[]

LETTER FROM MR. FRANCIS TO LORD NORTH, LATE EARL OF GUILDFORD.

WITH AN APPENDIX.

LONDON: Printed for J. DEBRETT, oppoſite Burlington Houſe, PICCADILLY.

[]

THEY, who were preſent at the debate in the Houſe of Commons, on Tueſday the twenty-third of April, 1793, will ſee the propriety and neceſſity of the preſent publication. Arguments, founded on the principles maintained in theſe papers, may poſſibly appear to the Public to have deſerved ſome conſideration. At leaſt, they ought to have been heard.

TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE LORD NORTH, &c., &c.

[]
MY LORD,

1. I TAKE it for granted that, whenever it ſhall be thought adviſeable to form a new arrangement for the future government of Bengal, and for the general ſecurity of our acquiſitions and eſtabliſhments in India, on ſome determinate principle, and under an united authority, the ſubſtance of our public letters to the Court [2] of Directors, and of the ſeveral minutes ſigned by Sir John Clavering, Colonel Monſon, and myſelf, as far as they may appear to relate to thoſe objects, will be duly conſidered. We ſpared no pains to procure uſeful information, nor neglected any opportunity of communicating it to the Company and to Government; not confining our reflections to the particular ſubject before us, but extending them generally to the political intereſts and internal adminiſtration of the country, as far as the occaſion would permit; and I truſt that, however our efforts, in other reſpects, may have been diſappointed of their immediate aim, the inquiries we made, and the knowledge obtained by them, will not be found uſeleſs to our ſucceſſors. To execute this part of the duty of our appointment as completely as I can, and to enable Government to take ſuch meaſures hereafter, for a final arrangement of India affairs, as may include every caſe fit to be provided for, and not be defeated in the execution, I beg leave to ſubmit to your Lordſhip ſome [3] important queſtions, on which we have had no proper opportunity of delivering our opinion, and which, I preſume, cannot be left undecided at home, without great inconvenience to the public ſervice here. Many of theſe queſtions are obvious, and will, without doubt, have already occurred to your Lordſhip. I think it neceſſary, nevertheleſs, not to paſs by any point whatever, on which your Lordſhip might poſſibly deſire an opinion or expect information from me.

2. The firſt queſtion, in the ſolution of which that of many others will be included, is of ſo much importance, and united with political conſiderations ſo remote from the immediate intereſts of Bengal, that I do not preſume to ſtate it in any other ſhape, than ſimply as a queſtion; viz. ‘"To what extent and in what form the actual ſovereignty of Great Britain over theſe provinces ſhall be avowed?"’ A higher judgment than mine muſt determine, whether any plan of meaſures for the internal Government [4] of Bengal can be perfectly regular, ſyſtematical, or ſecure, which does not ſuppoſe and eſtabliſh a unity of dominion. The operations of that power, deſcending from a ſingle ſource, would flow with regularity in their natural channels, and never claſh with each other.

3. In this obſervation, the object is conſidered as it ſtands; a country, in which the principal branches of the ſovereign power are exerciſed by the Eaſt-India Company, where juſtice is adminiſtered partly under the authority of the Subadar, and partly under that of the King of Great Britain, and where the natives in general acknowledge no King but the Mogul, whoſe rights as Sovereign are admitted by all Indoſtan, under whoſe authority the revenues are collected, and in whoſe name the current money of Bengal is coined. The wiſdom of His Majeſty's Council will determine, in what manner theſe ſeveral rights and powers can now be reconciled or adjuſted; or whether the actual condition of the object [5] will admit of any inſtitutions compleatly free from exception.

4. If meaſures, already taken, and the effects they have produced, had no influence on thoſe, which muſt be purſued hereafter, the ſafeſt, the moſt ſimple, and the leaſt invidious principle, on which this territory could be held, would have been that of a fixed tribute from the native Prince of the country, an armed force ſufficient to inſure his dependence, and one ſtrong poſt for ſecurity or retreat. On this principle, an interference in the internal Government would have defeated our own plan, and deprived us of the benefit of it. Acts of power, not neceſſary to the ſecurity of the dominion, are moſt felt by the conquered people, who, once ſubmitting to the dominion itſelf, will not repine at meaſures indiſpenſibly neceſſary to preſerve it. Such meaſures do not invade the laws, religion, manners, or prejudices of the people. Obedience is their ſole object; and that Government will be beſt obeyed, under [6] which the people are limited the leaſt in the enjoyment of their private rights. A wiſe Prince, who had made ſuch a conqueſt as Bengal, would probably have endeavoured to make this uſe of it.

5. By bringing this policy into view, I do not mean to propoſe it for preſent practiſe. Facts, not to be reſiſted, oblige me to baniſh that idea. But, though the inſtitution alluded to be in itſelf unattainable, it does not follow that ſome of it's component principles may not be ſelected and preſerved in raiſing another edifice.

6. Circumſtances, inſeparable perhaps from the Conſtitution of the Eaſt India Company, diſqualified them in every ſenſe for the duty and office, which the acquiſition of a territory in India impoſed upon them. A body of merchants had intereſts to provide for, beſides thoſe, which belonged to them in their aſſumed character of Sovereign. Profit, being the only object of a trading company, became the ſole object of Government, when the [7] two characters were united. Commercial principles of the worſt quality, as derived from the Conſtitution of an excluſive company, were all the principles, which the India Company brought with them into the Government of a great kingdom, and it has been governed accordingly. After raiſing the revenues as nearly as poſſible to the level of the rents, for the ſupport of their Government, they monopolized the produce and labour of the country for the ſupport of their trade. To obtain the higheſt poſſible revenue from the land, they were obliged to avow or countenance a principle ſubverſive of all national proſperity, and not leſs falſe in fact, than abſurd in theory and dangerous in practice; ‘"that the ruling power was proprietor of the ſoil."’ On this principle, they univerſally diſpoſſeſſed the hereditary and lawful owners, and farmed the country to ſtrangers. In a few inſtances, where the proprietors were employed, it was not in their true character, but as farmers of Government. There is no example, I believe, of ſuch [8] an act of power in the Hiſtory of Indoſtan.

7. The Company's ſyſtem, ſuppoſing it to have no view but the advantage of the body corporate, muſt have ruined Bengal, without the aſſiſtance of their ſervants, though not in ſo ſhort a period. ‘"*Of all deſpotic governments, there is none which oppreſſes itſelf more than where the prince declares himſelf proprietor of the ſoil, and heir of all his ſubjects. It always follows, that the cultivation of the earth is abandoned; but if, beſides this, the prince is a merchant, every ſpecies of induſtry is ruined."’

8. The internal juriſdictions of the country fell with the rights of the Zemindars, who were naturally, and by inſtitution, the magiſtrates of the people in the ordinary detail of juſtice, and anſwerable for the peace of their reſpective [9] Zemindaries. Great caſes were reſerved for the deciſion of the prince.

9. It is true that no attempt has been made to interrupt the natives in the exerciſe of their religion, much leſs to give them an idea of a better. The ſpirit of perſecution or converſion is foreign from the Engliſh character; nor could any additional profit have been derived from it. But the decline of the Zemindars has, in a great meaſure, deprived the lower claſſes of one of their principal enjoyments—the ſhews, proceſſions, and pageantry of a ceremonious ſuperſtition; at the ſame time that the ſources, out of which many charitable and religious inſtitutions were ſupported, have been reduced or annihilated.

10. Your Lordſhip will ſoon perceive how much it is the general object of this repreſentation to eſtabliſh an opinion, that, to make the poſſeſſion of Bengal beneficial and permanent, we ſhould revert to the ancient inſtitutions of the [10] country, as far as we are acquainted with them, and preſent circumſtances will permit. If it were not for the experience of ſome years paſt, it might be ſuperfluous to ſay, that we provide for our intereſts when we conſult the happineſs and proſperity of the people, who labour for us.

11. It appears to have been the Company's original policy, or that of Lord Clive, to govern theſe provinces through the medium of the Subadar, and the beſt they could adopt, ſuppoſing them to interpoſe in any ſhape in the internal government. This ſyſtem was ſoon violated in fact, and not long afterwards avowedly renounced. The predominant power of the Council at Calcutta neceſſarily reduced the Subadar to a cypher, and left him and his ſubjects, as it always will do, a prey to individuals. Forms and appearances were, however, in ſome degree, preſerved till the death of Syef-ul-Dowla in 1770. From that period we ſee nothing in the adminiſtration of [11] public affairs but enormous abuſes on one ſide, and an abſolute want of power or perſeverance to correct them on the other. But theſe are topics, on which I need not enlarge. Occaſional acts of vigour, on the part of the Court of Directors, were little felt or regarded in Bengal, and neither did nor could produce any laſting improvement in the conduct of their repreſentatives. Abuſes, which belong to the nature of the thing, and riſe directly out of it, are not to be corrected by regulations, even if the profeſſed intentions of the Court of Directors had been conſtantly and ſincerely ſupported. The Company's government was founded on a falfe and claſhing principle, and would, at all events, have produced the effects it has done, though perhaps by ſlower gradations. A fortunate choice of men, and a firm adminiſtration, might have checked the rapid growth of abuſes, and delayed the neceſſity of an entire change of ſyſtem to a remoter period. Under the Company's government, even this caſual reſource was [12] not to be expected. Their ſervants could not riſe to high ſituations without having ſpent their youth in the ſervice. Their minds, in general, unprepared by education, and ſoftened by the climate, were open to the impreſſions of example. The extraordinary temptations, to which almoſt every degree of power in this country is expoſed, has too direct a tendency to corrupt the hand, to which it is intruſted. But temptation is converted into neceſſity, or may plauſibly aſſume the ſame colours, when high ſtations are not united with avowed emoluments proportioned to them. Among other maxims, which belonged to the Company's commercial inſtitutions, and which they transferred to their political government, one was, not to allow their ſervants directly even a ſubſiſtence. On this principle they treated miniſters of ſtate and rulers of provinces as they had done clerks and factors. They were themſelves too powerful to be juſt, and neither did nor could reaſonably expect that their ſervants would not follow their [13] example. It was in vain, therefore, that they ſometimes endeavoured or pretended to reconcile regularity and juſtice, in the detail of their adminiſtration, with injuſtice in its fundamental principle—I mean that of uniting the character of Sovereign and merchant, and exerciſing the power of the firſt for the benefit of the ſecond.—‘"*A government cannot be unjuſt without having hands to exerciſe its injuſtice. Now it is impoſſible but theſe hands will be graſping for themſelves. Peculation, therefore, is natural in deſpotic ſtates."’

