have a fine effect when the bird erects it.
The lower belly, the inferior coverts of the tail and the thighs are of a brown colour; the tarſus and the toes of a dirty orange; the bill partly black, and partly fleſh-coloured. But the diſtribution of theſe colours ſeems not fixed in that part; for in the ſubjects which we have ob⯑ſerved, and in thoſe of Aldrovandus, the baſe of the bill was blackiſh, and all the reſt of a fleſh colour; whereas in thoſe examined by Edwards, the point of the bill exhibited the black, which changed by degrees into a dirty orange on the baſe of the bill and on the legs. The under-ſide of the tail ſeemed marbled, the effect produced by the colour of its lower coverts, which are blackiſh and tipt with white.
[308] In the female the head is black like that of the male, but not the neck, nor the quills of the tail and of the wings, which are of a lighter tinge; the colours of the ſcapulary are alſo leſs vivid.
This bird is rather ſmaller than the common Blackbird; its bill, wings, legs, and toes, are pro⯑portionably longer. In ſize, figure, and even inſtinct, it is much more analogous to the Ring-Ouzel, for it likewiſe migrates. However, we muſt own, that one of theſe Roſe-coloured Ouz⯑els, which was killed in England, kept com⯑pany with yellow-billed Blackbirds. Its length, from the point of the bill to the end of the tail, is ſeven inches and three-quarters, and to the ex⯑tremity of the nails ſeven and a half; its alar ex⯑tent thirteen or fourteen, and its wings, when cloſed, reached almoſt to the middle of the tail. A
The ROCK BLACKBIRD *.
• Le Merle de Roche, Buff. , • Turdus Saxatilis, Gmel. , • Lanius Infauſtus, Gmel. , • Merula Saxatilis, Ray, Will. and Briſſ. , • The Greater Red-Start, Alb. ,
and • The Rock Crow, Penn.
[][309]THE name indicates ſufficiently the haunts of this bird: it inhabits precipices and moun⯑tains; it is found in the wildeſt parts of Bugey; it ſits commonly on the large ſtones, and conſtantly without cover; ſo that it is difficult to get near it with a fowling-piece, for as ſoon as it perceives the perſon, it removes to another place. Its ſhy⯑neſs ſeems to be leſs owing to native wildneſs, than to its apprehenſions of man, and its expe⯑rience of his artifices. Nor is it ſo much ex⯑poſed as many other birds to danger from that quarter. The loſs of liberty alone is what it has to dread; for though excellent eating, it is more prized on account of its ſong, which is ſoft, va⯑ried, and much like that of the Pettychaps. It ſoon acquires the notes of other birds, and even learns our muſic. It begins by day-break, and welcomes the return of the morning; and it re⯑news its ſtrain with the ſetting ſun. If during the night we go near its cage with a light, it [310] immediately ſings; and in the day-time, if it is not warbling, it ſeems humming and preparing new airs.
Theſe birds conceal their neſts with the utmoſt care, and build them in the holes of the rocks, and in the bottom of the moſt inacceſſible ca⯑verns. It is with the greateſt difficulty and ha⯑zard that we can ſcramble to theſe, which they defend with courage, darting at the eyes of their plunderers.
Each hatch contains three or four eggs. They feed their young with worms and inſects, on which they live themſelves. They can ſubſiſt however on other food, and when they are raiſed in a cage, it ſucceeds well to give them the ſame paſte as the Nightingales. But they muſt be taken from the neſt; for after they have flown, they cannot be enticed into any kind of ſnare; and if they be caught by ſurpriſe, they will never ſurvive their liberty*.
The Rock Blackbirds are found in many parts of Germany, in the Alps, in the mountains of Tyrol, in thoſe of Bugey, &c. I received a female of this ſpecies caught on its eggs the 12th of May; it had built its neſt on a rock in the neighbourhood of Montberd, where theſe birds are very rare and quite unknown; its colours were not ſo bright as thoſe of the male. This laſt is rather ſmaller than the common Black-bird, and entirely different in its proportions. [311] Its wings are very long, ſuch as would ſuit a bird that neſtles in the bottom of caverns; they meaſure thirteen or fourteen inches when ex⯑panded, and if cloſed they reach almoſt to the end of the tail, which is only three inches in length. The bill is about an inch.
With regard to the plumage, the head and neck are covered as it were with a cinereous cowl, variegated with ſmall ruſty ſpots. The back is darker near the neck, and lighter near the tail. The ten lateral quills of the tail are ferruginous, and the intermediate brown. The wing-quills and their coverts are of a duſky co⯑lour, and edged with a lighter tinge. Laſtly, the breaſt, and all the lower-part of the body, orange, variegated with ſmall ſpeckles, ſome white, others brown; the bill and legs are blackiſh. A
The BLUE OUZEL *.
• Le Merle Bleu, Buff. , • Turdus Cyanus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Merula Coerulea, Briſſ. , • Turdus Solitarius, Klein. , • Cyanos, ſeu Coerulea Avis, Ray. , • The Indian Mock-Bird, Will. , • The Solitary Sparrow, Edw. ,
and • The Blue Thruſh, Lath.
[312]THIS bird has the ſame ground colour with the Rock Blackbird; that is, a cinereous blue, without any mixture of orange; the ſame ſize, the ſame proportions nearly, the ſame taſte for certain kinds of food, the ſame ſong, the ſame habit of ſettling on the ſummits of mountains, and of building its neſt in the moſt craggy rocks. In ſhort, we might be inclined to refer it to the ſame ſpecies. Accordingly, many naturaliſts have miſtaken the one for the other. The co⯑lours of its plumage vary ſomewhat in the de⯑ſcriptions, and it is probably ſubject to real va⯑riations, ariſing from the difference of the indi⯑viduals, that of age, of ſex, of climate, &c. The male which Edwards has delineated, Pl. XVIII. was not of an uniform blue throughout; the tinge of the upper-part of the body was deeper []
[313] than that of the lower; the quills of its tail blackiſh, thoſe of its wings brown, and alſo the great coverts, which are edged with white; its eyes ſurrounded by a yellow circle, the inſide of its mouth orange, its bill and legs of a brown verging on black. There would ſeem to be more uniformity in the plumage of the female.
Belon, who ſaw ſome of theſe birds at Ra⯑guſa in Dalmatia, tells us, that they are alſo found in the iſlands of Negropont, Candia, Zante, Corfu, &c.; that they are very much ſought for, on account of their ſong; but he adds, that they do not inhabit France or Italy. How⯑ever, the arm of the ſea which ſeparates Dal⯑matia from Italy is no inſurmountable barrier, eſpecially to theſe birds, which, according to Belon himſelf, fly much better than the com⯑mon Blackbird, and which could at leaſt make the circuit and penetrate into Italy by the State of Venice. Beſides, it is a fact that theſe Ouzels are found in Italy; the one deſcribed by Briſſon, and that figured in our Pl. Enl. No. 250, were both ſent from that country. Edwards had learnt from current report that they neſtled on inacceſſible rocks, or old de⯑ſerted towers*, and he ſaw ſome which were [314] killed near Gibraltar; from which he infers, with great probability, that they are ſpread through the whole of the ſouth of Europe. But this muſt be underſtood of the mountainous tracts, for it is rare to find them in the plains. They commonly lay four or five eggs, and their fleſh, eſpecially when they are young, is rec⯑koned good eating*. A
The SOLITARY OUZEL *.
• Le Merle Solitaire, Buff. , • Turdus Solitarius, Linn. and Gmel. , • Merula Solitaria, Briſſ. , • Paſſer Solitarius, Ray. ,
and • The Solitary Thruſh, Lath.
[315]THIS alſo is an inhabitant of the mountains, and famous for its elegant ſtrains. It is well known that Francis I. king of France, took ſingular pleaſure in liſtening to it; and even at preſent the male of this ſpecies is tamed and ſold at a very high price at Geneva and Milan†, and ſtill dearer at Smyrna and Conſtantinople‡. The native warble of the Solitary Ouzel is ex⯑tremely liquid and tender, but rather plaintive, as muſt be the ſong of every bird which leads a lonely exiſtence. It remains always ſingle, ex⯑cept in the ſeaſon of love. At that joyous pe⯑riod, the male and female not only aſſociate to⯑gether, [316] but deſert in company the wild and dreary heights where they had lived ſeparately, and reſort to the milder abodes of man. They ſeem to ſeek ſpectators of their pleaſures, and come forward in thoſe intoxicating moments, when other animals court the ſilence of retreat. But they lodge at a conſiderable height above the ſurface, and thus in the midſt of population they ſhun the dangers to which they would be expoſed. They build their neſt with ſtalks of graſs and feathers in the top of a ſeparate chim⯑ney, or on the ruins of an old caſtle, or on the ſummit of a large tree, and almoſt always near a ſteeple or lofty tower. The male ſits whole hours or days upon the vane or weather-cock, and ſoothes the tedious ſituation of his mate by a continual warble; but pathetic as are his ſtrains, they are ſtill inſufficient to expreſs the warmth and tenderneſs of his emotions. A ſolitary bird feels more delicately and ardently than others. Sometimes he riſes chanting, flap⯑ping his wings, diſplaying the feathers of his tail, briſtling thoſe on his head, and panting with delight, he deſcribes many circles in the air round his beloved mate as the centre.
If the female be ſcared by any uncommon noiſe, or by the ſight of any new object, ſhe re⯑tires into her fort, but ſoon returns to the neſt, which ſhe never abandons.
As ſoon as the young are hatched, the male ceaſes to ſing, but not to love; he gives another [317] proof of his affection by ſharing in the trouble of rearing the brood, and bringing proviſions in his bill. In animals the ardor of love is ever proportioned to the tenderneſs for the off-ſpring.
They commonly lay five or ſix eggs; they feed their young with inſects, on which, and on grapes, they ſubſiſt themſelves*. They arrive in April in thoſe countries where they paſs the ſummer, and depart about the end of Auguſt; they return every year to the ſame ſpot where they firſt fixed their abode. It is uncommon to ſee more than two pairs ſettled in the ſame tract†.
The young, when they are taken out of the neſt, are capable of inſtruction, and they learn to chant or to prattle. They begin to ſing at midnight, on the approach of the light of a candle. When well-treated they can live in a cage eight or ten years. They are found on the mountains in France and Italy‡, in almoſt all the iſlands of the Archipelago, eſpecially in Zira and Nia, where it is ſaid they neſtle among the heaps of ſtones§, and in the iſland of Cor⯑ſica, where they are not conſidered as birds of paſſage‖. But in Burgundy, thoſe which ar⯑rive [318] in the ſpring, and lodge on the chimney tops, and in ruined churches, were never known to ſpend the winter in that province. The So⯑litary Ouzel may not migrate in Corſica, and yet flit from one part to another, according to the change of ſeaſons, as it does in France.
The ſingular habits of this bird, and the charms of its ſong, have inſpired in the people a ſort of veneration for it. I know ſome places where it is looked upon as lucky, where they would hardly ſuffer its neſt to be diſturbed, and dread its death as a public misfortune.
The Solitary Ouzel is rather ſmaller than the common Blackbird, but its bill is ſtronger and more hooked near the point, and the legs are ſhorter in proportion. Its plumage is brown of different ſhades, and ſpeckled throughout with white, except on the rump, and on the feathers of the wings and tail. Alſo, its neck, throat, breaſt, and the coverts of the wings, are in the male of a blue tinge, with purple reflexions, en⯑tirely wanting in the female, which is of an uni⯑form brown, with yellowiſh ſpeckles. In both, the iris is of an orange yellow, the opening of the noſtrils wide, the edges of the bill ſcalloped near the tip, as in almoſt all the Blackbirds and Thruſhes; the inſide of the mouth yellow, the tongue parted into three threads, of which the mid one is the longeſt; twelve quills in the tail, nineteen in each wing, the firſt of which is very ſhort: laſtly, the firſt phalanx of the outer toe [319] is joined to that of the middle one. The total length of the bird is eight or nine inches; its alar extent twelve or thirteen; its tail three; its leg thirteen lines; and its bill fifteen; the wings, when cloſed, reach beyond the middle of the tail. A
FOREIGN BIRDS, WHICH ARE RELATED TO THE SOLITARY OUZEL.
[320]I. The PENSIVE THRUSH.
• Le Merle Solitaire de Manille, Buff. ,
and • Turdus Manillenſis, Gmel.
THIS ſpecies ſeems to be intermediate be⯑tween the Solitary Ouzel and the Rock Blackbird. It has the colours of the latter, and diſtributed partly in the ſame order; but its wings are not ſo long, though when cloſed they reach to two-thirds of the tail. Its plumage is a ſlate-blue, uniform on the head, the hind-part of the neck, and the back; almoſt quite blue on the rump, ſpeckled with yellow on the throat, and on the fore-part of the neck and top of the breaſt. The ſame blue colour is deeper on the coverts of the wings, with ſimilar ſpeckles, though ſcattered more ſparingly, and ſome white ſpots, which are ſtill fewer. The reſt of the under-ſide of the body is orange, ſpeckled with blue and white; the quills of the wings and of the tail are blackiſh, and the latter edged with [321] rufous; laſtly, the bill is brown, and the legs almoſt black.
The Penſive Ouzel is nearly of the ſize of the Rock Blackbird; its total length is about eight inches, its alar extent twelve or thirteen, its tail three, its bill only an inch.
The female has no blue or orange in its plum⯑age, but two or three ſhades of brown, which form pretty regular ſpeckles on the head, the back, and all the under-ſide of the body.—Theſe two birds were preſented by M. Sonnerat.
II. The HERMIT THRUSH.
• Le Merle Solitaire des Philippines, Buff. ,
and • Turdus Eremita, Gmel.
The figure of this bird, its port, and its bill, reſemble thoſe of the Solitary Ouzels, and its plumage is ſomewhat analogous to that of the Penſive Ouzel, but it is rather ſmaller. Each feather in the under-ſide of the body is rufous of various ſhades, and edged with brown. The feathers of the upper-ſide of the body are brown with a double border, the inner blackiſh, and the outer dirty white. The ſmall coverts of the wings have an aſh-caſt, and thoſe of the rump and tail are quite cinereous. The head is olive, [322] verging on yellow, the orbits whitiſh, the quills of the tail and of the wings edged with gray; the bill and legs brown.
The entire length of the Hermit Ouzel is about ſeven inches and a half, its alar extent twelve, and its wings, if cloſed, reach to three-fourths of its tail, which contains twelve quills, and is only two inches and three quarters long.
This bird, which was ſent by M. Poivre, reſem⯑bles in ſo many reſpects the Penſive Ouzel, that I ſhould not wonder if it be afterwards found only a variety of age or ſex; eſpecially as it is brought from the ſame country, is ſmaller, and its colour intermediate between thoſe of the male and of the female.
FOREIGN BIRDS, WHICH ARE RELATED TO THE EUROPEAN BLACKBIRDS.
[323]I. The AFRICAN THRUSH.
• Le Jaunoir * du Cap de Bonne Eſperance, Buff. , • Turdus Morio, Linn. and Gmel. ,
and • Merula Capitis Bonae Spei, Briſſ.
THIS bird has the black and yellow colours of the European Blackbirds: but the black is more brilliant, and has reflexions which in cer⯑tain poſitions have a greeniſh caſt. The yellow, or rather the rufous colour, is ſeen only on the quills of the wings, of which the three firſt are tipt with brown, and the following with this brilliant black I have mentioned. The ſame lucid refulgent black occurs on the two middle quills of the tail, and on that part of the middle quills of the wings which is uncovered; all that is hid of theſe middle quills, and all the lateral quills of the tail, are of a pure black. The bill is of the ſame black, but the legs are brown.
The African Thruſh is larger than the com⯑mon Blackbird; its length is eleven inches, its [324] alar extent fifteen and a half, its tail four; its bill, which is thick and ſtrong, is fifteen lines, and its leg fourteen; its wings, when cloſed, reach not to the middle of its tail.
II. The CRESTED BLACKBIRD of China.
• Gracula Criſtatella, Linn. and Gmel. , • Merula Sinenſis Criſtata, Briſſ. , • Sturnus crinibus cinereis, &c. Klein. , • The Chineſe Starling, or Blackbird, Edw. ,
and • The Creſted Grakle, Lath.
Though this bird is ſomewhat larger than the Blackbird, its bill and legs are ſhorter, and its tail much ſhorter; almoſt all its plumage is blackiſh, with a dull blue tinge, but not gloſſy; a white ſpot appears in the middle of the wings, and impreſſed on the quills, and a little white on the tips of the lateral quills of the tail; the bill and legs are yellow, and the iris of a fine orange. There is a ſmall tuft of pretty long feathers on the forehead, which the bird can briſtle up at pleaſure. But notwithſtanding this mark of diſtinction, and the differ⯑ence perceived in its proportions, we may per⯑haps regard it as a variety, produced by climate, of our Yellow-billed Blackbird. It has, like [325] that bird, a great facility in learning to whiſtle airs, and in repeating words. It is difficult to be brought from China into Europe. Its length is eight inches and a half; its wings, when cloſed, reach to the middle of the tail, which is only two inches and a half long, and compoſed of twelve quills nearly equal*.
III. The RUFOUS-WINGED THRUSH.
• Le Podobé du Senegal, Buff. ,
and • Turdus Erythropterus, Gmel.
We are indebted to M. Adanſon for this foreign and new ſpecies; its bill is brown, its wings and legs rufous, its wings ſhort, its tail long, tapered, marked with white at the extremity of the late⯑ral quills, and of the lower coverts. In every other part the Podobé is of the colour of our Blackbirds, and reſembles them in ſize, and in the ſhape of the bill, which, however, is not yellow.
IV. The BLACKBIRD of China.
• Turdus Perſpicillatus, Gmel. ,
and • The Spectacle Thruſh, Lath.
[326]This Blackbird is larger than ours, its legs much ſtronger, its tail longer and differently ſhaped, for it is tapered. The moſt remark⯑able feature in its plumage, is what appears like a pair of ſpectacles, placed at the baſe of the bill, and extending both ways upon the eyes; the ſides of theſe ſpectacles are nearly of an oval form, and black, ſo that they are diſtinctly de⯑fined on the gray plumage of the head and neck. The ſame gray colour, intermixed with a green⯑iſh tint, is ſpread over the whole of the upper⯑ſide of the body, including the wings and the intermediate quills of the tail; the lateral quills are of a much deeper colour; part of the breaſt, and the belly, are of a dirty white, with a little yellow, as far as the lower coverts of the tail, which are rufous. The wings when cloſed ex⯑tend not far beyond the origin of the tail.