12. The Subadar's authority, ſince the Company's acceptance of the Dewanny, has been gradually reduced under three ſucceſſive Nabobs, and is now merely titular in the perſon of Mobarek-ul-Dowla. The adminiſtration of criminal juſtice is, however, ſtill exerciſed, in his name, by the Naib Suba, Mahomed [14] Riza Cawn; and we ſometimes avail ourſelves of the pretence of his authority in our differences with the foreign factories. Diveſted of all power, and wholly dependent on the Company's pleaſure, he has nevertheleſs ſuch rights and claims to plead as may embarraſs any new arrangement, in which the office of Subadar is not included. His ſituation, and the difficulties likely to ariſe out of it, deſerve to be conſidered.

13. By the treaty concluded between him and the Company, in March, 1770, they engage to ſecure the Subahdarry to him, and to ſupport him in it, againſt all his enemies. They alſo engage to pay him an annual ſtipend of thirty-two lacks out of the revenues. The adminiſtration of juſtice, in his name, is an acknowledgement of his authority as repreſentative of the Sovereign. The Company approved of preſerving the ſucceſſion in the family of Meer Jaffier, but ordered his ſtipend to be reduced to [15] ſixteen lacks a year during his minority *. It is not determined at what period the minority is to end, nor by what authority the Company could reduce the ſtipend fixed by the treaty. The Nabob has been marriageable ſome years, and has ſeveral children. His age admits of no pretence to conſider him as a minor; nor, if it did, would the Company, in their aſſumed quality of guardian, be the leſs accountable to him for the ſavings created by the reduction of his ſtipend. We have yet received no inſtructions whatſoever on this ſubject. The Nabob does not ſubmit, without reluctance, to the reſtraints laid upon him. I have reaſon to believe that he has made private applications to the Governor, and may repeat them to the Board, for the removal of Mahomed Riza Cawn, and to be allowed the enjoyment and exerciſe of whatever rights are left him. He may then demand the full amount and arrears of his penſion; and it is not unlikely [16] that, failing of relief from Government, he may be adviſed to inſtitute a ſuit againſt the Company in the Supreme Court of Judicature. If the deciſion ſhould be favourable to him, the Company, I take it for granted, will throw the burden on the territorial revenues, notwithſtanding they have appropriated the ſavings, already made by the reduction of his ſtipend, to the proviſion of their inveſtment.

14. With reſpect to the Nabob, the principal points to be determined are, Firſt, ‘"Whether the office of Subahdar ſhall be continued, and on what footing?"’ Secondly, ‘"At what period the Nabob's minority is to end?"’ Thirdly, ‘"What meaſures are to be taken in the caſe of his death?"’—Mahomed Riza Cawn's conduct, in his ſtation of Naib Subah, has been hitherto unexceptionable; but it is not to be expected that he ſhould act with freedom, or be able to render us any eſſential ſervice, while the terror of the Governor's [17] actual power and of a claſhing juriſdiction with the Supreme Court is hanging over him.

15. In ſixing the future eſtabliſhment of the Subahdar and Naib Subah, it muſt be taken into conſideration that the circulation of their penſions is beneficial to the country; that they ſupport a number of Muſſulman families of diſtinction, which would be reduced to beggary if the penſions were withdrawn; and that the Fouzdarry Courts, now under Mahomed Reza Cawn, comprehend almoſt all the offices, in which Muſſulmen can be employed.

16. The ſovereignty aſſumed might authoriſe His Majeſty to remove the Subahdar; but I know not on what principle the Mogul Shaw Allum can be diveſted of his ſovereign rights, unleſs ſome ſatisfactory compromiſe can be made with him. The Company hold the Dewanny by his grant. The treaty concluded by Lord Clive in Auguſt, 1765, [18] not only acknowledges him as King of Bengal, but ſecures to him the full poſſeſſion of Korah and Illahabad as a royal demeſne for the ſupport of his dignity and expences; and by a particular agreement between him and the Company, of the ſame date, they engage themſelves to be ſecurity for the payment of twenty-ſix lacks a year, out of the territorial revenues, in conſideration of His Majeſty's having been graciouſly pleaſed to grant them the Dewanny of Bengal. Your Lordſhip knows how little theſe treaties have been regarded: his tribute was ſtopt, and his country (though avowedly entruſted to our good faith, and accepted as a depoſit) ſold to Sujah Dowla.

17. It was invariably the opinion of Sir John Clavering, Colonel Monſon, and myſelf, that the honour of the nation required that juſtice ſhould be done to the Mogul in ſome ſhape or other, and that it might be made conducive to our intereſt to ſupport him. Conſidering his preſent diſtreſſes, it would not perhaps [19] be very difficult to form a plan, in which his ſatisfaction, and the general tranquillity of the empire, might be equally conſulted.

18. After the internal ſettlement of our own territories, the next object ſhould be to lay the foundation of a general peace thro' Indoſtan, and, if poſſible, to give or reſtore an active conſtitution to the empire. Bengal cannot flouriſh while the neighbouring ſtates are perpetually in arms againſt each other. Returns of wealth are not to be obtained from nations, which have no induſtry of their own, or that languiſh under the dominion of the ſword. As the firſt ſtep to peace, the authority of the Emperor ſhould be in a conſiderable degree reſtored, and means given him to ſupport it. In return for an acquittance of his claims upon the Company, a reſpectable demeſne might be found for him out of the countries lying north-weſt of Oude, of which Delhy might be the center. This ſtep might lead to and facilitate [20] a general pacification, in which the rights of every ſubordinate power might be determined, and to which they ſhould all be invited to accede. The predominant power of the Engliſh ſhould be employed to cut through difficulties, and to guarantee the obſervance of the treaty. As far at leaſt as the ſucceſs of ſuch a plan may be attainable by negociation, it certainly deſerves to be encouraged from home, and recommended to the Adminiſtration here.

19. The Britiſh power is now unqueſtionably the firſt in India; at leaſt for defence. To make it reſpectable in itſelf and beneficial to mankind, it muſt be guided by ſolid, judicious principles of policy, and they muſt be ſteadily purſued. Enough has been done to eſtabliſh the reputation of our arms. If we mean to keep what we have acquired, ſome care muſt be taken to eſtabliſh an opinion of our ſteadineſs and juſtice. A continued diviſion in this council, beſides many other dangerous effects, produces [21] one which, I conceive, would have had great weight at home, if it had been foreſeen and conſidered. It expoſes the meaſures of Government, which, at leaſt in every fundamental point, ought to be fixed and uniform, to perpetual alterations, as the actual power may accidentally fluctuate from one ſide to the other. The death of Colonel Monſon produced not only a change of Adminiſtration, but a total change of ſyſtem. The death of Mr. Haſtings or Mr. Barwell might have reſtored the courſe of public meaſures to their former channel. Other caſes may now be foreſeen, in which a future majority may neither revert deciſively to our principles, nor completely execute the reſolutions of their immediate predeceſſors. The event will depend on the temper, character, and views of the men who compoſe it, and the new difficulties they may have to contend with. Diminution of dignity is not to be ſeparated from a fluctuation of councils; but changes of ſyſtem, which ſhake the foundation, are never accompliſhed without [22] extraordinary difficulty and hazard; nor is it always open to the wiſeſt men to do perfectly right after much wrong has been done. A new poſition of things creates a new queſtion, in which facts, as well as principles, muſt govern the deciſion.

20. The preſent condition of the Nabob of Oude, and the ſtate of his dominions, is the principal inſtance to which this reaſoning is meant to be applied. Your Lordſhip will ſoon ſee what an important ſhare belongs to it in the political intereſts of Bengal.

21. On the death of the late Sujah Dowla, Mr. Haſtings delivered a formal opinion to the Council, and afterwards to the Court of Directors*, ‘"that we could not with juſtice make any further demands upon his ſucceſſor."’ He admitted, ‘"that the treaty concluded by Mr. Briſtow was very advantageous [23] to the Company,"’ but he recommended ‘"that their orders might be ſuch as might tend to conciliate the mind of the Nabob, and to remove the apprehenſion of any future incroachments on his dominions."’

22. The arguments, which prevailed with a majority of the Board againſt the firſt opinion of Mr. Haſtings, appear at large on our proceedings. We reſolved, that the engagements which had ſubſiſted between Sujah Dowla and the Company were perſonal, and expired with him. On this principle, denied by Mr. Haſtings and Mr. Barwell, and ſince diſavowed by the Company, (who have availed themſelves of the conſequences derived from it,) the treaty of Fyzabad with the preſent Nabob of Oude was concluded in May 1775. The terms of it were as favourable to us as our real intereſt demanded, and more ſo than could have been obtained in other circumſtances. In return for the ceſſion of Ghazipore we granted him nothing but [24] a guarantee of the dominions originally poſſeſſed by his father, with an expreſs excluſion of his late conqueſts. For the defence of theſe dominions, we agreed to continue a brigade in his ſervice, but obliged him to make a conſiderable addition to the former ſubſidy. His own undiſciplined troops were, however, a greater burthen to him, and drained all his reſources without the poſſibility of doing him any ſervice. To leave his army on this footing was, in effect, to expoſe him and his country to deſtruction; and he was ſenſible of it. The reſolution to ſupply him with a moderate number of Britiſh officers was ſubſequent to the treaty. A corps of thirteen battalions of ſepoys, and three regiments of cavalry, was formed out of his diſorderly troops, and put under the command of theſe officers; but it was ſtill his army. A conſiderable number of the reſt were reduced. This was the utmoſt extent of the interpoſition of our Government in the Nabob's affairs; and at this point we were determined to ſtop. The [25] internal adminiſtration of his country might be expoſed to abuſes, but we were perfectly ſure that they would never be corrected by our taking charge of it.

23. Since the power of this Council devolved to Mr. Haſtings, other ideas have prevailed. The recall of Mr. Briſtow and the appointment of Mr. Middleton were the firſt ſteps to the new ſyſtem. An entire change of conduct towards the Nabob was talked of very ſoon after colonel Monſon's death. I know not by what ſecret motives Mr. Haſtings has been guided, nor how far the anxiety of his mind and the delicacy of his ſituation may have influenced his conduct, at points of time when apparently it was too late to deliberate. The notorious fact is, that in all his late arrangements of the Nabob's government, he has reſolved haſtily and executed ſlowly. The reſolution to transfer the Nabob's troops under Britiſh officers to the Company's eſtabliſhment, did not appear till May laſt, though it was publicly known [26] ſeveral months before; and near three months more have been ſuffered to elapſe before the new officers were appointed. General Clavering's remonſtrances and mine againſt the meaſure were ſcarcely liſtened to, though accompanied with urgent and repeated repreſentations to Mr. Haſtings, not to neglect the defence of Bengal, while he was providing for that of Rohilcund and other diſtant countries, in which the Company had no concern. In a few days after, the Governor reſolved to inſiſt on the Nabob's diſmiſſing ſome perſons in his ſervice who were obnoxious to us, and on his committing the internal adminiſtration, without reſerve, to a Miniſter named by the Board. The next ſtep was, to offer the Company's protection to Sadut Ally, the Nabob's brother, who had fled from his court, and was the immediate object of his jealouſy, and to invite him to reſide within theſe provinces. By the lateſt letters from Mr. Middleton it appears, that, under pretence of ſecuring the Company's debt, he has taken the collection [27] of the greateſt part of the revenues into his own hands.

24. The reſult is, that the Nabob is reduced to a cypher, that all power is veſted in Mr. Middleton, that the country, delivered up to aliens, who neither underſtand its intereſts nor have any concern for its proſperity, is falling into irretrievable ruin, that the revenues have long been unequal to the expences, and that nothing is collected but by military execution. On this footing it cannot laſt long. The perſonal character of the Nabob offers no reſource againſt the continuance of ſuch miſchiefs. I fear he has neither virtue nor capacity to make a proper uſe of power, if power was reſtored to him; certainly not, in circumſtances which demand an extraordinary proportion of both. Such is the ſituation we ſtand in at preſent. On the 4th of Auguſt, when Mr. Haſtings recommended the appointment of the new officers, he was pleaſed to declare, that ‘"if the adminiſtration of the Company's [28] affairs ſhould finally reſt in other hands, what he now did would be of little conſequence, as it would be undone of courſe, and the whole ſyſtem, of which it was but a part, annulled on the principles on which it was oppoſed."’

25. Without admitting the neceſſity of this concluſion from any act or declaration of ours, and deeming it highly unjuſtifiable to carry meaſures of ſuch importance into execution under any expectation of their being ſpeedily reverſed, I am compelled to confeſs, that the whole ſtate of facts taken together conſtitutes a queſtion beyond the reach of any degree of wiſdom exiſting in Bengal. We ſhall probably be governed by events for a ſhort period, and, I fear, obliged to abandon the country at the end of it.

26. Before your attention is drawn directly to Bengal, permit me to ſtate to your Lordſhip one queſtion more, in which the general ſecurity of the Britiſh [29] empire in India is concerned. The controlling power, veſted by Parliament in this Government over the other Preſidencies, is either not extenſive enough, or not defined with clearneſs and preciſion ſufficient to anſwer the purpoſes intended by it. We have not only met with ſlight and diſobedience, in the exerciſe of our authority in India, but I am ſorry to obſerve, that the Court of Directors themſelves ſeem to view it with jealouſy and diſtruſt. Your Lordſhip cannot but be apprized of the ſupport they have given to the Preſidency of Bombay, in oppoſition to the meaſures unanimouſly reſolved on here, for concluding a peace with the Mahrattas. In their letter of the 24th of December laſt, paragraph 45, they charge us with exceeding our lawful authority, when we prohibited the Preſidency of Madras from ſending troops out of their own diſtricts to aid the ſettlement of Bombay, and they diſapprove our interference in that caſe. I apprehend that the power of declaring and making war includes that of determining in what quarter it [30] ſhall be conducted with the greateſt general advantage, and proſpect of ſucceſs. But every arrangement of ours may be defeated, if the other Preſidencies are permitted to alter the diſpoſition of their reſpective forces, without our conſent, and of courſe without regard to any general plan of operations. Whether this obſervation be well or ill founded, it is plain that the Court of Directors ſought for an occaſion to limit our authority, and to diſcountenance us in the eyes of the other Preſidencies. The fact in queſtion was of too old a date, and of too little moment in itſelf, to be revived for any other purpoſe. In their letter of the 5th February laſt*, they cenſure us for relinquiſhing ſome of the ceſſions made by Ragoba in his treaty with the Preſidency of Bombay, concluded (ſeveral months after our arrival in Bengal) not only without our conſent and approbation, but without our knowledge. They alſo inſtruct us to take advantage of any [31] failure, on the part of the Mahratta Government, in the execution of the late treaty with them, and to renew the alliance with Ragoba, on the ſame terms which the Preſidency of Bombay had obtained from him. It is but too probable that, with ſo much encouragement from home, the Governor and Council of Bombay may ſoon find pretences for reſuming their favourite projects, and involve us in a general war with the Mahrattas. Whether that conſequence follows or not, your Lordſhip will judge, from theſe inſtances, how ineffectual and hazardous any endeavours of ours muſt be to preſerve the peace of India, as long as the determination of peace and war is ſubjected to a claſhing juriſdiction. If it was the original intention of the Legiſlature, that the whole force of the Britiſh empire in India ſhould be united under one direction, and move together, I muſt ſubmit my opinion to your Lordſhip, that other proviſions, more ſtrict and deciſive than any that exiſt at preſent, are indiſpenſably neceſſary to carry that intention [32] into effect. The latitude ſtill left with the other Preſidencies, to make peace and war, where they ſhall have received ſpecial orders from the Company, without any communication with us, or control on our part, defeats the general view of uniting the political meaſures of the three Governments under one ſyſtem and authority; becauſe the exception muſt always be too powerful for the rule.

27. I have already, in my repreſentations to the Company, declared my opinion ſo fully on many of the moſt important branches of the internal Adminiſtration of Bengal, that very little remains for me to ſay on this ſubject. With reſpect to the amount and collection of the revenues, the Court of Directors and Government are in poſſeſſion of all the lights and materials, I have been able to collect; and theſe, I hope, will enable them to determine, on what footing the land tax of the country ſhall be ſettled hereafter. The principal queſtions are, whether the lands ſhall be reſtored to the [33] hereditary owners. Whether the revenue, payable to Government, ſhall be fixed immutably at a certain ſum, and by what rule or ſtandard that ſum ſhall be aſcertained. To the two firſt queſtions I have invariably given an affirmative anſwer, founded on reaſons, which I deem incontrovertible. The third muſt be determined by the capacity of the country, eſtimated from an average of the actual collections, and combined with the indiſpenſible demands of Government.

28. The farming ſyſtem was adopted as the act of a proprietor, with a profeſſed view of diſcovering the ultimate value of the eſtate, or the utmoſt that could be obtained from it. Your Lordſhip will judge, how far the end, ſuppoſing it attainable, could juſtify the means. To General Clavering, Colonel Monſon, and myſelf, it always appeared an arbitrary, unexampled act of power, without a ſhadow of right to ſupport it. The principle, on which it went, annihilated [34] every idea of private property, while in fact it has been ruinous to the country, for the ſole benefit of the Company's ſervants, and their banians. But, even if the farms had, in every inſtance, been fairly allotted to the higheſt bidders, the meaſure could have produced no other conſequence, than that of forcibly alienating the whole landed property of the country, in favour of indigent ſtrangers and adventurers, equally ignorant of the value and circumſtances of the farm, and careleſs how much they offered for immediate poſſeſſion. The laſt ſettlement, made by the Committee of Circuit, promiſed an immoderate increaſe of revenue, at a time, when the famine had ſwept away one third of the inhabitants, and when the country was repreſented to be in a general ſtate of decay. Extraordinary merit was pleaded with the Company for this imaginary addition to their reſources. What the real object of the meaſure was, may be collected from the ſucceſs of it. The balances and remiſſions, on the ſettlements of the laſt five [35] years, amount to the enormous ſum of two hundred and thirty lacks of Sicca rupees. The plain truth is, that overratement and remiſſion play into each other's hands. If the country be exorbitantly taxed, the Governor and Council muſt be truſted with a diſcretionary power to make remiſſions. This latitude once given or aſſumed, it may be impoſſible to determine in what manner it is applied, or where the remiſſions center at laſt; ſince the diſtribution may be ſo formed, as to intereſt all parties in concealing it. If we had no facts or experience to guide our conjectures, it is apparent that a country, expoſed to arbitrary variations in the annual aſſeſſments, at the diſcretion of a Council of State, eſpecially at this immenſe diſtance from the ſeat of empire, offers temptations to the Members of ſuch a Council, which will not be always reſiſted. Improvements, in ſuch a ſtate of things, are not to be expected; for who will employ his money or his labour in the cultivation of a ſoil, that does not belong to him, or when he [36] has no ſecurity that the whole produce may not be extorted from him by a new aſſeſſment? The wealth of Bengal was ſo great, that the ſevereſt oppreſſion has not yet been ſufficient to beggar it intirely. But the richeſt mines may be exhauſted; and I am moſt deliberately of opinion that if private property be not once for all ſecured on a permanent footing, the public revenue will ſink rapidly with the general produce of the country. The ſame ſyſtem of taxation, which annihilates the property, attacks the induſtry of the ſubject, invades the ſources of production, and in the end obliges Government to depend for it's revenue on the fidelity of farmers and agents, who have no intereſt in the proſperity of the object, or on the precarious, periſhable reſources of direct violence and extortion.

29. The laſt orders* of the Court of Directors are favourable to the Zemindars, and other hereditary proprietors of the [37] lands, and amount to an indirect acknowledgement of the injuſtice they have ſuffered. They expreſs a ſatisfaction ‘"at finding it in their power to yield proper relief to the natives, without involving the Company in the leaſt inconvenience;"’ and they direct ‘"that ſuch Zemindars, or renters, as have fulfilled their engagements to our ſatisfaction, ſhall not be diſpoſſeſſed of their lands, or compelled to pay an advanced rent, without the moſt ſubſtantial reaſons."’—Without queſtioning the ſincerity of theſe profeſſions, it is apparent that the latitude taken in the expreſſion will ſoon defeat their intention. In a caſe, determinable by fixed general rules, it is equally unſafe and unneceſſary to rely on accidental motives of action, ſuch as the firmneſs, ability, or integrity of the perſons intruſted with the adminiſtration. What real appeal have the natives of Bengal to the directing Power in England, againſt acts ſuppoſed to be beneficial to that Power, and adorned with flattering repreſentations, in which juſtice and [38] profit are apparently united? Your Lordſhip will judge by what ſort of tenure the natives hold their property, while the convenience of the Eaſt-India Company, and the diſcretion of the rulers here, are to regulate the ſtandard by which it is to be taxed. The concluſion, to which this argument leads, is too obvious to be miſtaken. If I am not greatly deceived, the truths I am endeavouring to eſtabliſh are ſelf-evident, and proved the moment they are ſtated.