V. The GLOSSY THRUSH.
• Le Vert-Doré, ou Merle a Longue Queue du Senegal *, Buff. ,
and • Turdus Aeneus, Gmel.
[327]The extreme length of this bird, which is about ſeventeen inches, is only two-thirds of that of its tail. Its alar extent by no means cor⯑reſponds to the ſame proportion, being narrower than that of the common Blackbird, which is a much ſmaller bird. Its bill is alſo proportion⯑ably ſhorter, but its legs are longer†. The pre⯑vailing colour is the fine gloſſy green that ap⯑pears in the plumage of Ducks; the only differ⯑ence is derived from the various tints and reflex⯑ions which in different parts it aſſumes. It is blackiſh on the head, with gold colour ſhining through; and on the rump and the two long intermediate quills of the tail are purple reflex⯑ions; on the belly and thighs a changing green, with roſe-copper. Almoſt all the reſt of its plumage is of a rich gold green.
[328] There is in the Royal Cabinet a bird exactly like this, only its tail is not near ſo long. It is probably the ſame bird, but caught in the time of moulting*.
VI. The CRESCENT BLACKBIRD of America.
• Le Fer-a-Cheval, on Merle a Collier d'Amerique, Buſſ. , • Alauda Magna, Linn. and Gmel. , • Sturnus Ludovicianus, var. Lath. , • Merula Americana Torquata, Briſſ. , • The Large Lark, Cateſby. ,
and • The Creſcent Stare, Penn. and Lath.
The only black part of the plumage of this bird is a mark ſhaped like a horſe-ſhoe, which deſcends upon the breaſt, and a bar of the ſame colour riſing on each ſide under the eye, and extending backwards. The firſt of theſe ſpots ſeems, from its determined figure, to be the moſt characteriſtic of this ſpecies, and diſtinguiſhes it the beſt from the other collared Blackbirds. This horſe-ſhoe is traced on a yellow ground, which is the colour of the throat and of all the under-ſide of the body, and which appears again between the bill and the eyes; brown predominates on the head and behind the neck, and light gray on the ſides. Alſo the top of the [329] head is marked with a whitiſh ray; all the up⯑per-ſide of the body is of a partridge-gray; the quills of the wings and of the tail* are brown, with ſome ruſty ſpots; the legs brown and very long; and the bill, which is almoſt black, is ſhaped like that of our Blackbirds; like them alſo it ſings agreeably in the ſpring, though it has not the ſame extent of notes. It ſcarcely eats any thing but the ſmall ſeeds which it finds on the ground†; in which reſpect it reſembles the Larks, though it is much larger, exceeding even our Blackbird, nor is its hind-nail length⯑ened as in the Larks. It perches on the top of buſhes, and its tail is obſerved to have a briſk motion upwards and downwards. In fact, it is neither a Lark nor a Blackbird; and yet of all the European birds, it reſembles the latter the moſt. It is found not only in Virginia and Ca⯑rolina, but in almoſt the whole continent of America‡.
The ſubject examined by Cateſby weighed three ounces and a quarter; its extreme length ten inches, its bill fifteen lines, its legs eighteen; its wings when cloſed reached to the middle of its tail. A
[330]VII. The GREEN BLACKBIRD of Angola.
• The Blue and Green Daw, Edw.
The upper-part of the body, the head, the neck, the tail, and the wings, are of an olive green; but brown ſpots appear on the wings, and the rump is blue. On the back, and on the fore-ſide of the neck, is a mixture of blue with green; the blue again occurs on the upper-part of the throat: violet predominates on the breaſt, the belly, the thighs, and the feathers which cover the ears: laſtly, the lower coverts of the tail are of an olive yellow, the bill and legs of a deep black.
This bird is of the ſame ſize with the fifty-third Thruſh of Briſſon; the proportions are likewiſe the ſame, but the plumage of the latter is different, being entirely of a fine duck-green, [331] with a ſpot of ſteel-violet on the anterior part of the wing.
Theſe birds are nearly of the bulk of our Blackbird, their length being nine inches, their alar extent twelve and a quarter, their bill eleven or twelve lines; their wings when cloſed reach to the middle of the tail, which conſiſt of twelve equal quills.
It is probable that theſe two birds belong to the ſame ſpecies, but I cannot decide which is the original ſtem, and which the collateral branch. A
VIII. The GILDED THRUSH.
• Le Merle Violet du Royaume de Juida, Buff.
The plumage of this bird is painted with the ſame colours as the preceding, that is, with vio⯑let, green, and blue, but differently diſtributed; violet is ſpread without any mixture on the head, the neck, and all the under-part of the body; blue on the tail and its upper coverts; and laſt⯑ly, [332] green on the wings; but theſe have beſides a blue ſtripe near their inner margin.
This bird is alſo of the ſame ſize with the preceding: it appears to have the ſame port; and as it comes from the ſame climates, I ſhould be tempted to refer it to the ſame ſpecies, were it not longer winged, which implies other in⯑ſtincts and habits. But as the length of the wings in dried birds depends greatly on the mode of preparing them, we cannot admit the circumſtance juſt mentioned to conſtitute a ſpe⯑cific difference; and it will be prudent to wait the deciſion of accurate obſervation.
IX. The CEYLON THRUSH.
• Le Plaſtron-Noir de Ceilan, Buff. , • Turdus Zeylonus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Merula Torquata Capitis Bonae Spei, Briſſ. ,
and • The Green Pye of Ceylon, Edw.
I beſtow a ſeparate name on this bird, be⯑cauſe thoſe who have ſeen it do not agree with regard to the ſpecies to which it belongs. Briſ⯑ſon makes it a Blackbird, and Edwards a Pie or a Shrike. For my own part, I conceive it to be a Ring-Ouzel, not venturing, however, to de⯑cide, till farther information clear up the ſub⯑ject. [333] It is ſmaller than the Blackbird, and its bill proportionably ſtronger. Its total length is ſeven inches and a half, its alar extent eleven, its tail three and a half, its bill twelve or thirteen lines, and its legs fourteen; its wings when cloſed reach beyond the middle of its tail, which is ſomewhat tapered.
The black breaſt-piece which diſtinguiſhes this bird is the more conſpicuous, as it is bounded above and below by a lighter colour, for the throat and all the under-part of the body is of a pretty bright yellow. From the two ends of the upper-margin of this breaſt-piece ariſe two cords of the ſame colour, which firſt aſcend⯑ing on each ſide towards the head, define the beautiful yellow orange plate on the throat, and then bending under the eyes, terminate at the baſe of the bill, where they are in a manner in⯑ſerted. Two yellow eye-brows, which take their origin cloſe to the noſtrils, embrace the eyes above, and form a contraſt to the black cords. All the upper-part of this bird is olive; but that colour ſeems to be tarniſhed by a mixture of cinereous on the top of the head, and on the contrary to brighten on the rump, and on the outer edge of the wing-quills; the largeſt of theſe are tipt with brown; the two interme⯑diate ones of the tail are of an olive green, and alſo the whole of the under-part of the body; and the ten lateral ones are black, tipt with yellow.
[334] The female has neither the black breaſt-piece nor the black cords. Its throat is gray; its breaſt and belly of a greeniſh yellow, and all the up⯑per-ſide of the body of the ſame colour, but deeper. In general, the female differs little from the bird figured Pl. Enl. No. 358, under the name of the Orange-bellied Blackbird of Se⯑negal.
Briſſon has ſuppoſed that this bird is a native of the Cape of Good Hope; and indeed it was brought from that place by the Abbé de la Caille. But if we believe Edwards, it belongs to a more diſtant climate, that of the iſland of Ceylon. That naturaliſt obtained accurate information on this ſubject from John Gideon Loten, who had been governor of Ceylon, and who, on his re⯑turn from India, preſented ſeveral birds of that country to the Royal Society, and among the reſt a Ceylon Thruſh. Edwards introduces here an obſervation which we have already anticipated, but which it may not be improper to repeat. The Cape of Good Hope is the general rendez⯑vous of ſhips trading to the Eaſt, and it may often happen, that in touching there, birds may be left which afterwards are miſtaken for natives of the extremity of Africa,
X. The ORANGE-GREEN or the ORANGE-BELLIED BLACKBIRD of Senegal.
• Turdus Chryſogaſter, Gmel. ,
and • The Orange-bellied Thruſh, Lath.
[335]The principal colours of this new ſpecies are green and orange; a fine deep green, with re⯑flexions which are variouſly ſhaded with yellow, is ſpread over the whole of the upper-part of the body, including the tail, the wings, the head, and even the throat, but is not ſo deep on the tail. The under-part of the body, from the throat downwards, is of a ſhining orange. When the wings are cloſed, there appears a train of white which belongs to the outer edge of ſome of the quills. The bill is brown, and alſo the legs.—This bird is ſmaller than the Blackbird; its length is about eight inches; its alar extent eleven and a half; its tail two and three-quarters, and its bill eleven or twelve lines.
VARIETY of this BIRD.
The preceding bird reſembles much the fe⯑male of the Ring-Ouzel of Ceylon; but it is [336] equally related to the Blackbird of the Cape of Good Hope, No. 221, which I call Orange-Blue (oranbleu); for the whole of the under-part of its body is orange, from the throat to the lower belly incluſive; and blue is ſpread over the up⯑per-part from the baſe of the bill to the end of the tail. This blue conſiſts of two ſhades, the deeper of which edges each feather, whence re⯑ſults an agreeable and regular variety. The bill and legs are black, and alſo the quills of the wings; but many of the middle ones have a white-gray margin: laſtly, the tail-quills are the moſt uniform in regard to colour.
XI. The BROWN BLACKBIRD of the CAPE of GOOD HOPE.
• Turdus Bicolor, Gmel. ,
and • The White-rumped Thruſh, Lath.
We are indebted to Sonnerat for this new ſpe⯑cies. It is nearly the ſize of the Blackbird; its total length ten inches, and its wings extend a little beyond the middle of the tail. Almoſt all its plumage is of a varying brown, with reflex⯑ions of duſky green: the belly and rump are white.
XII. The BANIAHBOU of Bengal.
• Turdus Canorus Lanius Fauſtus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Merula Bengalenſis, Briſſ. , • The Brown Indian Thruſh, Edw. ,
and • To Crying Thruſh, Lath.
[337][...] plumage is every where brown; deeper on the upper-part of the body, lighter on the under, and alſo on the edge of the coverts and wing-quills; the bill and legs are yellow; the tail tapered, about three inches long, and ex⯑tending half its length beyond the cloſed wings. Such are the chief circumſtances which charac⯑terize this foreign bird, the ſize of which ſome⯑what exceeds that of the Throſtle.
Linnaeus informs us, on the authority of ſome Swediſh naturaliſts who had travelled into Aſia, that the ſame bird occurs in China; but it ſeems there to have been affected by the cli⯑mate, being gray above and ruſt-coloured be⯑low, with a white ſtreak on each ſide of the head. The epithet of canorus, which Linnaeus beſtows on it, no doubt from accurate information, im⯑plies that theſe foreign Blackbirds have an agree⯑able warble.
XIII. The CINEREOUS BLACKBIRD.
• L'Ourovang, ou Merle Cendré de Madagaſcar, Buff. , • Turdus-Urovang, Gmel. ,
and • Merula Madagaſcarienſis Cinerea, Briſſ.
[338]The name Cinereous Blackbird gives a very juſt idea of the predominant colour of the plum⯑age: but the intenſity is not every where the ſame: it is very deep, almoſt black, with a ſlight tinge of green on the long and narrow feathers that cover the head: it is lighter without mix⯑ture of other tinge on the quills of the tail and of the wings, and on the great coverts of the latter. It has an olive caſt on the upper-part of the body, on the ſmall coverts of the wings, on the neck, on the throat, and on the breaſt. Laſtly, it is lighter under the body, and about the lower belly, and there is a ſlight tinge of yellow.
This Blackbird is nearly as large as our Red-Wing, but its tail is rather longer, its wings ſomewhat ſhorter, and its legs much ſhorter. Its bill is yellow, as in our Blackbirds, marked near the end with a brown ray, and furniſhed with ſome briſtles round the baſe; its tail con⯑ſiſts of twelve equal quills, and its legs are of a brown colour.
XIV. The PIGEON THRUSH.
• Le Merle des Colombiers, Buff. ,
and • Turdus Columbinus, Gmel.
[339]This bird is called, in the Philippines, the Pigeon-houſe Stare; becauſe it is naturally fami⯑liar, and ſeeks the conveniencies which the dwell⯑ings of men afford, and neſtles even in the pi⯑geon-houſes. But it reſembles the Blackbird more than the Stare, in the ſhape of its bill and legs, and in the proportions of its wings, which only reach the middle of the tail, &c. Its bulk is nearly that of the Red-Wing, and its plum⯑age conſiſts of one colour, though not uniform; this is a varying green, which, according to its poſition, has different ſhades and reflexions. This ſpecies is new, and we are indebted for it to Sonnerat. There are alſo found in the col⯑lection which he brought from the Cape of Good Hope, ſome individuals that evidently be⯑long to the ſame ſpecies, but which differ in hav⯑ing their rump white, both on the upper and under ſurface, and in being ſmaller. Muſt this be aſcribed to climate or to age*?
XV. The OLIVE THRUSH.
• Le Merle Olive du Cape de Bonne Eſperance, Buff. ,
and • Turdus Olivaceus, Linn. and Gmel.
[340]The upper-part of the body of this bird, in⯑cluding what appears of the quills, of the tail, and of the wings, when they are cloſed, is of an olive-brown; the neck and the breaſt are of the ſame colour as the throat, but without ſtreaks; all the reſt of the under-part of the body is of a fine fulvous colour: laſtly, the bill is brown, as well as the legs, and the inſide of the quills of the wings and the lateral quills of the tail.
This Blackbird is as large as a Red-Wing; its alar extent near thirteen inches, and its total length eight and a quarter; the bill is ten lines, the leg fourteen; the tail, which conſiſts of twelve equal quills, is three inches long; and the wings, when cloſed, reach only half its length*.
XVI. The BLACK-THROATED THRUSH.
• Le Merle à Gorge Noire de Saint Domingue, Buff. ,
and • Turdus Aler, Gmel.
[341]The black on the throat of this bird extends on the one hand below the eye, and even on the ſpace between the eye and the bill; and on the other it deſcends upon the neck as far as the breaſt. It is beſides edged with a broad rufous border, with different ſhades of brown, which extends upon the eyes and upon the fore-part of the top of the head; the reſt of the head, the poſterior ſurface of the neck, the back, and the ſmall coverts of the wings, are grayiſh brown, variegated ſlightly with ſome browner tints. The great coverts of the wings, as well as the quills, are of a blackiſh brown, edged with light gray, and ſeparated from the ſmall coverts by an olive-yellow line belonging to theſe ſmall coverts. The ſame olive-yellow predominates on the rump, and on all the under-part of the body; but under the body it is variegated with ſome black ſpots, which are pretty broad, and ſcattered thinly over the whole ſpace between the black piece of the throat and the legs. The tail is of the ſame gray as the upper-part of the body, but in its middle only; the lateral quills being edged [342] on the outſide with a blackiſh colour; the bill and the legs are black.
This bird, which has not been hitherto de⯑ſcribed, is nearly of the bulk of the Red-Wing; its total length is about ſeven inches and a half, its bill one inch, its tail three; and its wings, which are very ſhort, reach ſcarcely the fourth of its tail.
XVII. The CANADA BLACKBIRD.
This reſembles the moſt the Mountain Black-bird, which is only a variety of the Ring Ouzel. It is ſmaller, but its wings bear the ſame propor⯑tion to its tail, not reaching beyond the middle, and the colours of its plumage, which are not very different, are diſtributed in the ſame man⯑ner. The ground colour is conſtantly dark⯑brown, variegated with lighter ſhades in every part, except in the quills of the tail and of the wings, which are of an uniform blackiſh brown. The coverts of the wings have reflexions of a deep but ſhining green; all the other feathers are blackiſh, and terminated with rufous, which, disjoining them from one another, produces a regular variety, ſo that the feathers may be counted from the rufous ſpots.
XVIII. The INDIAN OLIVE BLACKBIRD.
• Turdus Indicus, Gmel. , • Merula Olivacea Indica, Briſſ. ,
and • The Indian Thruſh, Lath.
[343]All the upper-part of this bird, including the quills of the tail, and thoſe uncovered of the quills of the wing, are of a deep olive-green. All the under-part is of the ſame ground-colour, but of a lighter tinge, and bordering upon yel⯑low. The inner webs of the wing-quills are brown, edged partly with yellow; the bill and legs are almoſt black.—This bird is larger than the Red-Wing; its whole length is eight inches, its alar extent twelve and a half, its tail three and a half, its bill thirteen lines, its leg nine, and its wings when cloſed reach to the middle of its tail.
XIX. The INDIAN CINEREOUS BLACKBIRD.
• Turdus Cinereus, Gmel. , • Merula Cinerea Indica, Briſſ. ,
and • The Aſh-coloured Thruſh, Lath.
The colour of the upper-part of the body is deeper than that of the under. The great co⯑verts [344] and the quills of the wings are edged with white-gray on the outſide; but the middle quills have this edging broader. They have likewiſe another border of the ſame colour on the inſide, from their origin, to two-thirds of their length. Of the twelve tail-quills, the two middle ones are cinereous, like the upper-part of the body; the two following are partly of the ſame colour, but their inſide is black: the eight others are entirely black, as alſo the bill, the legs, and the nails. The bill has ſome blackiſh briſtles near the angles of its opening.—This bird is ſmaller than the Red-Wing; it is ſeven and a quarter in length, twelve and two-thirds alar extent; its tail is three inches, its bill eleven lines, and its leg ten.
XX. The BROWN BLACKBIRD of Senegal.
• Turdus Senegalenſis, Gmel. , • Merula Senegalenſis, Briſſ. ,
and • The Senegal Thruſh, Lath.