30. The annual demand of revenue, once fixed on a reaſonable and permanent eſtabliſhment, would operate to the benefit of the country in other ſenſes, beſides that of immediate relief, ſecurity, and improvement. It would ſtop one of the principal ſources of litigation, and facilitate the adminiſtration of civil juſtice by the country Courts. The weight of the revenue preſſes ſo heavily on almoſt all ranks of people, that it becomes every man's ſtudy how to ſhift the burden from himſelf, and of courſe to haraſs his neighbour. [39] Let the cauſe of action be what it may, it ſeldom happens that the public revenue is not, ſome way or other, concerned in the origin of the ſuit, or liable to be affected by the iſſue. On the other hand, the introduction of a myſterious ſcience, under the title of the Farming Syſtem, with its endleſs train of principal farmers, nominal farmers, ſecurities, counter ſecurities, agents, and cutkinnadars, has not only perplexed the buſiſineſs of the collections, but increaſed the number of ſuits in the Dewanny Courts, and the difficulty of deciding them. This difficulty is ſo great, and the cauſes determined are ſo few, in compariſon with the multitude that remain unheard, that, in reality, it amounts to a general denial of juſtice. The little that is done, perhaps, is too often mixed with motives of influence or favour. If the revenue were once fixed on a moderate footing, and the people made tolerably eaſy in their circumſtances, the ſpirit of litigation muſt gradually ſubſide. At the ſame time, the diſputes between Government and the [40] proprietors of the lands, and of the latter with their under-tenants and ryots, would either vaniſh entirely, or admit of an eaſy and ſummary deciſion. The amount of the rents being unalterably ſettled, would reduce the preſent intricate accounts of demands, receipts, and balances, to a ſimple account current, the balance of which might be authenticated beyond the poſſibility of a diſpute. It muſt be underſtood, however, that proper meaſures are taken by Government to extend the plan of fixing the rents, to every claſs of people concerned in paying them. In other words, that the ſame ſecurity, which Government gives to the tenant in chief, ſhould, for the ſame reaſons, deſcend to the under-tenants in their ſeveral gradations, ſo that every rank of ſociety, and every member of it, may have ſomething to call his own. A great part of this buſineſs, which ſeems difficult and perplexed in the detail, will gradually execute itſelf, when once it is perceived, that a wiſe and ſolid ſyſtem is adopted at the Fountain-Head, and ſteadily adhered to. [41] But it is in vain to correct abuſes of adminiſtration, while the principle of the Government is itſelf an abuſe.

31. General Clavering, Colonel Monſon and I, had, on many occaſions, but more particularly in our minute dated the 21ſt of March 1776 declared our deliberate opinion that, ‘"under the general application of the Britiſh laws, or of any form of juſtice adminiſtered generally to the natives by the Judges of His Majeſty's Supreme Court of Judicature, Bengal cannot be held by Great Britain."’ The truth of a ſimilar propoſition has already been ſo ably defended by Mr. Verelſt, that I need not attempt to eſtabliſh our opinion on other ground. The Dewanny Courts undoubtedly require reformation, and I conceive that it would not be difficult to fix them on a footing of ſuch independence, (at leaſt until the Zemindarry juriſdiction can be gradually and completely reſtored) as would remove the moſt plauſible objection, made by the Judges, to the inſtitution [42] of ſuch Courts; viz. ‘"That, as they are at preſent conſtituted, the moſt powerful of the parties, in every revenue cauſe, is in effect the Judge."’

32. The Zemindar, as Lord of the Manor, might immediately adminiſter juſtice, in petty caſes, between his tenants. An appeal from him, or the original ſuit, in caſes where he himſelf or his officers might be parties, ſhould reſt with the Dewanny or Superior Civil Court of the Diſtrict. This Court ſhould be placed under the ſuperintendance of an Engliſh gentleman, properly qualified, with ſufficient appointments, under an oath to act faithfully, and not removable during his good behaviour. He ſhould have Judges of the Hindoo and Mahomedan laws to aſſiſt him, and his deciſions, under a certain amount, ſhould be final. For greater ſums, an appeal might be allowed to the Governor and Council, or to one ſuperior court eſtabliſhed centrically by their authority and formed on the ſame principles of independance. [43] I mean only to trace the outlines of a clear and ſimple plan for the benefit of the natives, not reſident in Calcutta, and would recommend that the execution or improvement of it ſhould be referred to the Governor and Council here, with power to eſtabliſh ſuch inſtitutions as they may deem adviſeable, and to put them in force, until farther orders can be received from England. But, in whatever hands it may be thought fit to place the adminiſtration of juſtice, I am clearly and immoveably of opinion, that the conſtitution and manners of the natives, fixed as they are to the ſoil which gave them birth, and never to be removed from it without the ſevereſt oppreſſion, do indiſpenſibly require that juſtice ſhould be carried home to their doors. My wiſh is to revert, as nearly as poſſible, to the ancient inſtitutions of the country, which, however perverted by the occaſional violence of an arbitrary Government, or corrupted by abuſes, will, I believe, be found judicious in themſelves, and better accommodated to the [44] genius of the people, than any ſyſtem forcibly introduced from the other ſide of the globe. Whatever grievance they might have ſuffered, by an abuſe of their own inſtitutions, it could not be greater than thoſe, which belong to an adminiſtration of juſtice ſuppoſed to be guided by other principles, and pretending to be gratuitous. It is not in England at leaſt, that juſtice is adminiſtered without delay or vexation, or perhaps ever obtained without exorbitant expences. Inconveniences of this nature, if felt in Weſtminſter Hall, muſt unavoidably be aggravated on the natives of this country, who, from their ignorance of our language, laws, and cuſtoms, and of the forms of the Court, are left intirely at the mercy of their interpreters, advocates, and attornies.

When theſe important queſtions come to be conſidered, I truſt they will be decided by men qualified to give laws to nations, and on principles more liberal and extenſive, than can be derived from [45] any degree of ſkill in the interpretation of acts of Parliament, or from the practice of our Courts.

33. The Zemindars have, for ſome years paſt, been affectedly, and for a purpoſe ſufficiently obvious, ſtiled collectors of the revenue. This idea ſeems to have been adopted for the ſupport of another, equally ill founded, that the ruling Power is proprietor of the ſoil. A doctrine, which annihilated private property, muſt find ſome cauſe to account for the exiſtence of ſuch perſons as the Zemindars. It converted them into Collectors *, without venturing to deny their hereditary poſſeſſion of the lands, or the reality of their tenure, under the Mogul government, by an unalterable quit rent. The facts and the doctrine are not to be reconciled. The hiſtory and conſtitution of the country, if they had ever been attended to, would have removed all difficulties. The Zemindars, it is true, were Officers and Magiſtrates, obliged by their ſunnuds to [46] the performance of certain civil duties, which relieved the Prince in the adminiſtration of his internal government. But it was the poſſeſſion of landed property, which naturally impoſed thoſe duties on the Zemindars, and ipſo facto made them the Magiſtrates of the country. There could not be a wiſer policy, either for the Prince, to whom the men of property were made reſponſible, or for the people, who had juſtice brought home to them, and adminiſtered by men who had a ſtake in the country, and a natural permanent intereſt in its proſperity.

34. I have nothing farther to add on this ſubject to our minute of the 21ſt March, 1776, and to our letter to your Lordſhip of the 16th May following, to which I beg leave to refer you.

35. On the ſtate of the coinage, and the expediency of eſtabliſhing one ſilver coin for the general currency of the provinces, every thing has been ſaid, in our repreſentations to the Court of Directors, [47] which the ſubject has hitherto ſuggeſted to us. The main queſtions to be determined at home are, What the ſtandard and weight of the coin ſhall be [...] What name or title ſhall be ſtamped upon it? And whether a gold coin ſhall be admitted as a legal tender*?—One of theſe queſtions depends on the declaration of the ſovereignty, and muſt be decided by it. The ſecond muſt be ſubmitted to men of knowledge and experience, and proper perſons and inſtruments ſent out to execute whatever plan may be reſolved on. The third is more eaſily determined in theory than in fact. The current coin ought to be confined to one of the precious metals; but, in the preſent condition of Bengal, I doubt whether there be a ſufficient quantity of ſilver in the provinces to anſwer the ordinary demands of circulation, without the aſſiſtance of a gold coinage. This point, I apprehend, muſt [48] be left to the diſcretion of the Governor and Council.

36. Suppoſing the ſeveral articles already touched upon to be now in ſome degree explained and underſtood, I may aſſure your Lordſhip, that there ſtill remains a number of abuſes to be corrected, which, though of leſs comparative importance, are ſufficient to diſtreſs and perplex any government, and to harraſs the people ſubject to it.

Firſt, The mode of keeping public accounts here, beſides that they are kept in a barbarous unknown language, ſome in Perſian, and others in the Bengal dialect, is involved in obſcurity by a confuſed reference to different aeras, and to different ſyſtems of dividing the year. Few perſons can fairly find their way through ſuch a labyrinth; but every man, concerned either in paying or receiving the revenues, may ſome way or other find his account in the confuſion that ariſes from it.

[49] Secondly, The barbarous terms affectedly made uſe of in all our records conſtitute a ſeparate ſcience, which, tho' not difficult to learn upon the ſpot, tends to make our letters unintelligible in England. This practice might eaſily be corrected. The beſt remedy, perhaps, for the confuſion in the accounts and mode of reckoning, would be to introduce the Chriſtian aera at once into Bengal, ſo that the ruling power and their ſubjects might compute by one and the ſame meaſure of time. I ſuggeſt this idea rather as a queſtion than as an opinion, deſiring only that it may be conſidered.

37. If, with the Chriſtian aera, the Engliſh language could be introduced into the tranſaction of buſineſs, as the Perſian was by the Mogul Conqueror*, [50] I conceive it would be attended with convenience and advantage to Government, and no diſtreſs or diſadvantage to the natives. To qualify themſelves for employment, they would be obliged to ſtudy Engliſh inſtead of Perſian. If ſchools were eſtabliſhed in the diſtricts, with proper encouragement to the maſters, a very few years would produce a ſet of young men qualified for buſineſs, whoſe example and ſucceſs would ſpread, and graft the inſtitution gradually into the manners of the people. The natives would ſoon find it one of the moſt effectual barriers againſt the oppreſſion of Europeans. Every man then would be able to ſpeak for himſelf, and every complaint would be underſtood.

38. I come now, my Lord, to the moſt delicate and hazardous part of my taſk. With an unlimited confidence in your Lordſhip's candour, and in your approbation of the principles on which I act, I cannot be inſenſible of the danger of always appearing in a character [51] of hoſtility to the intereſts of individuals, and of incurring perſonal enmity without a certainty of perſonal ſupport. My late colleagues and I frequently met this danger, whatever it might be; and I muſt diſregard it now, in a more important inſtance, or not acquit myſelf of perhaps the moſt eſſential duty implied by my appointment.

39. Suppoſing that, in a future arrangement, the trade to the Eaſt Indies is not to be laid open, (for, if it were, the preſent queſtion would be altered) it muſt be conſidered in what manner the Company's commercial intereſts are to be provided for, and whether any and what degree of influence, over the internal government of Bengal, ſhall be reſerved to them. In delivering an opinion on a queſtion of ſuch delicacy and importance, I ſhall not ſtop to guard and qualify my expreſſions. Your Lordſhip will diſtinguiſh the ſubſtance from the form, and allow for the ſtrong impreſſions [52] which an immediate view of facts has made upon my mind.

40. The return of a permanent tribute to Great Britain, whether it conſiſts of ſpecie or manufactures, and whether exported on the Company's account or that of individuals, is an evil attached to the political ſituation of Bengal, under which, I fear, it will ſink at laſt. It is impoſſible that the internal reſources of any country ſhould anſwer a conſtant demand on one ſide, without a proportionate ſupply from other quarters. The fact is againſt Bengal, in both inſtances. Even oeconomy and good government, if ſuch things exiſted, would not alone be ſufficient to avert the conſequence. A country, that gives, muſt receive, or its power of giving muſt ſoon be at an end. But our principal India markets are loſt in the ruin of Perſia and Indoſtan, and Europe returns nothing. It is unneceſſary to enter into a detail of the diſadvantages, under which the internal traffic and induſtry of this country [53] labour. The ſame principle of government, if it deſerves that name, which unites the Sovereign and the merchant in the ſuppoſed perſon of the Company, naturally extends thro' every branch of their commercial adminiſtration, and communicates ſome portion of their own arbitrary power to the loweſt agent or factor in their ſervice. The abuſes that follow are minute in their operation, and ſpare nothing. They reach to perſons and property, which no other ſyſtem of power could deſcend to, but which cannot eſcape the penetrating eyes of men acquainted with all the little channels, thro' which the loweſt order of manufacturers derive their ſubſiſtence. To this unprotected claſs of men no money has been ſhewn: nor could it be otherwiſe in a country where the Sovereign has views and intereſts incompatible with that character, and profeſſes them;—where the ſame power, or they who adminiſter it, take the rents of the lands as proprietor,—engroſs all the merchantable produce [54] as monopoliſt, and all the induſtry of the manufacturer for the pretended ſupply of their inveſtment.—*Not longer ago than March, 1775, the Court of Directors, after expreſſing an unwillingneſs to return to the former coercive ſyſtem of providing an inveſtment, expreſsly ordered us ‘"to prohibit all perſons whatever, under their protection, from trading in any of thoſe articles which compoſe their inveſtment, directly or indirectly, until it was compleated."’ This, among other regulations, was ordered ‘"to be forth with publiſhed throughout the provinces, and conſidered as a ſtanding order of the Company in all time to come."’

41. You will judge, my Lord, what kind of power devolves to the Company's commercial ſervants under colour of ſuch inſtructions. If, at any time, it ſhould be thought neceſſary to [55] inveſtigate this ſubject with greater particularity, a petition from the merchants of Dacca, (entered on our Revenue Conſultations of the 24th of September, 1776) with the papers annexed, will afford a thorough inſight into it. The ſyſtem itſelf, united with the increaſe of taxes, could produce no other conſequences but thoſe, which the Company themſelves have felt and complained of,—the ruin of the manufacturers, a conſiderable debaſement in the quality of the goods, and an equal advance upon the price. For the purpoſe of this repreſentation, it is ſufficient to mark the principle, on which the Company have acted, without purſuing the practice through all its operations. In ſtating the cauſe, we aſcertain the effect. The nation is not leſs intereſted than the Company in removing both. Under the preſent ſyſtem, the manufactures muſt gradually ſink to the level of the demand for the Europe markets, or very little more; but all this inveſtment, whether exported by the Company, by their [56] ſervants, or by the foreign factories, being really paid for by the money of the country, adds nothing to its ſtock or ability to ſupply many other channels, thro' which its wealth is extracted.

42. I apprehend that the decline of Bengal takes its origin too high to be recovered by any vigour of Adminiſtration, or even by a correction of abuſes. A new principle muſt be aſſumed for the government of the country, or it muſt fall. Meaſures, of any other quality, may perhaps delay the criſis, but cannot prevent it. I muſt be permitted to ſuppoſe that the government is not to be continued in the hands of a mercantile body, ſince I cannot admit the poſſibility of uniting ſuch power any longer to ſuch intereſt, without deſtruction to the object. On this ſuppoſition, permit me to ſtate freely to your Lordſhip my ideas of the terms, which ought to be ſettled in favour of Bengal. I confine my view to this point only, not preſuming to enter into any of the other conſiderations, [57] which muſt naturally influence a general arrangement between Government and the Company. The whole ſubject may be comprehended under four general queſtions.

  • ‘1. "What proportion of the net territorial revenues ſhall be reſerved for the proviſion of an inveſtment?"’

  • ‘2. "In what manner ſuch inveſtment ſhall be provided?"’

  • ‘3. "Whether any and what ſums ſhall be appropriated to ſupply the other Preſidencies?"’

  • ‘4. "Whether the Company ſhall monopolize any of the productions or manufactures of the country?"’

Your Lordſhip has ſeen an eſtimate ſent home by me in January 1776, in which ninety-three lacks of current rupees are allotted to the inveſtment and all commercial charges, and twenty lacks to the other ſettlements. That eſtimate, compared with accounts ſent home in former times, is moderate in ſtating the reſources of the country. The diſtribution of them muſt be confirmed or corrected [58] by a higher authority than mine. Your Lordſhip will obſerve, however, that the Court of Directors, in their letter of the 24th of December, 1776*, though very well ſatisfied with the above appropriation of 113 lacks to their ſervice, ſeem inclined to reſerve ſome of the articles on the credit ſide of the eſtimate, under pretence that ſuch deductions fall upon the unappropriated ſurplus, but ſtill leave part of it after all eſtabliſhments and ſervices are provided for. Among the articles ſo intended to be reſerved by the Company, are the produce of the Europe cargoes here, and the amount of the bills which they have allowed their ſervants to draw upon them, and which the eſtimate ſuppoſes will be continued, equal in all to twenty-five lacks of current rupees. But I ſubmit it to your Lordſhip, that they have not treated the eſtimate fairly. A conſiderable reſerve againſt unforeſeen emergencies is as neceſſary to be provided for [59] as any article of eſtabliſhed expence, and more ſo in this country than any other. On the leaſt alarm of an invaſion, it is morally certain that every rupee in the hands of the natives would inſtantly diſappear. Without an unappropriated ſurplus of thirty lacks, no prudent man would undertake to anſwer for the ſafety of the Government; much leſs to inſure an inveſtment of ninety-three lacks againſt all accidents. If therefore the Company do not think fit to throw the amount of the articles above mentioned into the general fund, it will be indiſpenſibly neceſſary that an equal ſum ſhould be dedicated from the allotment made to them out of the revenues. The annual ſupply of twenty lacks to Madras and Bombay is a ruinous drain to Bengal, and ought to be the firſt article of retrenchment; the remainder muſt fall upon the inveſtment.

43. If the Company ſhould reſolve not to allow their ſervants to draw upon them to the uſual amount of one hundred [60] and ſeventy-five thouſand pounds, ſome conſideration muſt be had of the conſequences, and of the difficulties, to which individuals may be driven. Thoſe difficulties will, in the end, be ſurmounted; and poſſibly by means equally prejudicial to Bengal, to themſelves, and to the Company; that is, by loans to the foreign factories, or by the direct extraction of ſpecie. A remittance in Bengal manufactures is ſo diſadvantageous, (owing to the advanced price here, and the ſtate of the Europe markets) that no private perſons could afford to remit their fortunes by that channel if they were openly at liberty to do ſo. The Company at preſent are not ſenſible of the loſs they ſuſtain between the coſt and ſale of their inveſtment, becauſe the whole is given them by Bengal. Your Lordſhip will judge from the decline and poverty of the country on one ſide, and the wealth of individuals on the other, how far it may be probable that the enormous ſum charged upon the revenues on account of the inveſtment has [61] been fairly laid out. The Commercial Board have now above a million ſterling annually at their diſpoſal.

44. The ſecond queſtion, ‘"In what manner the inveſtment ſhall be provided,"’ will depend on the influence reſerved to the Company over the internal government of the country. In whatever degree ſuch influence is continued, it will aſſuredly be employed, as it has been hitherto, in promoting the views of individuals, under the formidable name of the Company's commercial rights and intereſts, and forcing the meaſures of Government to bend to that ſingle conſideration. If the Company are no longer to govern directly, it will be no leſs neceſſary that their right to engroſs the induſtry of the manufacturers, or to provide an inveſtment by force, ſhould not ſurvive their political power. Their preſent ſervants, I fear, have been too long in the lucrative habits of monopoly and command to ſubmit to any terms of equality between [62] the manufacturers and themſelves. They follow the path of their predeceſſors, and inherit their ideas. But, my Lord, this is not a time to conſult the paſſions, or prejudices, or intereſts of individuals; the plain and ſimple remedy, and indeed the only one, for abuſes of power, in a caſe where power, however exerciſed, is itſelf a violation of right, is to oblige the Company to revert to their original principles, to renounce the unnatural character in which they have lately acted, and, if it be poſſible, to become merchants again.

45. Before the Company obtained a political influence in the country, their inveſtment was provided at Calcutta and Dacca by contract with native merchants called Dadneys. Preſent circumſtances may require that ſuch contracts ſhould be open to merchants of all denominations. The Company will benefit by the competition of ſellers at Calcutta, as the manufacturers would do by the competition of purchaſers at the Aurungs. [63] In a few years even contracts would be unneceſſary. No tolerable reaſon can be aſſigned for not reverting to a practice apparently ſafe and oeconomical to the Company, and equally beneficial to the country. It may not anſwer the purpoſe of their ſervants. It does not admit of expenſive eſtabliſhments in the diſtricts, where chiefs, ſuperintendants, and banians, detached from the Preſidency, and armed with deſpotic power to ſupport the pretended commercial intereſts of the Company, have taken poſſeſſion of the markets, excluded all competition, enſlaved the manufacturers, and, in ſome inſtances, obliged private merchants to purchaſe from themſelves, at an immoderate advance of price, the ſame goods which they had ſeized and ſet the Company's ſeal upon in the loom, under pretence that they were wanted for the public inveſtment.

46. I do not mean to intimate that practices of this nature have been carried on with equal violence in all the diſtricts; [64] but I am well aſſured that, more or leſs, they have generally prevailed, and have not been confined to the Company's ſervants. Adventurers of the loweſt order have frequently found their way into the diſtricts, aſſuming a lawleſs dominion over the people, who have loſt the protection of their native Prince, and, in fact, have no other to appeal to. If it be ſeriouſly meant to reſtore the trade of the country, the manufacturers muſt be relieved from this oppreſſion, and left at liberty to work for whomſoever they think proper. Regulations, pretending to check the miſconduct of individuals, will have no effect. In my judgment, there is but one courſe to be purſued. The inveſtment muſt be provided by contract, as it was heretofore, until the general increaſe and improvement of the manufactures will admit of its being provided by ready-money purchaſes. The employment of Europeans in the diſtricts, whether with or without authority, or even Gomaſtas with authority, muſt be ſtopped at all events; and [65] this, in my opinion, is a meaſure of indiſpenſible neceſſity, that will admit of no qualification. I do not affirm that no difficulties or inconveniences will attend it at the outſet; but, if it be ſeriouſly meant to prefer the Company's true and permanent intereſts to thoſe of individuals, the Court of Directors will liſten with reſerve and ſuſpicion to any repreſentations they may receive from their ſervants on this ſubject. If the meaſure ſhould be adopted, the burthen and odium of it muſt not be impoſed on the Adminiſtration here, much leſs muſt we be loaded with an excluſive reſponſibility for the event. A ſimple approbation or permiſſion will not arm us with power ſufficient to reſiſt and defeat the general combination that would be formed againſt us. The orders from home muſt be poſitive, and binding on all parties. It is a groſs and daring fallacy to aſſert, that the manufacturers would not have ſold their goods as readily to the Company as to any other merchant, provided they had been paid for them. If the Company's [66] ſervants had been compelled to do equal juſtice to the natives and to their employers, it is not poſſible that power or privilege ſhould have been wanted to inſure to the Company every commercial advantage they ought to aim at. The ſuperior weight of their purſe would naturally have ſecured to them, or to the perſons who contracted with them, a preference in every market, and defeated any competition for the articles which compoſe their inveſtment. The free vent and exportation of the remaining produce of the country cannot be too liberally encouraged. I ſubmit my opinion to higher judgement, that the cuſtom houſes ſhould be new modelled, if not aboliſhed. They check the operations of foreign trade in a country which properly ſells to all the world, and buys nothing, except ſome raw materials of manufacture, and neceſſaries from England for the conſumption of Europeans. The inland cuſtoms fetter the induſtry of the natives in all its minuteſt branches. The revenue, collected [67] by theſe eſtabliſhments, is either not worth the attention of Government, eſpecially at the expence of oppreſſion to the ſubject and of many embarraſſments to the export trade; or, ſuppoſing it neceſſary, the amount might be levied, with leſs inconvenience, directly from the land.