Nothing can be more uniform and ordinary than the plumage of this bird, or more eaſy to deſcribe. It is grayiſh brown on the upper and anterior parts, dirty white on the under-part, brown on the quills of the tail and of the wings, and alſo on the bill and legs. It is not ſo large [345] as the Red-Wing, but its tail is longer, and its bill ſhorter. Its whole length, according to Briſſon, is eight inches; its alar extent eleven and a half, its tail three and a half, its bill nine lines, its leg eleven. Its wings do not reach farther than the middle of its tail, which conſiſts of twelve quills.
XXI. The TANOMBE, or the MADAGASCAR BLACKBIRD.
• Turdus Madagaſcarienſis, Gmel. , • Merula Madagaſcarienſis, Briſſ. ,
and • The Madagaſcar Thruſh, Lath.
I have retained the name by which this bird is known in its native region. It is to be wiſhed that travellers would thus preſerve the real names of the foreign birds; we ſhould then be able to diſtinguiſh the ſpecies to which each obſervation applied.
The Tanombé is rather ſmaller than the Red-Wing; its plumage is in general of a very deep brown on the head, neck, and all the upper-part of the body; but the coverts of the tail and wings have a tinge of green. The tail is a gold green, edged with white, as alſo the wings, which have, beſides, ſome violet changing into [346] green at the tips of the great quills, a colour of poliſhed ſteel on the middle quills and the great coverts, and an oblong mark of fine gold-yellow on the ſame middle quills. The breaſt is of a rufous brown, the reſt of the under-part of the body white; the bill and legs are black, and the tarſus very ſhort. The tail is ſomewhat forked; the wings reach only to the middle, but its alar extent is greater in proportion than in the Red-Wing. I may obſerve, that in a ſubject which I had occaſion to ſee, the bill was more hooked at the point than repreſented in the figure, and in this reſpect the Tanombé ſeems to reſemble the Solitary Blackbird.
XXII. The MINDANAO BLACKBIRD.
• Turdus Mindanenſis, Gmel. ,
and • The Mindanao Thruſh, Lath.
The ſteel colour which appears on part of the wings of the Tanombé, is, in the Mindanao Blackbird, ſpread over the head, the throat, the neck, the breaſt, and all the upper-part of the body as far as the end of the tail. The wings have a white bar near their outer margin, and the reſt of the under-part of the body is white.
[347] This bird exceeds not ſeven inches in length, and its wings reach only the middle of the tail, which is ſomewhat tapered.—It is a new ſpecies, introduced by Sonnerat.
Daubenton the younger has obſerved another individual of the ſame kind, in which the ends of the long quills of the wings and of the tail are of a deep varying green, with ſeveral ſpots of wavy-violet on the body, but chiefly behind the head. It is perhaps a female, or elſe a young male.
XXIII. The GREEN BLACKBIRD of the Iſle of France.
• Turdus Mauritianus, Gmel. ,
and • The Mauritius Thruſh, Lath.
The plumage of this bird is quite uniform, all the outſide being bluiſh green, verging to brown, but its bill and legs cinereous. It is ſmaller than the Red-Wing: its length is about ſeven inch⯑es, its alar extent ten and a half, its bill ten lines, and its wings reach to the third of its tail, which is only two inches and a half. The feathers that cover the head and neck are long and narrow.—It is a new ſpecies.
XXIV. The BLACK CASQUE, or the BLACK-HEADED BLACKBIRD of the Cape of Good Hope.
[348]Though at firſt ſight this bird ſeems to re⯑ſemble moſt in its plumage that of the follow⯑ing article, the Brunet, and particularly the Yellow-rumped Blackbird of Senegal, which I conſider as a variety of the ſame ſpecies, we ſtill perceive obvious differences in its colour, and more important ones in the proportions of its limbs. It is not ſo large as the Red-Wing; its total length nine inches, its alar extent nine and a half, its tail three and two-thirds, its bill thirteen lines, and its leg fourteen. Its wings, therefore, ſpread leſs than thoſe of the Brunet, but its bill, tail, and legs, are proportionably longer. Its tail is alſo of a different form, and conſiſts of twelve tapered quills; each wing has nineteen, of which the longeſt are the fifth and the ſixth.
With regard to its plumage, it reſembles that bird in the brown colour of the upper-part of its body, but it differs by the colour of its helmet, which is of a ſhining black; by the rufous co⯑lour of its rump, and of the upper-coverts of its tail; by the ruſty caſt of its throat, and of the whole of the under-part of its body, as far as [349] the lower coverts of the tail incluſively; by the ſmall brown ray on the flanks; by the ſmall white ſpot which appears on the wings, and which belongs to the large quills; by the blackiſh colour of the quills of the tail; and laſtly, by the white mark which terminates the lateral ones, and which is larger as the quill is nearer the outſide.
XXV. The BRUNET of the Cape of Good Hope.
• Turdus Capenſis, Linn. and Gmel. , • Merula Fuſca Capitis Bonae Spei, Briſſ. ,
and • The Brunet Thruſh, Lath.
The predominant colour of the plumage of this bird is deep brown, which is ſpread over the head, the neck, all the upper-part of the body, the tail, and wings; it is rather lighter on the breaſt and ſides, has a yellowiſh caſt on the belly and thighs, and gives place to a beau⯑tiful yellow on the lower coverts of the tail. This yellow ſpot is the more conſpicuous, as it is contraſted with the colour of the quills of the tail, which are of a ſtill deeper brown below than above. The bill and legs are entirely black.
[350] This bird is not larger than a Lark; its wings meaſure ten inches and a half acroſs, and hardly reach to the third of its tail, which is near three inches long, and conſiſts of twelve equal quills*.
VARIETY of the CAPE BRUNET.
The bird repreſented Pl. Enl. No. 317, by the name of the Yellow-rumped Blackbird of Senegal *, is much analogous to the Brunet, only it is rather larger, and its head and throat are black. The remaining parts are of the ſame colour in both, and nearly of the ſame propor⯑tions; which would lead us to ſuppoſe that it is a variety produced by difference of age or of ſex. But having occaſion afterwards to obſerve that, among a great number of birds ſent by Sonnerat, many marked "Cape Blackbirds" were exactly like the ſubject deſcribed by Briſ⯑ſon, and not one with a black head and throat, it ſeems more probable that the bird, No. 317, is only a variety derived from climate. The bill of this bird is broader at the baſe, and more curved than that of the ordinary Blackbird.
XXVI. The BROWN JAMAICA BLACKBIRD.
• Turdus Aurantius, Gmel. , • Merula Jamaicenſis, Briſſ. , • Merula Fuſca, Ray, Sloane, and Klein. ,
and • The White-chinned Thruſh, Lath.
[351]Deep brown is the predominant colour of the head, the upper-part of the body, the wings, and the tail; brown of a lighter ſhade on the fore-ſide of the breaſt and of the neck, dirty white under the belly, and on the reſt of the lower-part of the body. The moſt remarkable feature in this bird is, that the throat and bill are white, and the legs orange. Its extreme length is ſix inches four lines, its alar extent nine inches and ſome lines, its tail two inches and eight or nine lines, its leg two inches and a quarter, its bill eleven lines; all Engliſh meaſure. It ap⯑pears then that it is not ſo large as our Red-Wing. It generally haunts the mountains and foreſts, and is eſteemed good eating. All that Sloane informs us, with reſpect to the interior ſtructure of this bird, is, that its fat is of an orange-yellow*.
XXVII. The CRAVATED BLACKBIRD of Cayenne.
• Turdus Cinnamomeus, Gmel. ,
and • The Black-breaſted Thruſh, Lath.
[352]The cravat of this Blackbird is very broad, of a fine black edged with white; it extends from the baſe of the lower mandible, and even from the ſpace included between the upper man⯑dible and the eye, as far as the middle of the breaſt, where the white border widens, and is marked with tranſverſe rays of black: it covers the ſides of the head as far as the eyes, and in⯑cloſes three-fourths of the circumference of the neck. The coverts of the wings are of the ſame black as the collar; but the ſmall ones are tipt with white, which produces ſpeckles of that co⯑lour; and the two rows of great coverts have a fulvous edging. The reſt of the plumage is cinnamon colour, but the bill and legs are black.
This Blackbird is ſmaller than our Red-Wing; the point of its bill is hooked as in the Solitary Thruſhes. Its whole length is about ſeven inches, its tail two and a half, its bill eleven lines, and its wings, which are ſhort, extend but a little way beyond the origin of the tail.
XXVIII. The CRESTED BLACKBIRD of the Cape of Good Hope.
• Turdus Cafer, Linn. and Gmel. ,
and • The Cape Thruſh, Lath.
[353]The creſt is not permanent; it conſiſts of long narrow feathers, which naturally recline on the top of the head, but which the bird can briſtle at pleaſure. Its colour, and that of the head and the breaſt, is a fine black, with violet reflexions; the fore-ſide of the neck and breaſt have the ſame wavy gloſs on a brown ground. This brown is ſpread on all the upper-part of the body, and extends over the neck, the coverts of the wings, part of the tail-quills, and even un⯑der the body, where it forms a ſort of broad cincture which paſſes under the belly; but in all theſe places it is ſoftened by a whitiſh colour which edges and defines each feather, in the ſame way nearly as in the Ring Ouzel.
The lower coverts of the tail are red, the up⯑per white, the abdomen alſo white, and the bill and legs black. The corners where the bill opens are ſhaded with long black briſtles projecting forwards. This Blackbird is ſcarcely larger than the Creſted Lark. Its wings meaſure eleven or twelve inches acroſs, and when cloſed do not [354] reach the middle of the tail. The longeſt fea⯑thers are the fourth and fifth, and the firſt is the ſhorteſt of all*.
XXIX. The AMBOYNA BLACKBIRD.
• Turdus Amboinenſis, Gmel. ,
and • The Amboina Thruſh, Lath.
I allow this bird to remain in the place aſ⯑ſigned it by Briſſon, though I am not quite cer⯑tain whether it really belongs to this genus. Seba, who firſt noticed it, tells us that he ranged it among the Nightingales, on account of the ſweetneſs of its ſong; it not only chants its loves in the ſpring, but erects its long beautiful tail, and bends it in a ſingular manner over its back. All the upper-part of its body is reddiſh brown, including the tail and the wings, except that theſe are marked with a yellow ſpot; all the under-part of the body is of this laſt colour, but the lower ſurface of the tail-quills is golden. Theſe are twelve in number, and regularly diminiſh⯑ing.
XXX. The BLACKBIRD of the Iſle of Bourbon.
• Turdus Borbonica, Gmel. ,
and • The Bourbon Thruſh, Lath.
[355]The ſize of this bird is nearly that of the Creſted Lark; it is ſeven inches and a half long, and eleven and one-third acroſs the wings; its bill ten or eleven lines, its legs the ſame, and its wings reach not to the middle of its tail, which is three inches and a half long, and conſequently almoſt half the whole length of the bird.
The top of the head is covered with a ſort of black cap; all the reſt of the upper-part of the body, the ſmall coverts of the wings, the whole of the tail and breaſt, are of an olive-aſh colour; the reſt of the under-part of the body is olive, verging on yellow, except the middle of the belly, which is whitiſh. The great coverts of the wings are brown, with ſome mixture of ru⯑fous; the wing-quills are parted by theſe two colours; the brown being placed within and be⯑neath, the rufous before. We muſt, however, except the three middle-quills, which are en⯑tirely brown; thoſe of the tail are brown alſo, and interſected near their end by two bars of different ſhades of brown, but from the ſame⯑neſs of the ground colour they are very indiſ⯑tinct: the bill and legs are yellowiſh.
XXXI. The DOMINICAN BLACKBIRD of the Philippines.
• Turdus Dominicanus, Gmel. ,
and • The Dominican Thruſh, Lath.
[356]The length of the wings is one of the moſt remarkable characters of this new ſpecies; they reach as far as the tail. Their colour, as well as that of the under-ſide of the body, is brown, on which appear a few irregular ſpots of the colour of poliſhed ſteel, or rather of changing violet*. This brown ground aſſumes a violet caſt at the origin of the tail, and a greeniſh at the end; it is lighter on the ſide of the neck, and becomes whitiſh on the head and all the lower-part of the body. The bill and legs are light brown.
This bird is ſcarcely ſix inches long. It is a new ſpecies, for which we are indebted to Son⯑nerat.
XXXII. The GREEN CAROLINA BLACKBIRD.
Cateſby, who obſerved this bird in its native region, informs us, that it is ſcarcely larger than a [357] Lark, and its figure is nearly the ſame; that it is extremely ſhy, and conceals itſelf dexterouſly; that it haunts the banks of the large rivers, two or three hundred miles from the ſea, and flies with its feet extended backwards (as uſual in thoſe of our own birds, whoſe tails are very ſhort), and that its ſong is loud. It probably ſubſiſts on the ſeeds of the purple-flowered night-ſhade.
All the upper-part of the body is of a dull green, the eye is almoſt encircled with white, the lower jaw delicately edged with the ſame colour; the tail brown; the under-ſides of the body, except the lower belly, which is whitiſh, the bill and the legs, black: the quills of the wings do not reach much beyond the origin of the tail.
The total length of the bird is about ſeven inches and a quarter, its tail three, its leg twelve lines, its bill ten.
XXXIII. The TERAT BOULAN, or the INDIAN BLACKBIRD.
• Turdus Orientalis, Gmel. , • Merula Indica, Briſſ. ,
and • The Aſh-rumped Thruſh, Lath.
The characters of this ſpecies are theſe: The bill, legs, and toes, are proportionably ſhorter [358] than in the others; the tail is tapered, but dif⯑ferently from ordinary; the ſix middle quills are of equal lengths, and it is properly the three lateral quills on each ſide that are tapered. The upper-part of the body, the neck, the head, and the tail, are black, the rump cinereous, and the three lateral feathers on each ſide tipt with white. The ſame white prevails on all the under-part of the body and of the tail, on the fore-ſide of the neck, and of the throat, and extends both ways over the eyes; but on each ſide a ſmall black ſtreak riſes at the baſe of the bill, and ſeems to paſs under the eye, and extend beyond it. The great quills of the wings are blackiſh, edged half-way with white on the inſide; the middle quills, and alſo the great coverts, are likewiſe edged with white, but on the outſide, and through their whole length.
This bird is rather larger than the Lark; its alar extent is ten inches and a half, and its wings extend a little beyond the middle of its tail. Its length, from the point of the bill to the end of the tail, is ſix inches and a half, and to the end of the nails five and a half; the tail is two and a half, the bill eight lines and a half, the leg nine, and the middle toe ſeven.
XXXIV. The SAUI JALA, or the GOLDEN BLACK-BIRD of Madagaſcar.
• Turdus Nigerrimus, Gmel. , • Merula Madagaſcarienſis Aurea, Briſſ. ,
and • The Black-cheeked Thruſh, Lath.
[359]This ſpecies, which is an inhabitant of the ancient continent, retains in part the plumage of our Blackbirds. Its bill, legs, and nails, are blackiſh; it has a ſort of collar of fine velvet black, which paſſes under the throat, and extends only a little beyond the eyes; the quills of the tail and of the wings, and the plumage of the reſt of the body, are always black, but edged with lemon colour, as they are edged with gray in the Ring Ouzel; ſo that the ſhape of each feather is beautifully defined on the contiguous feathers which it covers.
This bird is nearly of the ſize of the Lark; its alar extent is nine inches and a half, and its tail is ſhorter than in our Blackbirds, in pro⯑portion to the total length of the bird, which is five inches and three quarters, and alſo in pro⯑portion to the length of its wings, which ſtretch almoſt to two-thirds of its tail. The bill is ten lines, the tail ſixteen, the legs eleven, and the middle toe ten.
XXXV. The SURINAM BLACKBIRD.
• Turdus Surinamus, Gmel. , • Merula Surinamenſis, Briſſ. ,
and • The Surinam Thruſh, Lath.
[360]We find in this American Blackbird the ſame ground colour that predominates in the common Blackbird. It is almoſt entirely of a ſhining black, but diverſified by other tints. On the crown of the head is a yellowiſh fulvous plate; on the breaſt are two marks of the ſame colour, but of a lighter ſhade; on the rump is a ſpot of the ſame hue; on the wings is a white line that borders them from their origin to the third joint; and laſtly, under the wings is white, which pre⯑vails over all the lower coverts: ſo that in flying this bird diſcovers as much white as black. Its legs alſo are brown, and its bill only blackiſh; and alſo the wing-quills, and all thoſe of the tail, except the two firſt and the laſt, which are a yellowiſh fulvous colour at their origin, but only in the inſide.
The Surinam Blackbird is not larger than a Lark; its whole length is ſix inches and a half; its alar extent nine and a half; its tail three nearly; its bill eight lines, and its legs ſeven or eight; laſtly, its wings ſtretch beyond the mid⯑dle of its tail.
XXXVI. The PALMISTE.
• Turdus Palmarum, Linn. and Gmel. ,
and • The Palm Thruſh, Lath.
[361]This bird owes its name to its habits of lodg⯑ing and neſtling in palm-trees, where it no doubt gathers its food. Its bulk is equal to that of the Lark; its length is ſix inches and a half, its alar extent ten and one-third, its tail two and a half, and its bill ten lines.
What ſtrikes us firſt in the plumage is a ſort of large black cap, which deſcends both ways lower than the ears, and is marked on each ſide with three white ſpots, the one near the forehead, the other above the eye, and the third below it. The neck is aſh-coloured behind where it is not co⯑vered by this black cap, and white before, as alſo the throat. The breaſt is cinereous, and [...]he reſt of the under-part of the body is white- [...]ray. The upper-part of the body, including [...] ſmall coverts of the wings, and the twelve [...]uills of the tail, is of a beautiful olive-green; [...] parts of the wing-quills that appear are of [...] ſame colour, and the reſt is brown. The [...]ill and legs are cinereous.—The wings ſtretch [...] little beyond the middle of the tail.
The bird, which Briſſon has made another [...]ecies of the Palmiſte, differs from the preceding [362] in nothing but that its cap, inſtead of being en⯑tirely black, has an aſh-coloured bar on the top of the head, and has rather leſs white under the body. But in every other reſpect the reſem⯑blance is exact, and not a word of the deſcrip⯑tion needs to be altered: and as they inhabit the ſame country, I do not heſitate to conclude that theſe two individuals belong to the ſame ſpecies, and I am diſpoſed to think that the firſt is the male, and the ſecond the female.
XXXVII. The WHITE-BELLIED VIOLET BLACK-BIRD of Juida.
• Turdus Leucogaſter, Gmel. ,
and • The Whidah Thruſh, Lath.
The name of this bird contains almoſt a com⯑plete deſcription of its plumage. I need only add, that the great wing-quills are blackiſh, that the bill is of the ſame colour, and the legs cine⯑reous. It is rather ſmaller than the Lark; its length is about ſix inches and a half, its alar ex⯑tent ten and a half, its tail ſixteen lines, its bill eight, its legs nine.—The wings ſtretch three-fourths of the tail.
XXXVIII. The RUFOUS BLACKBIRD of Cayenne.
• Turdus Rufifrons, Gmel. ,
and • The Rufous Thruſh, Lath.
[363]The front and ſides of its head, the throat, and all the fore-part of its neck and belly, are rufous. The top of the head, and all the up⯑per-part of the body, including the ſuperior co⯑verts of the tail, and the quills of the wings, brown; the ſuperior coverts of the wings black, edged with bright yellow, which is conſpicuous on the ground colour, and terminates each row of theſe by a waving line. The lower coverts of the tail are white; the tail, the bill, and the legs, are cinereous.
This bird is ſmaller than the Lark; its total length is only ſix inches and a half. I could not meaſure it acroſs the wings; but theſe were certainly not broad, for when cloſed they did not reach beyond the coverts of the tail. The bill and the legs are each eleven or twelve lines.
XXXIX. The LITTLE RUFOUS-THROATED BROWN BLACKBIRD of Cayenne.
• Turdus Pectoralis, Lath. Ind. ,
and • The Yellow-breaſted Thruſh, Lath.
[364]I ſcarcely need add any thing to this deſcrip⯑tion. The rufous extends over the neck and breaſt; the bill is cinereous black, and the legs greeniſh-yellow. It is nearly of the ſize of the Goldfinch; its total length is hardly five inches, the bill ſeven or eight lines, the legs eight or nine; and the wings reach beyond the mid⯑dle of the tail, which in all is only eighteen lines.
XL. The OLIVE BLACKBIRD of St. Domingo.
• Turdus Hiſpaniolenſis, Gmel. , • Merula Olivacea Dominicenſis, Briſſ. ,
and • The Hiſpaniola Thruſh, Lath.
The upper-part of its body is olive, and the under gray, mixed confuſedly with the ſame colour. The inner webs of the tail-quills, of thoſe of the wings, and of the great coverts of [365] theſe, are brown, edged with white or whitiſh; the bill and legs are grayiſh-brown.
This bird is ſcarcely larger than the Petty Chaps; its whole length is ſix inches, its alar extent eight and three-quarters, its tail two, its bill nine lines, its legs of the ſame length; its wings reach beyond the middle of its tail, which conſiſts of twelve equal quills.
We may conſider the Olive Blackbird of Cay⯑enne, Pl. Enl. No. 558, as a variety of this; the only difference is, that the upper-part of the body is of a browner green, and the under of a lighter gray; the legs are alſo more blackiſh.
XLI. The OLIVE BLACKBIRD of Barbary.
Mr. Bruce ſaw, in Barbary, a Blackbird, which was larger than the Miſſel; all the upper-part of the body was an olive yellow, the ſmall co⯑verts of the wings the ſame colour, with a tinge of brown, the great coverts and the quills black, the quills of the tail blackiſh, tipt with yellow, and all of equal length; the under-part of the body of a dirty white, the bill reddiſh brown, the legs ſhort and lead-coloured; the wings reached only to the middle of the tail. It reſembles much the Barbary Throſtle already [366] deſcribed, but it has no ſpeckles on its breaſt; and beſides, there are other differences, which would lead us to refer them to two diſtinct ſpecies.
XLII. The MOLOXITA, or the NUN of Abyſſinia.
• Turdus Monacha, Gmel. ,
and • The Nun Thruſh, Lath.
Not only is this bird of the ſame figure and ſize with the Blackbirds, but like them it inha⯑bits the foreſts, and lives on berries and fruits. Inſtinct, or perhaps experience, teaches it to lodge in trees near the brink of precipices: ſo that it is difficult to be ſhot, and ſtill more to be found after it has dropped. It is remarkable for a great black cowl which covers the head and throat, and deſcends over the breaſt like a pointed ſtomacher; on this account it has been called the Nun. The whole of the upper-part of the body is yellow, more or leſs inclined to brown; the coverts of the wings, and the quills of the tail, are brown, edged with yellow; the quills of the wings different ſhades of black, and edged with light-gray or white; all the under-part of the body, and the thighs, light-brown; the legs ci⯑nereous, and the bill reddiſh.
XLIII. The BLACK and WHITE BLACKBIRD of Abyſſinia.
• Turdus Aethiopicus, Gmel. ,
and • The Ethiopian Thruſh, Lath.
[367]Black extends over all the upper-part, from the bill incluſively to the end of the tail, ex⯑cepting however the wings, on which we per⯑ceive a croſs bar of white, conſpicuous on the dark ground; white predominates in the under-part, and the legs are blackiſh. This bird is nearly of the ſize of the Red-Wing, but is rounder ſhaped; the tail is ſquare at the end, and the wings ſo ſhort, that they ſcarcely reach beyond its origin. It ſings nearly like the cuckoos, or rather the wooden clocks that imi⯑tate the cuckoos.
It haunts the thickeſt woods, and would be difficult to be diſcovered, but for its ſong; which would ſeem to ſhew that it does not ſeek ſafety in concealment, ſince the ſame inſtinct would enjoin ſilence.
This bird feeds on fruits and berries, like the Blackbirds and Thruſhes.
XLIV. The BROWN BLACKBIRD of Abyſſinia.
• Turdus Abyſſinicus, Gmel. ,
and • The Abyſſinian Thruſh, Lath.
[368]The ancients have ſpoken of an Aethiopian olive-tree that bore no fruit: this bird feeds on the flower of that tree. If it were con⯑tented with that proviſion, few would have rea⯑ſon to complain. But it alſo eats grapes, and is very deſtructive in the ſeaſon. This Blackbird is nearly as large as a Red-Wing; all the upper-part of the head and of the body is brown; the coverts of the wings of the ſame colour; the quills of the wings and of the tail deep-brown, edged with a lighter brown; the throat of a light brown; all the under-part of the body of a ful⯑vous yellow, and the legs black*.
The GRISIN of Cayenne.
[369]THE top of the head is blackiſh, the throat black; and this black colour extends from the eyes as far as the lower-part of the breaſt: it has a ſort of white eye-brows, which appear diſtinct on the duſky ground, and connect the eyes by a white line, which borders the baſe of the upper mandible. All the upper-part of the body is cinereous gray; the tail is deeper, and terminated with white; its lower coverts and the belly are alſo white; the coverts of the wings are blackiſh, and their limits accurately defined by a white border. The quills of the wings are edged without with light gray, and tipt with white; the bill is black, and the legs cinereous.
This bird is not larger than a Pettychaps; its length is about four inches and a half, its bill ſeven lines, its legs the ſame, and its wings reach to the middle of its tail, which is rather tapered.
In the female, the upper-part of the body is more cinereous than in the male; what is black in the latter is only blackiſh in the former, and for that reaſon the edge of the coverts of the wings is not ſo perceptible on the ground colour.
The VERDIN of Cochin China.
• Turdus Cochinchinenſis, Gmel. ,
and • The Black-chinned Thruſh, Lath.
[370]THE name of this bird ſufficiently marks its predominant colour. The green is ſhaded with a tinge of blue on the tail, on the outer edge of the great quills of the wings, and on the ſmall coverts near the back. The throat is velvet black, except the two ſmall blue ſpots which ap⯑pear on both ſides of the lower mandible. This black extends behind the corners of the mouth, and riſes on the upper mandible, where it occu⯑pies the ſpace between its baſe and the eye, and below it is ſurrounded by a ſort of yellow high cape that falls on the breaſt; the belly is green, the bill black, and the legs blackiſh. This bird is nearly of the ſize of the Goldfinch. I could not meaſure its length, becauſe the tail was not fully grown when the bird was killed.
The bill is ten lines in length, and appears ſhaped like that of the Blackbirds, its edges be⯑ing ſcalloped near the point. This little Black⯑bird is certainly a native of Cochin China, for it was found in the ſame box with the Muſk Ani⯑mal, ſent directly from that country.
The AZURIN.
[371]THIS bird is undoubtedly not a Blackbird, for it has neither the appearance nor the ſhape of one. However, there is ſome reſemblance in the form of the bill, the legs, &c. It has been called the Guiana Blackbird. I wait till travellers, ardent in the purſuit of Natural Hiſ⯑tory, make us acquainted with its true name, and, above all, with its habits. To judge from the little that is known of it, that is, from its ex⯑ternal appearance, I ſhould range it between the Jays and the Blackbirds.
Three broad bars of fine velvet black, parted by two bars of orange-yellow, cover entirely the upper-part and the ſides of the head and of the neck. The throat is pure yellow, the breaſt de⯑corated with a large blue plate; all the reſt of the lower-part of the body, including the infe⯑rior coverts of the tail, is radiated tranſverſely with theſe two laſt colours, and the blue appears alone on the quills of the tail, which are ta⯑pered. The upper-part of the body from the origin of the neck, and the neareſt coverts of the wings, are of a reddiſh brown; the moſt remote coverts are black, as are alſo the wing-quills: but ſome of the firſt have beſides a white ſpot, whence riſes a ſtripe of the ſame colour, [372] deeply indented, and which runs almoſt parallel to the margin of the cloſed wing. The bill and legs are brown.
This bird is rather larger than a Blackbird; its whole length is eight inches and a half, its tail is two and a half, its bill twelve lines, and its legs eighteen. The wings, when cloſed, reach almoſt to the middle of the tail.
The SHORT TAIL.
• Les Breves, Buff.
[373]NATURE has eſtabliſhed important diſtinc⯑tions between theſe birds and the Black-birds; and I therefore do not heſitate to range them ſeparately. The ſhortneſs of the tail, the thickneſs of the bill, and the length of the legs, are characteriſtic features; and theſe muſt in⯑volve other differences in their port, their habits, and perhaps in their diſpoſitions.
We are acquainted with only four birds of this ſpecies; I ſay ſpecies, for the reſemblance in the plumage is ſo exact, that they muſt be regarded as varieties only of a common ſtem. In all of them the neck, the head, the tail, are black or partly black; the upper-part of the body is green of various intenſity; the ſuperior coverts of the wings and tail are of a fine beryl colour, with a white or whitiſh ſpot on the great quills of the wing; laſtly, in all, except that of the Philip⯑pines, the lower part of the body is yellow.
I. The SHORT-TAIL PHILIPPINE*. Its head and neck are covered with a ſort of cowl entirely black, the tail of the ſame colour; the under-part of the body, including the coverts and the ſmall quills of the wings neareſt the back, of a deep green; the breaſt and the top of [374] the belly of a lighter green; the lower belly and the coverts of the tail of a roſe colour; the great quills of the wings black at their origin and at their extremity, and marked with a white ſpot between the two; the bill yellowiſh brown, and the legs orange.
The whole length of the bird is only ſix inches and a quarter, becauſe of its ſhort tail; but it is more than eight inches, when meaſured from the point of its bill to the end of its feet. It is nearly as large as the common Blackbird; its wings are twelve inches acroſs, and reach be⯑yond the tail, which is only twelve lines long; the legs are eighteen.
II. The SHORT TAIL which Edwards has figured, Pl. 324, by the name of Short-tailed Pie of the Eaſt-Indies *. Its head is not entirely black; it has only three bars of that colour riſing from the baſe of the bill, the one ſtretching over the top of the head and behind the neck, and each of the others paſſing under the eye, and deſcending on the ſides of the neck. The two laſt bars are parted from the middle one by an⯑other bar, which is divided lengthwiſe by yellow and white; the yellow being contiguous to this middle bar, and the white contiguous to the black lateral bar. Alſo, the under-part of its tail and the lower belly are roſe-coloured, like the preceding; but all the reſt of the under-part of the body is yellow, the throat white, and the [375] tail edged with green at the end. It was brought from the iſland of Ceylon.
III. The SHORT TAIL of Bengal*. Like the firſt it has the head and neck covered with a black cowl, but on this two large orange-co⯑loured eye-brows are diſtinctly defined: all the under-part of the body is yellow, and what was black in the great quills of the wing in the two preceding birds, is in this of a deep green, like the back. This bird is ſomewhat larger than the firſt, and of the ſize of an ordinary Black-bird.
IV. The SHORT TAIL of Madagaſcar†. The plumage of its head is alſo different from what we have juſt ſeen; the crown is of a blackiſh brown, which aſſumes a little yellow behind and on the ſides; the reſt is bounded by a half collar, which is black, and encircles the neck behind at its origin; and by two bars of the ſame colour, which riſing from the extre⯑mity of this half collar, paſs under the eyes, and terminate at the baſe of both mandibles; the tail is bordered at the end with a beryl co⯑lour; the wings are like thoſe of the firſt; the throat is mottled with white and yellow, and the under-part of the body is of a colour between yellow and brown.
The MAINATE of the Eaſt Indies *.
• Gracula Religioſa, Linn. and Gmel. , • Mainatus, Briſſ. ,
and • Minor Grakle, Lath.
[376]THE ſlighteſt compariſon will convince us, that this bird ought to be removed from the Blackbirds, Thruſhes, Stares, and Jackdaws, with which it has been haſtily ranged, and claſſed with the Goulin † of the Philippines, and eſpecially with the Martin ‡, which belong to the ſame country, and have likewiſe naked ſpots on the head. This bird is ſcarcely larger than a common Blackbird; its plumage is entirely black, but more gloſſy on the upper-part of the body, the throat, the wings, and the tail, and has green and violet reflexions. What is moſt remarkable in the bird, is a double yellow comb, irregularly jagged, which riſes on each ſide of the head, behind the eye; the two parts recline and approach each other, and on the back of the head they are parted only by a bar of long nar⯑row []
[377] feathers, which begins at the baſe of the bill; the other feathers on the crown of the head form a ſort of black velvet. The tail, which is eighteen lines long, is yellow, but receives a reddiſh tinge near the tail; laſtly, the legs are of an orange yellow. The tail of this bird is ſhorter, and the wings longer, than in the com⯑mon Blackbird; theſe extend within half an inch of the end of the tail, and meaſure eighteen or twenty inches acroſs. The tail conſiſts of twelve quills, and of thoſe of the wing, the firſt is the ſhorteſt, and the third the longeſt.
Such is the Mainate, No. 268, Pl. Enl.—But we muſt own that this ſpecies is ſubject to great variety, both in its plumage, in its ſize, and in the double comb which characterizes it. Before entering into detail, I ſhall mention that the Mainate has great talents for whiſtling, chant⯑ing, and even ſpeaking; that its pronunciation is more free than that of the Parrot; that it has been called by diſtinction the Speaking Bird, and that its garrulity becomes troubleſome*.
VARIETIES of the MAINATE.
[378]I. The MAINATE of Briſſon. It differs from ours, becauſe it has on the middle of the firſt quills of the wing a white ſpot which does not appear in the coloured figure; whether that it did not exiſt in the ſubject, or eſcaped the de⯑ſinger: we may obſerve that the edge of the firſt quills is black, even where the white ſpot croſſes them.
II. The MAINATE of Bontius. Its plum⯑age is blue of many tints, and conſequently ſomewhat different from that of ours, which is black, with reflexions of blue, green, violet, &c. Another remarkable difference is, that this blue ground was ſtrewed with ſpecks, like thoſe of the Stare, in point of ſhape and arrangement, but different with regard to colour; for Bontius ſubjoins that they are cinereous-gray.
III. The LITTLE MAINATE of Edwards. It has the white ſpot of Briſſon's on its wings; but what diſtinguiſhes it ſufficiently is, that the two creſts uniting behind the occiput, form a half crown, which ſtretches from one eye to the other. Edwards diſſected one, which was a fe⯑male; and notwithſtanding the diſproportion in point of ſize, he leaves it to be decided, whe⯑ther it was not a female of the following:
[379] IV. The GREAT MAINATE of Edwards*. Its creſt is the ſame as in the preceding, and it differs from that only in ſize, and in ſlight va⯑riations of colour. It is nearly the bulk of the Jay, and conſequently double the preceding, and the yellow of the bill and legs has no reddiſh tinge.—We are not informed whether the creſt of all theſe Mainates is ſubject to change of co⯑lour, according to the different ſeaſons of the year, and the various paſſions by which they are actuated.
The GOULIN *.
• Gracula Calva, Linn. and Gmel. , • Merula Calva Philippenſis, Briſſ. ,
and • The Bald Grakle, Lath.
[380]THERE are two ſpecimens of this ſpecies in the Royal Cabinet. In both, the upper-part of the body is of a light ſilver-gray, the tail and wings darker, each eye encircled by a bit of ſkin entirely bare, and forming an irregular ellipſe, inclined on its ſide, the eye being the inner focus: laſtly, on the crown of the head is a line of blackiſh feathers, which runs between theſe two ſkins; but one of theſe birds is much larger than the other. The largeſt is nearly of the bulk of the common Blackbird; the under-part of its body is brown, varied with ſome white ſpots, the naked ſkin which ſurrounds the eyes fleſh-coloured, the bill, the legs, and the nails, black. In the ſmaller, the under-part of [381] the body is of a yellowiſh brown; the bald parts of the head yellow, and alſo the legs, the nails, and the anterior part of the bill. Poivre informs us, that this naked ſkin, ſometimes yellow, ſome⯑times fleſh-coloured, which ſurrounds the eyes, is painted with a bright orange when the bird is angry; and this muſt probably happen likewiſe in the ſpring, when the bird burns with a paſ⯑ſion as impetuous but more gentle. I retain the name of Goulin, which it receives in the Philip⯑pines, becauſe it is diſtinguiſhed from the Black⯑bird not only by the bald part on its head, but by the ſhape and thickneſs of its bill.