47. When theſe capital diſcouragements are removed, the productions of induſtry will increaſe, their quality will improve. The country, then, having ſomething to ſell to other nations, will have ſomething to give to England; and tho' a time muſt come, when the nominal revenue can no longer be realized, when the inveſtment muſt be retrenched, and every eſtabliſhment contracted; in other words, when a great and wealthy ſtate, which ought to flouriſh by its expences, can only exiſt by its oeconomy, ſtill it is not a point of little moment to protract that event, if poſſible, to a diſtant, uncertain period. The actual choice lies between a diſeaſe, which threatens immediate [68] diſſolution, and a remedy, which at leaſt gives time for deliberation. We know not what favourable turns may appear during an interval of repoſe; but, at any rate, we ſhould not haſten a criſis, at which neither prudence nor fortune can ſave the object.

48. The annual ſupplies of the other Preſidencies, in time of peace, amount to about twenty lacks of current rupees. I have ſubmitted my opinion to the Company, that Bengal, in its preſent circumſtances, is not able to bear the continuance of ſo great a drain of its reſources. The future amount of this ſupply will, I preſume, be conſidered in the allowance reſerved for the inveſtment out of the territorial revenues, and determined by it. The revenue acquired on the Malabar coaſt, by the late treaty with the Marattas, if faithfully applied to the ſupport of the Company's eſtabliſhments at Bombay, ought, in a great meaſure, to relieve Bengal from any further demand for that ſervice. Since the firſt of [69] May, 1774, we have remitted to Bombay alone the ſum of current rupees 81, 20, 777. I will not pronounce deciſively on the uſes of maintaining that ſettlement at ſo exorbitant an expence; but the queſtion deſerves an attentive conſideration. Notwithſtanding this great ſupply from hence, they have incurred a debt of thirty lacks, (chiefly in the above period) which carries an intereſt of nine per cent.

49. Fort St. George, in time of peace, ought to ſupport itſelf. China will be ſufficiently ſupplied by individuals here, without an extraction of ſilver from England, if the Company think proper to open their treaſury at Canton, and grant bills at a reaſonable rate. If not, the money they refuſe will be lent to the French, Danes, and Swedes, whoſe imports from China ſtand in immediate competition with the Company, even for the conſumption of the Britiſh dominions. The ſupplies ſent from hence to Fort Marlborough, [70] and St. Helena, are not worth notice.

50. The fourth and laſt queſtion, ‘"Whether the Company ſhall monopolize any of the productions or manufactures of the country?"’ would, perhaps, be more properly ſtated, and better underſtood, if it were expreſſed in the following terms: ‘"Is Bengal incapable of a greater produce, than the Company's inveſtment requires; or ſhall it be prohibited from producing more than will ſupply that demand?"’ This ſtate of the queſtion is, in effect, the true one, and includes the anſwer. No man will affirm, that the Company's inveſtment is equal to the actual produce of the country, much leſs to what it is capable of producing; and if it were, Bengal, having no ſurplus to ſell, would, in a very ſhort period, have nothing to give. It is not even true, that the portion of the revenues, appropriated to the purchaſe of the inveſtment, returns undiminiſhed into the provincial circulation, [71] from which it was taken. In the expenditure of an immenſe capital, agency will pay itſelf, and every man will make ſomething. Whatever this annual defalcation may amount to, whether a fifth or a ſixth of the net ſum allotted to the inveſtment, it is the worſt of all taxes, becauſe it is taken directly from the ſources of production. But if this evil be no more avoidable than the obvious conſequences of it, the wiſdom of Government is ſo much the more powerfully called upon, to qualify abuſes by improvements, and to balance a weight, which no policy can remove.

51. I have ſuppoſed the merchant to be no longer Sovereign, nor charged with the general protection of the people:—Shall he retain the power of oppreſſing them in detail? My Lord, I am ſirm in my opinion, that the very monopolies, which the Company have appropriated to the ſupply of their inveſtment, or to the increaſe of their revenues, and which they were ready enough to condemn in [72] the hands of individuals, would ere long defeat the purpoſes they were intended to promote. They are now in excluſive poſſeſſion, or think they are, of the raw ſilk, ſaltpetre, opium, and ſalt, manufactured in Bengal. At the ſame time, the produce of the loom is apparently at their command. If the practice had been ſtrictly and entirely conformable to the principle, the reſources of Bengal, inſtead of declining by any gradations, muſt have ſunk precipitately. A partial remedy, or palliation of ſome of the evils, attending the Government inſtituted or exerciſed by the Company's ſervants, has been derived from its exceſſive ſeverity and injuſtice. When poſitive laws are oppoſed to every dictate of natural juſtice, humanity, and right reaſon, it is not eaſy to carry them, by any degree of power, into complete execution. Even private frauds, which, conſidering their quality and extent, denote a want of vigour and fidelity in the adminiſtration, have in ſome degree defended the country againſt public inſtitutions. This, I [73] conceive, is the laſt ſtate of miſrule into which a nation can fall, while any forms whatſoever are preſerved,—Fundamental errors of inſtitution counteracted, but not removed by abuſes of Adminiſtration, by deviations from principle, and by uniting all ranks of men in a regular connected ſyſtem of fraud againſt Government.

52. I have already taken notice of the orders received in December 1775, ‘"for prohibiting all perſons under the Company's protection from trading in any of the articles, which compoſe their inveſtment, until it was completed,"’ which never could happen, as the inveſtment proceeds the whole year round, with little relaxation. Theſe orders have ſince been qualified, in conſequence of ſtrong repreſentations from hence; but under ſuch limitations, and with conditions ſo hazardous to the perſons, whom the Court of Directors ſuppoſed to be in poſſeſſion of the Government, that, even if the change they expected had taken [74] place, their laſt inſtructions could have produced no effect. *They empower the Governor General and Council ‘"to ſuſpend the execution of ſuch part of their orders, as impoſe reſtrictions on the commerce of individuals, provided we are abſolutely certain it may be done, conſiſtent with the due proviſion of an ample and well-choſen inveſtment for the Company, and without riſking the timely proviſion of their inveſtment, the amount whereof muſt on no account be hazarded, even for a ſingle ſeaſon."’

53. Under conditions of this nature, their moſt favoured Adminiſtration could not have acted with ſafety. But when they add, that, ‘"to indulge their commercial ſervants in every branch of trade, not prohibited by law, is a meaſure, which nothing but the greateſt fidelity in their ſervants can render conſiſtent with the intereſt of the [75] Company,"’ I apprehend they at once miſtake the fact, and preclude the remedy. Their ſervants derive too many advantages from the Company's monopoly, to wiſh for an avowed and general freedom of trade, in which others might participate; and what aſſurance have the Company, that the truſt, repoſed in their ſervants, is not as much abuſed under apparent reſtrictions, and as effectually for their own intereſts, as it could be, if all reſtrictions were aboliſhed? The firſt prohibitory orders, dated the 3d of March, 1775, ſtill remain in force, without any attempt whatever to correct them by the laſt.

54. The queſtion of the ſalt trade has been ſufficiently canvaſſed in England, and ought to be thoroughly underſtood. The Company, it ſeems, have received new lights on this ſubject. Your Lordſhip knows how long, and with what vehemence, the monopoly of ſalt had been reprobated by them. In May 1766, they thought it ‘"neither conſiſtent with their [76] honour nor their dignity, to promote ſuch an excluſive trade; they could not ſuffer themſelves to indulge a thought towards the continuance of it on any conditions whatſoever; and that no regulations could be effectual to prevent the like conſequences, which they had ſeen.—They conſidered it too as diſgraceful, and below the dignity of their preſent ſituation, to allow of ſuch a monopoly, and that, were they to allow of it, under any reſtrictions, they ſhould conſider themſelves as aſſenting and ſubſcribing to all the miſchiefs, which Bengal had preſented to them for the four years paſt."’

55. In their letter of the 24th of December laſt*, they ſay, ‘"that the monopoly, on its preſent footing, can be no grievance to the country, and they direct that, for the preſent, the plan adopted by their late Preſident and Council be continued."’ This plan is [77] a rigorous monopoly, for the ſuppoſed excluſive profit of the Company. In the firſt two years of the contract, it raiſed the price above fifty per cent to the conſumer, and produced an immoderate importation of foreign ſalt, by which the Company has been conſtantly underſold, in one of the ſtaple commodities of Bengal, at their own markets. In conſequence of this importation, frauds in the management, ſmuggling, &c., the Company have gained nothing by their contracts in the third and fourth years, and now they have an enormous quantity upon their hands, which can only be ſold at a long credit, and never without a conſiderable loſs. Theſe notorious facts have determined Mr. Haſtings himſelf to renounce the monopoly, even againſt the Company's inſtructions.

56. With reſpect to ſalpetre, the Company's monopoly, or rather that exerciſed by their ſervants, has produced the effect, which it always muſt do, of diminiſhing the produce, until they at [78] laſt find it difficult to procure even the trifling quantity wanted for their inveſtment. The ſcarcity perhaps is exaggerated for private purpoſes. But ſaltpetre ought naturally to be one of the moſt cheap and plentiful productions of the ſoil, and would be ſo, if the natives were allowed the free uſe of their own lands, and the free diſpoſal of their own induſtry.