Sonnerat has brought from the Philippines a bald bird, which reſembles much the one figured No. 200, Pl. Enl. but differs in the ſize and plumage. It is near a foot in length; the two bits of naked ſkin which encircle the eyes are fleſh-coloured, and parted from the crown of the head by a line of black feathers, which runs between them. All the other feathers which ſurround this naked ſkin are alſo of fine black; and ſo is the under-part of the body, the wings, and the tail: the upper-part of the body is gray, but this colour is lighter on the rump and neck, deeper on the back and the loins. The bill is blackiſh; the wings very ſhort, and ſcarcely extend beyond the origin of the tail. If the two bald Blackbirds in the Royal Cabinet belong to the ſame ſpecies, we muſt regard the larger as a young ſubject, which had not attained its full [382] growth, or received its true colours, and the ſmaller as one ſtill younger.
Theſe birds commonly neſtle in the holes of trees, eſpecially on the cocoa-nut tree; they live on fruits, and are very voracious, which has given riſe to the vulgar notion, that they have only one inteſtine, which extends ſtraight from the orifice of the ſtomach to the anus*.
The PARADISE GRAKLE.
• Le Martin, Buff. , • Paradiſea Triſtis, Linn. and Gmel. , • Gracula Triſtis, Lath. Ind. ,
and • Merula Philippenſis, Briſſ.
[383]THIS bird feeds upon inſects, and the havoc which it makes is the more conſiderable, as it has a gluttonous appetite: the various ſorts of flies and caterpillars are its prey. Like the Carrion Crows and Magpies, it hovers about the horſes, the oxen, and the hogs, in ſearch of the vermin which often torment theſe animals to ſuch a degree as to exhauſt them, and even oc⯑caſion death. The patient Quadrupedes are glad to get rid of theſe, and ſuffer, without mo⯑leſtation, often ten or twelve Paradiſe Grakles to perch on their back at once: but the intruders are not content with this indulgence; the ſkin need not be laid bare by ſome wound; the birds will peck with their bill into the raw fleſh, and do more injury than the vermin which they ex⯑tract. They may indeed be conſidered as car⯑nivorous birds, whoſe prudence directs them to attack openly none but the weak and the feeble. A young one was known to ſeize a rat two inches long, excluſive of the tail, daſh it re⯑peatedly againſt the board of its cage, break the [384] bones, and reduce every limb to a pliancy ſuited to its views; and then lay hold of it by the head, and almoſt in an inſtant ſwallow it entire. It reſted about a quarter of an hour to digeſt it, its wings drooping, and its air languid; but, after that interval, it ran with its uſual cheerfulneſs, and about an hour afterwards, having found an⯑other rat, it ſwallowed that as it did the firſt, and with as little inconvenience.
This bird is alſo very fond of graſshoppers; and as it deſtroys immenſe quantities, it is a va⯑luable gueſt in countries curſed with theſe in⯑ſects, and it merits to have its hiſtory interwoven with that of man. It is found in India and the Philippines, and probably in the intermediate iſlands; but it has long been unknown in that of Bourbon. Not above twenty years ago, Deſ⯑forges-Boucher, Governor-general, and Poivre, the Intendant, perceiving this iſland deſolated by graſshoppers*, deliberated ſeriouſly about the means of extirpating theſe inſects; and for that purpoſe brought ſeveral pairs of Paradiſe Gra⯑kles from India, with the view to multiply them, and oppoſe them as auxiliaries to their formi⯑dable enemies. This plan promiſed to ſucceed; when unfortunately ſome of the coloniſts, no⯑ticing theſe birds eagerly boring in the new-ſown fields, fancied that they were ſearching for grain, [385] were inſtantly alarmed, and reported through the whole iſland that the Paradiſe Grakle was pernicious. The cauſe was conſidered in form: in defence of the birds it was urged, that they raked in new-ploughed grounds, not for the grain, but on account of the inſects, and were ſo far beneficial. However, they were proſcribed by the council, and two hours after the ſentence was paſſed, not one was to be found in the iſland. This prompt execution was followed by a ſpeedy repentance. The graſshoppers gained an aſcendency, and the people, who only view the preſent, regretted the loſs of the Paradiſe Gra⯑kles. De Morave, conſulting the inclinations of the ſettlers, procured four of theſe birds eight years after their proſcription. They were re⯑ceived with tranſports of joy. Their preſerva⯑tion and breeding were made a ſtate affair; the laws held out to them protection, and the phy⯑ſicians on their part declared that their fleſh was unwholeſome. After ſo many and ſo powerful expedients, the deſired effect was produced; the Paradiſe Grakles multiplied, and the graſshop⯑pers were entirely extirpated. But an oppoſite inconvenience has ariſen; the birds, ſupported no longer by inſects, have had recourſe to fruits, and have fed on the mulberries, grapes, and dates. They have even ſcraped up the grains of wheat, rice, maize, and beans; they have rifled the pigeon-houſes, and preyed on the young; and thus, after freeing the ſettlers from the [386] graſshoppers, they have themſelves become a more dreadful ſcourge*. Their rapid multi⯑plication renders it difficult to ſtop their pro⯑greſs; unleſs perhaps a body of more powerful rapacious birds were employed againſt them; a plan which would ſoon be attended with other difficulties. The great ſecret would be to main⯑tain a certain number of Paradiſe Grakles, and, at the ſame time, to contrive to reſtrain their farther multiplication. Perhaps an attentive ob⯑ſervation of the nature and inſtincts of graſs⯑hoppers, would ſuggeſt a method of getting rid of them, without having recourſe to ſuch ex⯑penſive auxiliaries.
Theſe birds are not timorous, and are little diſturbed by the report of a muſket. They commonly take poſſeſſion of certain trees, or even certain rows of trees, often very near ham⯑lets, to paſs the night. They alight in an even⯑ing in ſuch immenſe bodies, that the branches are entirely covered with them, and the leaves concealed. When thus aſſembled, they all be⯑gin to chatter together, and their noiſy ſociety is exceedingly troubleſome to their neighbours. Yet their natural ſong is pleaſant, varied, and ex⯑tenſive. In the morning they diſperſe into the fields, either in ſmall flocks, or in pairs, accord⯑ing to the ſeaſon.
[387] They have two hatches in ſucceſſion every year, the firſt being in the middle of ſpring. Theſe turn out well, unleſs the ſeaſon be rainy. Their neſts are very rude, and they take no pre⯑caution to prevent the wet from penetrating. They faſten them in the leaves of the palm or other trees, and whenever an opportunity pre⯑ſents, they prefer a hay-loft. Theſe birds are warmly attached to their young. When their neſts are about to be robbed, they flutter round, and utter a ſort of croaking, which indicates their rage, and dart upon the plunderer. Nor do their fruitleſs exertions extinguiſh their af⯑fection; they follow their brood, which, if ſet in a window or open place, the parents will care⯑fully ſupply with food; nor will they in the leaſt be deterred by anxiety for their own ſafety.
The young Paradiſe Grakles are quickly train⯑ed, and eaſily learn to prattle. If kept in the poultry-yard, they ſpontaneouſly mimic the cries of all the domeſtic animals, hens, cocks, geeſe, dogs, ſheep, &c. and their chattering is accom⯑panied with certain accents and geſtures, which are full of prettineſſes.
Theſe birds are rather larger than the Black⯑birds; their bill and legs are yellow as in theſe, but longer, and the tail ſhorter. The head and neck are blackiſh; behind the eye is a naked reddiſh ſkin, of a triangular ſhape, the lower-part of the breaſt, and all the upper-part of the [388] body, including the coverts of the wings and of the tail, of a cheſnut brown; the belly white, the twelve quills of the tail, and the middle quills of the wings brown; the large ones blackiſh, from the tip to the middle, and thence to their origin white; which produces an ob⯑long ſpot of that colour near the edge of each wing when it is cloſed; and in this ſituation the wings extend to two-thirds of the tail.
It is ſcarcely poſſible to diſtinguiſh the female from the male, by the external appearance*.
The CHATTERER *.
• Le Jaſeur, Buff. , • Ampelis Garrulus, Linn. and Gmel. , • Garrulus Bohemicus, Ray, Will. and Klein. , • Bombycilla Bohemica, Briſſ. , • Turdus Criſtatus, Friſch. , • The Silk Tail, Ray. ,
and • The Bohemian Chatterer, Penn. and Lath.
[][389]THIS bird is diſtinguiſhed from all others by the ſmall red appendices which terminate moſt of the middle quills of the wings; theſe appendices are nothing but the projection of [390] the ſhafts beyond the webs, which as they ſpread extend into the ſhape of a pallet, and aſ⯑ſume a red colour. Sometimes as many have been reckoned as eight appendices on each ſide; ſome aſſert that the males have ſeven, and the females five; others that the females have none at all*. For my own part, I have ſeen ſpeci⯑mens which had ſeven in the one wing and five in the other; others which had only three; and others which had none; and at the ſame time exhibited other differences in the plumage. Laſtly, I have obſerved theſe appendices ſome⯑times parted longitudinally into two branches nearly equal, inſtead of forming as uſual the little pallets of a ſingle piece.
Linnaeus has, with great propriety, ſeparated this bird from the Thruſhes and Blackbirds; obſerving, beſides the ſmall red appendices which diſtinguiſh it, that its proportions are different, its bill ſhorter, more hooked, and armed with a double tooth or ſcallop, which appears near the ends of both mandibles†. But it is not eaſy to conceive why he ſhould range it with the Shrikes, while he admits that it feeds on berries, [391] and is by no means carnivorous. There is in⯑deed a conſiderable reſemblance between theſe and the Shrikes and Red-Backs, in the diſpo⯑ſition of the colours, particularly on the head, in the ſhape of the bill, &c.; but the difference of inſtinct is more important, and ought to pre⯑clude their aſſociation.
It is not eaſy to determine the native climate of this bird. We ſhould be much deceived, if from the names of Bohemian Jay, Bohemian Chatterer, &c. we inferred with Geſner, Briſ⯑ſon, and others, that Bohemia is its principal abode. It only migrates thither, as into many other countries*. In Auſtria, it is conceived to be a native of Bohemia and of Stiria, becauſe it enters by the frontiers of theſe regions; but in Bohemia it might be called the bird of Sax⯑ony, and in Saxony the bird of Denmark, or of other countries on the ſhores of the Baltic. The Engliſh trades aſſured Dr. Liſter, that for near a century paſt the Chatterers were very common in Pruſſia. Rzaczynſki tells us, that they viſit Great and Little Poland and Lithuania. Reau⯑mur was informed from Dreſden, that they breed in the neighbourhood of Peterſburg. Linnaeus mentions, ſeemingly on good authority, that they ſpend the ſummer, and conſequently breed, in the countries beyond Sweden; but his cor⯑reſpondents did not communicate the detail of [392] circumſtances. Laſtly, Strahlemberg told Friſch that they are found in Tartary in the holes of the rocks, and no doubt they muſt build their neſts in theſe. But whatever be the country which the Chatterers chooſe for their reſidence, where they enjoy the ſweets of exiſtence, and tranſmit them to new generations, it is certain that they are not ſedentary, but make their excurſions over all Europe. They ſometimes appear in the North of England*, in France†, Italy‡, and no doubt in Spain; but this laſt is conjectural, for we muſt own that the natural hiſtory of this charming country, ſo rich and ſo contiguous, inhabited by a people ſo renowned, is not better known to us than that of California, or of Ja⯑pan§.
The migrations of the Chatterers are in every country pretty regular with regard to the ſea⯑ſon; but if theſe be annual, as Aldrovandus was told, the birds by no means purſue con⯑ſtantly [393] the ſame route. The young Prince Adam d'Averſperg, Chamberlain of their Im⯑perial Majeſties, and one of the Lords of Bo⯑hemia, who poſſeſſes the moſt extenſive chaſe⯑grounds, and makes the nobleſt uſe of them, ſince he aims at the progreſs of Natural Hiſtory, informs us, in a Memoir addreſſed to the Count de Buffon*, that this bird flits every three or four years† from the mountains of Bohemia and Stiria, into Auſtria, in the beginning of the autumn; that it returns about the end of that ſeaſon; and that, even in Bohemia, not one is ſeen during the winter. However, it is ſaid, in Sileſia, the winter is the time when theſe birds are found on mountains. Thoſe which have ſtrayed into France and England appeared in the depth of the winter, but always in ſmall num⯑bers: a circumſtance which would ſhew that they were parted from the great body by ſome accident, and too much fatigued, or too young to recover their route. We might alſo infer, that France, England, and even Sweden, are not ſituated in the courſe of the principal mi⯑gration; but we cannot draw the ſame con⯑cluſion with regard to Italy, for immenſe num⯑bers of theſe birds have there been ſeveral times obſerved to arrive. This was particularly the [394] caſe in 1571, in the month of December; at that time it was not uncommon to ſee flocks of an hundred or more, and forty were often caught at once. The ſame event took place in February 1530*, when Charles V. cauſed him⯑ſelf to be crowned at Bologna; for in countries where theſe birds appear at diſtant intervals, their viſits form an epoch in political hiſtory, eſpecially ſince when they are very numerous, they announce to the frightened imaginations of the people war and peſtilence. From theſe ca⯑lamities we muſt, however, except that of earth⯑quakes; for in 1551, when the Charterers again appeared, it was obſerved that they ſpread through Modena, Placentia, and almoſt all parts of Italy†, but conſtantly avoided Ferrara, as if they had a preſentiment of the earthquake which happened ſoon after, and diſperſed even the birds of that country.
We cannot well aſſign the cauſe that deter⯑mines theſe birds to leave their ordinary reſi⯑dence, and to roam into diſtant climes. It is not exceſſive cold; for they are embodied for their expedition as early as the beginning of au⯑tumn; and beſides, their migration is only oc⯑caſional, happening once in three or four years, or only after ſix or ſeven years, and their nume⯑rous [395] hoſt often darkens the heavens*. Are we to aſcribe theſe migrations to their prodigious multiplication; like the locuſts, and thoſe rats of the north called lemings; and, as has hap⯑pened to the human ſpecies, when they were leſs civilized, and conſequently ſtronger, and more independent of the equilibrium which at length eſtabliſhes itſelf between all the powers of nature? Or are the Chatterers compel⯑led repeatedly by local ſcarcity to quit their abodes, and ſeek ſubſiſtence in other climates? It is ſaid that they penetrate far into the arctic regions; and this is confirmed by Count Strah⯑lenberg, who, as we have already noticed, ſaw them in Tartary.
When the Chatterer reſides in wine countries, it ſeems fondeſt of grapes; whence Aldrovan⯑dus calls it Ampelis, or Vine Bird. Next to theſe, it feeds upon the berries of privet, of bramble, of juniper, of laurel; upon almonds, apples, ſorbs, wild gooſeberries, figs, and, in general, upon melting juicy fruits. The one which Al⯑drovandus kept near three months, would not eat ivy-berries or raw fleſh till driven to extremity, and never touched grain. That which they tried to breed in the menagerie at Vienna was fed upon crumbs of white bread, maſhed car⯑rots, bruiſed hemp-ſeed, and juniper berries, [396] which it preferred*; but in ſpite of all the care which was taken, it lived only five or ſix days. Not that the Chatterer is difficult to tame, but that a bird, which has roamed at will, and been accuſtomed to provide its own ſubſiſtence, thrives always beſt in the ſtate of liberty. Reaumur remarks, that the Chatterers love cleanlineſs, and when confined they conſtantly void their excre⯑ments in the ſame ſpot†.
Theſe birds are entirely of a ſocial diſpoſition; they commonly fly in flocks, and ſometimes form immenſe bodies. Beſide this general ami⯑cable turn, and independent of their attachment to the females, they are ſuſceptible of particular friendſhips to individuals of the ſame ſex. But their affectionate temper, which implies more gentleneſs than activity, more ſecurity than diſ⯑cernment, more ſimplicity than prudence, more ſenſibility than vigour, precipitates them oftener into danger than ſuch as are more ſelfiſh. Ac⯑cordingly, theſe birds are reckoned the moſt ſtupid, and they are caught in the greateſt num⯑bers. They are generally taken with the Thruſh, which migrates about the ſame time, and their fleſh has nearly the ſame taſte‡; which is na⯑tural to ſuppoſe, ſince they live upon the ſame [397] food. I ſhall add, that many of them are killed at once, for they ſit cloſe together*.
They utter their cry as they riſe from the ground; this is zi, zi, ri, according to Friſch, and all thoſe who have ſeen them alive; it is rather a chirrup than a ſong, and hence their name of Chatterer. Reaumur will not even admit that they can chant; but Prince d'Averſ⯑perg ſays that their notes are very pleaſant. Perhaps, in countries where they breed, they may warble in the ſeaſon of love, while they only chirp or chatter in other places; and when confined in cages they may be totally ſilent.
The plumage is agreeable when the bird is ſtill; but when it diſplays its wings, expands its tail, and erects its creſt, in the act of flying, its appearance is charming. Its eyes, which are of a beautiful red, ſhine with uncommon luſtre in the middle of the black band, in which they are placed. This black extends under the throat, and quite round the bill; the different ſhades of wine colour on its head, back, and breaſt, and the aſh colour of the rump, are ſurrounded with a frame enamelled with white, with yellow, and with red, formed by the different ſpots of the wings and tail: the latter is cinereous at its ori⯑gin, blackiſh in its middle, and yellow at its [398] end: the quills of the wings are blackiſh, the third and fourth are marked with white near the tip, the five following marked with yellow, and moſt of theſe terminated with broad tears of a red colour, of which I have ſpoken in the be⯑ginning of this article. The bill and legs are black, and ſhorter in proportion than in the Blackbird. The total length of the bird is, ac⯑cording to Briſſon, ſeven inches and three-quar⯑ters, its tail two and a quarter, its bill nine lines, its legs the ſame, and its alar extent thirteen inches. For my part, I have obſerved that the dimenſions were all greater than here ſtated; owing, perhaps, to difference of age or ſex, or even between the individuals.
I am not acquainted with the plumage of the young Chatterers, but Aldrovandus tells us that the margin of the tail is of a duller yellow in the females, and that the middle quills have whitiſh marks, and not yellow, as in the males. He adds a circumſtance which is hard to believe, though he aſſerts it from his own obſervation, that in the females the tail conſiſts of twelve quills, but in the males of ten only. It is much more credible that the male ſpecimens examined by Aldrovandus had loſt two of their quills*.
VARIETY of the CHATTERER.
[399]We may obſerve that the Chatterer is pro⯑portionably much broader acroſs the wings than the Blackbird or Thruſhes. Aldrovandus has alſo remarked, that the ſternum is of a ſhape bet⯑ter adapted for cutting the air, and accelerating its courſe. We need not then be ſurpriſed that it performs ſuch diſtant journies in Europe; and ſince it ſpends the ſummer in the countries of the north, we ſhould naturally expect to diſcover it in America. And this is actually the caſe. Reaumur received ſeveral from Canada, where they were called Recollet *, on account of the reſemblance perceived between the creſt and a monk's frock. From Canada they could eaſily ſpread into the ſouthern colonies. Cateſby de⯑ſcribes them among the birds of Carolina: Fer⯑nandez ſaw them in Mexico near Tezcuco†: I have examined ſome which were ſent from Cay⯑enne. This bird is not above an ounce in weight, according to Cateſby; its creſt, when erected, is pyramidal, its bill is black, with a large opening, its eyes placed on a bar of the ſame colour, ſeparated from the ground by two white ſtreaks, the extremity of the tail edged [400] with a ſhining white, the upper-part of the head, the throat, and the back, hazel, with a wine-tinge; the coverts and quills of the wings, the lower-part of the back, the rump, and a great part of the tail, of different ſhades of ci⯑nereous; the breaſt, and the inferior coverts of the tail, whitiſh; the belly and flanks of a pale yellow. It appears from this deſcription, and from the meaſures which have been taken, that the American Chatterer is rather ſmaller than the European ſort; that its wings have leſs of the enamel, and are rather of a duſkier hue; and that the wings do not extend ſo far in propor⯑tion as the tail. But it is undoubtedly the ſame ſpecies; for ſeven or eight middle quills of its wing are terminated by the little red appendices. Brooke, ſurgeon in Maryland, told Edwards, that the females wanted theſe appendices, and that the colours of their plumage were not ſo bright as thoſe of the males. The Cayenne Chatterers which I examined had really not theſe appen⯑dices, and the ſhades of the plumage were in general fainter, as it commonly happens in the females.
The GROSBEAK *.
• Le Gros-Bec, Buff. , • Loxia-Coccothrauſtes, Linn. and Gmel. , • Coccothrauſtes, Geſner, Aldrov. Briſſ. &c. ,
and • The Groſbeak, or Hawſinch, Will. Edw. &c.
[][401]THIS bird is an inhabitant of the temperate climates, from Spain and Italy, as far as Sweden. The ſpecies, though rather ſtationary, is not numerous. It appears every year in ſome of the provinces of France, and leaves them only for a ſhort time in the ſevereſt winters†. It generally inhabits in the woods during the ſum⯑mer, and ſometimes the vineyards; and in win⯑ter it reſorts near the hamlets and farms. It is a ſilent bird which is ſeldom heard, and ſeems [402] to have no ſong or decided warble. Nor is its organ of hearing ſo perfect as that of other birds, for though it reſides in the foreſts, it can⯑not be enticed by the call. Geſner, and moſt naturaliſts after him, have ſaid, that the Groſ⯑beak is good eating. I have taſted the fleſh, but it ſeemed neither pleaſant nor juicy.
I have obſerved in Burgundy that theſe birds are much fewer in winter than in ſummer, and that great numbers of them arrive about the 10th of April in ſmall flocks, and perch among the copſes, building their neſts* on trees, gene⯑rally at the height of ten or twelve feet, where the boughs divide from the trunk. The mate⯑rials are, like thoſe of the Turtle, dry ſticks, matted with ſmall roots. They commonly lay five bluiſh eggs ſpotted with brown. We might ſuppoſe that they breed only once a-year, ſince the ſpecies is not numerous. They feed their young with inſects, chryſalids, &c.; and when they are about to be robbed of their family, they make a vigorous defence, and bite fiercely. Their thick ſtrong bill enables them to crack nuts, and other hard ſubſtances; and though [403] they are granivorous, they alſo live much upon inſects. I have kept them a long time in vo⯑leries; they reject fleſh, but readily eat any thing elſe. They muſt be confined in a ſepa⯑rate cage, for without ſeeming at all diſcom⯑poſed, or making the leaſt noiſe, they kill the weaker birds that are lodged with them. They attack, not by ſtriking with the point of the bill, but by biting out a morſel of the ſkin. When at liberty, they live upon all ſorts of grain, and ker⯑nels of fruits; and Orioles eat the pulp of cher⯑ries, but the Groſbeaks break them to obtain the kernel; they feed alſo on fir and pine cones, and on beech maſt, &c.
This bird is ſolitary, ſhy, and ſilent; its ear is inſenſible, and its prolific powers are inferior to thoſe of moſt other birds. It ſeems to have its qualities concentrated in itſelf, and is not ſubject to any of the varieties which almoſt all proceed from the luxuriance of nature. The male and female are of the ſame ſize, and much reſemble each other. The ſpecies is uniform in our climate; but in foreign countries there exiſt many analogous birds, which ſhall be enume⯑rated in the ſucceeding article*. A.[404]
The CROSSBILL *.
• Le Bec Croiſé, Buff. , • Loxia Curviroſtra, Linn. and Gmel. , • Loxia, Geſner, Aldrov. Briſſ. &c. ,
and • The Shell-Apple, or Croſsbill, Will. Edw. &c.
[405]THE ſpecies of the Croſsbill is cloſely related to that of the Groſbeak. Both have the ſame ſize, the ſame figure, the ſame inſtincts†. The Croſsbill is diſtinguiſhed only by a ſort of deformity in its bill, a character, or rather a de⯑fect, which belongs to it alone of all the winged tribe. What proves that it is a defect, an error of nature rather than a permanent feature, is, that it is variable; the bill in ſome ſubjects croſſes to the left, in others to the right; but the productions of nature are regular in their de⯑velopement, and uniform in their arrangement. I ſhould therefore impute this difference of po⯑ſition to the way in which the bird has uſed its bill, according as it has been more accuſtomed to employ the one ſide or the other to lay hold of its food. The ſame takes place in men, who, [406] from habit, prefer the right hand to the left*. Each mandible of the Croſsbill is affected by an exuberance of growth, ſo that in time the two points are parted aſunder, and the bird can take its food only by the ſide; and hence if it oftener uſes the left, the bill will protrude to the right, and vice verſâ.
But every thing has its utility, and each ſen⯑tient being learns to draw advantage even from its defects. This bill, hooked upwards and down⯑wards, and bent in oppoſite directions, ſeems to have been formed for the purpoſe of detach⯑ing the ſcales of fir-cones, and obtaining the ſeeds lodged beneath theſe, which are the principal food of the bird. It raiſes each ſcale with its lower mandible, and breaks it off with the upper; it may be obſerved to perform this manoeuvre in its cage. This bill alſo aſſiſts its owner in climbing, and it dextrouſly mounts from the lower to the upper bars of its cage. From its mode of ſcrambling, and the beauty of its colours, it has been called by ſome the Ger⯑man Parrot.
[407] The Croſsbill inhabits only the cold climates, or the mountains in temperate countries. It is found in Sweden, in Poland, in Germany, in Switzerland, and among the Alps and Pyrenees. It is quite ſtationary in countries where it lives the whole year; but ſometimes it accidentally appears in large flocks in other regions. In 1756 and 1757, great numbers were ſeen in the neighbourhood of London. They do not ar⯑rive at ſtated ſeaſons, but ſeem to be rather directed by chance, and many years paſs with⯑out their being at all obſerved. The Nut-Crack⯑ers, and ſome other birds, are ſubject to the ſame irregular migrations, which occur only once in twenty or thirty years. The only cauſe which can be aſſigned is, that they have been deprived of their uſual ſubſiſtence in the cli⯑mates where they inhabit, by the inclemency of the ſeaſon; or have been driven upon the coaſt by the violence of a ſtorm or hurricane: for they arrive in ſuch numbers, and appear ſo much exhauſted, that they are careleſs of their exiſt⯑ence, and allow themſelves to be caught by the hand.
We might preſume that the ſpecies of the Croſsbill, which prefers the cold climates, would be found in the north of the New Continent, as in that of the Old: yet no traveller to America has taken notice of it. But beſides the general preſumption which is verified by analogy, there is a fact which ſeems to prove our opinion; the [408] Croſsbill is found in Greenland, whence it was brought to Edwards by the whale-fiſhers; and that naturaliſt, who was better acquainted than any perſon with the nature of birds, remarks properly, that both the land and the water ſort which inhabit the arctic regions, appear indiffe⯑rently in the north of America or of Europe.
The Croſsbill is one of thoſe birds whoſe co⯑lours are the moſt ſubject to vary; among a great number we can ſcarcely find two indivi⯑duals that are exactly ſimilar; not only are the ſhades of the plumage different, but the poſition of the colours change with the ſeaſon and the age. Edwards, who examined a prodigious number of them, and ſought to mark the limits of variation, paints the male with a roſe co⯑lour, and the female with a yellowiſh green; but in both, the bill, the eyes, the thighs, and the legs, are preciſely the ſame in regard to ſhape and co⯑lours. Geſner tells us that he kept one of theſe birds, which was blackiſh in September, and aſſumed a red colour in October. He adds, that the parts where the red began to appear, were the under-ſide of the neck, the breaſt, and the belly; that this red afterwards became yel⯑low, and that winter eſpecially is the ſeaſon when theſe changes take place, and that, at dif⯑ferent times, it is ſaid they receive a red, yellow, green, and cinereous caſt. We muſt not, there⯑fore, with our modern nomenclators, reckon as a ſeparate ſpecies, or a particular variety, a [409] greeniſh Croſsbill *, found in the Pyrenees, ſince it occurs equally in other places; and in certain ſeaſons it has in all countries that colour. Ac⯑cording to Friſch, who was perfectly acquainted with theſe birds, which are common in Ger⯑many, the colour of the adult male is reddiſh, or green mixed with red; but they loſe this red, like the Linnets, when they are kept in the cage, and only retain the green, which is more deeply impreſſed both in the young and in the old. For this reaſon they are called in ſome parts of Germany krinis or grünitz, that is, greeniſh bird. The two extreme colours have not therefore been well choſen by Edwards; we muſt not infer, as his figures would ſuggeſt, that the male is red, and the female green; there is every reaſon to believe, that in the ſame ſeaſon, and at the ſame age, the female differs from the male only in the greater faintneſs of the colours.
This bird, which is ſo analogous to the Groſ⯑beak, reſembles it alſo in ſtupidity. One may approach it, fire upon it without ſcaring it, and ſometimes even catch it by the hand; and as it is equally inactive and ſecure, it falls an eaſy victim to all the birds of prey. It is mute in ſummer, and its feeble notes are only heard in winter†. It is quite placid in captivity, and [410] lives long in a cage. It is fed with bruiſed hemp⯑ſeed, and this contributes to make it ſooner loſe its red*. In ſummer, its fleſh is ſaid to be good eating†.
Theſe birds delight only in the dark foreſts of pines and firs, and ſeem to dread the effulgence of day. Nor do they yield to the genial influence of the ſeaſons; it is not in ſpring, but in the depth of winter, that their loves commence. They build as early as January, and their young are grown before the other birds begin to lay. They place their neſts under the large branches of the pine, fixing them with the reſin of that tree, and beſmearing them with that ſubſtance, ſo that the melted ſnow or the rains cannot pe⯑netrate. In the young, as in thoſe of other birds, the bill, or rather corners of its opening, are yellow, and they hold it always open as long as they are fed by the mother. We are not told how many eggs they lay, but we may preſume, from their ſize and their reſemblance to the Groſ⯑beak, that the number is four or five, and that they hatch only once a-year. A
FOREIGN BIRDS, THAT ARE RELATED TO THE GROSBEAK.
[411]I.
THE Eaſt-India bird, delineated in the Pl. Enl. No. 101, fig. 1. under the name of Coro⯑mandel Groſbeak, and which name we have ſtill retained, becauſe it appears to be the ſame ſpe⯑cies with that of Europe. The ſhape, the ſize, the bill, the length of the tail, are the ſame in both, and the only difference conſiſts in the co⯑lours, which are alſo diſpoſed in the ſame order. In ſhort, we may impute the difference of ſhade to the influence of climate, and conſider this Coromandel bird, which no naturaliſt has taken notice of, as a beautiful variety of the European Groſbeak.
II.
The American bird, No. 154, Pl. Enl. termed the Blue American Groſbeak, on which we have beſtowed no diſcriminating name, becauſe we [412] are not certain if it is a peculiar ſpecies, dif⯑ferent from that of Europe; for in ſize and figure it is the ſame with our Groſbeak. The only difference is, that it has more red on its bill, and more blue in its plumage; and if its tail were not longer, we ſhould not heſitate to pronounce that it is a mere variety, occaſioned by the influence of climate. No naturaliſt has noticed this new variety or ſpecies, which we muſt be careful not to confound with the Caro⯑lina bird, called by Cateſby the Blue Groſbeak.
III. The HARD-BILL.
• Le Dur-Bec, Buff. , • Loxia Enucleator, Linn. and Gmel. , • Coccothrauſtes Canadenſis, Briſſ. , • The Greateſt Bulfinch, Edw. ,
and • The Pine Groſbeak, Penn. and Lath.
The Canada bird, delineated Pl. Enl. No. 135, fig. 1. under the name of Canada Groſ⯑beak, and which we have called Hard bill, be⯑cauſe its bill is comparatively harder, ſhorter, and ſtronger, than in the others; and it was pro⯑per to apply to it a diſtinct name, ſince it differs not only from the European Groſbeaks, but from all thoſe of America and of other climates. It is of a beautiful red, as large as our Groſbeak, [413] but longer tailed, and may be eaſily diſtin⯑guiſhed from all the other birds by the inſpec⯑tion of the coloured figure. The female has only a little reddiſh on its head and rump, and a ſlight tinge of roſe-colour on the lower-part of its body. Salerne tells us, that in Canada this bird is called bouvreuil (Bulfinch). This name has not been ill applied, for there is perhaps an affinity between it and the Bulſinch. The in⯑habitants of that part of America could decide this point by a very ſimple obſervation, viz. by noticing whether it whiſtles almoſt continually like the Bulſinch, or is almoſt mute like the Groſbeak*.
IV. The CRESTED CARDINAL.
• Le Cardiual Huppé, Linn. and Gmel. , • Loxia Cardinalis, Linn. and Gmel. , • Coccothrauſtes Virginiana, Briſſ. , • Coccothrauſtes Indica Criſtata, Ray, and Will. , • The Red Groſbeak, Albin. , • The Red Bird, Kalm's Travels. , • The Virginia Nightingale, Will. ,
and • The Cardinal Croſbeak, Penn. and Lath.
[414]This is a native of the temperate climates of America, and figured No. 37, Pl. Enl. by the name of the Virginia Groſbeak. It is alſo called the Creſted Cardinal, which name we retain, as denoting its two characters, its colour, and its creſt. This bird reſembles much the Pine Groſbeak; the ſize, and, in a great meaſure, the plumage, are the ſame; the bill is as ſtrong, the tail of the ſame length, and the climate is nearly the ſame. We might, therefore, but for the creſt, reckon it a variety of that beautiful ſpecies. The colours in the male are much brighter than in the female, whoſe plumage is not red, but only reddiſh-brown; its bill is alſo of a much fainter red, though both have the creſt. I ſhould range this bird rather with the Bulfinch and the Chaffinch, than with the Groſ⯑beak, ſince it ſings agreeably; whereas the Groſ⯑beak is ſilent. Salerne ſay, that the warble of []
[415] the Creſted Cardinal is charming, and reſembles the ſong of the Nightingale; and that it can be taught alſo to ſpeak like the Canary birds. He adds, that this bird, which he obſerved alive, is bold, ſtrong, and vigorous, that it feeds upon ſeeds, particularly thoſe of millet, and is eaſily tamed *.
The four birds which we have juſt men⯑tioned are all nearly of the ſame ſize with the European Groſbeak. But there are many other intermediate or ſmaller ſpecies, which we ſhall range according to their ſize and climate, and which, though all different from each other, may beſt be compared with the Groſbeaks, to which they are more analogous than to any other. We may name them the Middle Groſ⯑beaks and the Little Groſbeaks.
V. The ROSE-THROAT.
• Loxia Ludoviciana, Linn. and Gmel. , • Coccothrauſtes Ludoviciana, Briſſ. ,
and • The Red-breaſted Groſbeak, Penn. and Lath.
[416]The firſt of theſe ſpecies of the middle ſize is that of the Pl. Enl. No. 153, fig. 2. termed the Groſbeak of Louiſiana. Its throat is of a fine red roſe colour, and differs ſo much from all other ſpecies of the ſame genus, that it merits a diſtinct name. Briſſon firſt mentioned this bird, and has given a tolerably good figure of it; but he ſays nothing of its habits. The ſettlers in Louiſiana could inform us*.
VI. The GRIVELIN.
• Loxia Braſiliana, Lath.
The ſecond ſpecies of the middling Groſ⯑beaks is Fig. 1. No. 309, Pl. Enl. and there [417] termed the Brazilian Groſbeak. We have given it the name of Grivelin, becauſe the under-part of its body is ſpeckled like as in the Thruſhes (grives). As it is a beautiful bird, and unlike any other, it merited an appropriated name. It ſeems to be much related to the bird mentioned by Marcgrave, and which is called in Brazil Guira, Tirica. However, as the ſhort deſcrip⯑tion given by that author does not exactly cor⯑reſpond with our Grivelin, we cannot decide with regard to the identity of the ſpecies.
Theſe middle-ſized ſpecies, and thoſe ſtill ſmaller, are much more like the Sparrow in point of bulk and ſhape; but we have allowed them to remain with the Groſbeak, becauſe their bill reſembles that of theſe birds, and is much broader at the baſe than that of the Sparrow.