57. The opium of Bahar has been for many years monopolized, formerly by the favourites of the country Government, with ſome degree of juſtice and lenity to the riots; and, in later times, by the Company's ſervants, out of whoſe hands it was taken by Mr. Haſtings in the year 1773, and engroſſed for the benefit of the Company. It was not likely that any abuſes in the former practice, or any of the uſual effects of a monopoly, ſhould be corrected by this alteration. The ſervants of Government might poſſibly have been reſtrained by checks, which cannot be impoſed on Government itſelf. [79] A doubt whether, in the preſent ſtate of things, the trade could be really and effectually laid open, and whether it would not revert, in fact, to the gentlemen in ſtation at Patna, produced an early difference of opinion between Sir John Clavering and myſelf, on the expediency of continuing the opium contract, but by no means touched the general principles, on which we invariably concurred in condemning monopolies. We agreed, that whenever there was a Government ſufficiently firm and independent to execute its own reſolutions, and to enforce obedience to them, the monopoly of opium ſhould be aboliſhed. The deplorable ſtate of Bahar makes it neceſſary, that this ſhould be one of the firſt meaſures of ſuch a Government. The Company have lately* authorized us to give up this commodity as an article of commerce; but the contract was already diſpoſed of for the three enſuing years, before the receipt of their orders.

[80] 58. Raw ſilk is not ſubject to a declared monopoly at preſent. The quantity of this article is greatly increaſed. The ſtate of the India markets throws it chiefly into the Company's hands, without competition. The demand ſeems to increaſe in Europe.

59. One general objection occurs, in this country, to monopolies exerciſed by Government, which does not perhaps exiſt in any other. The commodity to be engroſſed is always provided by advances of money out of the public treaſury. A proportion of theſe advances muſt be paid at an early period, before the ſeed is ſown, as in the caſe of opium, or before the work is undertaken, and muſt be continued as the buſineſs proceeds. The riſque of the capital advanced, which is not inconſiderable, and the value of the intereſt, ought to be calculated, and deducted from the ultimate profits of the monopoly. A number of accidents may occaſion partial loſſes on the money advanced. [81] An invaſion or any general calamity would be the loſs of the whole. The Company have experienced the truth of this opinion in another part of their practice. Their outſtanding deſperate balances, ariſing on advances made to the weavers, amount to a very conſiderable ſum. On the other hand, it makes a wide difference to the country whether advances, to be repaid out of future production, are made by Government, or by individuals. In the firſt caſe, a multitude of perſons are precluded from engaging in the buſineſs engroſſed by Government, and from employing to advantage whatever means and credit they have left. The circulation of ſo much private property is loſt, and the proprietor compelled to live with parſimony on his capital. At the ſame time, the ſums, iſſuing from the treaſury to the contractor, flow in one large ſtream, under the direction of a deſpotic monopoliſt, whoſe eaſe and convenience lead him to contract with as few people, and to confine his advances to as few [82] places, as poſſible. This is the fundamental principle of monopoly. On the contrary, a free trade invites numbers to engage in it, who, in the face of a general competition, could never ſucceed but by fair dealing and ſuperior induſtry; and whoſe fortune, circulating in a variety of little channels, might extend to the remoteſt corners of the country, and act directly on the induſtry of the loweſt orders of men.

60. It is not for me to attempt to lead your Lordſhip's opinion, on the general queſtion of monopolies, by any other information than that of the facts before me. In this country, the exerciſe of them, under the direct authority and for the ſuppoſed benefit of a deſpotic government, has manifeſtly united an intereſt and a power, which ought never to have met in the ſame hands. Such a union, in the caſe of oppreſſion, whether real or pretended, conſtitutes the plaintiffs parties againſt Government, and leaves no indifferent tribunal to adminiſter [83] juſtice to them. I ſubmit to judgement, whether it ought to be aboliſhed or continued.

61. I will not, my Lord, add a uſeleſs apology to the trouble I have already given you. If the contents of this letter ſhould not juſtify the length of it, I have nothing to plead, but the ſame error of judgement which has uniformly governed my conduct, and from which no man has hitherto ſuffered any thing but myſelf.

I have no perſonal intereſt, immediate or remote, in the ſucceſs of this repreſentation. Before it can produce any effect in Bengal, the period of my appointment will probably be expired.

I have the honour to be, &c. PHILIP FRANCIS.

Appendix A AN inquiry into the adminiſtration of the Eaſt-India Company's affairs in Bengal, and into the effects it has produced, may properly be divided by the four following great departments of Government, and purſued in the ſame order.

[85]

The following Paper was drawn up by Mr. Francis, about tbe End of the Year 1781, very ſoon after his Arrival from India, at the Requeſt of Mr. Dundas:

  • 1. Poltical.
    • 1. Foreign.
    • 2. Domeſtic.
  • 2. Civil.
    • 1. The legiſlative power.
    • 2. Adminiſtration of juſtice.
    • 3. Collection of the Revenues.
    • 4. Coinage.
    • 5. Weights and Meaſures.
  • [86] 3. Cmmercial.
    • 1. Proviſion of Inveſtment.
    • 2. Monopolies.
    • 3. State of Trade.
  • 4. Military.
    • 1. Augmentation of Expence.
    • 2. Succeſſive Changes in the Eſtabliſhments.
    • 3. Preſent Eſtabliſhment.

Appendix A.1

Appendix A.1.1 FOREIGN POLICY.

The firſt general head may be ſubdivided into particular ſubjects of inquiry, viz.

1. Whether the Company had any profeſſed fundamental principles of policy, relative to the Princes and States of India, to negociations and treaties with them, to war and peace with them, and in general to the extenſion or limitation of their territorial acquiſitions;—what thoſe principles were, and at what periods, [87] and in what terms they were communicated and preſcribed to their repreſentatives abroad, as rules for their conduct.

2. Whether theſe rules have been obſerved or ſlighted, in what inſtances, and with what conſequences or effects.—Whether the Court of Directors have enforced their own orders, or puniſhed the breach of them; and whether they themſelves have conſtantly adhered to, or in any inſtance departed from their profeſſed principles. Theſe queſtions, of courſe, lead to an inquiry into facts, the moſt important of which ſeem to be,

3. The treaty of Illiabad, between the King Shah Aalum and the Company, made the 19th of Auguſt, 1765, and ſtill ſtubſiſting in 1773.—The treaty of Benares, concluded by Mr. Haſtings on the 7th of September, 1773, at an interview with the late Vizier Suja ul Dowla, Subadar of Owde, and the ſecret verbal engagement entered into at the ſame time [88] by Mr. Haſtings, to aſſiſt him with a body of the Company's forces to invade and ſubdue the Rohillas, in conſideration of the ſum of forty lacks of rupees.

4. The ſale of the provinces of Corah and Illiabad to the Vizier.

5. The cauſes, conduct, and conſequences of the Rohilla war in 1774.

6. The conduct of the Court of Directors and the Company, and the ſucceſſive orders given by them, when theſe tranſactions came to their knowledge.

7. The cauſes, conduct, and conſequences of the Mahratta war, begun by the Preſidency of Bombay in December 1774, when they took poſſeſſion of Salſette and Caranja, ended by the definitive treaty of peace concluded at Poona in February 1776, between the Governor General and Council of Fort William and the Peſhwa of the Mahratta State; recommenced in 1778, by the march of a [89] detachment from the provinces dependant on Bengal, acroſs the Jumna, in May, and by the march of an army from Bombay towards Poona in November; and ſtill ſubſiſting.

8. The nature and object of the engagements of the Preſidency of Bombay with Ragoba.

9. The nature and objects of Mr. Haſtings's negociations with Moodajee Booſla, Raja of Berar, and the effects they have produced.

10. The extent, value, and ſecurity of the acquiſitions of territory, made in Guzzerat or elſewhere, in conſequence of the operations of Brigadier General Goddard's army.

11. The actual expence incurred by the Preſidencies of Bombay, Fort St. George, and Fort William, on account of the Mahratta war alone, and excluſive of the war with Hyder Ally.

[90] 12. The treaty, concluded in November, 1779, between the Governor General and Council and the Rana of Gohid, againſt the opinion and proteſts of three Members of the Council, and the effects it has produced.

13. The meaſures adopted and purſued by the Governor General and Council, inſtituted by Parliament, in relation to all or any of the preceding tranſactions;—the diviſions in the Government of Bengal, which began in October, 1774, immediately after the commencement of their Adminiſtration, and have continued to November, 1780.

14. The treaty of Fyzabad, concluded on the 21ſt of May, 1775, between the Governor General and Council and the preſent Subadar of Owde, by which the provinces of Benares and Ghazipore were ceded to the Company.

15. The agreement to lend him a number of Britiſh officers to diſcipline [91] his troops in 1775;—the purpoſes to which that meaſure has been applied;—the conſequences it has produced;—the influence gradually obtained by it over the Subadar's perſon and government;—and the actual ſtate of his revenues and authority.

Appendix A.1.2 DOMESTIC POLICY.

The ſecond branch of the Political Department comprehends the following articles:

1. What is the Company's profeſſed and real object in maintaining a country government, under the name and authority of a Nabob or Nazim, and by what engagements they are bound to him.

2. Whether ſuch policy and engagements have been the rule of conduct to the Government of Fort William, and how far they have in fact been obſerved or neglected.

[92] 3. What the preſent condition of the Subadar of Bengal is, what his real authority is, and what purpoſes have been or may be anſwered by the Company's maintaining that eſtabliſhment.

4. Whether the Subadar of Bengal is or is not obliged, by treaty, agreement, or otherwiſe, to comply with all requiſitions of the Court of Directors, in matters relative to the government of the country or adminiſtration of juſtice.

Appendix A.2

Appendix A.2.1 LEGISLATIVE POWER.

In the Civil Department, the firſt object ſeems to be to aſcertain whether any ſovereign or legiſlative power exiſts in Bengal, and where it reſides; or rather, whether Bengal be not at this time, and has not been for many years, a country without a ſovereign or a legiſlature, and with what conſequences ſuch defect has been or may be attended.

[93] 2. By what regular and avowed authority do the Government of Fort William poſſeſs, and in what form do they exerciſe and adminiſter the whole civil government of the three provinces.

3. By what authority are courts of juſtice erected or new modelled in the provinces.

Appendix A.2.2 REVENUES.

Firſt, and principally to aſcertain who are the proprietors of the lands, and by what tenure, and with what ſecurity do they hold them.

2. What changes have taken place in the mode of collecting the revenues, ſince the time when the laſt Report from the Committee of the Houſe of Commons, which ſat in 1773, was concluded.

3. What increaſe or diminution appears in the net amount of the collections [94] ſince the ſame period, and from what cauſes ſuch alterations have ariſen.

4. What was the plan and object of a Committee of Circuit, inſtituted in Bengal in 1773;—on what principles they proceeded;—what was the nature and annual amount of the ſettlement formed by them for five years;—what was the final amount of balances and remiſſions on that ſettlement.

5. What ſort of power and influence the Members of the Committee of Circuit derived from their appointment, and in what manner they have employed it.

6. What have been the orders and inſtructions of the Court of Directors relative to letting of the lands ſince the year 1773, and how far they have been obſerved by the Governor General and Council.