VII. The RED BLACK.
The third ſpecies of the middle-ſized Groſ⯑beak is the bird delineated Fig. 2. No. 309. Pl. Enl. under the name of the Cayenne Groſbeak. We have called it the Red Black, becauſe the whole of its body is red, and the breaſt and belly black. This bird, which is brought from Cayenne, has been noticed by no naturaliſt; but [418] as we did not ſee it alive, we cannot deſcribe its habits. The people of Guiana could inſtruct us in that point.
VIII. The FLAVERT *.
• Loxia Canadenſis, Linn. and Gmel. , • Coccothrauſtes Cayanenſis, Briſſ. ,
and • The Canada Groſbeak, Penn. and Lath.
The fourth ſpecies of theſe foreign middle⯑ſized Groſbeaks is the bird Fig. 2. No. 152. Pl. Enl. termed the Cayenne Groſbeak. It is yellow and green, and therefore differs from the pre⯑ceding almoſt as much as it can do with regard to colours; but as its ſize, the ſhape of its body and of its bill, and its climate, are the ſame, we may reckon it a ſpecies cloſely related to the Red Black, if it be not a variety ariſing merely from the difference of age or ſex. Briſſon is the firſt who took notice of it. A
IX. The FAN-TAILED GROSBEAK.
• La Queue en Eventail, Buff. ,
and • Loxia Flabellifera, Gmel.
[419]The fifth ſpecies of theſe birds is that figured Pl. Enl. No. 380. under the name of the Fan⯑tail of Virginia. We received it from that part of America, and it has not been noticed by any preceding author. The upper figure, No. 380. repreſents probably the male, and the under the female, for its colours are not ſo vivid. We re⯑ceived theſe birds alive, but not being able to preſerve them, we could not decide whether we ſhould attribute the differences to ſex or to age. They are ſo remarkable for the ſhape of their tail, which is expanded horizontally, that this character alone is ſufficient to diſtinguiſh them from others of the ſame genus*.
X. The PADDA, or RICE-BIRD.
• Loxia Oryzivora, Linn. and Gmel. , • Coccothrauſtes Sinenſis Cinerea, Briſſ. ,
and • The Java Groſbeak, Lath.
[420]The ſixth ſpecies is the Chineſe bird, deſcribed and figured by Edwards, and which he names Padda, or Rice-Bird, becauſe the Chineſe call rice in the huſk padda, which is the food of this bird. This author has painted two of theſe birds, and ſuppoſes, with great probability, that Pl. 41 repreſents the male, and Pl. 42 the female. We had a male of this ſpecies, which is delineated Fig. 1. No. 152. Pl. Enl. It is an exceedingly beautiful bird; for beſides the luſtre of the co⯑lours, its plumage is ſo perfectly regular, that no feather projects beyond another, but they ap⯑pear covered entirely with down, or rather with a ſort of meal, ſuch as we perceive in plums, which produces a fine gloſs. Edwards adds lit⯑tle to the deſcription of this bird, though he ſaw it alive. He ſays only that it is very deſtructive among the plantations of rice; that the traders to the Eaſt-Indies call it the Javan, or Indian Sparrow; that this appellation would imply that it is found in the Eaſt-Indies, as well as in China; but he is rather diſpoſed to think that [421] the Europeans, in their intercourſe between China and Java, had often carried theſe birds to that iſland; and laſtly, that what proves them to be natives of China is, they are painted on the Chineſe paper and muſlins.
The ſpecies which we are now to deſcribe are ſmaller than the preceding, and conſequently differ ſo much from our Groſbeaks, that we could hardly refer them to the ſame genus, did not the ſhape of their bill, the figure of their body, and even the order and poſition of its co⯑lours, indicate that theſe birds, though not ex⯑actly Groſbeaks, are ſtill nearer related to them than to any other genus.
XI. The TOUCNAM COURVI.
• Loxia Philippina, Linn. and Gmel. , • Coccothrauſtes Philippenſis, Briſſ. ,
and • The Philippine Groſbeak, Lath.
The firſt of theſe ſmall foreign Groſbeaks is the Toucnam Courvi of the Philippines, of which Briſſon has given a deſcription, with a figure of the male, under the name of the Philippine Groſ⯑beak, and which is delineated Fig. 2. No. 135. Pl. Enl. by that denomination. But we have [422] here preſerved the name which it receives in its native climate, becauſe it differs from all the reſt. The female is of the ſame ſize with the male, but its colours are different, its head being brown, and alſo the upper-part of its neck, which in the male is yellow, &c. Briſſon gives alſo a figure and deſcription of their neſt*. A
XII. The ORCHEF.
• Loxia Bengalenſis, Linn. and Gmel. , • Paſſer Bengalenſis, Briſſ. , • The Bengal Sparrow, Alb. , • The Yellow-headed Indian Sparrow, Edw. ,
and • The Bengal Groſbeak, Lath.
The ſecond of theſe little foreign Groſbeaks is the Eaſt-India bird delineated Pl. Enl. No. 393. Fig. 2. under the name of Indian Groſ⯑beak. I have termed it gold-head (Orchef) be⯑cauſe [423] the upper-part of its head is of a fine yellow, and being different from all the reſt, required a diſtinct name.—This ſpecies is new, and has not been noticed by any preceding na⯑turaliſt*.
XIII. The NUN GROSBEAK.
• Loxia Collaria, Linn. and Gmel. ,
and • Le Gros Bec Nonette, Buff.
The third of theſe little ſpecies is that of Fig. 3. No. 393. Pl. Enl. which we have called the Nun, becauſe it has a ſort of black biggen on its head. It is a new ſpecies alſo; but we can ſay nothing more of it, being unac⯑quainted with its native climate. We bought it from a dealer in birds, who could give us no in⯑formation on that ſubject†.
XIV. The GRAY GROSBEAK.
• Loxia Griſea, Gmel.
[424]The fourth of theſe is new, and as little known as the preceding. It is Fig. 1. No. 393. Pl. Enl. called the Virginia Groſbeak. But we ſhall term it grey-white (Griſalbin), becauſe its neck and part of its head is white, and all the reſt of the body gray; and as it differs from the others, it merits an appropriated name*.
XV. The QUADRICOLOR.
The fifth of theſe little foreign Groſbeaks is the bird deſcribed by Albin, under the name of the Chineſe Sparrow, and afterwards by Briſ⯑ſon†, under that of the Java Groſbeak, and de⯑lineated Fig. 2. No. 101. Pl. Enl. by the ſame name. We ſhall, however, term it the Qua⯑dricolor, [425] to diſtinguiſh it from all the reſt, and mark its principal colours; for it is a beautiful bird, and painted with four brilliant colours; the head and neck being blue, the back, the wings, and the end of the tail, green; there is a broad red bar, like a girth, under the belly, and on the middle of the tail; and laſtly, the reſt of the breaſt and belly is light-brown or hazel. We are ignorant of its habits.
XVI. The JACOBINE, and the DOMINO *.
• Loxia Malacca, Linn. and Gmel. , • Coccothrauſtes Moluccenſis, Briſſ. ,
and • The Molucca Groſbeak, Lath.
The ſixth of theſe is the bird known to the curious by the name of Jacobine, which we re⯑tain as applicable and diſcriminating. It is re⯑preſented Pl. Enl. Fig. 3. No. 139. and titled "The Java Groſbeak, called the Jacobine." We conceive that Fig. 1. of that plate, termed the Molucca Croſsbill, is of the ſame ſpecies, and probably a female of the firſt. We have ſeen theſe birds alive, and fed them like Canaries. Edwards deſcribes and figures them by the name [426] of Coury *, Pl. XL. and from the meaning of this word, he infers that they inhabit India, and not China†. We would have adopted this term, had not that of Jacobine already come into uſe. Fig. 2. No. 139. and Fig. 1. No. 153. are two birds which the virtuoſi call Dominos, and which they diſtinguiſh from the Jacobines. They are ſmaller indeed, but ought to be re⯑garded as varieties of the ſame ſpecies. The males are probably thoſe which have the belly ſpotted, and the females thoſe which have it of an uniform white-gray. The deſcription of them occurs in Briſſon's work, but not a word is ſaid of their natural habits.
XVII. The BAGLAFECHT.
• Loxia Philippina, var. Gmel.
This is an Abyſſinian bird, much reſembling the Toucnam Courvi; the only difference con⯑ſiſting in the ſhades or arrangement of the co⯑lours. [427] The black ſpot which is on both ſides of the head riſes in the Baglafecht above the eyes; the brown and yellow marbling of the upper⯑part of the body is leſs marked, and the great coverts of the wings and their quills; thoſe of the tail are greeniſh-brown, edged with yellow. Its iris is yellowiſh, and its wings, when cloſed, reach near the middle of the tail.
The Baglafecht reſembles the Toucnam Courvi alſo in the precautions which it takes to ſecure its eggs againſt rain, and every ſort of danger; but the form of its neſt is different. The bird rolls it into a ſpiral nearly like the Nautilus, and ſuſpends it, as does the Toucnam Courvi, at the extremity of a ſmall branch, almoſt always above ſtagnant water, the aperture conſtantly turned to the eaſt, the quarter oppoſite to the rain. In this way the Baglafecht is not only ſheltered from the wet, but ſecured from the intruſions of different ſorts of animals, which ſeek to feed upon its eggs.
XVIII. The ABYSSINIAN GROSBEAK.
• Loxia Abyſſinia, Gmel.
I range among the Groſbeaks alſo the Abyſ⯑ſinian bird, which reſembles them in the cha⯑racteriſtic [428] feature, the thickneſs of its bill, and likewiſe in the ſize of its body. Its iris is red, its bill, the top and ſides of its head, its throat, and its breaſt, are black; the reſt of the under-part of the body, the thighs, and the upper-part of the body, light yellow, but which aſſume a brown tinge where the black of the anterior part meets it, as if the two colours there melted into one; the ſcapular feathers are blackiſh, the co⯑verts of the wings brown, edged with gray; the quills of the wings and of the tail are brown, edged with yellow, and the legs reddiſh-gray.
The moſt ſingular fact of the hiſtory of the Abyſſinian Groſbeak, is the conſtruction of its neſt, and the ſort of foreſight which it diſcovers, in common with the Toucnam Courvi, and the Baglafecht. The ſhape of the neſt is nearly py⯑ramidal, and the bird is always careful to ſuſ⯑pend it over the ſurface of water from the end of a ſmall branch; the entry is in the ſide, and commonly faces the eaſt; the cavity is divided by a partition into two compartments; the firſt is a kind of court into which the bird enters, then creeping along the incloſure, it deſcends into the ſecond chamber, where its eggs are laid. By means of this complex conſtruction, the eggs are ſheltered againſt the rain, from what⯑ever quarter the wind blows: and we may ob⯑ſerve, that in Abyſſinia the wet ſeaſon laſts ſix months: for it is a general remark, that incon⯑venience and hardſhip quicken induſtry, unleſs [429] they be ſo exceſſive as to extinguiſh it entirely. In that country the bird was expoſed not only to the penetrating rains, but to the attacks of the monkeys, the ſquirrels, the ſerpents, &c. It ſeems to have foreſeen the dangers that threat⯑en its family, and to have artfully provided againſt them. This ſpecies is new, and we owe all our information on the ſubject to Mr. Bruce.
XIX. The GUIFSO BATITO *.
• Loxia Tridactyla, Gmel. ,
and • The Three-toed Groſbeak, Lath.
There is no European ſpecies to which this foreign bird is more related than the Groſbeak. It ſhuns inhabited places, and lives retired in the unfrequented foreſts. It is languid in its amours, and deſtitute of ſong; and its only noiſe almoſt is made by the ſtrokes of its bill, in piercing the nuts to extract the kernel.—So far the analogy applies. But it differs from the Groſbeak by two remarkable properties; 1ſt, its bill is indented on the edges; and, 2dly, its feet have only three toes, two before and one [430] behind, which is an uncommon diſpoſition, and occurs only in a few ſpecies. Theſe two diſ⯑criminating features ſeem to me ſo important, that the bird required an appropriated name, and I have preſerved that by which it is known in its natal region.
The head, the throat, and the fore-part of the neck, are of a fine red, which extends in a pretty narrow ſtripe under the body, as far as the lower coverts of the tail. All the reſt of the under-part of the body, the upper-part of the neck, the back, and the tail, are black; the upper-coverts of the wings brown, edged with white, the quills of the wings brown, with a greeniſh border, and the legs of a very dull red. The wings when cloſed reach not beyond the middle of the tail.
XX. The SPOTTED GROSBEAK of the Cape of Good Hope.
The bird repreſented by this name, Fig. 1. No. 639. Pl. Enl. though different from the European Groſbeaks in its colours, and the diſ⯑tribution of its ſpots, appears ſo much a-kin to that ſpecies, that it may be regarded as a variety produced by climate, for which reaſon we have given it an appropriated name. And Sonnerat [431] aſſures us poſitively that it is the ſame with that of the firſt article; and he adds, that theſe birds appear different, becauſe they change their co⯑lours every year.
XXI. The CRAVATED GRIVELIN.
The bird delineated Pl. Enl. No. 659. Fig. 2. under the denomination of the Angola Groſ⯑beak, becauſe we received it from that province of Africa, appears to be related to the Grivelin; and as all the neck and the under-part of the throat is covered and encircled by a ſort of white cravat, which extends even over the bill, we have given it the name of the Cravated Grivelin. We are ignorant of its habits.
The HOUSE SPARROW *.
• Le Moineau, Buff. , • Fringilla Domeſtica, Linn. ,
and • Paſſer Domeſticus, Geſner, Aldrov. Briſſ. &c.
[432]We ſhall alſo ſeparate from the Common or Houſe Sparrow the Field Sparrow and the Wood Sparrow; two birds more related than any of the preceding, and alſo inhabitants of our cli⯑mate; to each we ſhall allot a diſtinct article. This is ſurely the only way to avoid con⯑fuſion.
Our Sparrow is too well known to need a de⯑ſcription. It is repreſented Nos. 6 and 55. Pl. Enl. fig. 1. No. 6. is the adult male after it has caſt its feathers; and fig. 1. No. 55. the young male before moulting. The change of colour in the plumage, and in the angles of the mandibles, is general and uniform; but the ſame ſpecies is ſubject to accidental varieties; for ſome Houſe Sparrows are white, others variegated with brown and white, and others almoſt entirely black*, and others yellow†. The only dif⯑ference between the females and the males is, [434] that the former are ſmaller, and their colours much fainter.
Beſides theſe firſt varieties, ſome of which are general and others individual, and which occur in all the European climates, there are others in more diſtant regions; which would prove that this ſpecies is ſpread from the north to the ſouth in our continent, from Sweden* to Egypt†, Senegal, &c.
But in whatever country the Sparrow is ſettled, it never is found in deſert places, or at a diſtance from the reſidence of man. It likes neither woods nor vaſt plains. It is more frequent in towns than in villages; nor is it ſeen in the ham⯑lets or farms that are buried in the depth of fo⯑reſts. It follows ſociety to live at their expence; and indolence and voracity lead it to ſubſiſt on the proviſions of others. Our granaries, our barns, our court-yards, our pigeon-houſes, and, in ſhort, all places where grain is ſpilt, are its favourite reſort. It is extremely deſtructive; its plumage is entirely uſeleſs, its fleſh indifferent food, its notes grating to the ear, and its fami⯑liarity and petulance diſguſting. In ſome places Sparrows are proſcribed‡, and a price ſet on their heads.
[435] But what will render them eternally trouble⯑ſome and vexatious, is not only their exceſſive multiplication, but their ſubtlety, their cunning, and their obſtinacy to abide in places which ſuit them. They are crafty and artful, eaſily diſtin⯑guiſh the ſnares laid for them, and wear out the patience of thoſe who try to catch them. It is only in ſeaſons of ſcarcity, and when the ſnow covers the ground, that the ſport will ſucceed; and little impreſſion can be made on a ſpecies which breeds thrice a-year. Their neſt conſiſts of hay, lined with feathers. If you deſtroy it, they will in twenty-four hours build another; if you plunder the eggs, which are five or ſix*, often more, they will in the courſe of eight or ten days lay others; if you drive them from the trees or the houſes, they will reſort in greater numbers to your granaries. Perſons who have kept them in cages, aſſure me, that a ſingle pair of Sparrows conſume near twenty pounds of corn annually. We may judge from their num⯑bers what prodigious deſtruction they muſt make in our fields; for though they feed their young with inſects, and eat many themſelves, they principally ſubſiſt on our beſt grain. They fol⯑low the labourer in ſeed-time, and the reaper in harveſt. They attend the threſhers at the barns, and the poulterer when he ſcatters grain to his fowls. They viſit the pigeon-houſes, and even [436] pierce the craw of the young pigeons to extract the food. They eat bees, and are thus diſpoſed to deſtroy the only inſects uſeful to man. In ſhort, it is much to be wiſhed that ſome method could be deviſed for deſtroying them. I have been told, that if ſulphur were ſmoaked under the trees, where in certain ſeaſons they aſſemble and ſleep at night, they would be ſuffocated and drop dead. I have tried the experiment, with⯑out ſucceſs, though I took much pains, and was intereſted in the iſſue; for I could not get them driven from the neighbourhood of my voleries; and I perceived that they not only diſturbed the warbling of my birds, but that by the continual repetition of their harſh cry, tui, tui, they ſen⯑ſibly ſpoiled the ſong of the Canaries, Siſkins, Linnets, &c.
I then placed on a wall, covered with great Indian cheſnuts, in which the Sparrows aſſem⯑bled in great numbers in the evening, pots filled with ſulphur, mixed with a little charcoal and roſin; and theſe ſubſtances being ſet on fire, cauſed a thick ſmoke, which had no effect but to waken the birds. As the volume aſcended, they removed to the tops of the trees, and then retired to the neighbouring houſes, but not one dropped. I obſerved only that they did not for three days viſit the trees that were ſmoaked, but afterwards returned to their former habit.
As theſe birds are hardy, they can be eaſily raiſed in cages, and live ſeveral years, eſpecially [437] if the females be withheld from them*; for it is ſaid that their exceſſive venery abridges the period of their lives. When they are taken young, they are ſo docile as to obey the voice and catch ſomewhat of the ſong of thoſe birds with which they are bred; and being naturally familiar, they become more ſo in the ſtate of captivity. But when at liberty, they are rather ſolitary; and hence, perhaps, the origin of their name†. Since they never leave our climate, and are always about our houſes, it is eaſy to perceive that they commonly fly ſingle or in pairs. There are, however, two ſeaſons in the year when they aſſemble, not to fly in flocks, but to chirp together, in autumn on the willows by the river ſides, and in ſpring on the firs and other evergreens. They meet in the evening, and in mild weather. They ſpend the night on the trees, but in winter they are found either alone or with their females in a hole of the wall, or beneath the tiles of roofs. And it is only in exceſſive froſts that five or ſix are found lying together, probably to keep them⯑ſelves warm.
[438] The males fight obſtinately for the poſſeſſion of their females, and in the violence of their ſtruggle, they often fall to the ground. Few birds are ſo ardent, or ſo vigorous in their love. They can embrace twenty times in ſucceſſion with the ſame fire, the ſame trepidation, and the ſame expreſſions of rapture. What is ſingu⯑lar, the female firſt ſhews a degree of impa⯑tience at a ſport which muſt fatigue her leſs than the male, but which may alſo yield her leſs pleaſure, ſince there are no preludes, no ca⯑reſſes, no adjuſtment. Much petulance is ſhewn without tenderneſs, and a flutter of action which betrays only a ſelfiſh appetite. Compare the loves of the Pigeon with thoſe of the Sparrow, and you will perceive almoſt all the ſhades from the phyſical to the moral qualities.
Theſe birds neſtle commonly under the tiles, in the lead-gutters, in holes of the wall, in pots that are erected for them, and often about the ſides of windows which have Venetian blinds. A few, however, build their neſts in trees. I have re⯑ceived ſome of theſe which were found in large cheſnuts and lofty willows. They place them on the ſummit of theſe trees, and conſtruct them with the ſame materials, viz. hay on the out⯑ſide and feathers within; but what is ſingular, they add a ſort of cap above which covers the neſt, ſo as to prevent the water from penetrat⯑ing, and leave an opening for entering at under this cap. When they lodge in holes or covered [439] places, they judiciouſly diſpenſe with this cap. Inſtinct diſcovers here a ſort of reaſoning, and at leaſt implies a compariſon of two ſmall ideas. Some Houſe Sparrows, more indolent, though bolder than the reſt, do not give themſelves the trouble of building, but drive off the Martins, and poſſeſs their neſts. Sometimes they fight the Pigeons, and eſtabliſh themſelves in the holes.—This little tribe exhibit therefore habits and inſtincts more varied and perfect than moſt other birds. This reſults undoubtedly from their living in ſociety. They enjoy the benefits of the domeſtic ſtate without ſurrendering any por⯑tion of their independence. Hence that ſub⯑tlety, that circumſpection, and that accommo⯑dation of inſtinct to ſituations and circum⯑ſtances. A
FOREIGN BIRDS, RELATED TO THE HOUSE SPARROW.
[440]I.
THE bird, delineated fig. 1. No. 223. Pl. Enl. under the name of Senegal Sparrow. We ſhall retain that denomination, ſince it appears to be of the ſame ſpecies with the Common Houſe Sparrow. The only difference is, that the bill, the top of the head, and the lower-parts of the body, are reddiſh; whereas, in the European Sparrow, the bill is brown, the crown of the head, and the lower-parts of the body, gray. But in every other reſpect, they are the ſame; and we may regard the difference of co⯑lour as reſulting from the influence of climate.
The bird of which the male and female are in fig. 1. and 2. No. 665. Pl. Enl. appears to be only a variety of this.
II.
We may extend theſe remarks to the bird fig. 2. No. 183. Pl. Enl. termed the Red-billed [441] Senegal Sparrow, which we ſhall conſider, eſpe⯑cially ſince it belongs to the ſame climate with the preceding, as a variety of it, occaſioned by difference of age or ſex.
III. The BLACK SPARROW.
There are other foreign birds however, which, though analogous to the Houſe Sparrow, muſt be regarded as of a different ſpecies. Such is the American bird, which the inhabitants of the French Weſt-India iſlands call the Black Father, (Pere noir). It is repreſented fig. 1. No. 201. Pl. Enl. It would appear to be ſettled not only in theſe iſlands, but on the continent of South America, as at Mexico; for it is mentioned by Fernandez under the Mexican name of Yohual⯑tototl, and deſcribed by Sir Hans Sloane as a na⯑tive of Jamaica*. We ſuppoſe alſo that the two birds, figured No. 224. are only varieties of this. The only thing which weakens this conjecture is, that they were found in climates very diſtant from each other: 1. from Macao, the 2d from Java, and the 3d from Cayenne. I ſtill con⯑ceive, however, that they are varieties of the Black Sparrow; for the climates allotted to them by the importers are not to be conſidered [442] as certain; and beſides, this ſpecies may occur equally in the hot countries in both conti⯑nents.
There are others alſo which may be regarded as varieties of this ſpecies. The Brazil Spar⯑row, of which fig. 1. No. 291. Pl. Enl. is the male, and fig. 2. the female, reſembles the Black Sparrow, ſo that we cannot heſitate to aſſign it the ſame place. The reſemblance is indeed the moſt perfect in the male, for the female differs widely in its colours; but this circumſtance only apprizes us of the uncertainty of any claſſifica⯑tion founded on the plumage.
Laſtly, There is another ſpecies which we ſhould range with the Black Sparrow, but for the great difference in the length of the tail. This bird is delineated fig. 1. No. 183. Pl. Enl. under the name of the Sparrow of the kingdom of Juida. We may conſider it as a variety of the Black Sparrow, diſtinguiſhed by its long tail, which conſiſts of unequal quills. If we have been rightly informed with reſpect to the cli⯑mates, it would appear that the Black Sparrow is found in the Antilles, in Jamaica, in Mexico, in Cayenne, in Brazil, in the kingdom of Juida, in Abyſſinia, in Java, and as far as Macao; that is, in all the tropical countries, both of the New and of the Old Continent.
IV. The DATE SPARROW *.
• Le Dattier, ou Moineau de Datte, Buff. , • Fringilla Capſa, Gmel. ,
and • The Capſa Finch, Lath.
[443]Dr. Shaw ſpeaks of this bird in his Travels, under the name of the Capſa Sparrow, and Mr. Bruce has ſhewn me a miniature drawing of it, from which I have made the following de⯑ſcription:
The Date Sparrow has a ſhort bill, thick at the baſe, with ſome whiſkers near the angles of its junction; the upper-mandible is black, the lower yellowiſh, and alſo the legs; the nails black, the anterior part of the head and throat white, the reſt of the head, the neck, the up⯑per, and even the lower ſurface of the body, gray, tinged with reddiſh; but the tint is deepeſt on the breaſt†, and on the ſmall upper-coverts of the wings; the quills of the wings and of the tail are black; the tail is ſlightly forked, pretty [444] long, and ſtretches two-thirds beyond the ex⯑tremity of the wings.
This bird flies in flocks; it is familiar, and ventures to pick up grains at barn-doors. In that part of Barbary, ſouth of the kingdom of Tunis, it is as common as the Houſe Sparrow in France; but it ſings much better, if what Shaw advances be a fact; that its warble is ſuperior to that of the Canaries and Nightingales*. It is a pity that it is too delicate to be carried out of its native country; at leaſt all the attempts that have hitherto been made of tranſporting it alive have proved unſucceſsful.
The TREE SPARROW *.
• Le Friquet, Buff. , • Fringilla Montana, Linn. and Gmel. , • Paſſer Montanus, Aldrov. Ray, and Briſſ. , • Paſſerinus, Geſner. ,
and • The Mountain Sparrow, Will.
[445]THIS bird is undoubtedly of a different ſpe⯑cies from the Houſe Sparrow. Though they inhabit the ſame climate and the ſame tracts, they never aſſociate together, and their habits are, for the moſt part, diſſimilar. The Houſe Sparrow never leaves our dwellings, but lodges and breeds in the walls and roofs. The Tree Sparrow ſeldom viſits us, lives in the fields, haunts the ſides of the roads, perches on ſhrubs and low plants, and builds its neſt in crevices and holes at a little height from the ground. It is ſaid to neſtle alſo in the woods, and in the hollows of trees; but I have never ſeen them in the woods but tranſiently, and they certainly prefer the open fields. The Houſe Sparrow flies heavily, and always to ſhort diſtances; nor can it walk without hopping and making awk⯑ward movements. The Tree Sparrow, on the contrary, whirls round more ſmartly, and walks better. This ſpecies is not ſo numerous as that [446] of the Houſe Sparrow; and it is exceedingly probable that they hatch only once a-year, lay⯑ing four or five eggs; for about the end of ſum⯑mer they aſſemble in great bodies, and remain together during the winter. It is eaſy in that ſeaſon to catch them on the buſhes where they ſit.
After this bird has alighted, it is in a conti⯑nual flutter, whirling, jerking its tail upwards and downwards, performing all theſe motions with tolerable grace; and hence comes its French name friquet (friſky). Though not ſo bold as the Houſe Sparrow, it does not ſhun the pre⯑ſence of man; it often follows travellers, with⯑out ſhewing any ſigns of timidity. It flies with a wheeling motion, and always very low; for it never perches on large trees, and thoſe who have called it the Cheſnut Sparrow, have con⯑founded it with the Ring Sparrow, which really lodges on lofty trees and on cheſnuts.
This ſpecies is ſubject to variety. Many na⯑turaliſts have reckoned the Mountain Sparrow*, the Collared Sparrow†, the Fooliſh Sparrow of the Italians, as ſpecifically different from it. But the Fooliſh Sparrow is exactly the ſame [447] bird, and the other ſorts are only ſlight va⯑rieties*.
What proves that the Paſſera Mattugia †, or Fooliſh Sparrow of the Italians, is either the Tree Sparrow, or a ſlight variety of it, diſtin⯑guiſhed only by the diſtribution of its colours, is, that Olina, who gives a figure and a deſcrip⯑tion of it, ſays, that it receives the epithet of Mattugia, becauſe it can never reſt a ſingle mo⯑ment in one place ‡; the ſame circumſtance to which I attribute the origin of its French name. Would it not be very ſingular, that this bird, which is ſo common in France, ſhould not at all be found in Italy, as our nomenclators have ſtated? On the contrary, it would ſeem that there are more varieties of this ſpecies in Italy than in France. It inhabits therefore the tem⯑perate and warmer regions, and not the cold climates, for it is not found in Sweden. But I am ſurprized that Salerne ſhould ſay that this bird occurs not in Germany or England, ſince the naturaliſts of theſe countries have given [448] figures and deſcriptions of it. Friſch even aſ⯑ſerts, that the Tree Sparrow and the Canary bird can breed together, and that the experiment has been made in Germany.
The Tree Sparrow, though more reſtleſs than the Houſe Sparrow, is not ſo petulant, ſo fami⯑liar, or ſo voracious. It is more innocent, and not ſo deſtructive to the crops. It prefers fruits, wild ſeeds, particularly thoſe of the thiſtle, and alſo eats inſects. It avoids meeting the Houſe Sparrow, which is ſtronger and more miſchiev⯑ous. It can be raiſed in a cage, and fed like a Goldfinch; it lives five or ſix years; its ſong is very poor, but quite different from the harſh cries of the Houſe Sparrow. Though more gentle than the Houſe Sparrow, it is remarked not to be ſo docile. This is owing to its living more out of the ſociety of man*.
FOREIGN BIRDS, WHICH ARE RELATED TO THE TREE SPARROW.
[449]THE bird called the Wild Sparrow (Paſſereau Sauvage) in Provence, appears to be mere⯑ly a variety of the Tree Sparrow. Its ſong, ſays M. Guys, would ſeem never to end, and is quite different from that of the Houſe Sparrow. He adds, that this bird is very ſhy, and conceals its head among the ſtones, leaving its body unco⯑vered, and then fancies itſelf to be ſafe. It ſub⯑ſiſts in the fields upon grain, and ſome years it is very rare in Provence.
But beſides this and other varieties of the ſame ſort that inhabit our climates, and which we have mentioned after our nomenclators by the names of Mountain Sparrow, Collared Sparrow, Fooliſh Sparrow, there are others found in fo⯑reign climates.
I. The GREEN SPARROW.
• Le Paſſe Vert, Buff.
It is delineated fig. 2. No. 201. Pl. Enl. un⯑der the name of Red-headed Cayenne Sparrow. [450] We ſhall term it the Green Sparrow, becauſe its body is greeniſh. But though in point of co⯑lour it differs as much as poſſible from our Tree Sparrow, it is nearer related to this than to any other European bird.
II. The BLUE SPARROW.
• Le Paſſe Bleu, Buff.
The ſame may be ſaid of the Blue Cayenne Sparrow of fig. 2. No. 203.; and as both theſe birds inhabit the ſame climate, we can hardly decide whether they are diſtinct ſpecies, or ought to be ranged in the ſame.
III. The FOUDI.
This bird is called in Madagaſcar, Foudi Le⯑hemené. Briſſon mentioned it firſt under the name of the Madagaſcar Cardinal. It is deli⯑neated fig. 2. No. 134. Pl. Enl. by the title of Madagaſcar Sparrow.
There are two birds, the Cardinal of the Cape of Good Hope, fig. 2. No. 6. and the Spar⯑row [451] of the Cape of Good Hope, fig. 1. No. 134. which both appear to me to be varieties of the Tree Sparrow, the former being the male, and the latter the female; for the only difference is, that the under-part of the body is black; but in all other reſpects they are alike, and as we have reaſon to believe that they live in the ſame cli⯑mate, we may conclude they belong to the ſame ſpecies.
IV. The CRESTED TREE SPARROW.
• Le Friquet Huppé, Buff. , • Fringilla Criſtata, Gmel. ,
and • The Black-faced Finch, Lath.
It is like the Tree Sparrow in ſize and ſhape, though much different in point of colour. It is delineated fig. 1. and 2. No. 181. Pl. Enl. un⯑der the names of the Cayenne and Carolina Spar⯑row. Fig. 1. is probably the male, and fig. 2. the female of the ſame ſpecies. A
V. The BEAUTIFUL MARKED SPARROW.
• Le Beau Marquet, Buff.
[452]It is delineated fig. 1. No. 203. Pl. Enl. un⯑der the appellation of Sparrow of the Coaſt of Africa. It is certainly different from the Tree Sparrow, and all thoſe which we have menti⯑oned, and therefore required an appropriated name. That which we have formed denotes that it is beautiful, and finely ſpotted under the belly.
The RING SPARROW *.
• Le Soulcie, Buff. , • Fringilla Petronia, Linn. and Gmel. , • Paſſer Sylveſtris, Briſſ. ,
and • Paſſer Torquatus, Aldrov. and Ray.
[][453]THIS bird has, as well as the Tree Sparrow, been often confounded with the Houſe Sparrow, though it is of a different ſpecies. It is larger than either, its bill is ſtronger, and red rather than black, and it has no habit in com⯑mon with the Houſe Sparrow. It dwells in the woods, and hence the name that it has received from moſt of the naturaliſts†. It neſtles in hollow trees, lays four or five eggs, and hatches only once a-year. As ſoon as the young are able to accompany the parents, that is about the end of July, they aſſociate in flocks. The Ring Sparrows are therefore collected ſix weeks earlier than the Tree Sparrows, and form alſo more nu⯑merous bodies. They remain united till the ſea⯑ſon of love, when they ſeparate with their fe⯑males in pairs. Though theſe birds are inva⯑riably ſtationary in our climate, it is probable that they dread the ſeverity of the arctic region, for Linnaeus makes no mention of them in his enumeration of the natives of Sweden. They [454] are birds of paſſage in Germany*, and do not arrive in flocks, but only one by one†; and what ſeems to confirm our conjecture, they are often found dead in the hollows of trees, in hard winters. They ſubſiſt not only on grain and ſeeds of all ſorts, but alſo on flies and other in⯑ſects. They are fond of the ſociety of their equals, and when they diſcover abundance of food, they invite them to partake. As they are almoſt always in numerous bodies, they do vaſt injury to newly-ſowed fields. They can ſcarcely be driven away or deſtroyed, for they partake of the caution of the Houſe Sparrow. They avoid ſnares, lime-twigs, and traps, but they can be caught in great numbers with nooſes‡.
FOREIGN BIRDS, THAT ARE RELATED TO THE RING SPARROW.
[455]I. The LITTLE RING SPARROW.
• Le Soulciet, Buff. , • Fringilla Monticula, Gmel. , • Paſſer Canadenſis, Briſſ. ,
and • The Mountain Finch, Lath.
THIS bird is ſo much like the Ring Sparrow, that we might conſider it as only a variety, if it were poſſible that it could migrate into the New Continent. It is delineated fig. 2. No. 223. under the name of the Canada Sparrow. It is ſmaller than the Ring Sparrow, as all the American animals are inferior to thoſe of the ſame ſpecies in the Old World*.
II. The PAROARE
[][455]Is another beautiful bird, a native of South America. Marcgrave calls it by its Brazilian [456] name, tije guacu paroara, from which we have taken the term Paroare. Briſſon has named it the Dominican Cardinal, becauſe its head is red, and its body black and white. In the female, the fore-part of the head is not red, but yellow-orange, ſprinkled with reddiſh points.
We ſhall alſo apply the name of Creſted Pa⯑roare to a bird of the ſame continent, which ap⯑pears to be only a variety, diſtinguiſhed by a tuft or creſt on its head. This beautiful bird is figured No. 103. Pl. Enl. and there termed the Creſted Dominican Cardinal of Louiſiana.
III. The CRESCENT.
• Le Croiſſant, Buff.
This bird is delineated fig. 1. No. 230. Pl. Enl. and there named the Sparrow of the Cape of Good Hope, which had been given to it by Briſſon. We ſhall term it the Creſcent, becauſe in its ſpecies and climate it is different from the others. In the diſtribution of its colours it is analogous to the Ring Sparrow, and has a white creſcent which extends from the eye below the neck.—This character is alone ſufficient to diſ⯑tinguiſh it.