7. Whether perſons in authority in the Government, or their delegates or [95] ſervants, have farmed the lands, or any other branches of the Company's revenue.

8. What new offices have been created, and what new ſalaries, or augmentation of ſalaries, have been granted in Bengal ſince the inſtitution of the Governor General and Council.

Appendix A.3 COMMERCIAL.

Appendix A.3.1 INVESTMENT.

1. In what manner the proviſion of the Company's inveſtment is made, whether by contracts with middle men, or direct advances to the weavers, &c.

2. What powers are veſted in the Board of Trade, or in the Company's ſervants at the aurungs, or in their native agents or ſervants;—and how ſuch powers have been or may be exerciſed.

[96] 3. Whether the weavers are compelled to work for the Company at a fixed price, or at liberty to work for whom they think proper.

4. What checks are placed over the Board of Trade, to guard the application and expenditure of the ſums veſted in their hands.

5. Whether the manufactures in general have been improved or debaſed ſince the Britiſh influence has prevailed over the country.

6. What the actual produce of the different aurungs is, compared with that of former periods.

7. Whether the prices charged to the Company have not been greatly increaſed, while the quality of the articles that compoſe the inveſtment has been conſtantly declining.

Appendix A.3.2 MONOPOLIES.

[97]

1. What articles of the produce of the lands, or induſtry of the natives, are and are not ingroſſed by the Company or their ſervants.

2. Whether the Company's inveſtment be avowedly or in effect a monopoly of the ſeveral articles, of which it is compoſed.

3. What liberty is left, or protection given to the weavers, boilers of ſalt, manufacturers of opium, ſaltpetre, &c.

4. What orders the Company have given in relation to monopolies in general, and how they have been inforced or obeyed.

Appendix A.3.3 TRADE.

1. To aſcertain, by inquiry of individuals now in England, what is the [98] quantity of tonnage actually employed in the country or export trade of Bengal.

2. What may be the amount of the exports of Bengal to the reſt of India; how the returns are made, and whether the balance be in favour of Bengal.

3. To form a compariſon between the preſent ſtate of the foreign trade of Bengal and that of any former period.

4. To inquire under what reſtraints and difficulties the inland trade labours, whether from heavy duties, multiplied cuſtom houſes, or a vexatious mode of collection.

Appendix A.4 MILITARY.

Appendix A.4.1 AUGMENTATION.

1. To ſtate the eſtabliſhment of numbers and expence of the army, fortifications, and other military ſervices in Bengal, as they ſtood in the year 1773, [99] when the Company, in their inſtructions to the Governor General and Council, declared, ‘"that their military expences in Bengal had increaſed to a degree which was become inſupportable to them."’

2. To inquire in what manner, and on what principles, contracts have been made for the conſtruction or repair of barracks, fortifications, &c., for military ſtores and proviſions, for boats, for victualling Fort William, and moſt particularly for ſupplying the army with draught and carriage bullocks. What orders have been given by the Court of Directors on theſe ſeveral ſubjects, and how they have been obeyed or inforced.

Appendix A.4.2 CHANGES.

1. To ſtate the ſucceſſive alterations in the form and augmentations in the numbers and expences of the army eſtabliſhments ſince 1772. On what principles, [100] and with what effects, ſuch changes have been made.

2. To inquire what new commiſſions have been granted in Bengal, ſince 1773, of general field and ſtaff officers, unauthoriſed by the Company, or againſt their orders.

3. What allowances have been granted by the Governor General and Council to the commanders in chief for the time being, in addition to thoſe fixed by Parliament or limited by the Company's inſtructions.

Appendix A.4.3 PRESENT STATE.

1. To ſtate the preſent eſtabliſhment and extraordinary expence of the army as they may appear from the lateſt accounts.

2. To compare the ſame with that of former periods, and with the preſent means of ſupporting it.

Appendix A.5 FINALLY,

[101]

To compare the whole of the preſent expences of the Government of Fort William with the whole of their preſent reſources; and each of theſe reſpectively with that of former periods.

When the Secret Committee ſhall have carried their inveſtigation thus far, one general queſtion, perhaps the moſt important of all, will remain to be conſidered, and may properly conclude their inquiries.

Whereas the Legiſlature have veſted the whole civil and military power of the Preſidency of Fort William, and in effect the Government of Bengal, in the Governor General and Council, who are directed and required to pay due obedience to all ſuch orders as they ſhall receive from the Court of Directors, with whom alone they are directed to correſpond; it follows that the authority of the Court of Directors is the only medium, [102] by which that of Great Britain over Bengal is held; and if their authority be ſlighted or defied, it follows that the dependance of that diſtant dominion on this country is ſo far forth weakened, and its connection with it looſened, if not diſſolved. It ſeems then to be a point that deſerves the moſt ſerious attention of Parliament to inquire and aſcertain, in what degree the authority of the Court of Directors has been in fact binding on the Governor General and Council; in what inſtances it has been reſiſted, and in general what meaſures have been adopted and purſued by the Court of Directors to maintain it, and to inforce obedience to their orders. And it is to be preſumed that Parliament will expect an opinion from the Secret Committee of the effects that have already taken place, the conſequences that may enſue, and whether the dominion of Great Britain over Bengal is ſecure, if the powers veſted in the Court of Directors by Parliament be found to have had no operation; whether owing to their [103] neglect or inattention to their duty, or to any other cauſes prevailing on this ſide; or to a ſpirit of independance, contumacy, and diſobedience in their repreſentatives abroad, which the Court of Directors have ſtrongly condemned, but have not ſufficient power to correct.

[104] In ſupport of the propriety of continuing the territorial poſſeſſions under the Government of the Eaſt-India Company, it was ſtrenuouſly urged in the Houſe of Commons, that the natives had eminently proſpered under that Government; that it would wound their feelings to be made ſubject to any other, and perhaps might occaſion a convulſion among them, which might prove fatal to the Britiſh intereſts in India.

Extract of a Letter from Earl Cornwallis to the Court of Directors of the Eaſt-India Company, dated the 2d of Auguſt, 1789.

INDEPENDENT of all other conſiderations, I can aſſure you that it will be of the utmoſt importance, for promoting the ſolid intereſts of the Company, [105] that the principal landholders and traders in the interior parts of the country ſhould be reſtored to ſuch circumſtances as to enable them to ſupport their families with decency, and to give a liberal education to their children, according to the cuſtoms of their reſpective caſts and religions, that a regular gradation of ranks may be ſupported, which is no where more neceſſary than in this country for preſerving order in civil ſociety.

I am ſorry to be obliged to ſay that agriculture and internal commerce has for many years been gradually declining; and that at preſent, excepting the claſs of Shroffs and Banians, who reſide almoſt entirely in great towns, the inhabitants of theſe provinces were advancing haſtily to a general ſtate of poverty and wretchedneſs. In this deſcription I muſt even include almoſt every Zemindar in the Company's territories; which, though it may have been partly occaſioned by their own indolence [106] and extravagance, I am afraid muſt alſo be, in a great meaſure, attributed to the defects of our former ſyſtem of management.

[107] The nature of the Zemindary tenure cannot be more accurately deſcribed than it has been by Mr. Haſtings, in his Defence before the Houſe of Commons, page 32, viz.

‘HAD Bulwantſing been are al and hereditary Zemindar, the ſucceſſion would have gone to him of courſe, there being in India no ſuch cuſtom as diſinheritance. This circumſtance proves alſo, that Bulwantſing was not the Zemindar, for, in that caſe, it muſt have devolved to him by inheritance. As Zemindar, his ſon muſt have ſucceeded. It would have been a clear, entailed, hereditary eſtate.

THE END.

Appendix B NEW PUBLICATIONS, Printed for J. DEBRETT, oppoſite Burlington Houſe, PICCADILLY.

[]

By permiſſion of the Right Hon. Henry Dundas.

This day is publiſhed, in One Volume Quarto, Price One Guinea in Boards,

HISTORICAL VIEW of PLANS for the GOVERNMENT of BRITISH INDIA, and Regulation of Trade to the Eaſt Indies; and Outlines of a Plan of Foreign Government, of Commercial Economy, and of Domeſtic Adminiſtration, for the ASIATIC INTERESTS of GREAT BRITAIN.

*⁎* The Authorities upon which the whole of this Detail reſts, have been obtained either from the Records of the Company, and from the Archives of the State, or from the Communications of thoſe whoſe official and local knowledge qualify them to aid their country upon this important occaſion.

ASYLUM for FUGITIVE PIECES, in Proſe and Verſe, not in any other Collection.

The following is a Liſt of Names who are the Authors of ſeveral of the Pieces contained in this Volume:

Earls of Carliſle, Orford, and Buchan; Generals Conway and Burgoyne; Governor Haſting; Sir Alex. Schomberg; Dr. Trotter; Meſſrs. Sheridan, Courtenay, Tickell, Crawford, Keate, Siddons, Bate Dudley, Pye, Holcroft, Peter Pindar, Thomſon, Berenger, Day, Thickneſſe, and Smart; Mrs. Piozzi, Smith, Williams, Knight, &c. &c. &c.

The Fourth Volume.—Containing ſeveral Pieces now firſt printed, and many others which have been circulated only amongſt their reſpective Authors' friends, or in the circles of ſuperior life, being principally written by perſons of faſhion. Price 3s. ſewed.

Of whom may be had, The Three former Volumes, price 9s. ſewed.

*⁎* The ASYLUM is a continuation of the FOUNDLING HOSPITAL for WIT, and is printed uniformly with that work, which conſiſts of ſix volumes, price 18s. ſewed.

Together they form the moſt approved collection of Fugitive Pieces that has appeared for many years. They commence with Sir Charles Hanbury Williams's Pieces, and continue (in ſome degree chronologically) to the preſent time.

The whole ten volumes may be had uniformly bound, price 2l.

Notes
*
Monteſquieu:
*
Monteſquieu 5, 14.
*
10th April, 1771.
*
Conſultations, 14th September, 1775.
*
Paragraphs 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25.
*
General letter, 5th Feb. 1777, par. 15.
*
Vide Appendix.
*
Vide General Letter, 11th May, 1769, par. 18.
*
‘Conſimiliter Gallici, poſt eorum adventum in Angliam, ratiocinia de eorum proventibus non receperunt niſi in proprio idiomate, ne ipſi inde deciperentur. FORTESCUE, cap. 48.
*
General Letter, 3d March, 1775, par. 27, 28, 29.
*
Par. 70.
*
General letter, 24th Dec. 1776, par. 70.
*
Paragraph 76.
*
General letter, 24th Dec. 1776, par. 77.
Distributed by the University of Oxford under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Citation Suggestion for this Object
TextGrid Repository (2020). TEI. 4757 Letter from Mr Francis to Lord North late Earl of Guildford With an appendix. University of Oxford Text Archive. . https://hdl.handle.net/21.T11991/0000-001A-5BCD-8